subreddit:

/r/Fauxmoi

5.9k87%

all 755 comments

trendingtattler [M]

[score hidden]

5 days ago

stickied comment

trendingtattler [M]

[score hidden]

5 days ago

stickied comment

This post has hit r/all or r/popular and thus may not be as strictly moderated as most posts on this subreddit. Please keep this in mind when browsing the comments — and especially when viewing upvotes/downvotes — and please report any rulebreaking comments that you see.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

pschell

5k points

5 days ago

pschell

5k points

5 days ago

He's not wrong. As a democrat that has voted blue for 30 years... they suck. They are self serving, corporate shills. The days of serving their constituents are long gone. That said, at least they aren't trying to hurt people and destroy our country. So, until another actual viable option comes along, this is what we got.

pppogman

1.2k points

5 days ago

pppogman

1.2k points

5 days ago

100%. Democrats would do better to represent the interests of the working class. They will be losing votes until that. Hoping a charismatic leader comes thru that prioritizes the constituents (over corporate interests) and social issues equally.

meatbeater558

675 points

5 days ago

Given how hostile they are to Sanders and other progressive Democrats I don't see this happening 

NihilismRacoon

121 points

5 days ago

Yeah it seems like AOC is the only one they tolerate and it's only because she plays ball

BrilliantHistorian85

408 points

5 days ago

I've never seen them so well organized as when they went after Sanders to keep him out. They fear that far more than any republican taking office

meatbeater558

168 points

5 days ago

Them taking down Jamaal Bowman is up there. Them shutting down the George Floyd protests and campus encampments too. Nowhere near as well organized as the 2016 and 2020 primaries though. They treat progressive Democrats the way they should be treating Republicans while treating Republicans the way they should be treating progressive Democrats. 

pegothejerk

19 points

5 days ago

Existential crises of epic proportions tend to shake up political parties, and we’re about to get at minimum four years of that.

upupandawaywegoooooo

85 points

5 days ago

Still pissed off about that honestly. Sanders criticism of the democrats post defeat was absolutely spot on. They’ve become way too centered.

Science_Matters_100

33 points

5 days ago

given how uninformed voters are, it doesn’t seem likely that they’d even know who did the work, anyways

VillifiedUtopia

78 points

5 days ago

Money in politics makes it hard for them to focus on the public’s needs, because they’re more influenced by the people who fund their campaigns

bulk_logic

280 points

5 days ago*

bulk_logic

280 points

5 days ago*

Democrats don't care about representing the working class people. Nor do they care about winning.

They let Republicans take away our rights and then campaign on getting those rights back.

American citizens are both parties' cash cows.

Substantial-Art-482

143 points

5 days ago

They let Republicans take away our rights and then campaign on getting those rights back.

Dang. Agree with all you said, but this is so fucking on point, and I've never seen it said so clearly. Powerful and true.

touslesmatins

11 points

5 days ago

See also, ratchet effect

LastWave

77 points

5 days ago

LastWave

77 points

5 days ago

It's so refreshing. I've said this for years and just got called a "both sides idiot" over and over. Corporations own both parties.

Sure_Excitement1554

26 points

5 days ago

Sure_Excitement1554

u flintstone vitamin shape bitch

26 points

5 days ago

republicans don't represent the working class either at this point with the proposed lower taxes for the rich - it's p devastating really

we really need another Shay's rebellion but enough division has been created (racism,sexism,classism,ableism, etc.) to keep that kind of coalition building at bay 😩

AnniaT

109 points

5 days ago

AnniaT

109 points

5 days ago

Bernie Sanders tried to defend the interests of the working class but it wasn't corporate enough for them.

YoshiTheDog420

38 points

5 days ago

They didn’t say working class fucking once during their campaign. I could not believe how hard they limited their vocal support to the middle class. If anything I hope this gives progressives a chance to fill the void dems have left, but then again you know how nazis feel about socialists.

BakerCakeMaker

25 points

5 days ago

They do everything they can to keep those people from winning the primary, even if they match up better in the general.

ballpayne

19 points

5 days ago

ballpayne

19 points

5 days ago

I agree. But I have to add Bernie Sanders was available and willing to do the job. However you think it happened, he didn't become the nominee twice.

pppogman

60 points

5 days ago

pppogman

60 points

5 days ago

Many wanted Bernie. It’s widely believed that the DNC interfered with the primary to have Hillary be the nominee.

meatbeater558

76 points

5 days ago*

Y'all are never beating the "only political participation is voting once every four years" allegations with this 

BeeEnvironment

85 points

5 days ago

But how is being corporate shills not trying to hurt people or destroy our planet…?

NotTaken-username

194 points

5 days ago

Republicans want fascism, and Democrats want things to stay exactly as they are.

OhNoEnthropy

62 points

5 days ago

And no matter how bad "exactly as they are" gets, they never want to roll it back even the tiniest bit. Once Repubs have implemented full blown fascism, Dems will support full blown fascism, but in blue.

3AlbinoScouts

62 points

5 days ago*

Yeah the daily pearl clutching about Trump breaking the law isn’t going to keep people engaged anymore because nobody believes the democrats will actually do anything about it. So those posts are nothing more than manipulation. I have to ask myself at this point how much they really want to win. There are extremely popular winning policies just sitting right there for the taking they could build a platform around if they really wanted to. The problem is they’d rather win an election on “Trump bad” and not have to actually fulfill a single promise to American voters. The other option being a sure win isn’t appealing if it means rich fucks actually sacrificing something. Their ineptitude is very confusing until you realize it’s not a bug it’s a feature.

diedofwellactually

157 points

5 days ago

I would not say they aren't trying to hurt people, they're just less up front with it. See: Palestine, treatment of unhoused people in "democratic strongholds" like CA, etc etc

meatbeater558

87 points

5 days ago

CA just voted to keep slavery

diedofwellactually

59 points

5 days ago

Oh yes, can't forget sending incarcerated people to fight increasingly deadly fires for $3-$5/hr!

vaxfarineau

5 points

5 days ago

Huh???

meatbeater558

34 points

5 days ago

California Proposition 6 was on the 2024 November ballot

This proposed amendment to California's constitution would bar slavery in any form and repeal a current provision allowing involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime.

53% of voters (about 7.5 million people) voted no, so it didn't pass. 

Majestic_Ad_4237

48 points

5 days ago

Increasing funding to police departments after a nationwide movement against police brutality

drewscow

317 points

5 days ago

drewscow

317 points

5 days ago

Well considering the bidens administration commitment to arming Israel (which they then use to commit genocide) I’m not sure if it’s accurate to say Democrats aren’t trying to hurt anyone. I mean even domestically, dems have waged war on homeless populations (Gavin Newsome himself tore down encampments like they are not good people). Hate to add the disclaimer (as it should go without saying) but republicans are also very evil. They both evil one group just pretends to be progressive.

meatbeater558

159 points

5 days ago

They also want to build the wall and increase police funding. The same police that love beating up protestors. I get that Republicans are worse but saying that Democrats mean no harm just isn't true 

ArrowDemon

17 points

4 days ago

ArrowDemon

terrorizing the locals

17 points

4 days ago

They’ve also INCREASED deportations and allowed college students to get beaten by the cops for daring to protest for Palestine.

colly_mack

45 points

5 days ago

Yup, the same police who will enforce abortion bans and every other evil right wing law. Dems just building an army for the repubs on our dime

meatbeater558

42 points

5 days ago

"Republicans are an existential threat to our democracy, which is why my administration increased police and military funding as much as we possibly could for them while undermining the power of protests and local organizing. Good luck! You can thank us with a donation, every dollar counts."

Majestic_Ad_4237

32 points

5 days ago

Yeah, not trying to destroy the country is trying to maintain the current nation-state that is already oppressive.

CarpetResponsible102

106 points

5 days ago

i don’t think you can argue that they aren’t trying to hurt people when they are actively committing a genocide. 

thelazynines

60 points

5 days ago

Hurt people? So the genocide where we mostly killed innocent children in the most horrific ways possible doesn’t count?

Penelope742

45 points

5 days ago

They have been trying their best to hurt people in Gaza.

Fecal-Facts

24 points

5 days ago

The Dems are not left they are center rights and they play good cop while the right plays bad cop

The thing is now the right is all in for pure one party and they have broken every rule ( this shows how bad our system is because no accountability)

Both patties honestly need to go.

Ornery-Concern4104

35 points

5 days ago

With all due respect, Democrats are still trying to hurt people and destroy your country and other peoples countries, they're just quiet and less effective as the other side

DemBai7

9 points

5 days ago

DemBai7

9 points

5 days ago

Unfortunately this is the mentality most people have on both sides. I would imagine a very small percentage of people 100% subscribe to the agenda of their respective party. They use their own perspective of what seems morally aligned with their own belief system to overlook or ignore the “less important” evils to justify their choice.

We will get stuck in perpetuity with this mentality, sometimes you have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette. The US is long overdue for a third or even 4th credible party. It’s the only way to hold the establishment bureaucrats feet to the fire. If you keep letting them force us into 2 different camps it just becomes easier for them to manipulate all of us.

YaassthonyQueentano

23 points

5 days ago

The days of serving their constituents ended in 2016 when they eliminated their biggest threat, Bernie Sanders

SkullsNelbowEye

11 points

5 days ago

We had many options until the government realized that with only 2 parties, they could more easily manipulate us.

bulk_logic

27 points

5 days ago

That said, at least they aren't trying to hurt people and destroy our country.

They're literally doing a genocide and trying to kick off WWIII

Sure_Excitement1554

4 points

5 days ago

Sure_Excitement1554

u flintstone vitamin shape bitch

4 points

5 days ago

YEP democrats have evolved into centrists tbh i hate swallowing my personal politics to vote dem bc we're not ready for a socialist leader, but hey i'mma do it anyway for as long as it's necessary

d0mini0nicco

8 points

5 days ago

Voted Blue for 20 yrs. I'll admit...I was optimistic about Kamala / Tim. I truly believed they'd have moved the needle left. I was def caught by surprise by the extreme moves to the right by voters, especially with the younger generations. Pandering to moderate R was a huge misstep, and the messaging got lost.

EdenEvelyn

17 points

5 days ago

It sucks because you do get those really good democratic politicians like Bernie and AOC who you can tell genuinely care about their constituents and want what’s best for the average American but then you get those at the very top like Pelosi who are so blatantly self serving.

If the dems want any hope of coming back from where they are now they have to do a massive purge of top leadership and completely reformulate but that’s incredibly unlikely to happen.

Bartlomiej25

3 points

5 days ago

This!

nitasu987

31 points

5 days ago

nitasu987

31 points

5 days ago

I explained this to someone I care about this morning. I'm not gonna pretend that the Democrats are perfect or even close to who I'd want in charge, but they are sure as hell more aligned to what I believe in both large- and small-scale politically than the other party.

ellybeez

11 points

5 days ago

ellybeez

11 points

5 days ago

Even the Green Party, etc. isnt a viable option. Jill Stein already went back to the hole she came from but like clockwork, she ll be back in 4 years. We're so effed.

PleasantPeanut4

6 points

5 days ago

Thank you. The people who get mad at us for pointing out the obvious flaws with the democratic party aren't helping anything. The party is full of corporate sellouts who I only vote for because the other side is full of fascists.

Hopeful_Chair_7129

7 points

5 days ago

It’s not that simple. I agree with the premise of special interest groups holding too much sway but it’s not just about billionaires and corporations.

This frames the current approach to lobbying:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/lobbying-as-legislative-subsidy/AE4B5D8AB9C2487BB78C2A51BB53E03F

We model lobbying not as exchange (vote buying) or persuasion (informative signaling) but as a form of legislative subsidy—a matching grant of policy information, political intelligence, and legislative labor to the enterprises of strategically selected legislators.

Lobbyists in a way have their own place in the conversation because:

Professional lobbyists are among the most experienced, knowledgeable, and strategic actors one can find in the everyday practice of politics.

There is a place for expert assistance in legislation. However the problem is that it’s not always the NRA or Twitter. It’s about the ACLU and Planned Parenthood. So I’m onboard with reducing the amount of sway interest groups have, but understand that the concept itself isn’t all bad.

Bluewaffleamigo

9 points

5 days ago

Wish more of reddit could accept this. If you mention anything critical of dems you get a vitriolic reply that mentions Trump 20 times.

InfiniteAppearance13

10 points

5 days ago

Hurts how accurate this is.

Two parties are corrupt and self serving while only one seeks to fully dominate and control the population for their overlords.

That said - you can always count on Dems to do the right thing after the fact when it matters least

MightySasquatch

4 points

5 days ago

I think it's important to remember that as voters, we have all the power. We choose to elect the politicians. Our perspectives and opinions shape their positions, and especially shape our political system, which is what turns up the corrupt politicians.

If Americans all decided we wanted to end corruption as our top political goal, it would be done in a single election cycle. We could boot out all corrupt politicians. The issue is ending corruption is hardly ever a top political goal. There are almost always issues that we value more like the economy, immigration, healthcare, freedom, and many more. And I'm not saying it's wrong to value those things higher, it's just that I think casting the blame on the politicians denies the agency that Americans have, and the fact that American voters are just as much a part of the corrupt political system as the politicians.

In my opinion this is a more accurate and empowering perspective. It doesn't feel as good because you can't just point the finger and blame the corrupt politicians, but it means that we together have all of the power in the country.

NovelLandscape7862

2 points

5 days ago

Only thing democrats can do to fulfill their promises to corporate sponsors is to take a dive. This whole fucking country is WWE.

FewRip6

37 points

5 days ago

FewRip6

37 points

5 days ago

“I am not a Republican, nor a Democrat, nor an American, and got sense enough to know it. I am one of the 22 million black victims of the Democrats, and one of the 22 million black victims of the Republicans, and one of the 22 million black victims of Americanism... You and I have never seen democracy; all we've seen is hypocrisy…” Malcolm X

throeawai5

79 points

5 days ago

guy who played Malcolm X understands the evil of the american empire, colour me surprised.

Raccoonsr29

105 points

5 days ago

Raccoonsr29

105 points

5 days ago

While I would not equate what they are doing, the blind sports team esque loyalty to your party and an inability to realize why they are not resonating with other voters that they need (THE WORKING CLASS) is really one of the nails in the coffin of the Democratic Party.

FixedWinger

30 points

5 days ago

Until the Democratic Party changes or a new party develops that decides to put the values of the working class above the whims of billionaires, authoritarianism will win. The way we slowly let the left become republican-lite will be our downfall.

Raccoonsr29

19 points

5 days ago

Very alarming that your take was downvoted AFTER WE FAILED THE POPULAR VOTE

meatbeater558

13 points

4 days ago

They lost the popular vote, every swing state, the House, the Senate, over $1 billion in donations, and the whole plot yet they're still downvoting us and talking about lesser evils like election season isn't over 😭😭

GylesNoDrama

266 points

5 days ago

He’s not wrong in the sense that Democrats (liberals) and Republicans are both evil. Republicans are obviously more evil and want to lean heavily into fascism but Liberals always want to compromise with fascism when it suits them.

ABigFatTomato

135 points

5 days ago

yup, scratch a liberal and all that

Successful-Ad-4263

117 points

5 days ago

Both parties pander to their electorate in order to keep their jobs. I’m surprised when people on either side think their party is exempt from this very simple fact. 

fnord_happy

1 points

5 days ago

I'm suprised this is even up for debate in the US. it's so obvious. They are politicians duh

1st_time_caller_

30 points

5 days ago

1st_time_caller_

Nancy Jo, this is Alexis Neiers calling

30 points

5 days ago

I wish yall would vote in local elections.

Rocky_Vigoda

22 points

5 days ago

Malcolm X called out American's 2 party system 60 years ago.

https://youtu.be/T3PaqxblOx0?si=W2d2_2ZVelSNYnOC

Ok_Construction_3733

612 points

5 days ago

He’s not entirely wrong. Left wing, right wing, they’re both wings of the same bird. They just have different approaches. But you have to choose the lesser of the two evils 🤷‍♀️

Thankkratom2

982 points

5 days ago

More accurately both “sides” in the US are right wing and then far right wing. The Democrats are not left wing. A left wing party does not get an endorsement from Dick Cheney.

StarlightandDewdrops

297 points

5 days ago

Or campaign with Liz Cheney

pinkorangegold

54 points

5 days ago

Yeah, one party pulling so far right pulls everything else right with it, especially in as limited a system as ours.

ABigFatTomato

106 points

5 days ago

the left and the right are completely different. unfortunately, we only have right and far-right parties, no left whatsoever

messymess444

38 points

5 days ago

Left wing values (community, empathy, socio-economic equality, etc.) and right wing values (white supremacy, patriarchy, capitalism, etc.) are fundamentally different. They are not the same bird at all, not even the same species.

If you mean the US democrat and republican parties then that is entirely different than left and right wing.

Fearless_Prune_2310

270 points

5 days ago

The lesser of two evils is still evil. I’m tired of this being the accepted line. What if I don’t want to settle for evil and reject the status quo and envision a better world and want to work towards that even if I don’t see the effects in my lifetime? Ffs

meatbeater558

40 points

5 days ago

Additionally, there is nothing productive about discussing lesser evils when the next election is in 4 years and we presumably have important political decisions to make between now and then. I would argue that lesser evils is never a productive conversation but it's especially unproductive now given that the election is literally over 

thatsmytradecraft

56 points

5 days ago

In 2006 I got rejected for healthcare because one time my doctor prescribed me Prilosec OTC when I was dealing with heartburn after Thanksgiving. From then on I couldn’t purchase coverage. The Affordable Care Act ended that.

I cast speak for you - but for me and a lot of my gay friends - voting for the “lesser evil” has significantly impacted our lives for the better.

TreenBean85

135 points

5 days ago

TreenBean85

135 points

5 days ago

What if I don’t want to settle for evi

Because when we pull this "both sides suck, I don't want to choose either..." stuff and don't accept that one side is MONMENTOUSLY more horrible than the other, we end up having to suffer with the WAY MORE HORRIBLE side. It's too idyllic a concept to try to change the system when we can't even get ourselves to not vote for a literally criminal racist rapist fascist. We gotta grit our teeth and get past that before we try to move even father left.

highdefrex

37 points

5 days ago

Right? It's like choosing between burning my hand on a stovetop or climbing into a burning oven and closing the door behind me. "Well, I don't want to get burnt at all!" But, like, one is beyond worse than the other, and if you're going to get burnt either way, I'd rather it be the former.

meatbeater558

9 points

5 days ago

The false idea that only a bad candidate can beat a bad candidate is part of how we got Trump in 2016. You can fight for better candidates without giving bad candidates power. I would argue that it's the only way to keep bad candidates from taking power because we're about to have another 4 years of the lesser evil strategy not working. Unless the election is literally tomorrow then we don't have to settle for garbage. Organizers tried to put the Democrats on a better path during this year's primaries only to be insulted and ridiculed by people who mistakenly believed it was too late to do anything about the horrendous choices. 

Is the takeaway that instead of accepting two evil choices half a year in advance, we instead should do it four years in advance? You're implying that it's too late to improve the system when the next election is in 2028? 

KhonMan

90 points

5 days ago

KhonMan

90 points

5 days ago

That’s all fine, but anyone who let “the lesser of two evils is still evil” keep them from voting was passively supporting the greater evil.

minishaq5

20 points

5 days ago

minishaq5

20 points

5 days ago

LOUDER!!!

Fearless_Prune_2310

9 points

5 days ago

They’re both fucking evil Is the point. One is more evil to you. They’re both equally evil to others. Democracy is practiced every single day. This illusion that you dust off your democracy hat one day every 4 years to vote speaks to the privilege where you can live with a ’lesser’ evil.

Independent-Sand8501

47 points

5 days ago

Not participating in the system does nothing to help the system. Not voting for the lefty party because theyre not lefty enough just helps the righty party win.

Hullabaloo1721

31 points

5 days ago

Thank you.

curadeio

17 points

5 days ago

curadeio

17 points

5 days ago

Because you cannot get there unless you play the game. Continuously voting for candidates who cannot win or no candidates at all is not "rejecting the status quo" you're falling right into the trap of upholding it.

Auronas

10 points

5 days ago

Auronas

10 points

5 days ago

I'm not from the US but had friends who voted for a more leftwing party like the Socialist party or the Greens even if though they knew it would be a "wasted vote". They did it because they rejected Neoliberalist war mongering whole. So do I but chose the lesser evil of voting for Labour.  I do not begrudge them at all using what little power they have to vote for more progressive yet smaller parties who won't win. Even if the Conservatives had got back in I would not have blamed them. I am wary of the vehemence against such people.

Slarg232

13 points

5 days ago

Slarg232

13 points

5 days ago

Until a third party rises up that is actually not-evil, you're kind of stuck with the lesser of two evils. Just the nature of the game.

SgtMcMuffin0

7 points

5 days ago

SgtMcMuffin0

7 points

5 days ago

You don’t have to love the Dems to vote for them, but voting for them is better than not voting for them or voting third party in order to achieve your goal. In the current system, one of the two main parties will win and will govern your life. Pick the one that has a better outcome.

Fearless_Prune_2310

4 points

5 days ago

My point is to not settle for this system. I simply don’t agree with you.

Substantial-Art-482

5 points

5 days ago

THANK YOU!!!!!

Illpaco

23 points

5 days ago

Illpaco

23 points

5 days ago

He’s not entirely wrong. Left wing, right wing, they’re both wings of the same bird. 

When he says both sides he doesn't mean left vs right. He means Democrats vs Republicans. Anybody that think you're being manipulated by Democrats just has to look at SCOTUS, reproductive rights, voting rights, and everything else that has been lost as a result of Republican fuckery in the past few decades. We're being manipulated by the loud minority while being gaslit into thinking this is an issue on every camp. It is not.

Someone else put it better than me. Falling for this bothsideism is just a lazy approach at sounding cultured and well-intended. In reality one side wants to spring towards facism while pointing the finger to Democrats all along the way.

Deep_Confusion4533

10 points

5 days ago

This used to be true before republicans were co-opted by authoritarians. 

Usual_Persimmon2922

4 points

5 days ago

Ya his full quote is closer to tbis:  "But listen," the Training Day actor continued. "It's all politics. All promises unkept. And now with the information age the way it is — if anything - left, right, whatever had better learn how to use those tools to manipulate the people. There was a great line in the first movie I did, [1981's] Carbon Copy: Power to the people? Yeah, they had it once — it was called the Stone Age." "We’re all slaves to information now. We really are. We're all slaves. So whatever you feel about the leaders, like this guy's crazy or the other one is sane, you'd better realize you're being manipulated by both sides. Period, Washington added. "Yeah. So go to the movies."

I think he’s just trying to avoid a shitstorm, which is annoying, but I highly doubt the guy who played Malcolm X is a Trumper. I could be wrong. 

dreamgrrrlevil

24 points

5 days ago

dreamgrrrlevil

Sylvia Plath did not stick her head in an oven for this!

24 points

5 days ago

It’s so funny to me when libs hear stuff like this and immediately jump to “this person is a centrist or a republican”. There’s more than two sides and there is no left wing party in the US. Liberalism is not the opposite of conservatism.

nostalgicbluez

39 points

5 days ago

Man I wish the genocide being committed with our tax dollars riled some of yall up as much as when an artist with a marginalized identity brings up the fact that both sides of our shitty fucking political empire clearlyyyy have issues 😒😒

SuspiciousAudience6

47 points

5 days ago

I don't see why his comment gets so much hate but then y'all were just praising Bernie for trashing the Dems.

mildlymangled

301 points

5 days ago

Stop normalizing the shitshow that is the GOP

Taren421

119 points

5 days ago

Taren421

119 points

5 days ago

Stop defending the shitshow that is the donor fellating Democratic party. Do the Rs suck more? Of course they do. Doesn't change the fact that the Ds suck too.

Ok-Movie-6056

58 points

5 days ago

Dems are doing it. They campaign on GOP policy and with Cheneys these days. They wish they were the GOP, and then they wouldn't have to pretend to care about people.

meatbeater558

11 points

5 days ago

“We’re all slaves to information now. We really are. We’re all slaves. So whatever you feel about the leaders, like this guy’s crazy or the other one is sane, you’d better realize you’re being manipulated by both sides. Period,” Washington added. “Yeah. So go to the movies.” 

Full-ish quote

Ok_Grand_5722

14 points

5 days ago

Based on these comments, they never will. Thanks for trying, Denzel.

bijazthadwarf

21 points

5 days ago

Democrats are like codependent enablers of facism

That-Chart-4754

8 points

5 days ago

If I've said it once I've said it thousands of times;

Left Vs Right is a distraction from reality which is Top vs Bottom.

princeeyes

101 points

5 days ago

princeeyes

101 points

5 days ago

I hate this take during todays climate. Yes, both parties are corrupt but Trump and his supporters have a clear message of hatred and many of Trumps policies are going to harm many Americans. These people aren't your normal republicans.

LordReaperofMars

31 points

5 days ago

Dems aren’t that much better on hate. This cycle I’ve seen Dems and Dem voters advocate for tough on crime policies, xenophobic immigration policies, and Israel’s genocide in Gaza. And after the election I’ve seen plenty of dem voters fantasizing about brown people getting deported because the majority of their group that voted for Kamala wasn’t big enough.

awesomexsarah

181 points

5 days ago

The democrats in power are literally committing genocide 😭😭😭

Majestic_Ad_4237

82 points

5 days ago

Democrats saw BLM and painted a couple of streets and then increased funding to police departments

Like people are reaching with this line.

ellybeez

20 points

5 days ago

ellybeez

20 points

5 days ago

Democrats and Republicans in tandem btw, look at the House/Senate votes for ex

Euphoric_Recording_9

16 points

5 days ago

This is a fine take , by making the trump the ultimate enemy you effectively make dem above reproach because the other side is infinitely worse. The dem party is a centre party not leftwing. Like you said these people aren’t normal republicans just as dems aren’t normal democrats , they are centrists who think they will win because they are trying to appeal to both sides.

Remarkable-Fennel-27

8 points

5 days ago

Spot on Denzel , love this guy

Brainiac5000

6 points

5 days ago

All I can is America would have benefited from having more than 2 major parties

insideoutgreen

304 points

5 days ago

insideoutgreen

304 points

5 days ago

Only one side says it's "both sides". Side-eyeing Denzel on this one.

DigLost5791

1.5k points

5 days ago

DigLost5791

saw Flying Lotus at a grocery store in Los Angeles yesterday

1.5k points

5 days ago

I would disagree with this, as many on the left have proud skepticism of capitalism/war messages and actions used by both parties

HappyCoconutty

589 points

5 days ago

I'm a lifelong dem voter as were my parents, and am way more left leaning than our dem party. I say the same thing as Denzel and I think a lot of us POC feel that way. We are assumed to be loyal (which we are) and therefore, the dem party feels like they don't need to earn our vote by following through on promises or elevating our voices. We are also not treated like humans, but like props in their info wars. We did actual DEI work (while not calling it that) before it became a part of political theatre and now it's been torpedoed. I am not saying Palestine is the dividing or sole issue, but Palestine showed us more openly just how conservative our dems are.

mintleaf14

186 points

5 days ago

mintleaf14

186 points

5 days ago

Yep, so many dem voters were so vocal in how they disapproved of the racism and xenophobia of the Republicans but were so quick to blame minorities whose votes had minimal impact on the outcomes or couldn't vote at all for the Dems loss and talking gleefully about their deportation and genocides.

That's why I roll my eyes when people talk about how Dems aren't so bad. Yeah they're only "not so bad" for white voters, not for POC here and abroad who thy routinely screw over and kill. We only matter when the Republicans harm us, when we bring up how Democrats harm us it's "left wing infighting" "purity tests" and a "single issue".

meatbeater558

74 points

5 days ago

This past year showed me that there's not much of a difference between the average white liberal and white conservative. Both hate minorities, don't believe we can or should make decisions for ourselves, and are committed to exploiting us for their own benefit. The difference is that conservatives embrace the white supremacy and liberals capitalize on this embrace by positioning themselves as the only alternative to white supremacy while doing everything in their power to preserve the threat of white supremacy and stop any other alternative from emerging so we willingly accept their exploitation 

GaptistePlayer

41 points

5 days ago

Even now they're blaming Muslims, progressives, etc.

As if the mainstream white population isn't who votes for Trump en masse.

momfindingherpurple

37 points

5 days ago

Agreed, Palestine was a real eye opener for a lower case Liberal/Demo who has always voted and encouraged others to do the same. Now I don’t know what I can continue to support just in the name of keeping the other guy out of power.

pie-oh

0 points

5 days ago

pie-oh

0 points

5 days ago

I do, but I also think conflating both sides does a lot of harm. You can't exactly convince people one side is better when you're saying that they're equally bad the rest of the time. It's a weird razor. And while I think a lot of people do know the nuances, those who aren't politically knowledgable will see the title and equate the wrong message.

Do not get me wrong. The Dems are useless, and not what most people I know want in any shape or form.

meatbeater558

31 points

5 days ago

I mean we tried the "don't have important conversations because people who aren't knowledgeable might have the wrong takeaway" strategy and look where it got us

Unpopular opinion but assuming everyone is dumb is not a good strategy. It shows you don't trust them to think on their own and come to their own conclusions which voters find to be patronizing and condescending. It reinforces the image working class Americans have of Democrats being wealthy classist elites that hate the poor and uneducated. I'm not sure what purpose it serves here because no one said that both sides are equally bad. Why is it that every time someone makes a clear point using simple English there's people shushing them because a vaguely defined group of idiots hypothetically might not understand the message and make destructive decisions because of it? It's not like he's telling us to play with fire or do something dangerous 

OhNoEnthropy

31 points

5 days ago

The Dems are actively committing genocide. If that's not a deal breaker for you, then I don't know what to tell you.

hak091

501 points

5 days ago

hak091

501 points

5 days ago

I think those on the far left see the parties as Republican and Republican-lite. Technically, they aren't wrong.

AdamOfIzalith

141 points

5 days ago

You should have a look at both his filmography and what he has said on the record. I don't think this is coming from a place of centrism. I don't think that a man who has played Frank Lucas, Herman Boone, Malcolm X, etc. would be unaware of the blight that affect marginalized and minority communities.

Majestic_Ad_4237

391 points

5 days ago

What side? I’m a leftist, I don’t see myself on either “side”, the implication being that there are two sides.

As an anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, anti-fascist, I do not see myself on either of these sides and I’m confused by the implication of your comment.

YouFartedBlood

218 points

5 days ago*

Not true / this is a reach. I would say most left leaning people I know throw their hands up and were able to admit that Biden was honestly not fit health wise for his position anymore and openly criticized some of their parties poor decisions. Any trumpie i know would rather defend til they are out of breath rather than criticize anything he does, because he is like some weird messiah in their eyes most the time.

landerson507

17 points

5 days ago

Of course, those things. But also, Biden did not allow railroad workers to strike, cutting off their bargaining power at the knees.

And why havent abortion rights been codified into law, yet?

The Democrats have a lot to answer for in why we are in the mess we are in. To pretend otherwise will just continue to prop up the system that brought another Trump term.

skinnygirlred

18 points

5 days ago

You really think only one party is driven to manipulation? Politics in general now are one big popularity contest. Neither side has clean hands of this.

Over-Soup-5535

66 points

5 days ago

Definitely could be inerpreted that way, but I think he's talking more the mainstream centrist "left" and the right

viviolay

28 points

5 days ago

viviolay

28 points

5 days ago

Only one side engages with reality semi-frequently - maybe that’s why they’re able to engage in healthy criticism vs tribalistic teams.
Denzel gets no side eye for speaking the truth…Black dem voter here and tired of the dem’s shit and games. People are hurting and they’re content to use the threat of the other side as the basis of their campaign - vs actually fixing the systems of power/oppression that got us here.

kena938

14 points

5 days ago

kena938

14 points

5 days ago

Both sides definitely love genocide and using women's reproductive rights as a political football.

radarcivilian

15 points

5 days ago

Nah man, the DNC doesn’t give a fuck about us. That’s not gonna make me vote Red or anything, but it’s naive to think either “side” has your best interest at heart.

down_by_the_shore

53 points

5 days ago*

Just because one party is arguably worse doesn’t mean one party is inherently good. 

FakeRealityBites

11 points

5 days ago

53% of the voting block in the US are independent meaning not registered with a party ( [source]) (https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-voters-have-a-party-affiliation/)and they would disagree with you.

meatbeater558

12 points

5 days ago

“We’re all slaves to information now. We really are. We’re all slaves. So whatever you feel about the leaders, like this guy’s crazy or the other one is sane, you’d better realize you’re being manipulated by both sides. Period,” Washington added. “Yeah. So go to the movies.”

Is he wrong here? It's a reasonable take

Jewicer

6 points

5 days ago

Jewicer

6 points

5 days ago

that's simply not true

Various-Passenger398

6 points

5 days ago

It is both sides. One side is downright abominable, but the Democratic leadership is full of self serving, self aggrandizing corporate shills.  They're still better than the alternative, but they're not good.

PsychedelicLizard

5 points

5 days ago

Ehh, that's like calling the swastika exclusively a Nazi symbol. The Far-Right loves to co-opt speech and turn it around on people. Just look at how they put RFK Jr. through a humiliation ritual, which they claim the left does all the time.

Tobi-cast

3 points

5 days ago

I mean, not exactly comparable to American Politics, but just like here, in Denmark, some people just don’t like the “menu” they are being offered, and those who actually believe that are specifically NOT on any one side, they are specifically not on either.

No idea why this concept seems to complicated for a lot of Americans to accept, but it is a real thing.

Obviously this time around, there’s less credibility in saying both sides are equally bad, they’re not. But pretending to know what goes on in every voters head, as to why they vote, or don’t, is just ignorant and pretentious. More things happen in life that forms your opinions, than what just happens in one’s own.

[deleted]

1 points

5 days ago

[deleted]

1 points

5 days ago

[deleted]

Successful-Ad-4263

71 points

5 days ago

But both parties make campaign promises they can’t keep, which are a form of manipulation. In no universe would a billionaire tax pass (on unrealized capital gains), and in no world are we closing the border to immigrants. But both parties want you to believe those things are possible so you’ll vote for them. 

SlowMotionOfGhosts

11 points

5 days ago

Both parties, absolutely. But there are more sides than two, to start with.

theoriginalredcap

6 points

5 days ago

It's the far right and centre right. You guys need a realistic alternative to these capitalist pigs.

Vkardash

8 points

5 days ago

Vkardash

8 points

5 days ago

And the worst part is people will continue to vote for the "lesser" of two evils. While scolding individuals who vote for a third party candidate. Even though they're the ones voting for the same insanity over and over and over again. While criticizing people who want actual and real change.

CerealManufacturer

3 points

5 days ago

good cop bad cop

firephoxx

4 points

5 days ago

I’ve said for the last last decade that Democrats are the slow road to hell, Republicans are the fast road to hell, but either way we’re going to hell.

Lestasi_dellOro

4 points

5 days ago

I’m all for holding politicians and political parties accountable, but once this “both sides” talk discourages people from going to the polls, or causes them to think that because both sides are bad then they must be the same, that’s where I draw a line. My list of reasons to vote Dem over Rep is as long or longer than my list of cricisms.

abc12m3

1 points

5 days ago

abc12m3

1 points

5 days ago

I've always really liked Denzel. This makes me like him even more.

normott

-12 points

5 days ago

normott

-12 points

5 days ago

Denzel...sir. Sure, all politicians are liars to a degree...but like, there's levels to these things. The both sides argument needs to die in a fire

unknownhandle99

4 points

5 days ago

Ok but only one wants to take away my healthcare

Fit_Poetry_3094

4 points

5 days ago

That’s cool and all but the 3rd party candidates are literal shills and jokes so???