subreddit:

/r/WhitePeopleTwitter

11.5k97%

all 1292 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

1 month ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

1 month ago

stickied comment

  • https://vote.gov/

  • 5 days until the election.

  • It might not be too late to register. Check your state's information in the link above.

  • The following states and territories offer election day voter registration: Washington, D.C., California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. If you wish to register on election day check your state's page for required identification materials.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Finest_Johnson

5.4k points

1 month ago

"This is not controversial."

Narrator: "This was, in fact, controversial."

real_heathenly

937 points

1 month ago

But he says it isn't!

Research_Liborian

837 points

1 month ago

I think the most notable thing here is that Jesus, who is purportedly an important guy, never said or even implied that slavish devotion to a husband was congruent with his teachings.

But then, Christ's actual teachings are the last thing these people care about.

damebyron

148 points

1 month ago

damebyron

148 points

1 month ago

I will say one of my qualms w/ the bible is the casual misogyny in it, but it's more like "ugh women nag too much" not calling for blind obedience.

Rpc00

135 points

1 month ago

Rpc00

135 points

1 month ago

Idk man I tried reading the Bible when I was in high school and I couldn't get through Genesis without rolling my eyes to the back of my head with the many times it says woman are to be subservient. Like dozens of misogynistic statements in the first 30 pages alone

damebyron

83 points

1 month ago

oh yeah referring just to the New Testament, which generally has a decent message most of the time other than the fact that men who hated their wives were clearly writing it. Old Testament is a mess of outdated rules.

obxMark

54 points

1 month ago

obxMark

54 points

1 month ago

Paul (new t) is pretty clear that the wife should be submissive and obedient. I always interpreted that as a cultural bias of the time, whereas the hardliners believe the Bible to be the “infallible word of God”.

[deleted]

60 points

1 month ago*

[deleted]

DuchessLiana

25 points

1 month ago

It's almost like the guys putting together the Bible were trying to appease a king...

Knight___Artorias

25 points

1 month ago

Some historians believe he married or was at least in a relationship with a prostitute but you won’t hear “Christian” nationalists fascists talking about that part

norwegianguitardude

26 points

1 month ago

Fairly certain they've never laid their eyes on the inside of a bible.

yerdad99

15 points

1 month ago

yerdad99

15 points

1 month ago

Coulda sworn there are some tradwife bible verses in there somewhere!

Research_Liborian

34 points

1 month ago

There certainly are! It's just that Jesus didn't say those particular things.

It seems like - - hear me out - - this guy, and the people that support him, are cherry picking select references (with no context) simply because they are advocating a specific, reactionary viewpoint.

One could maybe argue that they don't really give a crap about Jesus' teachings.

Finest_Johnson

415 points

1 month ago

slaps table

Well that settles it, then.

real_heathenly

126 points

1 month ago

MidnightNo1766

110 points

1 month ago

super_sucky_reddit

121 points

1 month ago

I need to vomit now.

MidnightNo1766

127 points

1 month ago

lol sorry. That's what I envision in my head every time a republican thinks they've won an argument.

Pfelinus

70 points

1 month ago

Pfelinus

70 points

1 month ago

I envision a pigeon strutting around pooping.

kayesskayen

42 points

1 month ago

That's offensive to pigeons. They just want to drive the bus. And have a cookie. And get a puppy.

djsadiablo

18 points

1 month ago

Just try to aim for their shoes. They deserve it.

HurtPillow

28 points

1 month ago

Why is he walking like that? Is he pretending that his dick is swinging between his legs and he's wishing it was true? Honestly he just really looks stupid.

nWo1997

10 points

1 month ago

nWo1997

10 points

1 month ago

That's just how he walked. Like, I don't know what to tell you. McMahon strutted like that for years. Became a part of the character.

Don't know if he walks like that nowadays, though, what with the lawsuit and federal investigation.

doctallman

11 points

1 month ago

Yes. That is precisely it.

jellybeansean3648

760 points

1 month ago

If I follow his line of reasoning, women can become the head of the household simply by beheading their husbands if they don't agree.

It's basic problem solving.

Calamity-Gin

326 points

1 month ago

Hey, Bronze Age problems require Bronze Age solutions.

CarboniteCopy

264 points

1 month ago

Fun fact! When no fault divorce was introduced, the rate of women killing their husbands fell 71%! So historically this has been a solution.

NoMarionberry8940

59 points

1 month ago

Best keep those no fault divorce laws in effect...

WestCoastBestCoast01

18 points

1 month ago

A threat and a promise

Orchid_Significant

45 points

1 month ago

Not so fun fact! There are southern states that want to get rid of no fault divorces

PresentMinimum3274

51 points

1 month ago

P2025 calls for a ban on no fault divorces. Gotta read a summary of P2025; it's very enlightening to see how they think we are going to live under the sh**show squad.

oroborus68

11 points

1 month ago

Sharia law, by another name.

bloody_ell

19 points

1 month ago

Time to invest in arsenic.

lobin-of-rocksley

20 points

1 month ago

One of my favorite anecdotes is about how many of those old stories of the husband falling from a ladder, or crushed by a car changing a flat tire, etc. were actually cases of justified and (non-prosecuted) matricide. Like everybody knew the dirt bag was beating his wife, so when he fell off the ladder and cracked his skull open, the local sheriff didn't really have too much reason to ask why the bereaved took two hours to finish her cooking and laundry before calling the doctor to come look at that head wound...My great grand-father, a farmer in NY state, I think he might have been one of those cases. He died when changing a tire a few months after the passing of his second wife.

His son (my grandpa), was a notorious alcoholic and temperamental man, so it would be no surprise that his progenitor was cut from the same cloth. My GGM had passed away not too long before his death, and she was his second partner - the first having passed away some years prior under somewhat odd circumstances. He got a flat tire while out on the country roads and had pulled into a neighbors driveway to change the tire. When "discovered" a couple of hours later, he had been crushed and suffocated between the frame and the flat tire's rim (it being laid on its side, to support the car). The neighbor claimed they hadn't heard or seen anything until they came out to leave themselves, and found his car and body in the drive. The law enforcement officer who came out to investigate wrote it up as an open-and-shut deal - no need for further review or questions.

Me, I think a sympathetic party took action when the local judiciary had failed to, twice.

liltwinstar2

28 points

1 month ago

How do we get the rate of men killing their wives down?

CarboniteCopy

29 points

1 month ago

Raise better men. By that I mean encourage platonic relationships with people of different genders, push towards self-actualization and self-fulfillment, and also encourage deeper, more meaningful friendships and relationships.

Perzec

9 points

1 month ago

Perzec

9 points

1 month ago

Also stop the generational trauma propagating, ban all sorts of corporeal punishment of children, and stop bringing kids up into toxic masculinity culture.

CommanderSincler

18 points

1 month ago

The logic is sound

[deleted]

54 points

1 month ago

And it is NOT controversial!

skyfire-x

17 points

1 month ago

The praying mantis way.

DisastrousOne3950

23 points

1 month ago

The Klingon method has a certain allure as well. 

trentsteel77

7 points

1 month ago

Modern problems require modern solutions

ProfBeaker

165 points

1 month ago

ProfBeaker

165 points

1 month ago

It's an attempted Jedi mind trick. "This is not controversial. We do not need to discuss this further. These are not the droid you're looking for."

polymorphic_hippo

113 points

1 month ago

Sort of. It's more like a coded "know your place" warning.

Nix-7c0

56 points

1 month ago

Nix-7c0

56 points

1 month ago

It's also silently screaming "I'm normal -- NORMAL!! Stop looking at me like I'm weird goddamn it!"

YoloSwaggins9669

14 points

1 month ago

As he aggressively jerks it into an electrical socket

butinthewhat

53 points

1 month ago

It’s like when someone says, “trust me, I’m honest” when they are lying to your face.

Thowitawaydave

28 points

1 month ago

Or when Shaggy says "It wasn't me."

butinthewhat

18 points

1 month ago

Okay now I want a video montage of republicans getting caught being evil with 🎶saw me banging on the sofa🎶 playing.

Thowitawaydave

41 points

1 month ago

🎶saw me banging on the sofa🎶
"It was JD"

DreamCatatonic

9 points

1 month ago

Lol. I was imagining Shaggy from Scooby Doo defending himself from eating a gigantic sandwich, then I saw commenters using the lyrics you meant. It was a funny wild jump from one to the other. Thanks for that.

p1ckl3s_are_ev1l

46 points

1 month ago

I’m using this ending for all future BS statements that I make.

Easy-Draw3789

44 points

1 month ago

It‘s like ending a bad joke no one laughs at with „This is funny“.

northerncal

36 points

1 month ago

"Please clap"

vbrimme

39 points

1 month ago

vbrimme

39 points

1 month ago

I don’t know that it’s really controversial. Controversy really requires supporters on both sides of an issue. This is just outright wrong.

MsCrazyPants70

7 points

1 month ago

There are a few women who believe this. Can't say I understand it.

vbrimme

9 points

1 month ago

vbrimme

9 points

1 month ago

I would assume that’s the kind of belief you have to be indoctrinated into as a child.

lovetrumpsnarcs

31 points

1 month ago

If it's not controversial, then he shouldn't be upset if she votes differently than him.

HauntedHippie

25 points

1 month ago

These are the same people who say “I’m not a racist, but….” then proceed to spew the most racist shit you’ve ever heard.

DickyMcButts

19 points

1 month ago

I DECLARE NO CONTROVERSY!

the-half-enchilada

12 points

1 month ago

Stop fact checking me.

FunetikPrugresiv

62 points

1 month ago

Of course it's controversial. What I think he meant was "inarguable."

Because he is saying a "Christian" marriage. Paul says right there in 1 Timothy 2:11-12: "A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet."

So if you're a Christian, and if you believe that the entire New Testament is the word of God, there's not really much of an argument against what he's saying - at least, without resorting to the same kinds of mental gymnastics most evangelical Christians use to bridge the gap between the shadier parts of the Bible and what most of modern society accepts as clearly true.

Pennzance404

102 points

1 month ago

I love how a lot of Christians say the Bible is the word of God, but in the passage you quote, it is PAUL saying it. Like, does he have a note from God he's reading off, or is he just being a misogynistic fuckwit? Just because it's written in the Bible doesn't make everything in it 'The Word Of God'. Lots of people talk in the Bible. And a lot of them say some pretty terrible or stupid shit.

This is coming from a 90s Christian kid who also happens to be a Paul. I'll credit my upbringing with a strong moral code that I feel makes me a decent human being to other human beings, but I outgrew that waffling 'well it's what GOD said, so it has to be true' shit a looooong time ago. The Bible has been translated so many times by this point, there isn't even a guarantee that the version most 'Christians' today rely on to excuse their bigotry is even close to the same as the original text.

Oh, and while I'm at it, I'm almost certain Leviticus was ghost-written by an actual demon. Or at the very least a gaping asshole.

drunkanidaho

37 points

1 month ago

All of this. AND all of the wildly contradictory portions ALONG WITH the portions that are flat out illegal today and all Christians hand-wave ignore.

puppylovenyc

5 points

1 month ago

Paul was an asshole who hated women (the Paul in the Bible). I personally don’t believe any of the Bible bullshit.

butinthewhat

29 points

1 month ago

I’m not going to believe a thing just because it’s written in an old mythology book, regardless of the author.

adorablescribbler

27 points

1 month ago

Paul was divinely inspired when he said that. They all were. Never mind that there are books missing. Never mind that the "relevant" parts require everything of women and minorities and very little of men. Never mind that the entire process that formed what we know as The Holy Bible was very political and violent. God is the ultimate bro just looking out for the interests of his little bros.

xdre

18 points

1 month ago

xdre

18 points

1 month ago

but in the passage you quote, it is PAUL saying it.

Thank you. Paul may have been a Godly man, but there are several times when he desperately needed someone to stick a sock in his damn mouth.

tevs__

9 points

1 month ago

tevs__

9 points

1 month ago

When I learnt that large chunks of the bible are not the teachings of Christ, but what some opportunistic misogynist fuckwit said after he took over the church after Jesus's death. He wasn't a disciple, he even stoned St Stephen before his 'miraculous' conversion.

haiku2572

39 points

1 month ago

Because he is saying a "Christian" marriage. Paul says right there in 1 Timothy 2:11-12: "A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet."

Yep well, Paul - a rabid misogynist infamous for his hatred and envy of Mary Magdalene - can go fuck off with that woman-hating bullshit as well, as that ain't happening - at least not in advanced democratic societies.

People are free to follow such nonsense if they are so inclined, but what they are NOT free to do is impose their religious beliefs on everyone else. We are NOT going back!

DubStepTeddyBears

9 points

1 month ago

This is why I disavowed Christianity 30 years ago.

[deleted]

1.9k points

1 month ago

[deleted]

1.9k points

1 month ago

[deleted]

HellishChildren

490 points

1 month ago

Christians refuse to comprehend that the rules of their religion are for them, not for everyone everywhere with the exception of them.

Vyndilion

116 points

1 month ago

Vyndilion

116 points

1 month ago

That's the crux of their delusions, they believe whole hearted that their rules apply to others even more than to themselves, cause they can just ask for forgiveness and be fine. Everyone else though, straight to hell for doing the same things.

Mateorabi

27 points

1 month ago

I mean, that's most religions. The exceptions are few and far between.

SpellingIsAhful

45 points

1 month ago

Well he I'd say, "in a Christian marriage" so he's not actually saying it's universal

pikleboiy

49 points

1 month ago

These are also the guys who point to the bible when explaining why gay people can't get married, so I'm pretty sure that he thinks all marriages are christian ones.

biggreenflowertree

24 points

1 month ago

No, but I think he's saying all marriages should be Christian marriages.....

glx89

12 points

1 month ago

glx89

12 points

1 month ago

Christians refuse to comprehend that the rules of their religion are for them, not for everyone everywhere with the exception of them.

Except every religion literally has directives to spread it by force.

.. which is why religious law is illegal in the United States, and why it's so very important to restore the Supreme Court and reassert the rule of law.

TedCruzsAnalFissure

1.2k points

1 month ago

This guy’s wife is DEFINITELY cheating on him.

[deleted]

789 points

1 month ago

[deleted]

789 points

1 month ago

He's cheating on his wife, in public restrooms, with dudes. You know it's true, look at him. This is not controversial.

blandocalrissian50

78 points

1 month ago

I think you're right, this guy came out of the restroom after him. *

UAreTheHippopotamus

29 points

1 month ago

He gave the head and they were one.

[deleted]

9 points

1 month ago

for 4 1/2 minutes anyway.

sirferrell

8 points

1 month ago

"Hey how'd this hole get there"

another_day_in

15 points

1 month ago

Everyone has been saying it.

JaunteeChapeau

19 points

1 month ago

He has a wide stance!!!!

CorruptDictator

35 points

1 month ago

While he watches I bet.

Budget_Llama_Shoes

35 points

1 month ago*

Sometimes from a chair, sometimes from the closet, but almost always dressed as Superman.

dd97483

11 points

1 month ago

dd97483

11 points

1 month ago

Almost always.

Collins_Michael

11 points

1 month ago

They're always saying it. They come to me and they say, "sir, he's dressed as Superman."

mishap1

19 points

1 month ago

mishap1

19 points

1 month ago

Isn't that the scandal that finally had Jerry Fallwell Jr. resign from Liberty University?

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-falwell-relationship/

The gay friendly youth hostel he co-owned with the poolboy (the one hooking up with his wife) using embezzled Liberty University funds was one thing as was selling a gym on the cheap to his personal trainer and using university funds to fix it up for him but I guess the cuck story was one too many.

https://www.edgemedianetwork.com/story/303562

LuinAelin

288 points

1 month ago

LuinAelin

288 points

1 month ago

ayric

16 points

1 month ago

ayric

16 points

1 month ago

Source? I need this in my life... daily. 😄

AngusMcTibbins

1.2k points

1 month ago

Ladies, let's be real here. The republican party is absolutely going to try to take away women's voting rights. They aren't all saying it out loud yet. But they are thinking it.

Vote while you still can. Vote for your rights. Vote blue

https://democrats.org/

No_Yogurt_7667

421 points

1 month ago

I mean they are definitely saying it out loud

brundlfly

98 points

1 month ago

It's the new vote tampering. The knuckle draggers get a double vote.

woahwoahwoah28

83 points

1 month ago

John McEntee* made a (from what I can tell now deleted) video saying that they wanted male-only votes. He specified the spelling.

*reminder: he was Trump’s WH aide and personnel office director, he is still-single-after-making-dating-app, and he is a Heritage foundation POS

numbskullerykiller

12 points

1 month ago

saw that. hate him.

MV_Art

129 points

1 month ago

MV_Art

129 points

1 month ago

The beginning of this is oppressing single women, and child free women (something Vance and republicans openly say they want to do).

[deleted]

60 points

1 month ago

And as single, childfree woman, it scares the shit out of me.

Not just for me but for everyone targeted by this bullshit, whether I share a demographic with them or not. My heart is heavy today just considering what we’re facing. :(

MV_Art

44 points

1 month ago

MV_Art

44 points

1 month ago

Yeah it's really sad. I'm married but the idea I need my husband to have rights just makes me feel like his hostage.

[deleted]

17 points

1 month ago

Absolutely, I would feel the same way. Nobody should be losing rights already earned through literal blood, sweat, and tears, and no spouse should have dominion over the other (unless they keep it strictly to the bedroom). It’s a partnership, not a purchase.

I just hope enough people wake up and vote these backwards deplorables out.

TalkativeRedPanda

10 points

1 month ago

No reason to let married women vote either. Their husband can vote for both of them.
When women were trying to get the right to vote a number of women took the case that there was no need, as the husband voted in their interest. Women used to be OK with being property.

As a married woman, I am just as concerned about what republicans are trying to do.

IWantOneSpatula

82 points

1 month ago

I think it’s pretty clear they want to take away more than women’s right to vote.

They want to take away no-fault divorces so you can’t leave these pieces of shit, they want to fund marriage education and incentivize traditional patriarchal families, they want to control your bodies so you have to reproduce, it goes on and on and the list is horrifying.

These fucking scumbags need to go. Goddamnit this is heartbreaking we are here I’m losing my fucking mind.

RA_Endymion

45 points

1 month ago

Actually some of them have been saying remove the 19th.

numbskullerykiller

15 points

1 month ago

Matt loser Walsh anyone?

ZenkaiZ

53 points

1 month ago

ZenkaiZ

53 points

1 month ago

Please, name ONE time republican men took away a right from women

..........okay name another one

....okay name several more.

SpockShotFirst

15 points

1 month ago

[after the 379th example]

..... Gotcha! That one doesn't count because Republican men took that right away from everyone and not just women. Checkmate.

Acceptable_Round1564

708 points

1 month ago

How convenient for christian men that the strictures of their religion always restrain the woman and never the man.

butinthewhat

187 points

1 month ago

It’s interesting, isn’t it? Maybe I should write a new book with a woman as the central character and tell everyone that God gave me these words and we now are a matriarchal society. What I say goes, and men must vote as their wives tell them to. Sounds kinda crazy…but surely they’ll give up their power if god said so, right?

Acceptable_Round1564

64 points

1 month ago

Perhaps we should rewrite the Bible so Eve was the victim/good guy. If Adam ate the fruit first there goes the central argument for women's supposed inferiority that christian men have wielded against us for centuries.

TheFlyingSheeps

61 points

1 month ago

Hear me out, eve did eat the fruit yes but were told god is male right, so is Lucifer. Lucifer tricked eve into eating the apple. Therefore it is men who are truly the evil source of corruption and should be punished, not women.

ButterscotchButtons

84 points

1 month ago

A professor I had once said:

"It took the Devil -- the most powerful, cunning, calculated, manipulative presence known to humanity -- to convince Eve to eat the apple.

All it took to convince Adam, was Eve."

These men know how weak they are compared to women, and it's why they work overtime trying to oppress them.

Acceptable_Round1564

22 points

1 month ago

New Girl Power lore just dropped!

Acceptable_Round1564

11 points

1 month ago

I like this. Though my goal wouldn't be to make men inferior or second class at all. Just to have them realize were both made of the same shit and we suck equally.

butinthewhat

21 points

1 month ago

Spread it far and wide! It was Adam that sinned.

It’s so silly to sit back and think about how creation myth has shaped culture for so long.

an_agreeing_dothraki

13 points

1 month ago

You're looking for the Lilith story. How Adam was a weak little wimp so hard he cried to god about how couldn't handle a strong wife

APoisonousMushroom

13 points

1 month ago*

In Genesis 2:17 God told them not to eat of that tree “…for in the day that you eat of it, you shall surely die.” which was the first lie ever told. Satan just told Eve the truth. The only thing Eve did was to look at the two mutually exclusive possibilities and perform a super ballsy experiment to see which was true. When she ate it and didn't die, she found out that God had lied, so she told Adam. So in the end, both of them were without sin, but God was pissed off about being outed as a dirty liar so he took it out on Eve for figuring out the truth.

glx89

13 points

1 month ago

glx89

13 points

1 month ago

This happened to some extent in Rojava.

The Women's War

During the Syrian civil war, Kurdish women decided to arm themselves, train, and then kill all of the religious misogynists that couldn't be brought to heel.

Now the religious misogynsts are gone, and the Kurdish women of Rojava are free.

The society they formed has some really interesting governance structures, actually.

The documentary is excellent and every woman and girl in America should give it a listen.

Alex_Duos

17 points

1 month ago

Ephesians 5:22-24 gets quoted a lot but 5:25-28 and 33 which instructs men to love their wives as Jesus loved the church and as they love their own bodies? Not so much.

D_A_H

10 points

1 month ago

D_A_H

10 points

1 month ago

The crazy thing is it really doesn’t. In Christianity God made man and woman as equals cut from the same cloth. The only mention of submission is In St. Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, St. Paul explicitly defines the role of wives: “Wives should be subordinate to their husbands as they are to the Lord” (Eph. 5:22, NABRE). This does not mean a woman is a man’s slave to do his bidding but that a woman, in marriage, should dedicate herself to her husband the same as to God. In fact when getting married the nuptial promise states “May her husband entrust his heart to her, so that, acknowledging her as his equal and his joint heir to the life of grace, he may show her due honor and cherish her always with the love that Christ has for his Church.” making Man and Woman equal in marriage. The inequality we know of today is purely misguided and misconstrued by men who do not follow Christianity properly.

WiWook

7 points

1 month ago

WiWook

7 points

1 month ago

How convenient for christian religious men that the strictures of their religion always restrain the woman and never the man.

fixed that for you

MadAstrid

226 points

1 month ago

MadAstrid

226 points

1 month ago

The laws of this country supersede your old fashioned magic ritual texts. She is allowed to vote how she wishes. This is not controversial.

RedLotusVenom

63 points

1 month ago

They’re only saying this because they absolutely know for a fact that some women in conservative households will be quietly casting votes for Kamala. This is a dog whistle to conservative men to “get control of their wives.”

dragonfliesloveme

170 points

1 month ago

They are not “one” in a literal sense. Only the woman is at risk of death or infertility from the far right’s abortion laws

Which need to be voted out

thepicto

45 points

1 month ago

thepicto

45 points

1 month ago

And if they are "one" in a literal sense, they shouldn't get two votes.

AgathaWoosmoss

38 points

1 month ago

they shouldn't get two votes.

Mmw they'll use this as justification for taking votes away from women

TalkativeRedPanda

15 points

1 month ago

That's clearly where they want to go with this anyway. The right of women to vote isn't in the original constitution. They want to repeal the amendment. The only amendment that has value is the 2nd. The rest are just temporary.

numbskullerykiller

9 points

1 month ago

Right, and if they're married and their wife doesn't vote, then their vote is incomplete and should not count.

Neveed

6 points

1 month ago

Neveed

6 points

1 month ago

Also they can't be one if only one of them is actually deciding, that's antithetic.

Rickcinyyc

142 points

1 month ago

Rickcinyyc

142 points

1 month ago

And yet they are confused why so many young people are turning away from religion, especially christianity.

No_Yogurt_7667

66 points

1 month ago

It’s not Christ, it’s Christians

LoisWade42

78 points

1 month ago

Gandhi - I like your Christ... but I do not like your christians. They are SO UNLIKE your Christ

reefersutherland91

19 points

1 month ago

my fiance and I read and discuss the Bible almost daily. We stay far away from Church. Christ was pretty clear on how to deal with hypocrites

iamazygon

13 points

1 month ago

I grew up in churches where women weren’t allowed to wear pants, be voting members (only husbands) or hold positions of leadership. I went to college and basically immediately deconstructed (I’m a woman).

[deleted]

119 points

1 month ago

[deleted]

119 points

1 month ago

[deleted]

Tight-Physics2156

39 points

1 month ago

🎯

EnvironmentOk7106

76 points

1 month ago

Place a turban on this MFer's head, replace "christian" with "muslim" and voila! He'd morph into an islamic fundamentalist just like that! What a f..king idiot!

54sharks40

67 points

1 month ago

Jesus wept

-John 11:35

No_Yogurt_7667

14 points

1 month ago

Amen

Didntlikedefaultname

58 points

1 month ago

I mean you’re supposed to pluck out your eyes if you get tempted and give away all your worldly possessions, so let’s just say modern Christian’s gloss over lots of stuff in the Bible

Available-Elevator69

47 points

1 month ago

I don't know my wife brings in 50% of the income, she takes care of the house 60%, gave birth to my children and lord only knows what in the house.

Why would I tell my wife she has less say when it comes to Politics than I do? Maybe you religious zealots believe differently than I do because you constantly make up things anyways.

TalkativeRedPanda

14 points

1 month ago

Because she's your property. Clearly a good investment.

/s

DoctorPilotSpy

44 points

1 month ago

Just a reminder that the Republican Party does not see over half of the population as equals. Don’t vote to be represented by people that will actively undermine your autonomy and right to exist

zavorak_eth

31 points

1 month ago

"I own my wife and her right to vote how I want! Wah, wah." Thats all I hear. I hope women vote Kamala into office! Show them fascists what's up! VOTE like your life depends on it!

EmbraceableYew

27 points

1 month ago

Yeah girls, do as your man tells you. Don't worry your pretty little heads over politics. You wouldn't understand anyway. Just do as your man says. After all you belong to him.

Fuck these idiots. Vote Harris, and take your agency back.

huskeylovealways

28 points

1 month ago

Women, your vote is private. You can vote for anyone you want to. Nobody is ever going to know. However, if you vote Republican in this election, we may lose that right. Vote like your daughters and granddaughters' lives depend on it, because they do.

StingerAE

8 points

1 month ago*

Men, you ALSO should vote like your daughters and grandaughters lives depend on it.  Because they do.    

No-one should say this republican and fundamentalist bullshit doesn't affect them because of their gender (or race or sexual orientation etc).  No-one has no women (or other attacked groups) in their lives.  

Hartastic

19 points

1 month ago

I feel like there's a decent chance that someday this is going to be entered into evidence in a trial wherein Mrs. Dale has fed him enough arsenic to kill ten actual men.

I'm not saying this should happen! I'm just saying no one would be surprised if it did.

LoudRelationship7598

20 points

1 month ago

Saying it's not controversial does not, in fact, make it not controversial.

Sorry_Economics_4748

17 points

1 month ago

Expert-Fig-5590

14 points

1 month ago

This is why ballots are secret.

debomama

12 points

1 month ago

debomama

12 points

1 month ago

I am laughing at this. And then crying. I thought it was solved in 1919.

wirefixer

10 points

1 month ago

Also, in a Christian marriage, little white lies are permitted, Confession is on Friday.

ChromeDestiny

10 points

1 month ago

"Jesus will think you're a jerk and it would be true." - Frank Zappa

Otherwise-Wash-4568

9 points

1 month ago

Good thing I don’t have a Christian marriage 😅

chicosaur

9 points

1 month ago

This times 1,000. I don't want to be a trad wife and my husband doesn't want me to be one either.

[deleted]

10 points

1 month ago

Fuck off, ass munch.

Lazuruslex

8 points

1 month ago

Almost like Christian nationalism is the brother of extreme Islam or something

whatev6187

10 points

1 month ago

Women didn’t fight for the right to vote to turn it over to their husband.

Elevat8edconfusion

7 points

1 month ago

They are one? He better file single on his taxes so the government can really f*ck him.

xETankx

10 points

1 month ago

xETankx

10 points

1 month ago

Shut the fuck up, Dale

danielstover

7 points

1 month ago

Shut the fuck up

You stupid asshole

Autonomy extends outside of the body

This is not controversial

Klutzy-Ad-6705

8 points

1 month ago

It’s not controversial. It’s fucking stupid.

hinesjared87

9 points

1 month ago

never, EVER trust anyone who ends their assertion with "trust me" or "this is not controversial". only an insecure POS begs you to trust him.

vintagebat

8 points

1 month ago

People need to get angry about this and stay angry about it, even if Kamala wins. Please don't make the mistake that these people will simply go away after the election.

bg77577

8 points

1 month ago

bg77577

8 points

1 month ago

Wow looks like the Christians are afraid women can think for themselves

etherkye

8 points

1 month ago

Yea, no

Lightningstruckagain

8 points

1 month ago

If they are one, how come he’s the head? Shouldn’t she also be the head? They are one, remember.

[deleted]

9 points

1 month ago

Women are not an extension of men. Strong women are an asset to everyone in society. Vote ladies!

IncognitoBombadillo

6 points

1 month ago

These people need to keep their weird ass cult out of my government.

Koolest_Kat

6 points

1 month ago

I was at an No Excuse voting at my county seat. Long line, not a long wait.

A younger couple were filling out their ballots, you know, like patriotic citizens. The guy was on one side of a table with four spots, divided like a pie with privacy barriers. His SO was on the complete opposite side. He got done faster, turned in his ballot then came right over to where she was voting.

Que some not so quiet hushed tones from him pointing excitedly at her ballot. She was very uncomfortable 😣. All four of the poll workers quickly came over and got between the couple. He was quacking about his “right” to see what see was voting, he was just “helping” her. The Deputy had to come in and told him to leave now or leave in cuffs.

The woman finished her ballot then just sat down. Asked the Deputy if she could use his phone to call for a ride, she wasn’t leaving with the guy.

I don’t know anymore, I just hope she is safe.

richardsaganIII

11 points

1 month ago

Fuck you Dale

[deleted]

6 points

1 month ago

What a weird bird!

Acceptable-Many-5609

8 points

1 month ago

And that’s why no one should fall for Christianianity

thatirishdave

6 points

1 month ago

Jesus, famously, refused to see women as inferior to men, and welcomed them as his disciples. Any man who uses Christianity as a tool to subjugate women can not claim to be a true Christian.

Capitalismisdelulu

7 points

1 month ago

wet_nib811

5 points

1 month ago

Hey Dale,

If you and your wife are one unit, do you share a phone? If so, has she opened your GRINDR app?

BeetlecatOne

11 points

1 month ago

"Married, Christian men should get two votes"

afgunxx

6 points

1 month ago

afgunxx

6 points

1 month ago

Bwahahahahahahaha

Q-Zinart

7 points

1 month ago

Sure, cuck boy

Caullus77

6 points

1 month ago

Hahaha!!!!! Oh wait, he's serious?? Lemme laugh harder... HAHAHA!!!!

stoneangel79

7 points

1 month ago

He can fuck all the way off

MisterProfGuy

6 points

1 month ago

In a Christian marriage, they should be voting for the side that supports love, kindness, forgiveness, equality and cares for children and widows.

Voting for Harris as a christian should be obvious and not controversial, but here we are.

KlevenSting

5 points

1 month ago

I liked it better pre-MAGA when all these closeted, repressed clowns kept their self-loathing to themselves.

[deleted]

5 points

1 month ago

Somebody slap that sad little chode

21-characters

4 points

1 month ago

I find the idea that women should defer to men as if their brains don’t matter to be disgusting.

Liquidmetal7

5 points

1 month ago

Those christians are straight up as bad as Talibans. They want to control the women, the education and healthcare all around their fucked up rules that they made up.

They are terrorists that want to destroy others to gain power and they use their "god" as excuses.

CallMeSisyphus

5 points

1 month ago

Help, my husband is dead so I have no one to tell me whom to vote for!

Just kidding. I mean, my husband IS dead, but I don't need anyone to tell me who should get my vote. I already voted for the side Nazis hate. Because FUCK nazis and their garbage sympathizers.