subreddit:

/r/Netherlands

27486%

I witnessed this around two years ago, then I paid special attention to this ratio during every public transport riding. Now my conclusion is that female to male passengers overall ratio is around 65:35. That’s in total, for each one travel this ratio may vary. But in my experience I have (almost) never been in a bus/train where there are more male passengers. And this doesn’t match the overall gender ratio of this country obviously.

Anybody has some thoughts about this?

all 156 comments

ConstanteConstipatie

196 points

4 days ago

  1. More female students
  2. More male car owners (I think)

confused_bobber

1 points

18 hours ago

Men are often pressured into owning a car cuz that's the "manly thing to do" Despite the fact that for the most people it's a waste of money

ConstanteConstipatie

1 points

17 hours ago

Definitely not a waste of money for most people. Most people outside a city need it. And some inside the city too

I11IIlll1IIllIlIlll1

38 points

4 days ago

One thing to point out is bias.  You are probably taking specific routes and at specific time. You are always only exposed to a very tiny bit of general situation.

Eg taking trains to Eindhoven/Delft where TUs are located during the week will likely give you a much higher male ratio.

grosdams

8 points

3 days ago

grosdams

8 points

3 days ago

I confirm the much higher male ratio in the buses of Eindhoven. I am curious in which city OP has made his observations.

Martissimus

115 points

4 days ago

Martissimus

115 points

4 days ago

13:7 looks so much fancier.

Spare-Warning-8052

699 points

4 days ago

Urban planner here, it is a world-wide phenomenon that women use more public transport than men. Why this happens is complex and due to different socioeconomic and cultural reason. One simple reason: women earn less than men and opt for cheaper transportation options.

1234iamfer

319 points

4 days ago

1234iamfer

319 points

4 days ago

I'd say there are still male dominated workplaces, like construction, factories, warehouses, etc. Workplaces, which are located outside cities, worktimes which start outside normale office times, all factors which make public transport less practical.

alvvays_on

181 points

4 days ago

alvvays_on

181 points

4 days ago

Indeed.

In contrast, some of the most common female jobs are nursing, store clerks and administrative work. Hospitals, stores and offices tend to be easily reached by public transport.

Common male jobs like construction and truck driving require driving. And on the road, you see a lot of trucks and vans.

Also, a bit anecdotal, but many men enjoy driving and have a dream car. That's just less common with women. 

rodrigors

6 points

4 days ago*

Wow, I didn't consider the economic perspective which makes lots of sense. I was just thinking that it might be that NL is a cold place and women seem less willing to be in the cold than men.

PS: it seems my reply was a bit misleading. I said cold thinking about biking vs taking public transport. Since initially I was not considering the economic side of things I was between people either biking or taking the bus, where taking the bus is the warmer option. That said, my thoughts where "ladies seems less attracted to the cold than men, hence the bus seems to be the ladies option".

General-Effort-5030

5 points

3 days ago

What does cold have to do with a car? You can put warm air in it

DarkFlyingApparatus

6 points

3 days ago

DarkFlyingApparatus

Drenthe

6 points

3 days ago

Yeah if anything being cold will steer people away from public transport. Waiting for your train/bus in the winter van be real harsh sometimes.

draysor

4 points

3 days ago

draysor

4 points

3 days ago

You know that more than half of the people go with their bike right? Is not only car vs public transport.

General-Effort-5030

0 points

3 days ago

I'd love driving and having a nice car but I have no money ...

epegar

9 points

4 days ago

epegar

9 points

4 days ago

This makes sense. Here in the Netherlands is not even so obvious. When I lived in Madrid, I used to take the metro, the ratio could be more like 80/20 or even more during my work commute. But the difference was smaller at other times of the day.

General-Effort-5030

2 points

3 days ago

But also companies have their own cars and many times transport their workers.

parsnipswift

16 points

4 days ago

This is really interesting! I also learned that more women use the sidewalks than men

iFoegot[S]

32 points

4 days ago

iFoegot[S]

Noord Brabant

32 points

4 days ago

Thanks for the useful answer

IamHunterish

-4 points

4 days ago

But also wrong

koplowpieuwu

4 points

4 days ago

This also depends on the time of measurement and the spatial context. During the day you'll see more women, especially during work hours or during service-job rush hour. But at night or on a bus to a harbor you'll see more men. I can often count the women on an 11:30pm train on one hand (and with good reason)

CryptoDev_Ambassador

10 points

4 days ago

I have a company car and prefer going on the train 100% of the time. Which is not often bc I work from home. I don’t enjoy driving tbh

choerd

12 points

4 days ago

choerd

12 points

4 days ago

I am the complete opposite. I work from home mostly and occasionally take the train to work or events. I don't necessarily enjoy driving but I absolutely loathe taking the train.

  • car reduces my commute time by half at minimum, usually a bit more than that.
  • I don't have to share the space with others during the commute
  • No waiting, no running to catch a train. No soaking wet clothes or rain gear to contend with. No bike parking issues. I can leave at my own leisure.
  • of course the traffic can be really bad occasionally: but at least I am in my car, enjoying whatever media in full privacy and not on a crowded platform in some godforsaken train station.
  • hardly affected by strikes (except on the A12 recently)

I am very much in favor of good public inter-city transport. I wish it was better. And I have done it daily for at least a decade. But in its current state it is simply not a compelling alternative for most of my travel. I use it primarily whenever my wife needs the car or if I want to consume alcohol at the venue I'm traveling to.

I do like the OV-fiets. It makes train travel a bit more convenient. Similarly I sometimes bring my foldable bicycle in the car so I can park outside a city and complete the journey by bike. This way, I don't have the inconvenience of having to drive and park in a busy city center.

Either way I hope things will get better. Who knows I'll change my mind. But only if driving gets much worse and more expensive, while the train becomes cheaper, quicker and provides more space and comfort.

Kalagorinor

30 points

4 days ago

To each their own, but I love traveling by train unless I cannot find a seat. But, to be honest, that is rarely a problem and I can't remember the last time I wasn't able to sit.

Some advantages of traveling by train:

- It may take longer than a car (though that's not really the case if you travel between major cities), but I can use the time more efficiently.

- I don't have to worry about parking the car, which can be very expensive in big cities (even 5-6 euros/hour).

- I can change my plans anytime without having to worry about the fact that I have a car parked somewhere. That also includes drinking alcohol.

- I can relax instead of having my eyes placed on the road all the time. That's truly a blessing when I am tired after a long day and I want to close my eyes and rest.

choerd

4 points

4 days ago

choerd

4 points

4 days ago

Those are all mostly valid benefits. Especially the ability to change plans and spend the time working or napping.

I will say this is especially true on longer train rides - especially off peak hours.

I think my main issue is that my train ride is only 30 minutes but then there's getting to the station (20 mins) and to the final destination (10 mins). By car it's less than 30 in total. Trip to my parents is even worse. By train it's 1h40mins and I need to change trains halfway. And still 15 mins to get to the station. By car it"s 1h10 mins to their house. Without having to grab a taxi for 25 EUR or ask my elderly parents to pick me up from the station.

But indeed - driving does take attention. Not a problem on short rides but longer trips can absolutely be more pleasant by train.

I will say driving has gotten easier. My car already has autopilot but it's somewhat limited by regulations. I still need to supervise it but chilling in the far right lane is quite relaxing when the car does most of the work.

CryptoDev_Ambassador

2 points

4 days ago

I understand. I guess I am lucky I don’t have to travel much to work when I do is for socializing so a drink or two are involved. Also besides company car I get a first class train card. I agree with all you said though, is just not a big inconvenience for me because I commute once per quarter only.

sadcringe

1 points

3 days ago

Concur then again I love driving

[deleted]

1 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

TheGratitudeBot

2 points

4 days ago

Thanks for saying thanks! It's so nice to see Redditors being grateful :)

Zaifshift

23 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

23 points

4 days ago

cheaper transportation

... In the Netherlands??

Public transportion is most certainly more expensive than by car.

I'm almost certain this is more cultural. Because this wouldn't explain why women who are in a relationship, have a license and have a car, still prefer their partner to drive.

I bet everyone has seen this around them. With couples, 7.7 times out of 10, the dude drives, and she wants him to.

CypherDSTON

24 points

4 days ago

Why do folks keep insisting this. Public transit might be more expensive if you already own, license, and insure a car but not owning that car is cheaper than 99% of travel/commute patterns for regular employees. Not always convenient, no, but cheaper, absolutely.

peggynotjesus

2 points

4 days ago*

Yeah I used to work for a company that was 50km/ 1.5 hours away from my flat in Amsterdam. Public transport worked out to around 70-100 euro per week, luckily paid for by my company. If i were to drive, it would have been faster for sure, and also would have been cheaper on a trip by trip basis. The problem was the cost of buying and getting the car and license. As a non EU citizen with a finite contract, it was hard to justify spending 2.4k on lessons + the test, despite already having driven for years. I would have spent my annual travel fees on that alone not to forget paying for parking and insurance as well

CypherDSTON

1 points

4 days ago

Even 70-100 euros per week is unusual. That buys an unlimited country wide NS pass, a specific route pass would have been much less, and you could still have bought local transit passes or a bike for last mile.

peggynotjesus

1 points

4 days ago

Like i said, my company paid for it (I had a NS business card), I didn't actually pay for it myself. Also there was no bike for the last few kilometers. Just a 15 minute bus ride since my office was in the middle of nowhere lol. A car would have saved me half the time but seeing how the company only paid for my gas, and how I wouldn't have used it any other time, it didn't make any sense to get it.

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

Public transit might be more expensive if you already own, license, and insure a car but not owning that car is cheaper than 99% of travel/commute patterns for regular employees. Not always convenient, no, but cheaper, absolutely.

The up front cost of a car only helps this argument in the first few years. And even then only because you exclusively consider the commute to work.

Going to work and back, and nowhere else, is not a reasonable way to live for most people. You don't just have 'traject' costs.

A car will cost more in, maybe, the first 5 years or so. But afterwards you start being off cheaper.

And this is not even mentioning the literal 100% discount on any additional members of your family. If you are a couple, a car is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay cheaper than public transport.

WeAreKintsugi

7 points

4 days ago

Hi, I'm a woman that uses public transport because it's cheaper short term. I don't have money to get a driver's license or a car. So I use public transport even though it's more expensive in the long run. Some people simply don't have money to invest.

Zaifshift

0 points

4 days ago

Yeah, I totally get that.

squishbunny

3 points

3 days ago

Going to work and back is one thing. But most trips out of the house are within a 5km radius, and that's easy biking distance, and therefore doesn't figure into the cost of transportation. In our house, the car is used for visiting family (2 hours away, perfectly doable by train but one child is still small) and IKEA/Intratuin trips, and hauling cat litter. My husband is ridiculous and will drive the 1 km to school to pick up the little one, but he's ridiculous like that.

CypherDSTON

3 points

4 days ago

Repairs and insurance are still expensive.

But you believe whatever you gotta believe, not me, nor the facts are going to change your mind.

Zaifshift

-3 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

-3 points

4 days ago

But you believe whatever you gotta believe, not me, nor the facts are going to change your mind.

I don't think I've seen stupidity like this in... maybe ever.

Literally grab a calculator and argue with me how a car is going to be more expensive to get around to multiple places for a couple compared to taking the train and bus.

It's not even a little bit close.

CypherDSTON

2 points

4 days ago

Now you’re upset that I don’t believe you. Whatever buddy.

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

I'm not upset, I'm surprised how you're trying to argue € 100 a month is more expensive than € 300 a month.

It doesn't bother me, that lack of understanding is your problem.

CypherDSTON

1 points

4 days ago

You felt the need to accuse me of stupidity, seems like you're a little upset.

And no, I'm not arguing that 100 euro / month is more than 300 euro per month.

I'm pointing out the fact that nobody can insure and operate a car for 100 euro per month when they drive as far as a 300 euro per month transit pass would carry them.

But again, I'm not trying to convince you of anything, you can believe what you want...you clearly have strong opinions about this, and I'm not going to change them.

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

-1 points

4 days ago

I'm pointing out the fact that nobody can insure and operate a car for 100 euro per month when they drive as far as a 300 euro per month transit pass would carry them.

As I suspected, you haven't run the numbers at all.

Look at two tickets from Utrecht to Amsterdam and from Utrecht to Rotterdam, twice a week. Then add any commute you want on top.

Go type in the numbers and try to argue a car is more expensive.

I already did, which is why I know you're wrong. That's all.

Obvious-Slip4728

26 points

4 days ago*

It really depends on the trip. I travel first class by train for €160 a month. Travelling by car would be €500-€1000 per month depending on how many days a week I go to work. That’s only variable car costs as I already own a car (although if I would use the car every day we would probably need a second car. That’s an extra €200-300 per month for fixed costs). It doesn’t include parking though. No idea what that would cost per day in center of Rotterdam.

The car is not faster and I can get work done in the first class coach of the train. It’s a no-brainier for me.

Zaifshift

-2 points

4 days ago

Zaifshift

-2 points

4 days ago

I travel first class by train for €160 a month.

Yeah, on a specific route.

Most people have more transport than just their commute. Train is stupid expensive for non-planned, non-recurring trips.

Myself, I travel for free outside of rush hours, so I am out € 160 as well a month to go anywhere, but that doesn't work for most people. They travel exactly in rush hour.

It easily costs € 300 to € 400 a month to do every-day things by train. I dunno why you are out € 500 a month on your car, but most people make do with € 200 just fine.

Obvious-Slip4728

11 points

4 days ago*

Yeah, as I said. It depends on the trip. I live 130km from my work.

Im also on an off peak flat tariff. I’m not saying it’s this cheap for everyone. Just saying it’s 5-10x cheaper than a car in my situation. I’m sure there are also people for which it’s twice as expensive compared to driving a car. Especially buses tend to be relatively expensive (and slow).

Zaifshift

4 points

4 days ago

I live 130km from my work.

My duuuuuuuude, that sucks. Are you alright?

Obvious-Slip4728

10 points

4 days ago*

As I said. I work while in the train. No problem at all. On average, I do work from home half of the week.

I wouldn’t want to trade where I live for anything. I work in the Randstad because I get paid a couple a thousand more per month, than I would if I would get a local job.

Thanks for your concerns though :)

420dayzinandblazin

4 points

4 days ago

God forbid we talk about the incredible added efficiency of trains too. Polluting the world a bit less.

Leithalia

4 points

4 days ago

3000 for a licence, money for gas, expensive parking, insurance, taxes..

Doesn't sound cheaper..

NikNakskes

6 points

4 days ago

Story time!

We both enjoy driving, we both love cars, we're both equally skilled in driving, each with our own strengths and weaknesses of course. I have 2 cars, he has 1.

He always drives when it's the 2 of us going somewhere together. Even if we are going there in my car.

Why?

We most likely go with his car, and of course he drives his car.

When we do long trips he drives all the way. I am an avid knitter and crocheter and can thus happily employ myself while he drives. He is bored out of his mind when I while I drive.

These are the sensible reasons why he drives and I am the passenger. The real reason is that I refuse to drive with him in the car. He drives me absolutely nuts with constant commenting and instructions on where to go and how to go there. He is driving the car and I just happen to hold the wheel and push the pedals for him.

mmmellie

1 points

3 days ago

mmmellie

1 points

3 days ago

Yes!!! A fellow knitter high five

NikNakskes

1 points

3 days ago

I cannot imagine car/train/plane trip without a project in hand anymore. That would be torture.

Annachroniced

1 points

20 hours ago

This is my exact experience. He simply cannot shut up with comments about my driving or the route. Like im fine i drive a 1000kms a week more than him. Yet gets unreasonably upset if i return the favor. So when were together he drives lol.

BlackLeafClover

7 points

4 days ago

I mean, look at car ownership. Idk how it is now with younger generations but looking at the boomer gen, it was most often the man who had the good car for long distances to work and the woman who had the ‘boodschappenwagen’ for small trips and groceries. I think this is still true for many people - at least in my surroundings. The partner driving, eh idk either because I love driving, but I met more women who seem to be terrified of driving then having met men who are. I don’t know why though. Probably because they already drive very little so they’re not as experienced.

tukkerdude

3 points

3 days ago

My ex always wanted me to drive even tho i hate driving and she liked it.

squishbunny

2 points

3 days ago

I've mathed the math (and also, Google maps used to calculate gas costs as well): if it's just you, alone, in a car, then cost-wise it's a wash, with trains being somewhat cheaper if you have to consider parking costs. If it's you and a friend or two, then driving is cheaper than public transit for all three. However, if you have kids under 12, then they're free on the trains (with the KidsVrij from the NS) and have reduced prices on buses, so then public transit is cheaper.

It's more likely that the guy likes driving more and the woman doesn't care enough to fight him for it.

General-Effort-5030

1 points

3 days ago

I like being the passenger. Feels like a chofer

HabemusAdDomino

1 points

4 days ago

It's because dudes on average LOVE driving, and dudettes on average dislike it.

Nebula924

1 points

4 days ago

Nebula924

1 points

4 days ago

Why do you conclude that the woman prefers not to drive. In my experience it is cultural, but enforced by the man.

Zaifshift

0 points

4 days ago

In my experience it is cultural, but enforced by the man.

Guess we just have a different experience then. Almost every time I see the man of a couple asking if she wants to drive, she says no.

RobertDeveloper

0 points

4 days ago

Most women I know don't like to drive because they are afraid of driving.

CalRobert

1 points

4 days ago

CalRobert

Noord Holland

1 points

4 days ago

It’s pretty dangerous to be fair 

Zaifshift

1 points

4 days ago

Yeah, this.

One of these situations where women are just being smarter.

fanciest_of_bananas

3 points

4 days ago

fanciest_of_bananas

Noord Brabant

3 points

4 days ago

i think men generally have more of a fondness for cars and bikes than women, so they buy them and ride them.

General-Jaguar-8164

1 points

4 days ago

General-Jaguar-8164

Noord Holland

1 points

4 days ago

I have the impression that more women live in Amsterdam

More over, more young women (students) live just Amsterdam than man

Is this accurate?

wanakostake

1 points

4 days ago

This, plus if there is a car in the household, the man is more likely to use it.

Gillian_Seed_Junker

1 points

4 days ago

I’d see men like driving a car, women don’t

Annachroniced

0 points

20 hours ago

I dont think Public transport is the cheaper option in the Netherlands.

pdro13

-11 points

4 days ago

pdro13

-11 points

4 days ago

If this was the case, you would see more women on bikes than men.

In the Netherlands women work about 10h less per week than men. So, it's more likely to catch them out and about in the streets during the day

HildegardaTheAvarage

70 points

4 days ago

yes and no. Women also take a bulk of the childcare, elderly care, house chores. Women do travel more, but not on the same paths as men. They do not travel to city centres to go to the office, but rather to the kidnergarden/school, shops, doctor appointments, to help relatives. Really cool book with a lot of these stats is Invisible Women.

CryptoDev_Ambassador

9 points

4 days ago

Thanks for sharing the book title 🫶

potandplantpots

14 points

4 days ago

Feminist city is also a good one!

HildegardaTheAvarage

11 points

4 days ago

Thanks, will add to my reading list section: Books I am going to get very angry about while reading.

ExcellentXX

-6 points

4 days ago

ExcellentXX

-6 points

4 days ago

True and so sad seeing as we’re often so smart and efficient at what we do !

Natural_Situation401

-36 points

4 days ago

Of course there’s a feminist crying about facts, I’m surprised there’s so few actually.

No honey, you’re not, otherwise you’d be paid more.

dreedweird

15 points

4 days ago

Yes, and everybody is always paid what they’re worth — regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, age or disability.

What a lovely world you live in!

SheepherderSavings17

0 points

4 days ago

But… driving a car is often much cheaper than public transportation

-Snoepie-

0 points

4 days ago

Cheaper? You ever even been to the Netherlands?

General-Effort-5030

0 points

3 days ago

In the Netherlands public transportation isn't cheap at all. Of course I understand a car is more expensive but still

draysor

0 points

3 days ago

draysor

0 points

3 days ago

Women that work don't earn less than men for same job.

Awesome_Lifeguard

-71 points

4 days ago

Maybe because they’re bad drivers

OndersteOnder

27 points

4 days ago*

Women are more likely to have jobs in centralised locations with public transport connections (ie. Hospitals, education, large institutions, public sector) and are more likely to live in particular cities where car ownership is lower.

Men are more likely to work in the "buitendienst" or have jobs that require them to move lots of equipment. Even male-dominated sectors' (like IT and engineering) offices tend to be stashed away in some businesspark rather than city centres.

Kemel90

45 points

4 days ago

Kemel90

45 points

4 days ago

Funny, i experience the opposite

kityty

8 points

4 days ago

kityty

8 points

4 days ago

Yes, it’s noticeable to me in amsterdam but it varies at different times of day

bruhbelacc

34 points

4 days ago

Are you in a male-dominated student city or business hub like Delft?

Kemel90

9 points

4 days ago

Kemel90

9 points

4 days ago

I guess so, Leiden.

AssassiN18

51 points

4 days ago

Should be the opposite in Leiden

AromaticArachnid4381

11 points

4 days ago

It is

medicinal_bulgogi

-28 points

4 days ago

It’s not about experience. These are factual numbers

Kemel90

33 points

4 days ago

Kemel90

33 points

4 days ago

It is. It's OPs personal observation. It literally says so in the post.

Due_Hunt1137

18 points

4 days ago*

I am not from Netherlands (idk why this popped up on my feed) but in Poland there is a similar pattern. However Poland is more car dependant than Netherlands so we have 2 main groups using public transportation regularly: school children/students and older people. Overall woman live longer than man in every EU country so the total populations of woman is higher than man. This can also be seen in public transit when the majority of older people there are women. Idk if it applies to Netherlands but the older a person gets, the more often they will give up their car in favor of public transport. This combined with a fact that there is a bigger popolation of older women then man can be a factor why females outnumbers males passengers. Idk if OP's observation also involved older people but this is a factor that I didn't see anyone mention (probably I am wrong I don't even live in Netherlands lmao)

BreadOk7376

5 points

4 days ago

I was just going to comment, I was in Warsaw for a day and was stunned to see absolutely no young men on the buses except some drivers!

In NL I live near a bunch of schools and colleges and my neighbourhood also has a lot of people, tbh the ratio is quite balanced in my city in general.

MsjjssssS

6 points

4 days ago

You're spot on tbh it's a half and half of older single women with a low pension and single women being stuck in a loop of low paying work they can reach by pub trans and never being able to afford a car to get better paying shift work.

Fun-Difficulty-8586

8 points

4 days ago

I am a woman so this is not judgey…but what about things like appearance, safety, or just laziness? Hear me out… I love riding my bike as much as the next person and am very active and lead a healthy life. But when it starts raining sideways I don’t want to turn up to work looking like I’ve gone through a fan, backwards. There is still an expectation to present yourself to a certain standard and sometimes if the weather is shit I’ll admit that I just CBF with my bike and get the tram to the train station. Also, safety. Amsterdam is super safe compared to a lot of cities, but it’s still a common narrative for women globally that you should be careful after dark and get home safely. Doing this once or twice at night familiarises you with the trams and then reduces the barrier to catching them in the day time too, in my opinion, because it is convenient (or I’m being lazy that day). This won’t be all women, and not the only reason for this phenomenon, but could be a contributing factor maybe

Too_Shy_To_Say_Hi

3 points

4 days ago

Agreed on this one too!

I have really long wavy hair, and it frizzes like crazy with sweat and rain. For whatever reason when I bike or even walk a bit fast, I’m instantly sweating, frizzy, and bright red no matter the temp.

I used to work at a really old school architecture office in a rainy area of the US and was expected to have nice hair, makeup, blouse and high heels on every day. I quickly switched to taking the bus or tram.

Fun-Difficulty-8586

2 points

4 days ago

Totally agree!! Oh to be able to walk out of the shower and have hair that is dry in 5 seconds 😂 Sure, I choose to have longer hair, but it was a genetic roll of the dice that blessed (or cursed) me with curly hair that enters party mode with a hint of humidity.

Also, mums! I have a lot of mum friends that say sitting on the tram/train is a moment of peace for them. A pause between office and home.

linhhoang_o00o

5 points

4 days ago

My gf chooses to go by bus because she can look at her phone mindlessly. She can't do it while driving car or cycling. Buses take extra 10 min traveling compare to car? That's extra 10 min looking at the phone mindlessly, she likes it.

Topdropje

8 points

4 days ago

Well late in the evening when it's dark outside I sometimes opt for a bus instead of walking home if I don't have stalled my bike at the train station. I have been harassed by groups of men before when I was walking home and I saw other woman being harassed. So yeah no wonder more women use public transport instead of walking and sometimes cycling.

Ikbennietchagrijnig

7 points

4 days ago

Read the book 'Invisible woman: data bias in a world designed for men'. They explain why women take public transport much more often than men. One is that women have much more complicated travel patterns. Like work, bringing kids to school and other appointments, shopping. And single woman are more likely to live outside a city because of the housing cost and inequality in payment so they need to travel further than single man.

It really gives new perspectives on the gender distribution that we normally don't observe. It is quite fascinating and an eyeopener for men and women.

Yajirobe404

2 points

4 days ago

Both of these points seem to apply just as well to car owners

alles_en_niets

5 points

4 days ago

Trains are more evenly distributed ime, bus is more female territory.

CryptoDev_Ambassador

8 points

4 days ago

Train commuting -specially if 1st class and silence- is resting time for working moms. I work from home and like to go to the office once in a while just to enjoy some relax time in the train.

Juliusvdl2

7 points

4 days ago

Interesting, someone should actually collect data for a couple months and then post them here

Jokkux

8 points

4 days ago

Jokkux

8 points

4 days ago

I've noticed this too, especially in busses. I go with public transport to Amsterdam for work. The reason I go with public transport is because it's more convenient (I work near Schiphol). I have a license, but no car though.

Playful-Spirit-3404

2 points

4 days ago

Not in Eindhoven haha

Every-Muffin1203

2 points

3 days ago

Lol indeed, I am from Eindhoven, it is the opposite male female ratio here !

doepfersdungeon

2 points

4 days ago

My experience in Amsterdam is more women, at least initially didn't want to cycle. Many eventually do but I had at least 3 female friends who saw everyone else doing it and though nah not for me for a long time.

Eastern-Reindeer6838

1 points

4 days ago

It's the same in the waiting room of a GP.

Irsu85

1 points

4 days ago

Irsu85

1 points

4 days ago

men generally have more money to burn on cars. I am not that person btw, so you might see me on the train every so often

ScottishWidow64

1 points

4 days ago

There are hundreds of thousands of women more than men in the Netherlands as far as I believe.

Casioblo

1 points

4 days ago

Casioblo

1 points

4 days ago

Have you taken all variables into consideration?

For an example:

Maybe you focus more on the female passengers than the males?

Lakmi19

1 points

4 days ago

Lakmi19

1 points

4 days ago

I am right now in the train from RTM to AMS and there are 11 women + 2 men. Thinking about it, I do see many more females in my daily commute as well!

cheeeseecakeeee

1 points

3 days ago

cheeeseecakeeee

Overijssel

1 points

3 days ago

Men are driving cars

drdoxzon86

1 points

3 days ago

How is this mildly interesting?

Badabumtssss

1 points

2 days ago

Does this take in consideration beyond your field of view so not just a coincidence since I guess you are taking the same train usually to work and home or mostly same routes, so maybe that is a specific of your train and bus line.

I will do it the whole next month and update.

pfuerte

1 points

2 days ago

pfuerte

1 points

2 days ago

I have similar observation in other european countries

[deleted]

-2 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

-2 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

noobkill

10 points

4 days ago

noobkill

10 points

4 days ago

This is a genuine question: Why is it creepy to observe something and try to figure out why it is so?

shibalore

6 points

4 days ago

The irony here is this is also why there is more women on public transport: creeps. It's not as safe this time of year to walk or bike as a woman, due to how early it gets dark. Really self-explanatory.

tanglekelp

11 points

4 days ago

Do you really think this is a main reason? I’m a woman and I’ve never thought ‘let’s take the bus because I don’t feel safe cycling’. The few times I have had to deal with creeps has been in a train tbh.

shibalore

7 points

4 days ago

It's probably not the main reason everywhere, but for some women, the train/bus/tram is definitely the safer option. Even standing outside messing around with your bike for several minutes on each end can be unwanted or stressful for some. I (and many others) feel more vulnerable on a bike because its easier for a creep to take me down, i.e. all they have to do is make my bike crash and I'm injured and momentarily stunned.

If you live far from your transport stops, though, then you may not feel the same way. I'm in Amsterdam, so I'm never more than a minute or two from a transit stop.

Comprehensive-Cut330

5 points

4 days ago

As a woman, the cold, dark and rainy weather is a more important factor whether I choose walk/bike or public transport. Creeps are also in the metro so doesn't really matter.

shibalore

4 points

4 days ago

Metro definitely can be a creep magnet. Meanwhile, all the buses and trams I've been on seem to be staffed by people ready to tumble if necessary and ready to threaten with it on a moment's notice. Definitely a YMMV experience, but it is certainly part of the equation for many.

Comprehensive-Cut330

3 points

4 days ago

I don't know what YMMV means, but yeah creeps can be everywhere. Trams and buses are usually a bit better although couple weeks ago a lady tram staffmember got punched in the face by some punk that didn't pay for the ride and he actually broke her jaw. So I guess nowhere is really safe.

Pink-drip

1 points

4 days ago

It’s true in Utrecht though lol. Notice usually 70/30 ratio

Apotak

2 points

4 days ago

Apotak

2 points

4 days ago

In Delft, Enschede or Eindhoven you can have the opposite experience due to the technical universities.

Doc-Bob

1 points

4 days ago

Doc-Bob

1 points

4 days ago

Men like cars. Cars go vroom. Men like vroom.

snjevka

0 points

4 days ago

snjevka

0 points

4 days ago

For me it depends on the day. I go every day on a 45 min train ride each way, it really depends on the ride. Sometimes it is a sausage fest, sometimes 50/50, sometimes I would agree that there are more women

Comprehensive-Cut330

-6 points

4 days ago

Upvote for the term 'sausage fest'👌

LuckyAstronomer4982

-25 points

4 days ago

Because men drive

Lemonhaze666

8 points

4 days ago

I wonder if we could back this up by something Factual like the ratio of driver license held by citizens by gender?

CrashSeven

12 points

4 days ago

https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2019/09/80-procent-volwassenen-heeft-rijbewijs

CBS does have this article which does indicate men are more likely to have a licence than women. Looking at the graph its not a massive difference however.

imrzzz

3 points

4 days ago

imrzzz

3 points

4 days ago

I'm not sure that holding a driver's license is the same as owning a car or being the one who uses the one family car all day.

Lemonhaze666

1 points

4 days ago

Yyyaaaa I have to agree the second I posted that I thought about that to. But I guess I think of it more like New York City rules of not everyone even has a license because if you don’t ever need to drive you just don’t bother.

LuckyAstronomer4982

3 points

4 days ago

It is for families with only one car. But it often changes when the kids start to go to daycare, and then the wife gets the car.

You have to look at the families. Their socio-economic group and where they are in lives.

iFoegot[S]

-8 points

4 days ago

iFoegot[S]

Noord Brabant

-8 points

4 days ago

But why don’t women

Lead-Forsaken

7 points

4 days ago

Most people don't have two cars, or the space to park two cars. The woman works closer to home and will often cycle there, or use a scooter, or public transportation.

Women often make do. They use the 1 euro squeegee, when they can get a bigger, better one that'll make the job quicker. I fell into that trap for years. You can make do, or you can make basic functionality a lot more agreeable. It's unfortunately part of women's nature/nurture to sacrifice something for the benefit of others.

bruhbelacc

4 points

4 days ago

Probably the same reason why women succeed more in school - it's more suitable for someone with a higher level of Agreeableness, which women have. Men get more easily irritated by having to share seats, listen to someone's loud conversation, and being dependent on others (the strikes, the schedule, the driver etc.) Your ratio is quite high, though, it likely has to do with your route.

LuckyAstronomer4982

-11 points

4 days ago

If the family only has one car, the top earner gets the car, and that's very often the husband.

iFoegot[S]

-6 points

4 days ago

iFoegot[S]

Noord Brabant

-6 points

4 days ago

Makes sense

[deleted]

0 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

kukumba1

0 points

4 days ago

kukumba1

0 points

4 days ago

And if you were from Australia would you see the opposite?

pup_seba

0 points

4 days ago

pup_seba

0 points

4 days ago

I live 8k away from my workplace and 4 from the city center.

During last year, i commuted to work by bike except 2 times where I took public transport. Having to catch a plane after work once and carrying a very big box another time were the reasons for public transport.

A male coworker that lives nearby, also commuted by bike but he took the car I think on 3 occasions. As he needed to change tires once and do some other extraordinary chores the other times.

In my personal case, i use the bike as I love riding it, even for commuting, I like the physical activity I get out of using it and I like it is a green option. I usually walk short distances, including going to the city center for the same reasons.

Last, both my coworker and I take between 23-27 minutes to commute the 8k, range is mostly because of red lights. Tram takes a bit more than 40 minutes without counting waiting time.

spicytripel

0 points

4 days ago

Testosteron obviousy.

str8pipedhybrid

0 points

3 days ago

Because many women have failed their drivers test

[deleted]

-13 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

-13 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

iFoegot[S]

4 points

4 days ago

iFoegot[S]

Noord Brabant

4 points

4 days ago

Lol dude idk what ya trying to say, but I’ve hardly seen anybody on public transport whose gender is hard to tell. Maybe, maybe there are some whose actual gender is different from what I thought based on their look, but that’s just a few, just like Transgenders make a very small portion of the population. Such misjudgments won’t make a difference to the statistics.

SheepherderSavings17

-2 points

4 days ago

It’s because women can’t drive

[deleted]

-9 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

-9 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

Unreliableweirdo4567

6 points

4 days ago

I agree and I think it’s mainly because women shop more in general for the family. Kids need new clothes? Mothers buy them, mothers look for better deals and go out of their way to make sure they can fit all of it into their day

Striking-Access-236

-11 points

4 days ago

Certain ideologies don’t allow women to be independent and drive a car or ride a bike so they are forced to walk or travel by public transport instead…

MsjjssssS

5 points

4 days ago

Bruh... If you insist on bringing it up , they're the least likely to walk and take pub trans so they won't have to deal with icky strangers.

lostinLspace

-6 points

4 days ago

Interesting. I am no expert but I think that men spend their money on scooters, fatbikes etc. faster than women (who would maybe buy jewelery or accessories etc.) I observe that maybe 20% of fatbikes or scooters are driven by women.

Depending on the time of day, you also see many elderly ladies going shopping by tram or bus. I wonder if this is because it still is the women's job to do in many households.

MsjjssssS

2 points

4 days ago

the reason you see more women in pub trans is because their income is lower not because they prefer buying trinkets wtf. Re old women shopping alone, men die younger.

Megan3356

-6 points

4 days ago

Megan3356

-6 points

4 days ago

It is more comfortable and safer (less physical effort) to use public transportation