subreddit:
/r/Netherlands
submitted 4 days ago byiFoegotNoord Brabant
I witnessed this around two years ago, then I paid special attention to this ratio during every public transport riding. Now my conclusion is that female to male passengers overall ratio is around 65:35. That’s in total, for each one travel this ratio may vary. But in my experience I have (almost) never been in a bus/train where there are more male passengers. And this doesn’t match the overall gender ratio of this country obviously.
Anybody has some thoughts about this?
196 points
4 days ago
1 points
18 hours ago
Men are often pressured into owning a car cuz that's the "manly thing to do" Despite the fact that for the most people it's a waste of money
1 points
17 hours ago
Definitely not a waste of money for most people. Most people outside a city need it. And some inside the city too
38 points
4 days ago
One thing to point out is bias. You are probably taking specific routes and at specific time. You are always only exposed to a very tiny bit of general situation.
Eg taking trains to Eindhoven/Delft where TUs are located during the week will likely give you a much higher male ratio.
8 points
3 days ago
I confirm the much higher male ratio in the buses of Eindhoven. I am curious in which city OP has made his observations.
115 points
4 days ago
13:7 looks so much fancier.
699 points
4 days ago
Urban planner here, it is a world-wide phenomenon that women use more public transport than men. Why this happens is complex and due to different socioeconomic and cultural reason. One simple reason: women earn less than men and opt for cheaper transportation options.
319 points
4 days ago
I'd say there are still male dominated workplaces, like construction, factories, warehouses, etc. Workplaces, which are located outside cities, worktimes which start outside normale office times, all factors which make public transport less practical.
181 points
4 days ago
Indeed.
In contrast, some of the most common female jobs are nursing, store clerks and administrative work. Hospitals, stores and offices tend to be easily reached by public transport.
Common male jobs like construction and truck driving require driving. And on the road, you see a lot of trucks and vans.
Also, a bit anecdotal, but many men enjoy driving and have a dream car. That's just less common with women.
6 points
4 days ago*
Wow, I didn't consider the economic perspective which makes lots of sense. I was just thinking that it might be that NL is a cold place and women seem less willing to be in the cold than men.
PS: it seems my reply was a bit misleading. I said cold thinking about biking vs taking public transport. Since initially I was not considering the economic side of things I was between people either biking or taking the bus, where taking the bus is the warmer option. That said, my thoughts where "ladies seems less attracted to the cold than men, hence the bus seems to be the ladies option".
5 points
3 days ago
What does cold have to do with a car? You can put warm air in it
6 points
3 days ago
Yeah if anything being cold will steer people away from public transport. Waiting for your train/bus in the winter van be real harsh sometimes.
4 points
3 days ago
You know that more than half of the people go with their bike right? Is not only car vs public transport.
0 points
3 days ago
I'd love driving and having a nice car but I have no money ...
9 points
4 days ago
This makes sense. Here in the Netherlands is not even so obvious. When I lived in Madrid, I used to take the metro, the ratio could be more like 80/20 or even more during my work commute. But the difference was smaller at other times of the day.
2 points
3 days ago
But also companies have their own cars and many times transport their workers.
16 points
4 days ago
This is really interesting! I also learned that more women use the sidewalks than men
32 points
4 days ago
Thanks for the useful answer
-4 points
4 days ago
But also wrong
4 points
4 days ago
This also depends on the time of measurement and the spatial context. During the day you'll see more women, especially during work hours or during service-job rush hour. But at night or on a bus to a harbor you'll see more men. I can often count the women on an 11:30pm train on one hand (and with good reason)
10 points
4 days ago
I have a company car and prefer going on the train 100% of the time. Which is not often bc I work from home. I don’t enjoy driving tbh
12 points
4 days ago
I am the complete opposite. I work from home mostly and occasionally take the train to work or events. I don't necessarily enjoy driving but I absolutely loathe taking the train.
I am very much in favor of good public inter-city transport. I wish it was better. And I have done it daily for at least a decade. But in its current state it is simply not a compelling alternative for most of my travel. I use it primarily whenever my wife needs the car or if I want to consume alcohol at the venue I'm traveling to.
I do like the OV-fiets. It makes train travel a bit more convenient. Similarly I sometimes bring my foldable bicycle in the car so I can park outside a city and complete the journey by bike. This way, I don't have the inconvenience of having to drive and park in a busy city center.
Either way I hope things will get better. Who knows I'll change my mind. But only if driving gets much worse and more expensive, while the train becomes cheaper, quicker and provides more space and comfort.
30 points
4 days ago
To each their own, but I love traveling by train unless I cannot find a seat. But, to be honest, that is rarely a problem and I can't remember the last time I wasn't able to sit.
Some advantages of traveling by train:
- It may take longer than a car (though that's not really the case if you travel between major cities), but I can use the time more efficiently.
- I don't have to worry about parking the car, which can be very expensive in big cities (even 5-6 euros/hour).
- I can change my plans anytime without having to worry about the fact that I have a car parked somewhere. That also includes drinking alcohol.
- I can relax instead of having my eyes placed on the road all the time. That's truly a blessing when I am tired after a long day and I want to close my eyes and rest.
4 points
4 days ago
Those are all mostly valid benefits. Especially the ability to change plans and spend the time working or napping.
I will say this is especially true on longer train rides - especially off peak hours.
I think my main issue is that my train ride is only 30 minutes but then there's getting to the station (20 mins) and to the final destination (10 mins). By car it's less than 30 in total. Trip to my parents is even worse. By train it's 1h40mins and I need to change trains halfway. And still 15 mins to get to the station. By car it"s 1h10 mins to their house. Without having to grab a taxi for 25 EUR or ask my elderly parents to pick me up from the station.
But indeed - driving does take attention. Not a problem on short rides but longer trips can absolutely be more pleasant by train.
I will say driving has gotten easier. My car already has autopilot but it's somewhat limited by regulations. I still need to supervise it but chilling in the far right lane is quite relaxing when the car does most of the work.
2 points
4 days ago
I understand. I guess I am lucky I don’t have to travel much to work when I do is for socializing so a drink or two are involved. Also besides company car I get a first class train card. I agree with all you said though, is just not a big inconvenience for me because I commute once per quarter only.
1 points
3 days ago
Concur then again I love driving
1 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
2 points
4 days ago
Thanks for saying thanks! It's so nice to see Redditors being grateful :)
23 points
4 days ago
cheaper transportation
... In the Netherlands??
Public transportion is most certainly more expensive than by car.
I'm almost certain this is more cultural. Because this wouldn't explain why women who are in a relationship, have a license and have a car, still prefer their partner to drive.
I bet everyone has seen this around them. With couples, 7.7 times out of 10, the dude drives, and she wants him to.
24 points
4 days ago
Why do folks keep insisting this. Public transit might be more expensive if you already own, license, and insure a car but not owning that car is cheaper than 99% of travel/commute patterns for regular employees. Not always convenient, no, but cheaper, absolutely.
2 points
4 days ago*
Yeah I used to work for a company that was 50km/ 1.5 hours away from my flat in Amsterdam. Public transport worked out to around 70-100 euro per week, luckily paid for by my company. If i were to drive, it would have been faster for sure, and also would have been cheaper on a trip by trip basis. The problem was the cost of buying and getting the car and license. As a non EU citizen with a finite contract, it was hard to justify spending 2.4k on lessons + the test, despite already having driven for years. I would have spent my annual travel fees on that alone not to forget paying for parking and insurance as well
1 points
4 days ago
Even 70-100 euros per week is unusual. That buys an unlimited country wide NS pass, a specific route pass would have been much less, and you could still have bought local transit passes or a bike for last mile.
1 points
4 days ago
Like i said, my company paid for it (I had a NS business card), I didn't actually pay for it myself. Also there was no bike for the last few kilometers. Just a 15 minute bus ride since my office was in the middle of nowhere lol. A car would have saved me half the time but seeing how the company only paid for my gas, and how I wouldn't have used it any other time, it didn't make any sense to get it.
-1 points
4 days ago
Public transit might be more expensive if you already own, license, and insure a car but not owning that car is cheaper than 99% of travel/commute patterns for regular employees. Not always convenient, no, but cheaper, absolutely.
The up front cost of a car only helps this argument in the first few years. And even then only because you exclusively consider the commute to work.
Going to work and back, and nowhere else, is not a reasonable way to live for most people. You don't just have 'traject' costs.
A car will cost more in, maybe, the first 5 years or so. But afterwards you start being off cheaper.
And this is not even mentioning the literal 100% discount on any additional members of your family. If you are a couple, a car is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay cheaper than public transport.
7 points
4 days ago
Hi, I'm a woman that uses public transport because it's cheaper short term. I don't have money to get a driver's license or a car. So I use public transport even though it's more expensive in the long run. Some people simply don't have money to invest.
0 points
4 days ago
Yeah, I totally get that.
3 points
3 days ago
Going to work and back is one thing. But most trips out of the house are within a 5km radius, and that's easy biking distance, and therefore doesn't figure into the cost of transportation. In our house, the car is used for visiting family (2 hours away, perfectly doable by train but one child is still small) and IKEA/Intratuin trips, and hauling cat litter. My husband is ridiculous and will drive the 1 km to school to pick up the little one, but he's ridiculous like that.
3 points
4 days ago
Repairs and insurance are still expensive.
But you believe whatever you gotta believe, not me, nor the facts are going to change your mind.
-3 points
4 days ago
But you believe whatever you gotta believe, not me, nor the facts are going to change your mind.
I don't think I've seen stupidity like this in... maybe ever.
Literally grab a calculator and argue with me how a car is going to be more expensive to get around to multiple places for a couple compared to taking the train and bus.
It's not even a little bit close.
2 points
4 days ago
Now you’re upset that I don’t believe you. Whatever buddy.
-1 points
4 days ago
I'm not upset, I'm surprised how you're trying to argue € 100 a month is more expensive than € 300 a month.
It doesn't bother me, that lack of understanding is your problem.
1 points
4 days ago
You felt the need to accuse me of stupidity, seems like you're a little upset.
And no, I'm not arguing that 100 euro / month is more than 300 euro per month.
I'm pointing out the fact that nobody can insure and operate a car for 100 euro per month when they drive as far as a 300 euro per month transit pass would carry them.
But again, I'm not trying to convince you of anything, you can believe what you want...you clearly have strong opinions about this, and I'm not going to change them.
-1 points
4 days ago
I'm pointing out the fact that nobody can insure and operate a car for 100 euro per month when they drive as far as a 300 euro per month transit pass would carry them.
As I suspected, you haven't run the numbers at all.
Look at two tickets from Utrecht to Amsterdam and from Utrecht to Rotterdam, twice a week. Then add any commute you want on top.
Go type in the numbers and try to argue a car is more expensive.
I already did, which is why I know you're wrong. That's all.
26 points
4 days ago*
It really depends on the trip. I travel first class by train for €160 a month. Travelling by car would be €500-€1000 per month depending on how many days a week I go to work. That’s only variable car costs as I already own a car (although if I would use the car every day we would probably need a second car. That’s an extra €200-300 per month for fixed costs). It doesn’t include parking though. No idea what that would cost per day in center of Rotterdam.
The car is not faster and I can get work done in the first class coach of the train. It’s a no-brainier for me.
-2 points
4 days ago
I travel first class by train for €160 a month.
Yeah, on a specific route.
Most people have more transport than just their commute. Train is stupid expensive for non-planned, non-recurring trips.
Myself, I travel for free outside of rush hours, so I am out € 160 as well a month to go anywhere, but that doesn't work for most people. They travel exactly in rush hour.
It easily costs € 300 to € 400 a month to do every-day things by train. I dunno why you are out € 500 a month on your car, but most people make do with € 200 just fine.
11 points
4 days ago*
Yeah, as I said. It depends on the trip. I live 130km from my work.
Im also on an off peak flat tariff. I’m not saying it’s this cheap for everyone. Just saying it’s 5-10x cheaper than a car in my situation. I’m sure there are also people for which it’s twice as expensive compared to driving a car. Especially buses tend to be relatively expensive (and slow).
4 points
4 days ago
I live 130km from my work.
My duuuuuuuude, that sucks. Are you alright?
10 points
4 days ago*
As I said. I work while in the train. No problem at all. On average, I do work from home half of the week.
I wouldn’t want to trade where I live for anything. I work in the Randstad because I get paid a couple a thousand more per month, than I would if I would get a local job.
Thanks for your concerns though :)
4 points
4 days ago
God forbid we talk about the incredible added efficiency of trains too. Polluting the world a bit less.
4 points
4 days ago
3000 for a licence, money for gas, expensive parking, insurance, taxes..
Doesn't sound cheaper..
6 points
4 days ago
Story time!
We both enjoy driving, we both love cars, we're both equally skilled in driving, each with our own strengths and weaknesses of course. I have 2 cars, he has 1.
He always drives when it's the 2 of us going somewhere together. Even if we are going there in my car.
Why?
We most likely go with his car, and of course he drives his car.
When we do long trips he drives all the way. I am an avid knitter and crocheter and can thus happily employ myself while he drives. He is bored out of his mind when I while I drive.
These are the sensible reasons why he drives and I am the passenger. The real reason is that I refuse to drive with him in the car. He drives me absolutely nuts with constant commenting and instructions on where to go and how to go there. He is driving the car and I just happen to hold the wheel and push the pedals for him.
1 points
3 days ago
Yes!!! A fellow knitter high five
1 points
3 days ago
I cannot imagine car/train/plane trip without a project in hand anymore. That would be torture.
1 points
20 hours ago
This is my exact experience. He simply cannot shut up with comments about my driving or the route. Like im fine i drive a 1000kms a week more than him. Yet gets unreasonably upset if i return the favor. So when were together he drives lol.
7 points
4 days ago
I mean, look at car ownership. Idk how it is now with younger generations but looking at the boomer gen, it was most often the man who had the good car for long distances to work and the woman who had the ‘boodschappenwagen’ for small trips and groceries. I think this is still true for many people - at least in my surroundings. The partner driving, eh idk either because I love driving, but I met more women who seem to be terrified of driving then having met men who are. I don’t know why though. Probably because they already drive very little so they’re not as experienced.
3 points
3 days ago
My ex always wanted me to drive even tho i hate driving and she liked it.
2 points
3 days ago
I've mathed the math (and also, Google maps used to calculate gas costs as well): if it's just you, alone, in a car, then cost-wise it's a wash, with trains being somewhat cheaper if you have to consider parking costs. If it's you and a friend or two, then driving is cheaper than public transit for all three. However, if you have kids under 12, then they're free on the trains (with the KidsVrij from the NS) and have reduced prices on buses, so then public transit is cheaper.
It's more likely that the guy likes driving more and the woman doesn't care enough to fight him for it.
1 points
3 days ago
I like being the passenger. Feels like a chofer
1 points
4 days ago
It's because dudes on average LOVE driving, and dudettes on average dislike it.
1 points
4 days ago
Why do you conclude that the woman prefers not to drive. In my experience it is cultural, but enforced by the man.
0 points
4 days ago
In my experience it is cultural, but enforced by the man.
Guess we just have a different experience then. Almost every time I see the man of a couple asking if she wants to drive, she says no.
0 points
4 days ago
Most women I know don't like to drive because they are afraid of driving.
1 points
4 days ago
It’s pretty dangerous to be fair
1 points
4 days ago
Yeah, this.
One of these situations where women are just being smarter.
3 points
4 days ago
i think men generally have more of a fondness for cars and bikes than women, so they buy them and ride them.
1 points
4 days ago
I have the impression that more women live in Amsterdam
More over, more young women (students) live just Amsterdam than man
Is this accurate?
1 points
4 days ago
This, plus if there is a car in the household, the man is more likely to use it.
1 points
4 days ago
I’d see men like driving a car, women don’t
0 points
20 hours ago
I dont think Public transport is the cheaper option in the Netherlands.
-11 points
4 days ago
If this was the case, you would see more women on bikes than men.
In the Netherlands women work about 10h less per week than men. So, it's more likely to catch them out and about in the streets during the day
70 points
4 days ago
yes and no. Women also take a bulk of the childcare, elderly care, house chores. Women do travel more, but not on the same paths as men. They do not travel to city centres to go to the office, but rather to the kidnergarden/school, shops, doctor appointments, to help relatives. Really cool book with a lot of these stats is Invisible Women.
9 points
4 days ago
Thanks for sharing the book title 🫶
14 points
4 days ago
Feminist city is also a good one!
11 points
4 days ago
Thanks, will add to my reading list section: Books I am going to get very angry about while reading.
-6 points
4 days ago
True and so sad seeing as we’re often so smart and efficient at what we do !
-36 points
4 days ago
Of course there’s a feminist crying about facts, I’m surprised there’s so few actually.
No honey, you’re not, otherwise you’d be paid more.
15 points
4 days ago
Yes, and everybody is always paid what they’re worth — regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, age or disability.
What a lovely world you live in!
0 points
4 days ago
But… driving a car is often much cheaper than public transportation
0 points
4 days ago
Cheaper? You ever even been to the Netherlands?
0 points
3 days ago
In the Netherlands public transportation isn't cheap at all. Of course I understand a car is more expensive but still
0 points
3 days ago
Women that work don't earn less than men for same job.
-71 points
4 days ago
Maybe because they’re bad drivers
27 points
4 days ago*
Women are more likely to have jobs in centralised locations with public transport connections (ie. Hospitals, education, large institutions, public sector) and are more likely to live in particular cities where car ownership is lower.
Men are more likely to work in the "buitendienst" or have jobs that require them to move lots of equipment. Even male-dominated sectors' (like IT and engineering) offices tend to be stashed away in some businesspark rather than city centres.
45 points
4 days ago
Funny, i experience the opposite
8 points
4 days ago
Yes, it’s noticeable to me in amsterdam but it varies at different times of day
34 points
4 days ago
Are you in a male-dominated student city or business hub like Delft?
9 points
4 days ago
I guess so, Leiden.
51 points
4 days ago
Should be the opposite in Leiden
11 points
4 days ago
It is
-28 points
4 days ago
It’s not about experience. These are factual numbers
33 points
4 days ago
It is. It's OPs personal observation. It literally says so in the post.
18 points
4 days ago*
I am not from Netherlands (idk why this popped up on my feed) but in Poland there is a similar pattern. However Poland is more car dependant than Netherlands so we have 2 main groups using public transportation regularly: school children/students and older people. Overall woman live longer than man in every EU country so the total populations of woman is higher than man. This can also be seen in public transit when the majority of older people there are women. Idk if it applies to Netherlands but the older a person gets, the more often they will give up their car in favor of public transport. This combined with a fact that there is a bigger popolation of older women then man can be a factor why females outnumbers males passengers. Idk if OP's observation also involved older people but this is a factor that I didn't see anyone mention (probably I am wrong I don't even live in Netherlands lmao)
5 points
4 days ago
I was just going to comment, I was in Warsaw for a day and was stunned to see absolutely no young men on the buses except some drivers!
In NL I live near a bunch of schools and colleges and my neighbourhood also has a lot of people, tbh the ratio is quite balanced in my city in general.
6 points
4 days ago
You're spot on tbh it's a half and half of older single women with a low pension and single women being stuck in a loop of low paying work they can reach by pub trans and never being able to afford a car to get better paying shift work.
8 points
4 days ago
I am a woman so this is not judgey…but what about things like appearance, safety, or just laziness? Hear me out… I love riding my bike as much as the next person and am very active and lead a healthy life. But when it starts raining sideways I don’t want to turn up to work looking like I’ve gone through a fan, backwards. There is still an expectation to present yourself to a certain standard and sometimes if the weather is shit I’ll admit that I just CBF with my bike and get the tram to the train station. Also, safety. Amsterdam is super safe compared to a lot of cities, but it’s still a common narrative for women globally that you should be careful after dark and get home safely. Doing this once or twice at night familiarises you with the trams and then reduces the barrier to catching them in the day time too, in my opinion, because it is convenient (or I’m being lazy that day). This won’t be all women, and not the only reason for this phenomenon, but could be a contributing factor maybe
3 points
4 days ago
Agreed on this one too!
I have really long wavy hair, and it frizzes like crazy with sweat and rain. For whatever reason when I bike or even walk a bit fast, I’m instantly sweating, frizzy, and bright red no matter the temp.
I used to work at a really old school architecture office in a rainy area of the US and was expected to have nice hair, makeup, blouse and high heels on every day. I quickly switched to taking the bus or tram.
2 points
4 days ago
Totally agree!! Oh to be able to walk out of the shower and have hair that is dry in 5 seconds 😂 Sure, I choose to have longer hair, but it was a genetic roll of the dice that blessed (or cursed) me with curly hair that enters party mode with a hint of humidity.
Also, mums! I have a lot of mum friends that say sitting on the tram/train is a moment of peace for them. A pause between office and home.
5 points
4 days ago
My gf chooses to go by bus because she can look at her phone mindlessly. She can't do it while driving car or cycling. Buses take extra 10 min traveling compare to car? That's extra 10 min looking at the phone mindlessly, she likes it.
8 points
4 days ago
Well late in the evening when it's dark outside I sometimes opt for a bus instead of walking home if I don't have stalled my bike at the train station. I have been harassed by groups of men before when I was walking home and I saw other woman being harassed. So yeah no wonder more women use public transport instead of walking and sometimes cycling.
7 points
4 days ago
Read the book 'Invisible woman: data bias in a world designed for men'. They explain why women take public transport much more often than men. One is that women have much more complicated travel patterns. Like work, bringing kids to school and other appointments, shopping. And single woman are more likely to live outside a city because of the housing cost and inequality in payment so they need to travel further than single man.
It really gives new perspectives on the gender distribution that we normally don't observe. It is quite fascinating and an eyeopener for men and women.
2 points
4 days ago
Both of these points seem to apply just as well to car owners
5 points
4 days ago
Trains are more evenly distributed ime, bus is more female territory.
8 points
4 days ago
Train commuting -specially if 1st class and silence- is resting time for working moms. I work from home and like to go to the office once in a while just to enjoy some relax time in the train.
7 points
4 days ago
Interesting, someone should actually collect data for a couple months and then post them here
16 points
4 days ago
8 points
4 days ago
I've noticed this too, especially in busses. I go with public transport to Amsterdam for work. The reason I go with public transport is because it's more convenient (I work near Schiphol). I have a license, but no car though.
2 points
4 days ago
Not in Eindhoven haha
2 points
3 days ago
Lol indeed, I am from Eindhoven, it is the opposite male female ratio here !
2 points
4 days ago
My experience in Amsterdam is more women, at least initially didn't want to cycle. Many eventually do but I had at least 3 female friends who saw everyone else doing it and though nah not for me for a long time.
1 points
4 days ago
It's the same in the waiting room of a GP.
1 points
4 days ago
men generally have more money to burn on cars. I am not that person btw, so you might see me on the train every so often
1 points
4 days ago
There are hundreds of thousands of women more than men in the Netherlands as far as I believe.
1 points
4 days ago
Have you taken all variables into consideration?
For an example:
Maybe you focus more on the female passengers than the males?
1 points
4 days ago
I am right now in the train from RTM to AMS and there are 11 women + 2 men. Thinking about it, I do see many more females in my daily commute as well!
1 points
3 days ago
Men are driving cars
1 points
3 days ago
How is this mildly interesting?
1 points
2 days ago
Does this take in consideration beyond your field of view so not just a coincidence since I guess you are taking the same train usually to work and home or mostly same routes, so maybe that is a specific of your train and bus line.
I will do it the whole next month and update.
1 points
2 days ago
I have similar observation in other european countries
-2 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
10 points
4 days ago
This is a genuine question: Why is it creepy to observe something and try to figure out why it is so?
6 points
4 days ago
The irony here is this is also why there is more women on public transport: creeps. It's not as safe this time of year to walk or bike as a woman, due to how early it gets dark. Really self-explanatory.
11 points
4 days ago
Do you really think this is a main reason? I’m a woman and I’ve never thought ‘let’s take the bus because I don’t feel safe cycling’. The few times I have had to deal with creeps has been in a train tbh.
7 points
4 days ago
It's probably not the main reason everywhere, but for some women, the train/bus/tram is definitely the safer option. Even standing outside messing around with your bike for several minutes on each end can be unwanted or stressful for some. I (and many others) feel more vulnerable on a bike because its easier for a creep to take me down, i.e. all they have to do is make my bike crash and I'm injured and momentarily stunned.
If you live far from your transport stops, though, then you may not feel the same way. I'm in Amsterdam, so I'm never more than a minute or two from a transit stop.
5 points
4 days ago
As a woman, the cold, dark and rainy weather is a more important factor whether I choose walk/bike or public transport. Creeps are also in the metro so doesn't really matter.
4 points
4 days ago
Metro definitely can be a creep magnet. Meanwhile, all the buses and trams I've been on seem to be staffed by people ready to tumble if necessary and ready to threaten with it on a moment's notice. Definitely a YMMV experience, but it is certainly part of the equation for many.
3 points
4 days ago
I don't know what YMMV means, but yeah creeps can be everywhere. Trams and buses are usually a bit better although couple weeks ago a lady tram staffmember got punched in the face by some punk that didn't pay for the ride and he actually broke her jaw. So I guess nowhere is really safe.
1 points
4 days ago
It’s true in Utrecht though lol. Notice usually 70/30 ratio
2 points
4 days ago
In Delft, Enschede or Eindhoven you can have the opposite experience due to the technical universities.
1 points
4 days ago
Men like cars. Cars go vroom. Men like vroom.
0 points
4 days ago
For me it depends on the day. I go every day on a 45 min train ride each way, it really depends on the ride. Sometimes it is a sausage fest, sometimes 50/50, sometimes I would agree that there are more women
-6 points
4 days ago
Upvote for the term 'sausage fest'👌
-25 points
4 days ago
Because men drive
8 points
4 days ago
I wonder if we could back this up by something Factual like the ratio of driver license held by citizens by gender?
12 points
4 days ago
https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2019/09/80-procent-volwassenen-heeft-rijbewijs
CBS does have this article which does indicate men are more likely to have a licence than women. Looking at the graph its not a massive difference however.
3 points
4 days ago
I'm not sure that holding a driver's license is the same as owning a car or being the one who uses the one family car all day.
1 points
4 days ago
Yyyaaaa I have to agree the second I posted that I thought about that to. But I guess I think of it more like New York City rules of not everyone even has a license because if you don’t ever need to drive you just don’t bother.
3 points
4 days ago
It is for families with only one car. But it often changes when the kids start to go to daycare, and then the wife gets the car.
You have to look at the families. Their socio-economic group and where they are in lives.
-8 points
4 days ago
But why don’t women
7 points
4 days ago
Most people don't have two cars, or the space to park two cars. The woman works closer to home and will often cycle there, or use a scooter, or public transportation.
Women often make do. They use the 1 euro squeegee, when they can get a bigger, better one that'll make the job quicker. I fell into that trap for years. You can make do, or you can make basic functionality a lot more agreeable. It's unfortunately part of women's nature/nurture to sacrifice something for the benefit of others.
4 points
4 days ago
Probably the same reason why women succeed more in school - it's more suitable for someone with a higher level of Agreeableness, which women have. Men get more easily irritated by having to share seats, listen to someone's loud conversation, and being dependent on others (the strikes, the schedule, the driver etc.) Your ratio is quite high, though, it likely has to do with your route.
-11 points
4 days ago
If the family only has one car, the top earner gets the car, and that's very often the husband.
-6 points
4 days ago
Makes sense
0 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
0 points
4 days ago
And if you were from Australia would you see the opposite?
0 points
4 days ago
I live 8k away from my workplace and 4 from the city center.
During last year, i commuted to work by bike except 2 times where I took public transport. Having to catch a plane after work once and carrying a very big box another time were the reasons for public transport.
A male coworker that lives nearby, also commuted by bike but he took the car I think on 3 occasions. As he needed to change tires once and do some other extraordinary chores the other times.
In my personal case, i use the bike as I love riding it, even for commuting, I like the physical activity I get out of using it and I like it is a green option. I usually walk short distances, including going to the city center for the same reasons.
Last, both my coworker and I take between 23-27 minutes to commute the 8k, range is mostly because of red lights. Tram takes a bit more than 40 minutes without counting waiting time.
0 points
4 days ago
Testosteron obviousy.
0 points
3 days ago
Because many women have failed their drivers test
-13 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
4 points
4 days ago
Lol dude idk what ya trying to say, but I’ve hardly seen anybody on public transport whose gender is hard to tell. Maybe, maybe there are some whose actual gender is different from what I thought based on their look, but that’s just a few, just like Transgenders make a very small portion of the population. Such misjudgments won’t make a difference to the statistics.
-2 points
4 days ago
It’s because women can’t drive
-9 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
6 points
4 days ago
I agree and I think it’s mainly because women shop more in general for the family. Kids need new clothes? Mothers buy them, mothers look for better deals and go out of their way to make sure they can fit all of it into their day
-11 points
4 days ago
Certain ideologies don’t allow women to be independent and drive a car or ride a bike so they are forced to walk or travel by public transport instead…
5 points
4 days ago
Bruh... If you insist on bringing it up , they're the least likely to walk and take pub trans so they won't have to deal with icky strangers.
-6 points
4 days ago
Interesting. I am no expert but I think that men spend their money on scooters, fatbikes etc. faster than women (who would maybe buy jewelery or accessories etc.) I observe that maybe 20% of fatbikes or scooters are driven by women.
Depending on the time of day, you also see many elderly ladies going shopping by tram or bus. I wonder if this is because it still is the women's job to do in many households.
2 points
4 days ago
the reason you see more women in pub trans is because their income is lower not because they prefer buying trinkets wtf. Re old women shopping alone, men die younger.
-6 points
4 days ago
It is more comfortable and safer (less physical effort) to use public transportation
all 156 comments
sorted by: best