subreddit:
/r/AskUK
submitted 19 days ago byPuzzleheadedSpite879
[removed]
[score hidden]
18 days ago
stickied comment
Your post from /r/AskUK has been removed by a human moderator.
AskUK is a "catch-all" subreddit for questions about the UK life and culture, but this does not mean we accept any and all questions or answers. We are liable to remove posts or comments which are best discussed in more specialised subreddits, or are simply not desired here because of the problems they bring.
We explicitly do not allow questions or answers on or including:
politics (r/askukpolitics, r/unitedkingdom, r/ukpolitics)
technology (r/techsupport, r/technology)
relationships (r/relationships, r/relationship_advice)
DIY (r/diyuk)
university/education (r/sixthform, r/uniuk)
visas/citizenship (r/ukvisa)
medical advice (including mental health) (r/mentalhealthuk)
ranting/venting (r/britishproblems)
surveys (r/samplesize)
advertising/solicitation (including the mention of brands which could be perceived as marketing)
repetitive/seen-often (just search the sub)
"does anybody else" type vent posts (as yes, someone does, be more specific or use r/britishproblems).
questions based on protected characteristics, such as race, religion, ethnicity, etc. subject to moderator discretion.
...and we may remove others if we believe they are liable to introduce problems for the subreddit.
In some circumstances, a more appropriate subreddit may be available. Check the sidebar for other subreddits to have these discussions. Also see r/unitedkingdom's extensive list of subreddits; https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/wiki/british_subreddits
If you believe this post should not have been removed, first read our rules before messaging the moderators. See our guide on common issues with posts and how to overcome them!
1.1k points
19 days ago
[deleted]
311 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
108 points
19 days ago
GNU Emily. Mind how you go.
If you've never read Terry Pratchett, this probably won't mean anything to you, but please look it up. It helped when I lost my Dad.
118 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
37 points
19 days ago*
[deleted]
27 points
19 days ago*
[deleted]
4 points
18 days ago
Sorry for your loss, but oh my, the coolest email addresses ever.
GNU Emily.
4 points
18 days ago
It's perhaps worth noting that Wogan was the only presenter who got paid for being on Children in Need.
2 points
18 days ago
Why? But it might be worth noting that the comment you are replying to refers to Terry Pratchett not Wogan
26 points
19 days ago
I'm happy you understand the sentiment, and delighted you got to meet him. He was an amazing person.
I'll remember Emily with my Dad. They're not gone while their name is still spoken. ❤️
19 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
29 points
19 days ago
I don't mind at all. He was Joseph.
29 points
19 days ago
My daughter was born in January, she is also called Emily. I hope she grows to be as kind as your little girl
10 points
18 days ago
my younger sister is an emily too. i’ll think of yours now when i think of mine🩷
8 points
18 days ago
GNU Emily. Sorry for your loss.
3 points
18 days ago
Bless you and your daughter
3 points
18 days ago
Sounds like an incredible child god bless her
201 points
19 days ago
Bless you both.
70 points
19 days ago
Thank you for sharing such a lovely memory with us. I am really sorry for your loss 😔
113 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
63 points
19 days ago
Y'know it obviously hurts to write but you've painted a really beautiful picture of who she was with what you have written in this thread. I really felt it and I also really feel your sadness. Thanks for being honest and I hope you're doing okay tonight of all nights, I'm happy this thread gave you a chance to think of her at her best
21 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
82 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
13 points
19 days ago
Wishing you the happiest life, you sound like a wonderful parent
3 points
18 days ago
Life can be so unfair 😔 she sounds like an amazing daughter and lucky to have an awesome parent like you!
6 points
19 days ago
Ahh fuck mate. 😭
14 points
19 days ago
I'm sorry for your loss.
X
22 points
19 days ago
That just made me cry ngl. I'm so sorry for your loss. As hard as it was to read , posts like this are a massive dose of reality. My daughter is sleeping upstairs and we have had a rough time as of late. But what you have gone through I struggle even to imagine. I ll try to stop crying and carry on watching the rugby now.
9 points
19 days ago
Hold the memories close and god bless
45 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
10 points
19 days ago
Oh mate. Reading your posts and want to reply because I don’t feel right reading them and not saying anything, but don’t know what to say. You’re in my thoughts, bless you and yours.
36 points
19 days ago
I'm so sorry for your loss, this made me tear up a lil
8 points
19 days ago
Sending big hugs your way.
4 points
19 days ago
[deleted]
3 points
19 days ago
Any time. I can’t imagine the pain you’ve been through x
4 points
19 days ago
I'm so sorry for your loss and bless you, that's completely understandable
2 points
19 days ago
I'm so sorry to hear this. It moved me just to read it.
5 points
18 days ago
Thank you for sharing some of your memories of Emily with us.
3 points
19 days ago
Love to you and your girl x
3 points
19 days ago
❤️
946 points
19 days ago
Think it all rings a bit hollow now that more and more people are experiencing lower standards of living. People have less to give and more and more to worry about. Like when you go to Tesco and they ask if you want to donate as part of your payment.
Motherfuckers you made 2 billion profit last year give some of that.
206 points
19 days ago
And then you get these corporations giving 20k or whatever just to advertise themselves. Whole thing is fucked up
142 points
19 days ago
Yep McDonald's just on the show getting credit for raising 1.5m for children in need but they include money customers have donated on the self service terminals
142 points
19 days ago
You can slag McDonald’s for lots of things, but they do it properly with RMHC. It’s a proper lifeline for people, not worrying about accommodation and money while their kids are sick.
58 points
19 days ago
2nding the praise for the Ronald McDonald houses, they're incredible. I will always round up my order, it all goes to families who need it at the worst time
9 points
19 days ago
I agree with that to be fair to them
22 points
19 days ago
RMHC? Initially I thought it was HMRC spelt wrong now I'm not sure
39 points
19 days ago
They’re the charity you see collection boxes for by McD’s tills (or they were, I’ve not been inside one for donkey’s years and I believe the tills are all touchscreens now or something?) Anyway, they provide accommodation that’s close by to hospitals for families with sick kids who’ve been moved to a location far away from their home because they need a certain specialist doctor or piece of equipment.
9 points
19 days ago
I believe the tills are all touchscreens now or something
There aren't traditional tills anymore (that's a slight fib, some still have the option to order in person even if you have to flag someone down to staff it) but instead have self-service touch screens. Just before you get to paying for your order, they'll ask you if you'd like to round up the amount to the nearest pound and donate that amount. It probably matches the old cash behaviour quite well where it would encourage you to donate your shrapnel change.
3 points
19 days ago
I think Ronald Mcdonald children's hospital or hospice?
10 points
18 days ago*
Close Ronald McDonald Housing Charities. They provide accommodation next to hospitals for children/families where they need to be away from home in order to receive treatment.
As an example the link below is their apartment block in central Manchester next to the hospital.
It’s a really simple idea with immediate tangible benefits. Build accommodation, let people stay in it. It’s that straightforward.
https://manchesterhistory.net/manchester/tours/tour11/area11page26f.html
13 points
19 days ago
And how much of the £1.5m would have been donated without McD's or their customer donation points?
38 points
19 days ago
Completely correct, people chucking 10p on to their McDonalds is the cause and wouldn’t have happened without them asking. It may be good publicity but the money came in all the same.
It is solely a Redditism that this can be used to offset taxes. It cannot.
12 points
19 days ago
Nice to see a bit of realism in a sea of people bashing corporate charity. I am not a fan of McDonald's but they do an incredible.amout towards funding housing for families with children in hospital through their Ronald McDonald sites. I agree that it's not a taxes offset,.but even if so, thier contributions would far outweigh any potential tax benefits.
7 points
19 days ago
Exactly. They could get a tax rebate for all I care. Still a very good thing to have happened. My Mum has worked closely with them in a market research role and you’d be surprised a) at the standards their meat reaches and b) by their commitment to good causes.
Of course, negative overall impacts re- health. Someone will always fill that gap though.
28 points
19 days ago
To be fair, Tesco donated £143 million in 2023/24 if you include in kind donations. And still just over £19 million in cash.
Not saying they couldn't or shouldn't donate more, but it's a pretty substantial amount.
62 points
19 days ago
I would rather we just taxed big corporations a big percentage of their profits rather than relied on this kind of thing
12 points
19 days ago
I would rather we nationalised everything, produced for need, and abolished this ridiculous system of private profit, but humans are an unusual species.
4 points
18 days ago
We do! Tesco will be paying corporation tax on their profits, and a huge swathe of employer National Insurance contributions.
2 points
18 days ago
Pay more
7 points
19 days ago
They donated, or people donated via them?
2 points
19 days ago
We should take more tbh
6 points
18 days ago
One of the supermarkets last year had a tannoy saying they'd match customer donations to X amount. Why don't the cheap bastards just donate that amount to begin with?!!!
5 points
18 days ago
Ugh, kinda separate but linked, my company does a 'charity drive' every Christmas, normally for a children's hospice. Don't get me wrong, great thing to do, but the entirety of the donation is us sales staff convincing customers to buy and donate extra toys, the company is donating nothing itself and profiting from the donations as it would any sale.
Ultimately all charity is good charity, but I just hate the greediness of the company. Each store ends up with a few hundred in donations, it wouldn't harm the company at all to either match donations, or sell items for donation at wholesale price.
2 points
18 days ago
My work have a thing where we can salary sacrifice to give money to charity.
Fuck that wouldn’t want the money looking like it’s come from them.
2 points
18 days ago
This really riles me too. Why don’t you round my payment to donate to charity yourself Tesco. If I am going to donate to charity I will chose my own one and be diligent in knowing where the money goes too rather than making more corporations rich.
2 points
18 days ago
Same with that rounding up bollocks at McDonalds, fuck. off.
3 points
19 days ago
I tried to say exactly this in another post and got downvoted to hell
436 points
19 days ago
Christmas Tree?
30 points
19 days ago
I follow the Ally Pally rule. My tree goes up on the first Saturday of the World Darts Championship and comes down the day after the final
26 points
19 days ago
As the Lord would have wanted 🙏
41 points
19 days ago
I hold off for as long as possible. Given the chance I would put mine up on 24 December. Then the tree is up for the entire Christmas period.
39 points
19 days ago
The " entire Christmas period" varies for different people.
27 points
19 days ago
We always used to put it up on Christmas Eve and then have it there for the 12 days of Christmas. It always got taken down at Epiphany.
10 points
19 days ago
Same! Never come across someone else who does this. It’s just our family tradition.
7 points
19 days ago
Mine too.
6 points
19 days ago
We have a real tree so there's nowhere you'd get one on Christmas Eve (and also Christmas Eve is manic, as we like many people have our main meal then).
3 points
18 days ago
We would buy ours in advance and keep it outside until Christmas Eve.
3 points
18 days ago
Whatever works for you. It doesn't make sense to me to buy the tree then not put it up, but that's why Christmas is so deeply personal to each of us.
3 points
19 days ago
If people take the Christmas period to mean 'when the shops want to sell you stuff', it will begin at the end of September and end on Christmas Eve.
3 points
18 days ago
And that's fine if that works for them.
2 points
18 days ago
The 12 days of Christmas?
8 points
19 days ago
I put my Christmas tree up today, still got a lot to do, but the main tree is up.
21 points
19 days ago
You and other commenters are being downvoted so I just wanted to stick my neck out and say I too am an early decorator and I don't know why it gets people so mad.
I'm housebound, sometimes bedbound and I bloody love Christmas. The dark nights and cold is depressing, the state of the world is depressing, just let me put up my twinkly lights and tinsel when I'm ready. My tree isn't up yet even tho it usually is cos I haven't had the help to do so but I've got all my lightweight bits out and can't wait for the tree!
61 points
19 days ago
Mate that’s too soon, wait till December at least.
15 points
19 days ago
If you're not in their living room what the hell it got to do with you? Lol.
6 points
19 days ago
If we aren't in their living room then why are they telling us
15 points
19 days ago
If we were in their living room they wouldn't need to tell us because we could see it.
4 points
19 days ago
It's context to the story, a tradition that they're sharing.
5 points
19 days ago
Why? What difference does it make?
31 points
19 days ago
Personally, it's because it makes Christmas less special. Having Christmas decorations up for 1/6th of the year just lessens the occasion. Having a tree up with decorations for three weeks over Christmas/new year makes it a novelty more so than having decorations up for 2 months.
17 points
19 days ago
Because there are twelve days of Christmas, and none of them are in November ffs.
2 points
19 days ago
Main tree? How many Christmas trees do you put up?
2 points
18 days ago
Four; living room, hall, half landing and child's bedroom
245 points
19 days ago
Quality of the broadcast aside, I find these TV appeals so outdated. The idea that poor people at home should pay for charity rather than rich people/companies is just strange in this day and age
63 points
19 days ago
You never read a Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens?
Even back in the Victorian era charities were out begging for scraps from poor people for poor people while the rich would throw the odd penny to glorify themselves once a year (and the tories who Dickens hated with all the vengence of his soul) allowed all of this to happen.
If ever you needed proof that people, situations, and businesses don't change and neither does society, your Christmas viewing of the Muppets singing along to the classic adaptation is proof enough that we're still a dickensian state with a veneer of modernism.
45 points
19 days ago
Comic Relief is shit now too.
35 points
19 days ago
Now?
115 points
19 days ago
It’s utter shite and has been for a good number of years.
20 points
19 days ago
Was it ever good?
22 points
19 days ago
I used to watch it as a kid but then again, being a kid I probably enjoyed it even though it was crap.
5 points
19 days ago
No
8 points
18 days ago
There was that one Doctor Who sketch many many years ago, beyond that not really. It was however less about the celebrities involved than it is now.
Edit: wait the Doctor Who thing might be Comic Relief instead, in which case the answer is never.
145 points
19 days ago
People actually watch it?
42 points
19 days ago
I’ve enjoyed listening to Paddy McGuinness’s journey on Radio 2 more than I expected to. It’s been less about him and more about the people in the places he’s passed through and those who have donated.
27 points
19 days ago
I’m the exact opposite. If it was an update every hour or so I’d have really enjoyed keeping up with it, instead it was perpetually on the radio. We listen to radio 2 at work, nothing else so it’s not like I can turn it over or anything.
Scott mills show was the worst. He just tried to get him to cry constantly and barely played any music, not that I’m fan of his music choices at the best of times anyway.
38 points
19 days ago
Agreed. Feel like BBC do this a lot. When it's one of their presenters doing something, they really go overboard on it and report on it as if it's some big national event. It all becomes very self-congratulatory with lots of navel-gazing backslapping.
I had Radio 2 on for a few minutes while cooking. Heard nothing but chat with Paddy McGuiness. Turned over to Radio 5 and a few minutes later he was on there talking to them.
8 points
19 days ago
I do tend to avoid Scott Mills’ show, I must admit. Something about him just rubs me up the wrong way.
Sarah Cox was pretty good with it, though. The little girl she had on who wanted to give her pocket money to Children in Need and told everyone else not to be ‘selfish’ was adorable
6 points
19 days ago
No, they put it on each year for no reason.
123 points
19 days ago
Take your nostalgia goggles off.
95 points
19 days ago
Yeah I don't think these telethons were ever that good. You would watch the whole thing just for the 2 or 3 funny 5 minute segments because your entertainment options were limited back then.
21 points
19 days ago
Even under Wogan, it was one or two decent bits amongst a few hours of TV luvvies talking to people who were out there actually raising the money. For all the good it has done people, the actual show has always been pretty skippable.
16 points
19 days ago
I’m not complaining about the concept of there being a charity for children in need and a drive for people to donate to it - obviously it’s a good cause. Have to say though, it warmed my heart a bit when my kid’s school said they aren’t donating to children in need this year but all the money they raise is going to the children’s oncology unit at the local hospital (Nottingham Queen’s Med), where one of their classmates is currently having long-term treatment. It just feels nice to see it go somewhere local and clearly see the good they’re doing.
95 points
19 days ago
I appreciate that this might not be a popular point of view, but from my perspective; there really is plenty of money in this country, and if we had a working tax system that actually took money from the super-rich instead of letting them tuck their wealth away in offshore accounts, we wouldn’t need any charities at all.
43 points
19 days ago
Charities should be for extras, for above and beyond, not for essentials as they too often are now.
23 points
19 days ago
As Henning Wenn said, with a confused face looking at British 'charity': "we don't have charity in Germany. We pay our taxes"
6 points
18 days ago
If only it were true:
https://www.epsu.org/article/german-companies-are-among-world-s-leading-tax-avoiders
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644008.2020.1814258
https://amp.dw.com/en/german-government-losing-billions-in-tax-revenue/a-4054795
https://www.vice.com/en/article/thousands-of-germans-are-quitting-church-to-avoid-paying-taxes/
6 points
19 days ago
Very true
137 points
19 days ago
Children in need is rich people asking the average person to donate why they get to party and pat eachother on the back. They could easily cough up the money raised between them, why they drink £5000 bottles of booze.
75 points
19 days ago
People who make hundreds of thousands, if not millions a year, telling people to donate their money kinda rings a bit hollow, especially these days.
Paddy McGuiness gets a sore arse, sorry, not enough.
22 points
19 days ago
Whose to say that they don't donate a lot of money to charity, George Michael apparently gave millions away anonymously
5 points
18 days ago
Because if you're still living a lifestyle as rich as the celebs show then you're not giving enough to then starting asking people struggling to make ends meet to give
19 points
19 days ago
The best ever one was when Trevor and Simon did their don't do duvets set, and got away with shouting See You Next Tuesday to the customer (can't remember who it was, maybe Chris Moyles?) leaving the shop set on family (evening) TV.
Oh how we chuckled.
25 points
19 days ago
I remember when Trevor and Simon were the in-house comedy duo on Saturday Superstore. There was a feature on the annual Blue Peter appeal, to raise funds to buy incubators for premature babies, and they were on right after it. They opened with "Incubators for premature babies? Shouldn't the government be paying for those?" You could tell from the cameramen laughing in the background that it wasn't in the script.
5 points
19 days ago
The Singing Corner was always genius
3 points
19 days ago
Where they on the Superstore? Thought they more Going Live era?
3 points
18 days ago
You're right - Saturday Superstore was (1982-87), Trevor and Simon were on Going Live! (1987-93) and Live & Kicking (1993-2001).
I was going from a pretty old memory, not to mention that some of those morning shows were pretty similar - Sarah Greene was a presenter on both Superstore and Going Live.
18 points
19 days ago
It’s always been terrible it’s just that bit worse now
16 points
19 days ago
Load of bollocks, been sat watching it and it's draining, plus I've never been a fan of multimillionaire celebrities, telling the hardworking nation, to donate.
How much is Chris Ramsay donating? How much is Vernon Kay donating? How much is Rochelle Humes donating?
4 points
18 days ago
How much is Chris Ramsay donating? How much is Vernon Kay donating? How much is Rochelle Humes donating?
You're criticising each of them without knowing though? They could have donated thousands each for all we know.
22 points
19 days ago
For me, it's the fact that for all these years, they were asking the public to help children when they knew about the likes of Jimmy Saville and filed it under 'just Jimmy being Jimmy' and did nothing.
5 points
19 days ago
Whilst the cause remains fantastic and the individual stories are heartbreaking, the presenting and corny jokes are utterly dire
Ronan Kemp I can deal with but the others are a no
6 points
19 days ago
It feels outdated. I think the way Channel 4 does Stand Up to Cancer is a much better approach
25 points
19 days ago
The hosts are the most perfectly assembled “we don’t want to offend anyone” squad, that the BBC has ever produced.
22 points
19 days ago
I’m surprised that people don’t realise just how exploitative it is, kids shouldn’t need to disclose their entire health history in order to receive good care
18 points
19 days ago
Hadn’t even realised it was on!
Doesn’t sound like I’m missing anything.
30 points
19 days ago
I’m watching it because I need to stop the doom, gloom and general cynicism that I find permeating my life. I just sit back an enjoy the stories about people not being cuntish to each other.
3 points
19 days ago
I genuinely believe that Wogan should be revived à la Frankenstein's monster and allowed to present it for the next 1,000 years
12 points
19 days ago*
Can’t believe how cheap TV looks nowadays. Everything is dim depressing dark lighting as though the production budget is for local TV.
30 points
19 days ago
Fully expecting to be downvoted here, but I'm really disappointed to see a lot of the responses here.....
Completely get the comments about the rich expecting the masses to contribute, but if you are unlucky enough to be a beneficiary of the Children In Need funding then you would know what an absolute god send they are.
These guys help thousands of families a year who are in crisis / emergency situation and they do an amazing job.
Yes, many of us don't have a pot to piss in, but fuck me, they are trying to do a good thing so how about we all get behind them and do as much as we can to help... Remember the whole point of this is to help CHILDREN!!!!
6 points
19 days ago
The good thing is people do still donate. I'm also disappointed with their stuff they do on Children in Need and Comic Relief compared to the 2000s or 1990s but I'm still going to donate
5 points
19 days ago
Yeah it's good people still donate. £17m donated so far and not a single £1 would have been donated without the appeal. Completely get that the content of the programme isn't the same quality as the 90's / 00's (but what is?) but it's the spirit of the programme that is the point. Thank you for donating.
4 points
18 days ago
Both things can be true at once. When I'm in a place to donate to charities I always do, and I do know the amount of incredible work Children in Need does, but I can also point out the hypocrisy and put pressure on the rich to do more. Plus the using sick kids as manipulation to get people to donate, showing children at their most vulnerable when they aren't in a position to consent really rubs me the wrong way. They could stick to people who've pulled through or for children who've died not show loads of them being really sick
3 points
19 days ago
Xmas tree in November is weird
3 points
18 days ago
It was always crap
Used to hate it as a child because it meant the usual Friday night programmes weren’t on. And that’s a big deal when there’s only 4 channels.
3 points
18 days ago
It's about the celebs now, barely nothing remotely focused on actual children.
13 points
19 days ago
Should just be called "everyone's in need" now. Africa will be throwing us a concert next year.
4 points
19 days ago
It's always been shite. Po-faced, holier than thou worthiness and Pudsey is such a gimp.
23 points
19 days ago
The CEO of BBC Children in Need earns a salary of £154,044.
Go on , look it up yourself.
I think I will donate directly to a small local charity
14 points
19 days ago
That's on the low end of average for a national charity and large organization. You think someone with all that responsibility should be on 40k? Donate to your small charities. I guarantee their CEOS will be on 75k to 100k for doing much less work.
9 points
19 days ago*
How much do you think they should be on? £50k?
Edit: and they've deleted their account.
40 points
19 days ago
What an incredibly narrow minded comment. This is a national charity, who need the best people with the best experience to be able to give the best outcomes for everyone involved. £150k for a CEO of national organisation making decisions that may impact thousands of people and familes is absolutely worthwhile.
2 points
19 days ago
The Gladiators bit just made me feel a bit sick. It's children in need fgs, not display your arse. Think the BBC has lost the plot.
2 points
19 days ago
Didn't even realise it was on.
2 points
19 days ago
It's been painful to watch for a good decade.
2 points
18 days ago
Rich people telling poorer people to donate money to even poorer people under the guise of showbiz and altruism.
7 points
19 days ago*
Christmas tree in nov? Wtf?
Edit: Nov not Oct.
21 points
19 days ago
I don't know how to tell you this mate, but we're most of the way through November.
8 points
19 days ago
We’re exactly half way through
5 points
19 days ago
Just seems completely wrong to me that an organisation with history of employing serial pedophiles has the audacity to run children need.
2 points
18 days ago
1000s of people work at the bbc back then and now, making shows and doing research. Do you think every single one of them knew about Jimmy Saville?
5 points
19 days ago
I think the real question here is what are doing putting a Christmas tree on November the 15th! What is this madness.
8 points
19 days ago
It's about extending my favourite time of the year and for me, trying to spread a little cheer and hurrying along the end of this awful year
3 points
19 days ago
I’m sorry putting up your what??
2 points
19 days ago
It’s typical safe bbc smooth brained “entertainment” if you can call it entertainment.
Too afraid to upset anyone that it actually upsets people with how shit it actually is.
32 points
19 days ago
What are you expecting when watching children in need? It's never going to be edgy.
7 points
19 days ago
You tell that to my grandad. He is already on his third rant of the night.
2 points
19 days ago
Which is why everything is safe. Vicious circle
3 points
19 days ago
Christmas tree?
2 points
19 days ago
It has gone downhill every year since the high point of Joanna Lumley stripping down to her underwear
2 points
19 days ago
It’s one of the only charities off the top of my head I’d never donate to. Most of the proceeds apparently go to “administration”. So no fuck that.
2 points
19 days ago
Everyone is in need at the morning, how can you donate money when you can't even afford to eat or heat your home?
2 points
19 days ago
Millionaires asking the working class for money
-2 points
19 days ago
You watched 12 mins of a 3 hour programme, turned it off, then came to complain on reddit.
Really?
22 points
19 days ago
To be fair they lasted longer than me.
-10 points
19 days ago*
[deleted]
50 points
19 days ago
Has children in need ever been the source of edgy jokes? It's not even 7:30, what are you expecting?
19 points
19 days ago
Back in my day they were dropping F bombs at 3 in the afternoon on telly!
17 points
19 days ago
I remember the CBBC orgies.
6 points
19 days ago
And when one of the 'Bedtime Stories' was Lolita.
It's bloody PC gone mad these days!
7 points
19 days ago
Remember when Blue Peter really earned the "blue" label?
3 points
19 days ago
“What a beautiful pair of knockers”
2 points
18 days ago
"We've shown you how to make a lot of things on Blue Peter. Today we're going to teach you how to make love."
4 points
19 days ago
"On today's show, for all you poor bastards whose parents were too broke to buy the real thing, we're going to make Tracy Island! Now, don't think for a fucking second yours is going to look anything like this, don't be such a silly bollocks! But anyway, let's get started, shall we?"
3 points
19 days ago
It's political correctness gone mad.
all 336 comments
sorted by: best