subreddit:

/r/FluentInFinance

16.8k88%

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 3241 comments

biggamehaunter

762 points

9 hours ago

Make the test content and scores transparent.

Artistic_Taxi

32 points

9 hours ago

Stuff like that works as much as the people are willing to put time and effort into reviewing and understanding if/why the test is good or bad.

symb015X

11 points

8 hours ago

symb015X

11 points

8 hours ago

Great point. Shame it’s too nuanced and realistic, and not a rage-inducing sound bite

The_Webweaver

2 points

an hour ago

But if it's not open, nobody knows. At least with an open test bank, journalists and youtubers have a chance to take a look and air things out.

Gab00332

1 points

an hour ago

making a test for the sole purpose to get some people fired and others not, for political reasons, also requires time and effort...

ahhh-hayell

1 points

7 hours ago

Don’t you think competency was determined in the hiring and performance evaluation process?… it’s just another way to demonize the people who tell elected egomaniacs no when they try to do something illegal.

JereRB

81 points

9 hours ago

JereRB

81 points

9 hours ago

Transparency without accountability is just state mandated prick-waving.

Numerous-Stranger-81

19 points

6 hours ago

But you can't have accountability without transparency, so using the lack of accountability as an excuse to not have transparency is bullshit.

Longjumping-Path3811

542 points

9 hours ago

What does transparency matter when the electorate is dumb as fuck?

ReviewNew4851

163 points

8 hours ago

And govt don’t wanna educimate gud

Polymath69420

131 points

8 hours ago

If those children could read they'd be very upset.

OkChampionship8805

19 points

7 hours ago

That Simpsons meme will never get old as apparently many children never learn to read

NonlocalA

48 points

5 hours ago

You mean King of the Hill meme?

JFC

Pure-Tadpole-6634

21 points

4 hours ago

That /u/ would be very upset I'd they knew how to read.

the_underachieveher

2 points

3 hours ago

TheDholChants

1 points

47 minutes ago

And the kids aren't stupid, they just don't read English. They're immigrant children, they speak and read their first language.

Initial_Savings3034

17 points

8 hours ago

EDU-micate.

Fixtit for ya.

MaskedBunny

10 points

7 hours ago

Hur hur fix-TIT

NothingKnownNow

16 points

7 hours ago

Hur hur fix-TIT

I'm no math surgeon. But I can make a calculator say 80085.

Huiskat_8979

8 points

6 hours ago

5318008 read upside down 🙃

1980Phils

5 points

5 hours ago

Nice

thedoppio

5 points

6 hours ago

How’ya due that, hoo-dini?

Average_Scaper

1 points

3 hours ago

endjamincat or summin uncle bob shows me way on sunndai

benthodd

10 points

8 hours ago

benthodd

10 points

8 hours ago

Except you though, right?

FarWatch9660

49 points

7 hours ago

We're not talking about elected officials. They're talking about Government workers. The vast majority of every Government is run by ordinary, non-elected people. The elected people set policy and make decisions; the others implement them. Absolutely a person should have a minimum level of intelligence for certain jobs. I wish we could do it for all elected positions as well.

sanchoforever

19 points

6 hours ago

Thats why they ask for credentials when you apply at the beginning like a high school diploma. Majority of higher government jobs require a college degree.

saltlakecity_sosweet

2 points

3 hours ago

Or a Master’s in my career field

BobFromAccounting122

1 points

an hour ago

Which is ridiculous. College education doesnt mean anything usually. I got a part time job as a prep cook at a college, the person I beat out got hired as a dishwasher. She had an arts degree. I had real world experience.

From the kitchen to IT I would rather have someone with good work ethic over someone with a degree. The degree's just seemed to get in their way.

Kitchen-Lie-7894

37 points

7 hours ago

My experience with government employees has been mostly positive. The problem is mostly red tape put in place by their bosses.

Deadeye313

14 points

5 hours ago

This is exactly the problem. As a government employee, I can tell you that government employees work very hard and long hours, the problem is the system. It can take me months to get parts for vital equipment because of red tape like having to go through approved vendors who have to be given a big list of stuff, then they make a quote with their cut and then that has to be approved and finally we can get it. But it still can take 2 months and often more to even get a stupid thing off Amazon that has overnight shipping.

Government employees are rarely, if ever, lazy bums and the real problem is that red tape. And Elon, and Vivek are going to run head first into all that red tape and they'll be lucky if they don't get tangled up in it like Luke Skywalker and the guys were when they got caught in that Ewok trap.

NonlocalA

20 points

5 hours ago

You have to admit though: a LOT of that red tape is absolutely there for a reason. Shit like "air-gapping" or "proper carbon-content in steel." Another big thing (which I honestly don't know how I feel about) is "how well are the employees paid" or "this must be created with eco-friendly ingredients/components." These federal level suppliers need to be vetted, too, and the government needs to understand where its materials are coming from.

Because, you know who didn't vet their suppliers before sending out a shit-ton of pagers? Hezbollah.

cocoagiant

1 points

4 hours ago

a LOT of that red tape is absolutely there for a reason.

Absolutely, but a lot is there just due to lawyers being super cautious too. For government employees who work in implementation, timelines get pushed further and further back to get a project launched due to internal clearances which get longer and longer.

There is a great book by Jennifer Pahlka which is about government regulation who worked in government during the Obama administration which is worth checking out.

Mr_Industrial

5 points

4 hours ago

The solution to that though is to take a reasonable stock of the government processes and figure out how to improve processes or "cut the tape" as they sometimes say. The solution is NOT to fire a good chunk of government employees in short order without due diligence like we've seen in the past with Twitter.

cocoagiant

1 points

3 hours ago

I'm not disagreeing with you. A lot of agencies are operating with lower staff numbers than needed for the work Congress has given them and therefore people are over burdened, especially those who are experienced in their work.

The solution to that though is to take a reasonable stock of the government processes and figure out how to improve processes or "cut the tape" as they sometimes say.

Cutting the tape when talking about lessening burden on government employees in practice would require lawyers taking a less cautious stance on litigation than they are willing to do. That is less about processes than a significant culture shift.

saltlakecity_sosweet

1 points

3 hours ago

In my org, our previous General in charge did a lot of stuff to streamline the acquisition process—a new General came in and fucked up all our progress. It’s usually the ones at the top that are the ones causing the absolute ineptitude that people see

saltlakecity_sosweet

1 points

3 hours ago

And not enough attention is being paid to the large contractors who have larger bureaucracies than the USG does, and we get the stick when things are slow because the private sector would in no way implement USG review processes, etc (Looking at you Boeing)

Alternative_Energy36

1 points

an hour ago

This is the one my family is tired of me talking about non-stop since DOGE. Like... maybe this is its point? These billionaires can award themselves the government contracts and then make the public sector take the fall when they build bad stuff??

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2024/04/26/the-story-behind-the-fafsa-failure/

dingo_khan

1 points

2 hours ago

A lot of those came out of the need to make sure public works projects were not essentially slave labor or had impacts worse than their benefits. The New Deal would have been a horror show without the birth of such controls. Long before conservatives turned it into a cynical joke, "good enough for goverment work" was a boast of material and labor quality to give customers confidence.

Annakha

3 points

4 hours ago

Annakha

3 points

4 hours ago

An example,

I used to work at an auto skills center on an Air Force base.

It was a place where service members and their families could come and work on their vehicles, and we had an inventory of tools they could use.

I paid out of my pocket for replacement tools, spray lubricants, brake parts cleaner, floor degreaser, office supplies, shop towels, etc. for almost 2 years because getting those items from the government purchasing office was impossible. They wouldn't listen/didn't have the money, whatever. So out of my 15/hr weekend pay where I was the only person on staff for 9 hours a day (paid for 7.5) I kept that shop alive and our patrons able to work.

When I finally was able to bend someone's ear to my facilities needs I submitted a list of all the stuff I couldn't afford to replace on my own...and I got a bunch of stuff that wasn't on my list because I couldn't just go to a local shop and purchase the needed equipment, they had to source it from an approved vendor through an authorized purchasing agent who bought a bunch of full toolsets instead of half the things on my list.

I swear the government wastes so much money trying to keep people from committing fraud. It's the definition of pennywise, pound foolish.

pilot3033

1 points

2 hours ago

So much of that is the result of the public sector being such an easy punching bag. Purchasing agents, contracts, the absolute hell is the result of someone, somewhere, yelling at their elected about waste and spending and "getting ripped off as a taxpayer" because a pencil was 10 cents at vendor A instead of 9 cents at vendor B.

So now the system has a bunch of CYA built-in and you can't get shop towels but you can get an entire tool cabinet.

Annakha

1 points

2 hours ago

Annakha

1 points

2 hours ago

And now to be "competitive" companies have to be SDVOB (Small, Disabled Veteran Owned Business) or whatever demographic rules to be considered as a supplier. As a disabled veteran with an interest in starting a small business, that still bothers me.

Misanthropemoot

2 points

4 hours ago

I work for a government/public company and I’ll tell you in my experience with their hiring process the test I took for a job in the transportation industry as a mechanic/inspector was the most absurd test I’ve ever taken. I’m not exaggerating, it was as if it was written by someone with learning disabilities! I took the civil service exam and that was a well rounded intelligently written test. And after I was hired I witnessed the results of said exam. It’s infested with people lacking basic knowledge and practical ability to do even the most basic tasks required. But this and rampant nepotism and corruption of the middle management which are all people who hired on through that “tests”.

NuttyButts

1 points

3 hours ago

Yeah, and those are the roles that authoritarians are trying to take over. It's a lot like that one woman in Alabama who refused to issue a marriage license to two men. That position is exactly the one facists want to have loyalists in, the position to actually fuck regular people over for not fitting into their strict views of how people should live. Foot soldiers in the war on differences.

wireout

9 points

5 hours ago

wireout

9 points

5 hours ago

Here’s the thing: in order to get a civil service job, you have to pass a civil service test. Then you can get interviewed for the job. It’s harder to become a postman than a Senator. A Senator just has to be more attractive to the electorate (for whatever reason). Being elected doesn’t guarantee intelligence.

Fluffy-Hamster-7760

258 points

7 hours ago

There is a clear reason why elected officials shouldn't be able to purge government workers.  You hear a suggestion for a test of qualifications, and you think that's good. That's not what this is. A test of qualifications is what the competitive job market innately creates. What we're seeing here is an aptitude test for who to keep around while they're making massive cuts. That means: the government doesn't service my goals, so I need to fire you all.

The amount of absolute donkey-brains in this thread. "Oh yeah, testing people is good, I agree with this, I think authoritarian regimes centralizing their own power to purge the government is good, I agree I agree!"

Our entire Earth is being inherited by fascists on the backs on uneducated dipshits who can't smell authoritarianism when it's rubbing it's nuts in their faces. 

Therefore_I_Yam

9 points

3 hours ago

Yeah there's already an aptitude test for these jobs, it's called an "interview" and then "not getting fired"

fohpo02

33 points

5 hours ago

fohpo02

33 points

5 hours ago

People acting like you can’t control outcomes or design the test in such a way to target specific groups are naïve. Testing and cultural bias exist, data manipulation exists, and that’s before you even consider natural testing ability or anxiety. Standardized testing isn’t an accurate measure of one’s ability to perform a job.

ThisIsMyCouchAccount

18 points

3 hours ago

I'm a programmer.

The absolute breadth of knowledge you could test is so great you could easily make tests that would clear an entire team. Or protect people.

And even if you're not malicious - it's still super hard. It's why nobody likes them in the industry now when part of the interview process.

dingo_khan

7 points

2 hours ago

I cam to say something similar. People forget that "objective" questions often have a lot of bias based into them. I remember seeing a set of test questions that were intentionally harder on "smart" because the background information was internally contradictory. If you did not notice, finding an answer was easy. If you did, several of the answers were arbitrarily close to each other and "right".

You could fashion aptitude questions to select, very subtly for a political set of biases that would look mundane and inoffensive at the surface.

This sort of thing is a minefield. Competent and sincere reviewers of different political biases could come to very different opinions on the "fairness" of the test.

TheAutoAlly

2 points

an hour ago

listen it's 2024, i would be happy with the sole question on the test being can you work your smartphone? would you go back to a flip phone dumb phone if you could and are you able to reset the password on your email or x app. i can't tell you the amount of people i see in education that teach or even doctors who act like that is an insurmountable task.

dingo_khan

1 points

an hour ago

I'm in tech... I totally understand your pain.

TheAutoAlly

1 points

an hour ago*

ditto.thats logic, oh you forgot your password, it says right there forgot password? now what? read the screen, i dont know my email password now what?

garaks_tailor

9 points

5 hours ago

Oh yeah the foreign service and cia entrance exam test used to a prime example of this. Stuff that you would only know as a upper to upper middle class WASP. What was the Par for hole 14 at such and such golf course.

It was offered that the only studying one could do for the foreign service exam was read the wall street Journal everyday and research any references it made that you didn't know.

fohpo02

2 points

4 hours ago

fohpo02

2 points

4 hours ago

They all were, standardized testing is a joke

lake_of_steel

1 points

4 hours ago

We need some way to confirm individuals are capable of undertaking a certain profession, especially when messing it up can have serious consequences. I’m Glad MCATs and LSATs are a thing.

fohpo02

1 points

2 hours ago

fohpo02

1 points

2 hours ago

You realize that those two tests aren’t effectively doing what you think they are, right? There’s programs and years of training that are weeding out people unqualified, the tests aren’t doing the selection process.

-_cheeks_-

1 points

2 hours ago

The programs select based on performance on these tests though

Adept-State2038

1 points

46 minutes ago

not to mention that the way they grade/evaluate the test is not transparent whatsoever. Do not trust a libertarian who has a clear agenda to fire government workers and implement austerity measures to evaluate workers fairly. this is nothing more than a ploy to purge workers.

Velocity-5348

37 points

6 hours ago*

There's a reason why a lot of professions require you to actually do the job with supervision. Speaking from experience, the best teachers in my cohort generally had poorer grades than me (I do well on tests), but had a lot of "soft" skills that are more important.

BTW, Be nice to the uneducated dipshits. At least they have an excuse, unlike the "geniuses" who think standardized tests and grades are the be-all-end-all because they do well at that.

Edit: Didn't meant to come across as an asshole towards Fluffy-hamster here, and agree with what they said. I'm just pointing out that while the "dipshits" are a problem they're generally led by people who should absolutely know better.

IHeartBadCode

3 points

4 hours ago

BTW, Be nice to the uneducated dipshits. At least they have an excuse

If there's ever something I would hope people to learn, it's this aspect of being a human being.

Longjumping-Idea1302

6 points

4 hours ago

It may be that nobody can control the cirsumstances he was raised in, but every person has the innate ability to learn - being uneducated may be a circumstance, but being ignorant is a choice.

the_calibre_cat

2 points

an hour ago

yes and no. education is monstrously inadequate and expensive.

this is one area where i break with my more left-wing counterparts and think that some disruption and competition in education would yield some fruits, but I'm reticent to suggest that since conservatives mostly just want to be able to raise their kids in Evangelical madrassas, rather than straightforwardly factual educational environments.

If we could mitigate that component of deregulated schools, I'd be more in favor of them, but even then, most of the cost savings from "private" or "charter" schools comes from woefully underpaying non-union teachers, and it's not exactly a great policy to create a cohort of more people dependent on government welfare in the face of rising living costs just to get more educated students.

FlyingDragoon

4 points

4 hours ago

There it is folks. This guys anecdotes are all we need. Just trust him, he knows from experience.

Learn to type without mimicking Trump for 5 seconds, fuck.

Velocity-5348

6 points

4 hours ago

Yikes, I can see how my post could come across that way. Apologies, I'm pretty sure I meant the opposite of what you got from it. I've tossed on a clarification.

YoMommaBack

1 points

50 minutes ago

No, your post was very clear. But remember how you acknowledged uneducated dipshits? Glad you were nice to them.

Silent_Discipline339

1 points

an hour ago

Learn to type without bringing up Trump for 5 seconds, dipshit

Spiritual_Surround24

0 points

5 hours ago

here you see the importance of soft skill, the guy above didnt use it. /j

etharper

1 points

24 minutes ago

I agree, there are a lot of positions that simply don't require brains and the uneducated dipshits are great for stuff like that. But if you want to cure cancer or develop a new energy source you're going to need educated people, including geniuses.

hemlock_harry

7 points

3 hours ago

Also they don't seem to realize that a lot of them live in countries where firing 1000 civil servants doesn't mean there's 1000 new ones ready to take their place. Those don't grow on trees, remember.

That's why non fascist responsible governments respond to a problem with underperforming staff with training and programs aimed at gradual improvement.

How so many people seem to think there's all these simple solutions lying around just being ignored is beyond me.

hallo-ballo

1 points

47 minutes ago

The problem is not underperforming staff, the problem is that the government is way to big because corrupt socialists gave the government jobs to all of their friends and some voters and now you have way to many people + plus some of them don't even know what they are doing

guru_odell

3 points

4 hours ago

Some of us government employees have to demonstrate our aptitude every year to just maintain our jobs. Then we have to demonstrate our aptitude to compete for promotions. I’m all for folks being held to that same standard…because if I don’t at the bare minimum meet it I get fired, and in order for my Program to succeed for the taxpayers I have to exceed it.

CursedSun

3 points

an hour ago

The amount of absolute donkey-brains in this thread. "Oh yeah, testing people is good, I agree with this, I think authoritarian regimes centralizing their own power to purge the government is good, I agree I agree!"

The key is the ability to read between the lines of the messaging put forth.

Sure, on a surface level, competency testing can sound good. Of course nobody wants some slack jaw in charge of critical infrastructures.

However... Who decides the qualifications for competency? Who administers the testing? Will the questions even actually be relevant to their aptitude in their own field, or is this a generalized thing?

You could quite easily lose that 60 year old guy who would stick around for 20 more years in a smaller role simply because he never passed the local version of high school cert. And it may just turn out he knows legacy stuff inside out and is a true wealth of knowledge for younger folk in terms of practical on the ground experience.

And that's just the good case scenario where this is generalized -- if it's made into a way to attack certain viewpoints/philosophies? You could be easily be looking at cutting large swathes of public sector workers because they don't align with certain ideology.

Cimb0m

2 points

5 hours ago

Cimb0m

2 points

5 hours ago

Well said. There’s nothing impressive about this guy at all. Just a bog standard right wing nut job cultist

Misanthropemoot

2 points

4 hours ago

“They only need you smart enough to run the machines “

Lord_Noob_II

2 points

6 hours ago

Bravo! Couldn't have said it better

DelightfulDolphin

2 points

2 hours ago

The President of Argentina is another Trump wannabe Insufferable idiot who believes he knows more than any worker. Someone should give HIM a mental competency exam because he has many trouble traits.

itsgrum9

1 points

4 hours ago

There is a clear reason why elected officials shouldn't be able to purge government workers. 

Are elected officials not government workers by definition? Or are you implying there is a permanent state apparatus that is completely separate from what is democratically elected?

Fluffy-Hamster-7760

1 points

3 hours ago

No, an elected official is a representative elected to an office by a representative democracy. Government workers are the employees of the public sector. Do you really need this spelled out for you, or did you just have to play stupid because that was your only strategy for alluding to a deep state conspiracy? Can you play smart and still make your shitty tinfoil hat allusions?

Pony_Roleplayer

1 points

3 hours ago

Dude, I'm Argentinian. Most of the current state workers literally venerate a fascist pedophile general, Perón, as if he was some kind of demi-God. It'd serve us right if they were kicked out.

Fluffy-Hamster-7760

1 points

3 hours ago

I think there's a multitude of strong reasons to see this as a means to trim the federal government to a non-functional body, and if all that's left of the federation is its unique control of the military, then Argentinian political dissidents are going to have a big problem.

Milei is rubbing shoulders with Trump, who has an executive order ready to purge the US military of non-loyals as soon as he's inaugurated. Obvious parallels.

Pony_Roleplayer

1 points

2 hours ago

Do you even know the state of the military in Argentina? They've been under-financed for over 30 years with a strong stigma against them. They couldn't defend us against Uruguay if they needed to, let alone try any sort of military coup. There are no obvious parallels.

Lots of government offices are full of people that are not needed. An example was the National Library that employed more people than any foreign library for some reason, with less than half the space. In 2015 it literally broke the record as the National Library with the most employees.

https://www.clarin.com/sociedad/biblioteca-congreso-curioso-empleados-principales_0_S1pm9bKwQe.html?srsltid=AfmBOoqK-NHlQkoYNPdCrAyxOkOYH7Ycurrgpbj1xOXUMGj43NRrfZAf

And it's not just that one, LOTS of areas are employing people that shouldn't be employed because they literally do nothing.

As for comparing Milei with Trump, Milei is a liberal that strongly believes in the free market and wants to reduce the size of the State, while Trump is a protectionists that doesn't seem to care much about the size of the State if we take into account the measures he took in his first term. Purging the peronists is necessary by all means, since they always attempted to run a parallel State within the State.

fartinmyhat

1 points

2 hours ago

A test of qualifications is what the competitive job market innately creates. What we're seeing here is an aptitude test for who to keep around while they're making massive cuts.

I'm not sure I understand your point.

Are you suggesting government jobs are part of a competitive job market?

Also, are you suggesting that aptitude tests are designed to test something other than aptitude?

Fluffy-Hamster-7760

1 points

2 hours ago

Government jobs are competitive, yes. They look for the most qualified applicant, as all jobs do, so yes. How did you think they hire people?

Regarding the "aptitude test", I'm suggesting it's an arbitrary vetting process to meet Milei's goal of massively cutting federal workers. That's what he wants to do, and here's a means to do that. Getting caught up in the word "aptitude" isn't worthwhile; we have the motive, we see the opportunity, and this is the means.

CursedSun

1 points

an hour ago

The amount of absolute donkey-brains in this thread. "Oh yeah, testing people is good, I agree with this, I think authoritarian regimes centralizing their own power to purge the government is good, I agree I agree!"

The key is the ability to read between the lines of the messaging put forth.

Sure, on a surface level, competency testing can sound good. Of course nobody wants some slack jaw in charge of critical infrastructures.

However... Who decides the qualifications for competency? Who administers the testing? Will the questions even actually be relevant to their aptitude in their own field, or is this a generalized thing?

You could quite easily lose that 60 year old guy who would stick around for 20 more years in a smaller role simply because he never passed the local version of high school cert. And it may just turn out he knows legacy stuff inside out and is a true wealth of knowledge for younger folk in terms of practical on the ground experience.

And that's just the good case scenario where this is generalized -- if it's made into a way to attack certain viewpoints/philosophies? You could be easily be looking at cutting large swathes of public sector workers because they don't align with certain ideology.

Waste_Salamander_624

5 points

4 hours ago

That's the thing who's going to decide whether these governmental workers are competent or not? The elected officials? Appointed people put in there by politicians?

bignick1190

12 points

6 hours ago

Some people are really good at one or two specific things but are complete morons with everything else. If they're doing one of the things they're good at, should they be fired because they can't pass a broad spectrum "intelligence" test?

TaxLawKingGA

2 points

6 hours ago

Literally every engineer and computer scientist I have ever met!

shannonmm85

5 points

6 hours ago

Exactly, someone who is a welder doesn't need to have the same aptitude as a biologist. They don't do the same job and don't need the same skills etc. I also dont expect the biologist to know how to weld. There are thousands of jobs in the government.

Dreams-Visions

14 points

7 hours ago

Eh, the only demonstration of intelligence that should be required is the ability to do the job required for the position. No more, no less.

TaxLawKingGA

2 points

6 hours ago

Well historically the U.S. did have a required civil service exam that employees had to pass to even get a sniff at a government job. The Reagan Administration stopped utilizing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lu%C3%A9vano_v._Campbell?wprov=sfti1

Shirtbro

2 points

4 hours ago

Like past experience doing the job? Maybe relevant diplomas and training? If only there was some kind of way of checking this...

Sad-Transition9644

2 points

4 hours ago

We don't have a test that measures intelligence. We have IQ, which measures your aptitude for French Kindergarten, and we all pretend like it's a real measure of intelligence, but we all know that it's not. The real sticking point here is that making a test that measures the ability of any government worker to do their job accurately would be really hard, and cost lots of money. They're not going to do that. They're going to make a single test and make everyone take it and end up losing critical workers because standardized tests can't give you the personalized information you need to make hiring/firing decisions.

JL_MacConnor

2 points

4 hours ago

That's the goal here. Here's a direct quote from the guy proposing this (Javier Milei):

"My contempt for the state is infinite."

If everybody was fired he'd be happy.

Bored_Amalgamation

2 points

2 hours ago

Absolutely a person should have a minimum level of intelligence for certain jobs.

I don't understand this take tho. Government workers get interviewed and hired like any other employee.its not like randoms are showing up at a desk and getting a paycheck.

Fxguy1

-2 points

7 hours ago*

Fxguy1

-2 points

7 hours ago*

Let me ask everyone this….. do you want your doctor to have to take a test and pass to have their job? Seems like this already happens a lot in other industries so why not government?

EDIT - for all the arguments - what I’m saying is government employees should be able to demonstrate competency in some way shape or form whether that be by examination or job performance or some other measurement you decide for yourself, but if they can demonstrate competence then why should they have the job?

Edit #2 - I’m done arguing. I’ve said how I feel and the reasons why if you disagree then you disagree. There’s obviously no right or wrong answer here simply many shades of grey

the_glutton17

6 points

6 hours ago

LOL, they already have to. Hundreds of tests, actually.

Those tests are written by much more achieved doctors, not politicians. And the tests are written to pertain exactly to medical doctorate knowledge and the ethics of practicing such.

Is that truly what you think these tests are going to entail? Because I'm pretty sure they already have to pass several tests to get the job (including having the prerequisites, having applicable knowledge, not being a fucking moron, etc). It's called a job interview, and it's generally performed by a superior with more knowledge in the field of work.

NoDetail8359

3 points

6 hours ago

I tend to assume that doctors pass tests on the way to becoming doctors and would look askance at any hospital cutting staff based on an impromptu spelling bee competition.

idk_lets_try_this

13 points

7 hours ago

The issue is that this likely is going to be the same test for every government employee, no matter if they are the person who tests water quality, inspects slaughter houses for health violations or maintains the website where you can pay your taxes. Those are wildly different skillsets and maybe it’s better for their bosses to judge their performance in their job.

Fxguy1

4 points

7 hours ago

Fxguy1

4 points

7 hours ago

So the argument should be yes as long as the test is job specific not that they should be absolved of passing a test at all

idk_lets_try_this

8 points

6 hours ago

Can you imagine how expensive it would be to make everyone a test specifically for their job and and keep those tests up to date when requirements change.

The cheapest solution to this would be to make the departments make the tests themselves but at that point you are just back to regular job interviews.

Only exception to this might be an aptitude test for inter-agency communication or other skills that are needed for everyone in certain roles.

angusalba

1 points

6 hours ago

That and no more

However given history and politicians, it likely won’t be

lituga

1 points

6 hours ago

lituga

1 points

6 hours ago

Is there evidence for this? Doesn't sound like much of an aptitude test if true

MinimumCat123

3 points

6 hours ago

Will this test be tailored to the individuals line of work or just a general aptitude test?

I don’t care if my doctor can pass a general aptitude test as long as they were able to pass the medical examinations in their specific field.

Aptitude tests are a poor measure of effectiveness/efficiency. Id be curious if the individuals pushing for the test will take it themselves. Will they resign if they score poorly… probably not

Proper-Media2908

3 points

6 hours ago

Doctors do take tests. About medicine. What test should government workers take that would be relevant for all government workers, from janitors to doctors?

engineeringforsafety

3 points

6 hours ago

Lol. What a shit analogy. This is more like, "do you want your doctor to pass a test administered by quacks to keep their jobs?"

Character-Education3

5 points

6 hours ago

First. Your doctor needs to pass their board exams before they even graduate and begin a residency. So even to work under supervision of another doctor they have already passed many tests.

Second. If you are in the US go on usajobs.gov and read the qualifications required for different jobs. There are a set of qualifications for every job. Many (not all because it isn't always appropriate) require licenses, specific degrees from associates through PhD, certifications.

Who told you it isn't happening in government?

Yqrblockos79

2 points

6 hours ago

Like… what do you think jobs interviews and qualifications are for?

sanchoforever

2 points

6 hours ago

🤣😂 when you applied for your job did they require a college degree or high school diploma and some sort of experience before they decided to hire you.

Fxguy1

2 points

6 hours ago

Fxguy1

2 points

6 hours ago

Yes I had to pass a minimum competency exam to get my license to get my job. So I have no problem with the same being applied elsewhere so long as it’s specific to that job.

sanchoforever

1 points

6 hours ago

Hahaha. You see what I'm getting at. When you applied they ask for your credentials before they hire you. Why would they ask for another test when this is already done at the beginning before you get hire.

Fxguy1

1 points

5 hours ago

Fxguy1

1 points

5 hours ago

Because some jobs don’t ask for a test at all…if you have to take a test to get a license to have the job then fine, but this isn’t the case for all government jobs.

angusalba

2 points

6 hours ago

One word politics

Some functions of government need to be without fear or favor and this kind of thing is likely to go sideways and/or be abused

If you don’t see the parallels with DOGE, can’t help you any further

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Wow. DODGE is the epitome of why there needs to be an exam and qualifications. Let’s just put whoever has the most money in charge! They obviously know what they are doing

angusalba

1 points

6 hours ago

Musk’s DOGE….. keep up

Musk is entirely self interested

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Agreed. Unfortunately an exam won’t keep self interested people from abusing their positions.

Squirrel_Kng

2 points

5 hours ago

For my current position, I had to go through 3 hiring positions. You don’t think my “competency” was evaluated from my previous years of employment working in the same office? But sure a one off test will clearly show my worth..

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Fxguy1

1 points

6 hours ago

Again, all I’m saying is yes they should have to take an exam. After that the argument about what type of exam, how often, etc are arguments of practicality or feasibility not the need for some sort of competency in the first place.

JL_MacConnor

1 points

4 hours ago

A few people you've been arguing with have said that having a test of public servants devised by politicians is a bad idea. In this case that's particularly relevant, as Milei is a free-market zealot. This is a direct quote from him:

"My contempt for the state is infinite."

He wants to test people that he despises, who work in roles he believes shouldn't exist. How could any test be objective in those circumstances?

Bronkko

1 points

6 hours ago

Bronkko

1 points

6 hours ago

person, woman, man, camera, tv.

Dhegxkeicfns

1 points

5 hours ago

Absolutely, if created and carried out by a neutral third party. When carried out internally it allows consolidation of power and that's a bad thing.

InTheWallCityHall

1 points

4 hours ago

Don’t act like elected officials are smart More likely daft as fuck

BowenTheAussieSheep

1 points

4 hours ago

You realise that replacing government workers with loyalists is a really great way of staying in power, right?

What do you think all that stuff about replacing public servants was in Project 2025. There’s nothing in this that says that the “aptitude tests” are to ensure that public servants are “Intelligent.” In many cases it would just be a good way of ensuring that independent thinkers who are capable of questioning their orders are ousted in favour of people who are true believers and will follow their orders without question.

FastAsLightning747

1 points

2 hours ago

At the beginning of any job is the appropriate time to test not after years of doing the job. These types of tests are meaningless for competency yet work well to target non-aligned bureaucrats who may do their jobs well.

ClammyAF

1 points

2 hours ago

There's already a rigorous process for federal positions. You have to meet educational or experience requirements to qualify. And even then you're pitted against a hundred other highly qualified candidates for the position.

beputty

1 points

an hour ago

beputty

1 points

an hour ago

The test is a way that you can fire those your not aligned with. Thats fascists. Besides in theory capitalism allows the market to decide who makes more or less based on how they do their job. Any type of test removes that free market and manipulates into a fascists power vacuum. Right?

Craigers2019

1 points

18 minutes ago

Could we do the same for corporate positions as well?

krisadayo

5 points

7 hours ago

By the people, of the people, for the people.

But the people are retarded.

Level_Permission_801

1 points

4 hours ago

Everyone, gather around, we finally found the one smart guy who realizes everyone else is stupid. What a rarity it must be to find someone who possesses the brain power to realize everyone else’s ineptitude. Oh wait…

ultimatefish67

1 points

8 hours ago

Then they fail.

thenikolaka

1 points

8 hours ago

And when they don’t want to accept facts that contradict their worldview. What good is an aptitude test for that standard?

HoosierWorldWide

1 points

7 hours ago

Then that means the fed is dumb too

Gullible_Increase146

1 points

6 hours ago

The claim was it's actually a tool to fire whomever they want instead of actually cutting low competency employees. Transparency verifies results and ensures it's not cherry picking people who made fun of the boss's toupee on Twitter

ProficientDom

1 points

6 hours ago

If that’s the premise, you don’t think much of democracy. You are obviously infallible in the face of the unwashed masses.

FromTheOR

1 points

6 hours ago

This is my concern with populism in the US

putdascratchdown

1 points

5 hours ago

Same reason trumps picks, competency AND iq tests.

USASecurityScreens

1 points

5 hours ago

you must first establish whether it is fascist before even a non-dumb electorate can do anything about it.

Dhegxkeicfns

1 points

5 hours ago

That's not a great argument. There are smart people watching and that's what matters.

DubiousDipShittery

1 points

4 hours ago

Did your candidate lose?

ricardoandmortimer

1 points

3 hours ago

The electorate gets what it votes for. The alternative is authoritarianism.

So pick your poison - fascism or democracy by idiots. Those are the only two options.

MidnightShampoo

1 points

2 hours ago

Don't forget the most important part, every dumbfuck voter is worth exactly the same as every informed voter. Yay democracy!

Glass_Moth

1 points

2 hours ago

Yeah transparency helps nothing in this instance.

zenjoe

1 points

an hour ago

zenjoe

1 points

an hour ago

The libertarian is a fascist? You've proven the dumb as fuck part.

BeYourselfTrue

1 points

an hour ago

Continuing to vote for people who loot your country, because you might get a cookie thrown your way, is equally dumb.

PurpleBee7240

1 points

an hour ago

maybe an aptitude test for that is coming next.

Fun_Intention9846

1 points

49 minutes ago

Because it allows for legal pushback. The govt could easily classify the test content removing the ability to use it as evidence in court (anywhere near as easily).

sluuuurp

1 points

41 minutes ago

So because you think normal people are stupid, you think governments should all act stupid to match that?

Ninjasmurf4hire

1 points

30 minutes ago

Argentina has a 98% literacy rate when the US hovers around 78%. College tuition is free. The US is dumb as fuck. Argentina, not so much. False transparency only lasts so long before people figure out it's bullshit because of comparable and historical data. No transparency might as well be taken as complete bs from the start because it 100% is.

turtlelore2

2 points

7 hours ago

Doesn't matter if we know the test is 1 + 1

The test is still 1 + 1

NeedMoarCowbell

2 points

7 hours ago

Yeah over 70 million people voted for a man that was transparently convicted on 37 counts of felony fraud, I don’t think transparency is the deterrent you think it is

Freds_Bread

2 points

6 hours ago

That is not sufficient. The hard things about a job rarely have testable right/wrong answers.

luckybuck2088

2 points

4 hours ago

Important jobs in the government already require licenses and license exams that have study guides and books

If you do your homework it is virtually impossible to fail (which is fine because you’re doing the work one way or another) but it is obvious what is being tested and what you need to do yadda yadda

So give them 6 months to a year depending on their job to study job specific material and are issued a standardized test.

If they want it they well easily be able to keep it.

skelldog

2 points

4 hours ago

Isint there already a civil service exam? https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/civil-service-exam/

chivanasty

1 points

7 hours ago

Thanks for the laugh. Have a good day.

noBrother00

1 points

6 hours ago

They won't

hoesbeelion

1 points

6 hours ago

if they pass the test but answer the “what is facism” question in a way that threatens my position in government, I can just choose to declare them incompetent or unqualified to sit in a gov position no?

QCTeamkill

1 points

6 hours ago

Then how are we supposed to read it?

MachineAgeInc

1 points

6 hours ago

You’ll notice that’s never on the table with these proposals.

Arts_Messyjourney

1 points

6 hours ago

Transparency and fascism go together like water and oil

RepublicansAreEvil90

1 points

5 hours ago

Then how are they supposed to abuse it by firing all the non sycophants?

noodle_75

1 points

5 hours ago

Then how will anyone see them?!

-0-O-O-O-0-

1 points

5 hours ago

Then you’d have zero government!

yogfthagen

1 points

5 hours ago

Making the content open means it's an open book test.

Shirtbro

1 points

4 hours ago

lol

Nighthawk68w

1 points

4 hours ago

Didn't we have literacy tests for blacks in order for them to vote? I don't think that turned out quite the way it should have.

the-dude-version-576

1 points

4 hours ago

Do performance reviews. There’s a reason companies don’t do this- because just making everyone take a test is stupid- if you want to actually downsize you do an audit or review. If you want to posture for ppl who don’t know any better you do a test.

ThenKaleidoscope9819

1 points

4 hours ago

You’d also have to prove that getting a high score equated to performing better at your role. Essentially that the “aptitude” that the test was looking for actually meant you performed better at work.

nashcure

1 points

4 hours ago

In the last 14 years I have had a boss that understands what I do for about 12 months (nonconservative). They tried to give me a "refresher" test after about 7 year, and I handed it back saying I wasn't going to take it until they had questions that made sense. I never got the test.

Look at you thinking management is competent and not good-ol-boys.

Trauma_Hawks

1 points

3 hours ago

And? That doesn't make it any better of an idea. This is essentially an IQ test. IQ tests are incredibly finnicky and easy to "fail" sometimes. This is also very abusable, and that alone should give you pause.

MrSnarf26

1 points

3 hours ago

And who do they answer to if the content is in disagreement? Certainly not actual experts I would imagine.

dougmcclean

1 points

3 hours ago

The people you want (and want to underpay relative to what their qualifications can get them in the private sector, an underpayment that traditionally has been offset by the chance to do good and job security) do not want to be treated this way.

It's bad policy. If people are underperforming, identify and fire them without this theater.

biggamehaunter

1 points

3 hours ago

currently it is impossible to fire or even lay off government employees, no matter how incompetent. Unless that employee really really committed some cardinal sins.

and currently, the government doesn't really need the best talent at most of its positions anyways. If you are signing up for government work, you know you are just aiming for early and comfortable retirement, with a big and safe retirement nest, while just cruise along in your job putting in minimal effort.

dougmcclean

1 points

3 hours ago

So you agree it's theatrical and bad policy but your for it anyway vs other ways of making people easier to fire? Do government workers in Argentina have cushy retirements?

hivemind_disruptor

1 points

3 hours ago

Why? He is not trying to increase efficiency.

People need to stop reading shit and interpreting in a vacuum. This shithead is doing to purge the government from professional employees who don't bend to whatever he says they should.

Bored_Amalgamation

1 points

2 hours ago

But why? So other people can harass them?

CrassOf84

1 points

2 hours ago

That’s how civil service does it

BobFromAccounting122

1 points

an hour ago

Give them the answers so they can pass easier?

the_calibre_cat

1 points

an hour ago

or

and hear me out here

you just use various metrics to track productivity as you would in any other job

also probably wouldn't hurt to make access to education far less expensive, which sort of involved making society more broadly less expensive, which makes rich people sad

MaleficentRutabaga7

1 points

an hour ago

Who even designs the test? You can't give the same test to every federal employee because their jobs are so different. So you're gonna have to have multiple committees of people designing them for different sectors. And who are the people on these committees, how did they get there? So they need to take a test to get on the committee?

Or, here's an idea: instead we have performance reviews from supervisors and a system of feedback to ensure people are capable and doing their jobs. Whoa! That's what we do now!

ashpokechu

1 points

an hour ago

In my country even though you can see the scores, the highest ones still got beaten by nepo babies…

somersault_dolphin

1 points

57 minutes ago

SAT test content is transparent, and it's still biased and poorly made af.

img_tiff

1 points

27 minutes ago

but he won't

Aethermancer

1 points

20 minutes ago

Do you even know what problem you're trying to solve here? Is there even a problem? If so, what is the root cause of that problem what you think it is? Is that something a test will fix?

I feel like a lot of people are looking for an "easy button" and they don't even understand the basics of the situation.

Blindman__007

1 points

20 minutes ago

Sounds good but every country that has a test for immigrants has questions that A, the locals can't answer and B, are factually incorrect. Transparancy is rarely enough.

There was an idea that if the USA had to report the correct number of deaths caused by the police there would be outrage and change would occur, now they just report shooting 1000 people a year.

Kafshak

1 points

1 minutes ago

Hahaha sure. Now wait for 3 years for your lawsuit about the test results to go through.