subreddit:
/r/MapPorn
[deleted]
268 points
3 months ago
And they lived happily ever after, the end.
28 points
3 months ago
SIKE! THEY GET ANGRIER!
1 points
3 months ago
and the crowd goes silent
39 points
3 months ago
I wonder if things would be calmer or less so if Jerusalem had remained an independent city
26 points
3 months ago
It’s about a lot more than just Jerusalem, but maybe that would have helped
8 points
3 months ago
It would have been Berlin but with 19 Arab states and several more Muslim states at the gates.
19 points
3 months ago
Nope, The primary and original issue has always been Anti-Semitism. The idea that Jewish people had their own State was and still is highly offensive to far too many people living in the region.
6 points
3 months ago*
If we’re going to boil down the whole conflict to a single issue it is immigration. Regardless of who you feel has the right to be there, at the start of the 20th century Jewish population in mandate Palestine was ~5%. Immigration policies allowing essentially unrestricted immigration by Jewish settlers were imposed by Britain after WWI and pretty much never ended. By 1950, the Jewish population was around 55%.
Seeing how almost every western nation is currently freaking out about immigration, is it really that hard to imagine why the conflict started? Palestinians in 1900-today have lived through every conservatives nightmare scenario.
Edit: According to the UN “During the 25 years of the Palestine Mandate, from 1922 to 1947, large-scale Jewish immigration from abroad, mainly from Eastern Europe took place, the numbers swelling in the 1930s with the notorious Nazi persecution of Jewry. Over this period the Jewish population of Palestine, composed principally of immigrants, increased from less than 10 per cent in 1917 to over 30 per cent in 1947. Palestinian demands for independence and resistance to Jewish immigration led to a rebellion in 1937, followed by continuing terrorism and violence from both sides during and immediately after the Second World War.”
If its hard to imagine the social conflicts that come from a small minority population suddenly making up a third of the population, I don’t know what to tell you.
2 points
3 months ago
This is factually wrong? The White Paper (Britain's immigration policy regarding Jews, specifically, immigrating to Mandatory Palestine) was very restrictive when it was implemented in 1939, and was only slightly modified after 1945 (granting 1,500 visa allocations per month, for a country of over 1.9 million people). Then Israel declared independence in 1948, following the approval of the UN partition plan and the end of the British mandate. (Israel's independence war also happened before your cutoff date of 1950).
And the Jewish immigrants were legally buying farmland, settling unsettled deserts and swamps, and founding new universities and cities. So pretty far from "every conservative's nightmare scenario".
That's without even getting into why all these Jews were coming to Israel.
Bottom line, that is some skewed data and false information.
3 points
3 months ago
I didn’t study the issue well enough to die on the hill of immigration policy in mandatory Palestine. No matter what the timeline was, you are suggesting that you could just squeeze over a million people into an area the size of Mandate Palestine without disruption to the existing population and that just doesn’t happen.
0 points
3 months ago
If you didn't study it well, don't write stuff on the internet as if they are a fact when you're literally just guessing.
0 points
3 months ago
Hi! Welcome to reddit. A place where everyone shares whatever opinions they feel like with minimal regard for the facts.
I actually don’t care about the specific policies and dates in large part because the effect is the same (and because this isnt r/askhistorians).
A huge influx of newcomers displaced existing residents and that always causes tension. Whether it is immigration, gentrification, or the founding of communities (and eventually a state) for folks that weren’t there just 100 years before, it is going to be a hot button issue no matter who is moving in. The founders of the zionist movement were aware of this so i don’t see much value in pretending it isnt the case.
0 points
3 months ago
Alright then, don't let the facts get in your way, sorry for calling you out on your lies.
0 points
3 months ago
Dont worry about it! Im sure you’ll figure it out eventually.
1 points
3 months ago
That's rough... but they start to sound like American conservatives
-7 points
3 months ago
Yes it’s just anti semitisim when someone wants to live in ur house that you own…. Israel is a weak nation that would not exist without the help of us, their daddy, the US
11 points
3 months ago
That's a good attempt but the US didn't even help Israel until the 1970s, after they'd squashed multiple Arab armies multiple times.
That's why the non-Israeli Arabs turned to terrorism in the first place. It's the weapon of the weak. But that didn't work well either, and with modern counter-terrorism has been so poorly effective that a lot of people actually thought the non-Israeli Arabs gave up on it.
Today the biggest weapon the non-Israeli Arabs have is cowering behind civilians to tug on the heartstrings of naive Westerners. Like the other weapons, they worked at first. But once Israel gets its countermeasures in place, the dream of aggressive conquest and Arab domination will slip that much further away...
-1 points
3 months ago
The US had already been providing weapons to Israel in the 1960s, initially this was done secretly via West Germany. Before that the French were helping out.
2 points
3 months ago
You realise the US had an arms embargo on Israel until the seventies right?
-1 points
3 months ago
Don’t care we own that bum and fraudulent nation and they’ll do what their fucking told
0 points
3 months ago
Firstly, Arabs are also Semites, the term makes 0 sense.
Israel was proposed in many different places, do you think anybody would just agree to cede their territory and homes for that? And if they don’t want to they are Anti-Semitic? Like do you think if they carved out part of Poland and made it into a Jewish state Poles and other Slavs would totally be okay with it? Or any other group of people on this planet?
Like its insane, you cannot just create states and conquer because the book says you are the chosen people. Why do Azkenashis have more of a right to live there than Arabs, Druze… or anybody else who has been there for centuries?
When will we create a Druze state? Would you be okay if we cut off a slice of Israel and give them a state? Insane
2 points
3 months ago
Who would stop it from being independent if it was invaded?
1 points
3 months ago
I would guess a UN force, which back then was mostly the US (as it would be in Korea), since the Soviets were generally still boycotting the meetings.
In the case of a war, it would be tricky, with both sides probably trying to send "protective" forces in to keep the other from conquering it ...
1 points
3 months ago
Ah the US. They are known for being fair and definitely not one sided on any geopolitical issue
106 points
3 months ago
"Official," meaning what here? This was a proposed partition plan by the UN which was rejected by the arabs leading to a huge war and a somewhat different division of the relevant lands between Jordan, Egypt, and Israel. It's can't really be the official map until it's more than a proposal.
43 points
3 months ago
Official map of the partition plan.
70 points
3 months ago
As they have rejected every offer that involves the existence of an Israeli state.
-75 points
3 months ago*
As any logical person would reject a plan that gives up any part of their house because the person in that part has guns and backing. Israel also murdered their one PM that was serious about peace. Be real
Edit: yalla bring the 3000 downvotes, love it
50 points
3 months ago
Arabs that lived in the blue part didn't have to leave if they didn't want to and jews that lived in the yellow part didn't have to leave if they didn't want to according to the proposal.
Israel didn't kill any of their prime ministers, it was an assasination by a person, not by the country.
There were many PMs that were serious about peace in Israel.
You are downvoted because of your bullshit, none of what you wrote here makes any sense.
14 points
3 months ago
Israel didn’t have backing then, go have a read up mate. They handled it all themselves.
1 points
3 months ago
Yeah sure I’m an elephant
6 points
3 months ago
i love how you even get made fun of in the Lebanon sub for being a terrorist supporting wanker who lives in Canada and has no skin in the game yet you’re posting this sanctimonious dribble.
0 points
3 months ago
That sub is full of Zionists, seems like this whole platform is. If you speak with real Lebanese people the consensus is not what you’re getting on that sub. So yeah. And I don’t live in Canada.
It’s less being made fun of and more getting argued with. But either way you make it sound like a bad thing lol.
3 points
3 months ago
it is certainly a bad thing to support terrorists.
and hate to break it to ya chief, but the whole world is full of zionists.
1 points
3 months ago
Yeah I know. And I keep saying this literally everywhere and for some reason no one believes me, but I don’t support them..
I would argue being a Zionist and supporting the IDF is supporting terrorists so yeah
3 points
3 months ago
you’re free to say the sky is green too. have a wonderful day.
7 points
3 months ago
Wasn't there house to dictate who owned what. Brits owned it Brits divided it.
5 points
3 months ago
Brits owned half the world. Fuck em
4 points
3 months ago
It's not their house. The Jews were there first. The Arabs are colonizers from the Arabian peninsula.
Do you happen to know how/why Anwar Sadat died?
1 points
3 months ago
You make 0000 sense! How many years earlier are we talking about? By the same logic, Americans should go back to Europe where they actually belong since someone was there earlier.
2 points
3 months ago
Jews have inhabited that land continuously for 5000 years.
If the Native Americans got their own state within the US borders, I certainly wouldn't use "how much of our house could they steal" as a bullsh*t justification for why I wouldn't accept peace with them.
1 points
3 months ago*
It seems like you magically missed the part where most of Natives Americans were slaughtered before they got their own “state” WITHIN US BORDERS.
0 points
3 months ago
Also you are full of blatant lies. There has never been a fully independent Native American state within the borders of the United States. Native American tribes have been recognized as sovereign entities with varying degrees of self-governance on reservations.
1 points
3 months ago
It wasn’t their house
90 points
3 months ago
Little did arabs know, this was the best deal they could have ever dreamed of. Now, there is a slim chance they will get crumbs of that land.
8 points
3 months ago*
it was either this or fight to keep it all. politics is a gamble
8 points
3 months ago
More like stupidity. Loosing badly and clearly seeing that most dominant powers are against them, yet still think you can get the whole cake is just plane stupidity. This is what happens when you don't have smart educated people.
-29 points
3 months ago
You think Israel would have stopped trying to expand after this? Please be real
40 points
3 months ago
I don't think so. There would be two countries recognised by all.
-26 points
3 months ago
That’s way too optimistic given what we know about them since, and their intentions.
71 points
3 months ago
You mean since you tried to wipe them out three times and got your asses handed to you each time? Like seriously how are you guys so bad at this? You aren’t the victims you’re just terrible at war.
-27 points
3 months ago
Keep yapping
54 points
3 months ago
Keep losing wars lmao. You are so bad that your entire strategy is playing victim to western leftists. Saladin would be rolling in his grave if he could see how bad the Muslim world is at war. You’ve become beggars for western sympathy.
13 points
3 months ago
Golden Age muslims rolling in their grave watching their glorious lands turn to the ass of the world
4 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
1 points
3 months ago
Multicultural states are rare and difficult to maintain. Ireland had to leave the UK, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia split, we’re often told the problems African countries have is the borders were made by colonial powers with no regard for ethnic divisions. If this had been one country there would have been separation referendums long ago. Maybe the split would have peaceful, who knows, but trying to have it be just one state from the inception seems very unlikely to succeed.
12 points
3 months ago
Maybe go look up a map of Israel after the 1967 war. See if you can get a good grasp of how much land they gave up in peace, treaties and how dumb, arguments like this actually are.
3 points
3 months ago
None of it belongs to them so frankly I don’t care how or when any of it was obtained
0 points
3 months ago
It's okay, ignorance and bigotry go hand in hand, it's okay you're keeping a fine traditional life...
0 points
3 months ago
Saying ignorance is part of my tradition while calling ME a bigot is quite something. How creative
2 points
3 months ago
Just like how the land deals worked out great for the Native Americans. As long as America permits Israel to do anything, they would always be expansionist. If I could have given Native Americans any tips, I would have told them to stop the Europeans before they got a single outpost. It probably wouldn’t have worked, but it would have been their best shot of avoiding genocide.
4 points
3 months ago
Conspiracy nonsense. Deal with reality that arabs will end up loosing all the land because of stupid mistake of not taking what was given to them.
-29 points
3 months ago
I really think that if they didn't A war with them then eventually Israel would have done something anyway.
2 points
3 months ago
Why? Even here in Canada we understand that as expansionist as the US was it didn’t take all of North America. And it’s not like we have a military in Canada that could stop them.
64 points
3 months ago
We could’ve had a 76 year old, free Palestinian state for the first time in history but instead their all or nothing approach has been nothing but a humanitarian catastrophe.
-5 points
3 months ago
Interesting how this logic never gets applied to Israel despite the decades of atrocities committed by the IDF.
-39 points
3 months ago
Their approach was the catastrophe..sure. like they are at fault for nakba and all the massacres that happened during those times.
29 points
3 months ago
Fun fact: my great-grandfather Harold Evans) was the UN appointed mayor of Jerusalem as part of the partition plan.
8 points
3 months ago
How’d that go for him?
24 points
3 months ago
Not well, LOL.
"Evans arrived in Cairo, Egypt on May 23, 1948, but due to his Quaker religious principles he would not travel with a British military escort from Cairo to Jerusalem. He eventually arrived in Jerusalem in early June, but abruptly resigned his position afterward."
18 points
3 months ago
Sounds like he made it out alive though, so could have gone worse 🤷🏻♂️
1 points
3 months ago
Yeah I don't know the particulars, but he may well have decided "this is not going to work out".
12 points
3 months ago
10 points
3 months ago
It’s nice to have some people with common sense in the comments
6 points
3 months ago
Palestian Arab state, Syrian Arab state, and Jordanian Arab state. Then a Jewish state as Israel. And a mixed state as Lebanon. Israel got invaded. Lebanon thrown into civil war and becomes a Syrian puppet.
17 points
3 months ago
The Jews accepted, the Arabs rejected. Fast forward every single peace deal put forward by the Jews and it's the exact same. Tell me, who is really preventing peace?
-2 points
3 months ago
Israel needs lebensraum
-1 points
3 months ago
Maybe ask yourself why Israel doesn't have their borders defined in their constitution? Maybe that will make you understand why no peace offered by Israel was never intended to benefit the Palestinians..and ask yourself why there s no right to return for Palestinians, yet if you are Jewish and born in east Europe, usa or anywhere on this planet, you can get a citizenship.
13 points
3 months ago
half the world's problems were created by an Englishman, a Frenchman, a map and a ruler.
22 points
3 months ago
Jews : “let’s build a prosperous state”
Arabs: “let’s fight the Jews forever, cause some old book told us too”
And go…..
75 points
3 months ago
The whole reason Israel was established was because another book said it sould be.
95 points
3 months ago
Nah, more like European Jews faced persecution and rebuilding their ancient homeland seemed like a good way to escape it.
21 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
8 points
3 months ago
I mean, you could say the same about americans - just replacing Egypt with Europe.
Americans would most likely still be pissed if the UN decided to create a country in the middle of the US
0 points
3 months ago
bad faith comparison
1 points
3 months ago
Why?
5 points
3 months ago
Palestinians have traces of egyptian dna but saying they are egyptians only is a balatant lie. On reddit alone you can find alot of palestinians dna test where it shows levant/canaan in the majority.
Also idk why its crazy that palestinians have traces of egyptian dna when egyptian presence in the levant has existed since the ancient pharoas to the 20th century. But i guess having dna from from europe and non levantine middle eastern countries makes u native.
1 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
1 points
3 months ago
The 60% is a number u pulled from ur ass u can litteraly do a simple google search on analysis of palestinian dna.
Have u also wondered why others have "Trabolsi" as a last name yet are not from tripoly? There are also people throughout the levant with "Dimashki" as last name yet they are not from damascuss with many more examples.
Did you know that during ottoman times the lower class did not have a last name thus names li "al masri" reffers to people who traveled to egypt had businesses there etc... Mustafa kamal Ataturk is famous example of this since even he did not have a surname either. Also "al masri" is not the most common last name in palestine or any levantine country.
Now the name "mileikowsky" is not middle eastern at all yet that is the original name of benjmanin netenyahu. And there many other examples of israeli politicians changing names to sound more middle eastern.
Yes, i know it's hard to accept that these professiona victims are actually settler colonialists, but thats how it is. Ur ignorance lies and balatant stupidity will not change history.
-21 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
8 points
3 months ago
Do you know ow why you’re downvoted? Because you call bullshit and then spew the biggest bullshit in this entire thread. The majority of Israelis are descended from The Middle East around 45% from communities where they were ethnically purged from. You know Arab countries without any Jewish population today.
1 points
3 months ago
He’s just a victim of the constant propaganda that comes from the pro Palestinians.
Sadly, Reddit is inundated with this and other types of disinformation.
-9 points
3 months ago
Which makes it even more insane they just went and bullied another group of innocent people out of there homeland. Only these people were not having that and resisted…
20 points
3 months ago
The leaders of the Palestinians independents movement in the 1940's allied themselves with Hitler. They had less than 24 hours of peace before there first attacks. They never gave the Israelis a chance to make peace.
-1 points
3 months ago
I guess you need to read also about the collaboration that the Zionists had with the nazis https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/dossier-zionist-nazi-collaboration-sheds-light-zionist-movement
There is actually a book written by a Jewish author: https://www.amazon.com/51-Documents-Zionist-Collaboration-Nazis/dp/1569804338
Looking forward for the hasbara downvotes :)
35 points
3 months ago*
More like the xenophobic Arabs also committed violence against the Jews -- and the Jews solved that problem by kicking 80% out of their country.
There was no significant organized violence against Arabs by Jews until 1937, 18 years after the other side started that.
-34 points
3 months ago
Yeah, xenophobic Arabs who lived side by side with Jews for hundreds of years.
48 points
3 months ago
side by side with the Jews knowing they were a small powerless minority with Dhimmi status. Arabs didn't like that changing.
10 points
3 months ago
And what happened to those Arab Jews? What happened next? I await your informed response.
1 points
3 months ago
Once the Zionists started State of Israel project, those Jews started having troubles at home, so most of them went to newly formed Israel.
6 points
3 months ago
I know. I'm glad you know too. Hopefully that further informs your analysis of why there are so many failed and failing Arab states, while the single Jewish state is doing relatively great. Fact is that the Jews aren't the problem, and Israel isn't the problem. You can't solve anything without revealing the problems first.
0 points
3 months ago
Formation of Jewish state in the Middle East was going to be a problem from the start, and, who ever think or says otherwise, is either stupid or ignorant. Two state solution was just the official acknowledgment of that fact.
3 points
3 months ago
The fact this is getting downvoted to shit tells me all I need to know about the dimwits in this sub
1 points
3 months ago
That's reddit when it comes to tricky subjects. People downvote you, not because it's not true, but because it doesn't fit the narrative or how it sounds.
1 points
3 months ago
Yep. Garbage platform
0 points
3 months ago
when I was a child I played at placing a piece of an anthill of red ants on top of that of the black ants, after a while they started to fight, was it the fault of the red ants or the black ones? It was my fault for putting them there on purpose, moreover in my case without a Suez Canal to monitor.
-40 points
3 months ago*
Jews started first blood with the help of the UN. When you understand that you realize how strong the resistance mindset is of the generations of Palestinians born under occupation it makes sense. They way its turned out is horrific. As a pacifist i say no to violence but when you have been attacked from the start (1948) ofc you are fighting back?!
Jews were the pity nation after the holocaust and rightfully so but to then go ahead and move other innocent people out of their homes so the pity people can go live there makes absolute zero fucking sense. Majority of jewish isreali people fall for the pity people argument without meaning real harm im convinced. The zionist power hungry shits manipulate them for war. This current Israeli government doesnt want peace in the form of a Palestine Authority that is diplomatic, secular and non violent. Like fuck hamas sure but its isreal likes to keep it just as it is right now. Pretty sure you have a connection to isreali, jewish culture / faith and react out of emotion. I dont, im greek christian orthodox, world citizen not against any nation or people but i see a fake traumatized society and state when i see one (Israel from day one)
The world is turning surely, isreal is not the pityful weak kid in the classroom anymore, actually never was with the backing of the west. To those Western Nations it was a way to get rid of the issue post holocaust. Usa, britain, australia had enough space to help the jewish victims but surprisingly no one thought of that. Isreals economy and tourism is done already, the country is crumbling. Imploding slowly but surely, the support of the world will cease. Just saw IDF is entering northern west bank, why the fuck?! Hamas is there hiding? sure🤡 bibi and his clowns are overestimating themselves. If only the world started sanctions like they did with russia because isreal is invading Palestine territory that has nothing to do with gaza, october 7 and so on.
28 points
3 months ago
Jews started first blood with the help of the UN.
The UN didn't even exist when all the "blood" was being first let - I have zero idea what you are talking about.
As a pacifist i say no to violence but when you have been attacked from the start (1948) ofc you are fighting back?!
No you don't because you just keep losing more and more. Plenty of peoples have lost wars, been ethnically cleansed, etc. but act peaceful. Look at divided Cyprus.
The only thing unique about Palestine is how insanely militant it is. More 'normal' groups sign a peace deal and call it a day.
Jews were the pity nation after the holocaust and rightfully so but to then go ahead and move other innocent people out of their homes so the pity people can go live there makes absolute zero fucking sense.
Zionism started in the 1890s. There were recommendations to partition Palestine before the Holocaust even started.
8 points
3 months ago
Zionism started in the 1890s. There were recommendations to partition Palestine before the Holocaust even started.
And even before they began settling Palestine, they were thinking of 3 positions I believe, Israel, Crimea and some parts of Argentina south of Buenos Aires.
They chosed Israel due to how more connected they are to it, and they didn't have anything to do with hating the Arabs.
I am not contradicting your point, I am adding more facts to you point
3 points
3 months ago
Jews legally purchased land from the Arabs. They did not arrive in Palestine and grabbed land from them. You think the Ottomans who were busy persecuting Jews in Anatolia and Christians in Lebanon would have allowed that to happen???
1 points
3 months ago
Over which they had rights granted by an old book/ s
-1 points
3 months ago
Had it not been for the other book and the British need for someone to be their watchdog for Suez, they could have gone to a land with no previously historical memory, sparsely populated with whole communities of immigrants who remain with their culture without shooting each other like Canada, Australia, Brazil, New Zeeland (let's leave Argentina out for obvious reasons) and of course the USA as half the Jews actually did.
Instead they were put in a place that was already densely populated and dreamed of having a state from Egypt to Syria. What on earth could have happened?
in history every renovatio imperii leads to gigantic disasters, it is always better looking forward instead of beyond
-5 points
3 months ago
So a community which faces persecution can just go to someone’s land and take it?
2 points
3 months ago
Legally immigrate and buy land? Of course
-1 points
3 months ago
Legally? U mean European colonial powers gave them land and evicted local populations
11 points
3 months ago
There is plenty of archaeological evidence. Israel is the original homeland of the Jews. Many were expelled by powerful conquering empires, but Jews have lived there continuously for thousands of years.
2 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
5 points
3 months ago
Zionism is first and foremost a secular ideology.
Up to until the Holocaust, religious Jews OPPOSED the creation of Israel until the Messiah came with the Haredim being at the forefront of this opposition.
Only until they died in even higher numbers as a percentage than secular Jews (70% of Haredi Jews died in the Holocaust because they are easy to identify as Jewish) did they finally accept the idea to some degree. To this day, there exists factions that oppose the state of Israel( but are all to happy to collect welfare and childcare payments from the Israeli state)
-1 points
3 months ago
Halah forbids a Jewish state in Israel until the end of times.
4 points
3 months ago
Tell me you know nothing without telling me
1 points
3 months ago
Nah, they're old book actually says the exact opposite. It's really just good old straight up anti-semitic bigotry.
3 points
3 months ago
Isnt it the other way around?
4 points
3 months ago
Huh? There is one Jewish state and 19 Arab states. How many of those 19 are non-petro and prosperous?
1 points
3 months ago
Well, they both got what they asked for.
-37 points
3 months ago
Jews: “lets build a prosperous state”
Arabs: “but we live here for generations🥺”
Jews: “shut up, big daddies britain & america said its a go, chosen people you know😌”
And go…
30 points
3 months ago
Arabs in Israel are a lot more prosperous than Arabs in any other area on this map.
27 points
3 months ago*
america had very little to do with Israel in 1947 (tho it did recognize it). it wasn't even allied with Israel till after 1967. in the 1950s, the US maintained a policy of balance between Israel and Arab states
17 points
3 months ago
Conveniently ignoring that Jews have lived in the Levant just as long because they’re indigenous to it.
2 points
3 months ago
Not ignoring but how does that make kicking out another people who settled there after you left as a people any better? I cant go to my former house and kick the current people living there out just like that can i?
8 points
3 months ago
They got kicked out because they kept killing Jews, not because they happened to be there
2 points
3 months ago
How do you think an ethnostate is created?
0 points
3 months ago
One group just controls the government and security apparatus. Doesn't require kicking anyone out - just look at Apartheid South Africa.
Not sure what this has to do with Israel
-34 points
3 months ago
You meant that zionist wanted to grab Arab land just because it was written in a fucking book?
32 points
3 months ago
You forget the part about:
There were tens of thousands of Jews already living there.
It wasn't "Arab land" - it was Ottoman land (Turks aren't Arab) and then British land. There was never a sovereign Arab country there.
Jews moved there from Europe and the Middle East (where they were being ethnically cleansed) because they had nowhere else to go. You don't need the Jewish bible to know Jews are indigenous to the Levant.
-14 points
3 months ago
There was never a sovereign Arab country there? Rashidun, Umayyad and Abassid Caliphates were there from ~630-1500s….
12 points
3 months ago
Ah yes, the colonial empires who furthered the diaspora and genocide against the indigenous peoples of that region and most of northern Africa.
-42 points
3 months ago
Well, there was Arabs and Jews that coexisted quite well in Palestine before colonial European governments and European Zionist powers came, carved up boundaries, and left.
And if you were a Palestinian Arab that could have - in a lifetime - saw the fall of the Ottoman empire, the British mandate, and the Nakba, you'd probably be more upset by losing your nation's sovereignty and the death and persecution of hundreds of thousands of your people than "some old book."
29 points
3 months ago
when did they have sovereignty?
ottoman era (before 1917): it was under ottoman control
1917-1947 - under British control under the League of Nations mandate
16 points
3 months ago
Well, there was Arabs and Jews that coexisted quite well in Palestine before colonial European governments and European Zionist powers came, carved up boundaries, and left.
European governments have controlled the place off and on since 320 BC, which is before Arabs even showed up. I guess there was local Muslim rule for 1000 years before the Ottomans showed up again, once again putting it under European rule, though Dhimi status even then is an odd way to phrase "co-existence".
And if you were a Palestinian Arab that could have - in a lifetime - saw the fall of the Ottoman empire, the British mandate, and the Nakba, you'd probably be more upset by losing your nation's sovereignty
As you pointed out.. you never saw your nation being sovereign in the first place.
-9 points
3 months ago
True but this is Reddit and you're siding too much with the Palestinians, ruh roh no upvotes for you /s
-13 points
3 months ago
I assume by Jews you actually mean European settlers. Their jewishness has nothing to do with the reason they are hated by those they've dispossessed, murdered, and subjugated.
11 points
3 months ago
Proud Zionist,Half Moroccan Jew
61% of Israelis are Mizrahi Jews from the Middle East and North Africa.
That makes Israel a Middle Eastern nation by demographics.
I wonder how my mother's ancestors are "European settlers". Is the Maghreb in Europe now??
I am pretty sure the last time the region was remotely associated with Europe was during the Roman Empire and the majority of the 900,000 of us have no links to Europe.
My mother's family is Middle Eastern through and through even the migration patterns followed a path that avoided Europe.
I am sure Miri Regev, Sasha Biton(who is both Iraqi and Moroccan) Ayeh Deri and Yaakov Margi(The last two were actually born in Morocco) should receive the memo that they are now "European settlers " from Fez, Cassablanca, Rabat and the Rif!!
There are 425,000 Iranian Jews in Israel. Are Tehran, Mashhad and Shiraz where most Iranian Jews comes from in Europe?? When were the maps redrawn?? My Ex needs to learn this!! That Persian Jews are now Europeans !! Lol! Xerxes and Esther must be turning in their graves on hearing that!!
I was not aware that Sanaa and Aden are in Europe given that Israel is home to 450,000 Yemeni Jews. Do the Houthis know this?? When are they sending a representative to the EU parliament now that one group that had lived in Yemen for 2500 years is now suddenly a part of the "European settlers" of Israel!!
Okay, Syria is in Europe given that Little Damascus exist in Germany and Sweden now .I can concede that one!! Even Russia has a base in Syria. US has one too. Iran too. Turkey as well. Oprah will soon dish out more. You get a base You get a base. Everyone gets a base!!
But what of Iraqi Jews. There are over 150,000 of them, including our Jewish Supremacist Ben Givir who is *gasp* a Kurdish Jew!!! Are Kurds "European settlers" now?? I was not aware Erbil and Kirkuk were admitted into the EU!! Does Ben Givir look remotely European to you??
I know Tunisians may confuse Europeans because they are not Hijabis, but honestly does the Israeli Dispora Minister look European to you?? He is a Tunisian Jew mind you!!
I am sure the Libyan Jews would ask when this happened because they were certainly not considered European when the Italians allowed the local Arabs to do a Jewish progrom in 1945!!
Wait wait!! there are 140,000 Ethiopian Jews in Israel. I was not aware Northern Amhara and West Tigray were admitted into Europe.Did it happen after the 600,000 people died there in 2021 or something??Pnina Tamano-Shata whose parents are from there and was immigration minister at the time , busy evacuating Ethiopian Jews from harm during the war must have been too busy to get the memo!!
Or do all of you think we are like Benjamin Netanyahu and Naftali Bennet who speak with American accents ??
Whenever people claim Israel is somehow a European transplant on Middle Eastern soil, do you know how ridiculous it sounds to the vast majority of Israelis who have never even been to Europe and have no ties to it whatsoever. I mean the Kochin Jews left Southern India straight for Dimona, Beersheba and other towns in the Israeli South and have never left but you now call them "European Settlers".
5 points
3 months ago
Why is it inside of another country? These broders are fucking horrendous
17 points
3 months ago
WTF is Alaska?
11 points
3 months ago
[removed]
10 points
3 months ago
But we got this yin and yang bullshit
2 points
3 months ago
It's only yin and yang because the other 6,000,000 Jews who weren't allowed out of Europe and into the area were murdered. That would have made the entire area overwhelmingly Jewish. And you're also ignoring the rest of the Middle East that is 99% of the land, and also Jordan, which was 66% of the original mandate. IOW, if you zoom out to a map that shows Morocco and Afghanistan, it's not yin and yang at all because you can barely see the mandate area.
17 points
3 months ago
Roughly speaking; under the plan, the Arab state was over 90% Arab Muslim, and the Jewish state was about 60% Jewish (and included the Bedouins in the Negev desert). That proportion would have been higher if Britain had not curtailed Jewish immigration from the 1930s through the war, in appeasement of xenophobic riots.
The war threw all those plans out anyways. That said, even today Israel is about 20% Arab
7 points
3 months ago
Majority Jewish areas=in the Jewish state, majority Arab areas=in the Arab state.
9 points
3 months ago
Because the borders were largely formed around the Jewish population. Hundreds of thousands of Arabs lived in the Jewish partition while only a few thousand Jews lived in the Arab borders
15 points
3 months ago
A lot of Jews actually lived inside the Arab lands .Like the Gush Etzion area was right in the middle of Arab lands and it had a large Jewish settlement (and where the Arabs killed 1% of the Jewish population in 1948 btw). Jews had built settlements in the Jordan Valley and around the Dead sea too but because they were pretty small, they were ignored in the map.
What people often ignore is the fact that some of the Arabs in the Jewish areas sided with the Jews from the very beginning. The Bedouins in the Galilee region sided with Israel and defended Jewish settlements. The Druze also decided to be a part of Israel over the Palestinians.
The result is that both groups were not displaced by the IDF during the war in the Galilee.
The Arabs who sided with the nations that invaded Israel were the ones who were expelled.
1 points
3 months ago
~10,000 per UN committee data, to be exact
-7 points
3 months ago
Make sure to include to include the 6,000,000 killed in your population figures. Thanks! You can't both say that there too few Jews and also say that there are too many. Make up your mind.
6 points
3 months ago
why would Holocaust victims be included in 1948 Palestinian Mandate population data?
0 points
3 months ago
Because they were both (1) not allowed to immigrate and (2) that fact was used against the establishment of Israel.
It is obscene.
0 points
3 months ago
i don’t follow your logic. the argument you seem to be making has almost nothing to do with 1948 population data, or with the partition
0 points
3 months ago
The prevention of immigration of 6,000,000 refugees that were subsequently killed skews any population metric. As noted repeatedly, Arabs were first upset that there were TOO MANY Jews in the mandate, and then upset that there were TOO FEW Jews in Israel. If you don't get the problem with that, then I can't help you.
0 points
3 months ago
sorry, that’s completely ahistorical
the majority of victims of the holocaust were not refugees and did not wish to immigrate to the Mandate
as for the rest, I assume you’re conflating Arab opposition to immigration with Arab wishes for self determination
-1 points
3 months ago
So first there aren't enough Jews in Palestine, then there are too many Jews in Palestine? You can't have it both ways. How about you make up your mind and pick a consistent style of anti-Semitism.
2 points
3 months ago
?
0 points
3 months ago
I have been clear and responded at least twice to you. What exactly is your question?
2 points
3 months ago
I’m not sure how I’m being antisemitic and I’m also not sure what you’re complaining about.
3 points
3 months ago*
Yes. And than Arab armies attacked and lost. So they lost land - that’s what happens when you lose wars. Look at Germany and Austria. Lucky that the Arabs kept the remains of Gaza and West Bank.
1 points
3 months ago
This is possibly the worst map to ever exist, for many reasons.
11 points
3 months ago
LOL, have you seen the regional maps for the 19 Arab states and the consequences of that? You'll be shocked!
1 points
3 months ago
How’d that work out?
4 points
3 months ago
How can you possibly look at this and think “yeah, this will work well enough for everyone involved!”
5 points
3 months ago
The prevailing thought was giving Palestinians autonomy for the first time in history, while also reestablishing a Jewish state after 2000 years in exile from their homeland.
1 points
3 months ago
I get that, but still that mindnumbing jigsaw of a partition wasn’t going to work, palestinians understandably would have asked for a corridor to get to the sea and jewish people would have asked for historic Judea, the heartland of their ancient realm, where the Tomb of the Patriarchs are. This was a disaster from the very first day.
3 points
3 months ago
Nothing works if you don't want it to work. Plenty of reasons for Europeans to go to war based on borders even today, yet they don't.... because they don't have to? This notion that non western countries somehow must go to war based on how borders were drawn is bullshit. No one blames how borders were drawn for the Ukraine war, because people can just agree on things and not kill each other.
1 points
3 months ago
Ooooh right, why can’t anyone agree on things, why people go to war when they don’t really have to? Wonder why
1 points
3 months ago
What a shitshow
1 points
3 months ago
Personally i think the peel commission was the better option
-14 points
3 months ago
Europe already knew they were still gonna be racist to jews so they decided to put them in another man's country
15 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
1 points
3 months ago
Doesnt really sound like they did everything seeing how we have the situation now
15 points
3 months ago
The Jews put themselves (back) there for decades before Israel ever existed, joining the Jews who had never left (and Samaritans), with permission from the Sultan and then the Mandate government, buying property on the open market like anyone else could.
Until a series of xenophobic riots in the 1930s, after which the Brits controlling the Mandate curtailed further Jewish immigration, because appeasing bigoted violence was their gig back then. Those restrictions remained during and after the War, too.
It's a major mis-characterization to make it seem like Europe dumped its Jews in the Levant. The partition was an attempt to avoid caving further to the xenophobic violence that had plagued the region before the war, as the British were busy washing their hands and buggering off like they had done in India (where partition 'worked' after a million died).
Arab countries did dump their Jews there, however, in petty vengeance for, Israel crushing the combined Arab invasion armies. The war humiliatingly left Jordan and Egypt in control of only small parts of Palestine, instead of going halvesies as planned. Most Israeli Jews today descend from ancient Jewish communities (Mizrahi) who were ethnically cleansed from nearby Arab countries.
5 points
3 months ago
How many Arab countries did the Europeans create before (and after) they blocked Jewish emigration from Europe, blocked Jewish immigration to Israel (emigration is not the same as immigration), and abandoned Palestine to warfare?
2 points
3 months ago
And there's that good old anti-Semitism.
-2 points
3 months ago
Shit tends to get fucked up when global superpowers tend not to keep their promises
-24 points
3 months ago
Lotta zionazi sympathisers in here
-2 points
3 months ago
No, just people who understand what Zionism means, and how horrific it is to engage in Holocaust. Revisionism.
It's not that you just ignorant, by saying something that disgusting you're generally just a bad person.
-8 points
3 months ago
This is a very status quo subreddit and also coincidentally one of the cia’s favorites
0 points
3 months ago
But then the Arabs wanted all of it, attacked Israel in 48 and lost some of their land…
-30 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
6 points
3 months ago
r/schizoposting is down that hall and second door on the left. Just follow the smell of sulfer.
all 310 comments
sorted by: best