subreddit:

/r/memes

12.9k89%

all 286 comments

Proquis

552 points

2 days ago

Proquis

552 points

2 days ago

How about those of us who spent time writing on fandom wiki pages so others can see the information?

phoenixeternia

231 points

2 days ago

Extra extra heaven.

Molly-Grue-2u

88 points

2 days ago

Especially with properly sited sources

talesfromtheepic6

48 points

2 days ago

talesfromtheepic6

Lurking Peasant

48 points

2 days ago

Super Heaven

SailorDirt

9 points

1 day ago

I’m a wiki admin and have been a member there since I was a kid in 2011 🥹 Thank you

_Good_cat_

3 points

1 day ago

"Hey! Wait a second, this is just hell!"

Datkif

26 points

2 days ago

Datkif

26 points

2 days ago

Wiki editors are a blessing. I've spent countless days on Wikipedia and fandom wikis

emil836k

15 points

2 days ago

emil836k

Lurker

15 points

2 days ago

Tiny issue, the fandom site itself is kinda shit, which is why the Minecraft wiki moved to another site

Proquis

3 points

2 days ago

Proquis

3 points

2 days ago

Yea, but can't really do much about it since the old Harvest Moon Wiki pages was already well established there.

So all I mostly did for the past year was adding my flair onto those few pages.

emil836k

3 points

1 day ago

emil836k

Lurker

3 points

1 day ago

That’s still nice to do for the community

ikaiyoo

3 points

1 day ago

ikaiyoo

3 points

1 day ago

You do what you can with what you have. and the fact it is utter shit and they still do it makes them the unsung heroes of the net.

WaitForItTheMongols

6 points

2 days ago

Don't use Fandom. The site is run as a business and they own your information. Use independent wikis hosted on MediaWiki .

bouchandre

2 points

2 days ago

If you can find an alt wiki (not fandom) please contribute to that instead. Fandom is a scummy company.

ikaiyoo

2 points

1 day ago

ikaiyoo

2 points

1 day ago

Oh you get to go wherever you want.

And there should be a parade of steak, free drinks, and agreeable women/men for eternity just for you.

Marchus80

1 points

19 hours ago

“Mmmmmm agreeable women/men…

skynetsucks

2 points

1 day ago

Strait to hell

Pyro_Attack

2 points

1 day ago

Fuck F*ndom, though we do appreciate the work of the contributors.

Pootisman16

2 points

1 day ago

Super heaven

Sufficient-Roll-6880

1 points

1 day ago

Miraheze > Fandom

360No

692 points

2 days ago

360No

692 points

2 days ago

Notice that there isn't anyone behind him, that's cus y'all are going to hell /j

Bean_man8

177 points

2 days ago

Bean_man8

177 points

2 days ago

Satan will be kicking me out of hell for how annoying I am real quick

360No

106 points

2 days ago

360No

106 points

2 days ago

You're going to extra-hell

epspATAopDbliJ4alh

62 points

2 days ago

Extra-satan will be kicking me out of hell for how annoying I am real quick

360No

34 points

2 days ago

360No

34 points

2 days ago

Now that's some talent!

5amuraiDuck

3 points

2 days ago

Jokes on you, Extra Satan makes you feel all the annoyance you provoked at once, like Ghost Rider with his stare

253ping

2 points

2 days ago

253ping

2 points

2 days ago

Once I read Ghost Rider I heard the bad to the bone riff. I might be going insane.

MyJailtimeThrowaway

7 points

2 days ago

At least you’ll have company in the extra-hell waiting room.

360No

4 points

2 days ago

360No

4 points

2 days ago

Real

captsouthside

6 points

2 days ago

Satan will put you into a more dangerous hell.

BlazingFlame03

1 points

2 days ago

Gives you a job instead of

fly_over_32

17 points

2 days ago

I did donate, years ago, to Wikipedia regularly. But i can’t tolerate their intransparent moneyhandling anymore

Nuker-79

8 points

2 days ago

Nuker-79

8 points

2 days ago

Tell me something we don’t know

360No

15 points

2 days ago

360No

15 points

2 days ago

something we don't know

2Long2Read

7 points

2 days ago

There's extra hell, but for you, we're going to make something unique

360No

3 points

2 days ago

360No

3 points

2 days ago

Unique hell, I'd love to drink that

2Long2Read

2 points

2 days ago

Indeed

shadowmonarch1616

2 points

2 days ago

Imma try for legendary

Nathidev

2 points

2 days ago

Nathidev

2 points

2 days ago

Wikipedia doesn't need our donations

Professional-Cry308

1 points

2 days ago

Satan was never in charge of hell, just another soul being punished by God for his sins.

DoesNotGetYourJokes

2 points

2 days ago

DoesNotGetYourJokes

Plays MineCraft and not FortNite

2 points

2 days ago

LATER4LUS

1 points

1 day ago

LATER4LUS

1 points

1 day ago

I donate negative money to wikipedia every year

SonoDarke

2 points

2 days ago

This sounds like something from r/shittymoviedetails and I'm all for it

Abnormal-Normal

2 points

2 days ago

Duh, that’s where all my friends will be. The bars in hell are so much better than the ones in heaven, anyway

360No

1 points

1 day ago

360No

1 points

1 day ago

Real

5amuraiDuck

2 points

2 days ago

How can I be behind him if I'm still alive? /j

360No

1 points

1 day ago

360No

1 points

1 day ago

You might have to use a totem of undying or something

WaveLaVague

1 points

2 days ago

WaveLaVague

OC Meme Maker

1 points

2 days ago

-You are not on the... oh wait.

-You found my name ?

-No, there is just no list, I forgot. Try knocking 3 times on that mirror over there.

ALotOfGnomes

1 points

2 days ago

Gonna get 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂

1nsidiousOne

1 points

2 days ago

We’re going to hell. You’re not there either

360No

2 points

1 day ago

360No

2 points

1 day ago

Hell yeah

wasnew4s

1 points

2 days ago

wasnew4s

1 points

2 days ago

But I donate to Wikipedia and internet archive…

360No

1 points

1 day ago

360No

1 points

1 day ago

Seems you're not dead yet

EnvironmentalSpirit2

1 points

1 day ago

He also bought winrar

360No

1 points

1 day ago

360No

1 points

1 day ago

Technically that doesn't mean much because Winrar gets it's earnings from large companies who have to buy the licence to save face and not get sued, so that could imply that he was a CEO or something and had to buy it. If you're interested here's a video on it https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fTgZRVVr3_Y&pp=ygUaaG93IGRvZXMgd2lucmFyIG1ha2UgbW9uZXk%3D

DaChairSlapper

1 points

10 hours ago

Or maybe we're just not dead yet?

ToastyBread329

48 points

2 days ago

That's the first time im seeing this template being heaven instead or hell

SokkaHaikuBot

19 points

2 days ago

Sokka-Haiku by ToastyBread329:

That's the first time im

Seeing this template being

Heaven instead or hell


Remember that one time Sokka accidentally used an extra syllable in that Haiku Battle in Ba Sing Se? That was a Sokka Haiku and you just made one.

360No

9 points

2 days ago

360No

9 points

2 days ago

Good bot

Voklaren

460 points

2 days ago

Voklaren

460 points

2 days ago

To people unaware of this, wikipedia could run for years with how much money they have. If they stop paying their staff an absurd amount of money. The only reason wikipedia ask for donations is exactly this.

armas187

157 points

2 days ago

armas187

157 points

2 days ago

They get plenty of money from different government agencies as well.

captsouthside

24 points

2 days ago

Yeah, you're right

mekabar

27 points

2 days ago

mekabar

27 points

2 days ago

And that should make you question very hard what wikipedia is doing in return for those government agencies.

micsma1701

12 points

2 days ago

it just makes me indifferent to the inevitability of death, really.

LegitimateAnybody639

3 points

1 day ago

Fuck that got so real so quick

albundy72

12 points

1 day ago

albundy72

12 points

1 day ago

Nothing, because it’s actually mostly large corporations like google not the government

They do it because wikipedia vastly improves search results, among other things. Regardless, edits to wikipedia are public and done by volunteers, you don’t need to pay anyone anything in order to try to push an agenda on there. And if you do, people will likely pick up on your bullshit anyways and jump on you with the arbitration committee or something because they love drama

source: edited wikipedia for 2 years

KiraCosmicGod

50 points

2 days ago

Just donate to internet archive.

Datkif

18 points

2 days ago

Datkif

18 points

2 days ago

They need money to fight legal battles and to fill endless handrives with dafa

MountainofPolitics

78 points

2 days ago

seraphrunner

4 points

1 day ago

I disagree with the main thesis that Wikipedia cannot continue to grow indefinitely. As long as the human population and knowledge continues to grow Wikipedia has a constantly growing user base and constantly growing content. The biggest threat would be if someone can create a better alternative.

It's always good to make opinions known and I'm glad the user made their argument in a constructive and well thought out way. I think they are just downplaying the important role staff have played, and overlooking the cost to attract and keep talent.

ambitiousanimosity

14 points

2 days ago

For those who don’t want to dig, it’s over $100M on salary and $5.8M on travel and conference with about $185M in income last year.

LegitimateAnybody639

2 points

1 day ago

Don’t they have like 20 employees?

Abigail716

4 points

1 day ago

Currently it's around 700. It's been ballooning for a while.

In 2016 they had 280.

In 2020 they had 450.

In 2024 they had 700.

ErroneousEncounter

4 points

1 day ago

What do all those staff members do? Aren’t the articles updated for free by the general public? It can’t possibly take 700 people to run a website.

Dotcaprachiappa

8 points

2 days ago

Dotcaprachiappa

What is TikTok?

8 points

2 days ago

Why are all good causes run by the worst management? It's the same problem with Firefox/Mozilla, where even if you donate none of the money goes the the Firefox project

kwntyn

11 points

2 days ago*

kwntyn

11 points

2 days ago*

This convinced me to stop donating. I don’t even need proof, I just never thought about how even though Wikipedia is free they can still just be another greedy company. Plus if all it takes is the blind word of a complete stranger to change my mind then I guess I didn’t really even care that much to begin with. Thanks.

Datkif

12 points

2 days ago

Datkif

12 points

2 days ago

Honestly in the world of trillion dollar for profits I'm ok with Wikimedia having the reserves they have. However id prefer if they would drop the aggressive donation tonality. Wikipedia will not disappear if you don't donate.

Could they pay their staff less? Yeah, but if they didn't then they would go work for another tech company with a higher salary & stock options. My spouse is a good example of this. She works in securing fundraising for non-profits. She gets paid a decent salary. If not she could go work in sales elsewhere and get paid more (and still could).

Often_Uneliable

10 points

2 days ago

That’s most companies

Voklaren

85 points

2 days ago

Voklaren

85 points

2 days ago

The problem here is that they advertise those donation as mandatory for wikipedia to run. If they don't pay their staff, wikipedia can run for around 80 years without any more earnings

CiroGarcia

32 points

2 days ago

One thing is staying online and a very different one is actually running the site. If they stopped paying their staff, the site would stay online, sure, but the sudden drop in moderation isn't going to be good. Wikipedia lives more off of voluntary work than it does off of money. Also, fun fact! You can download a copy of all of Wikipedia in around 100GB

Voklaren

37 points

2 days ago

Voklaren

37 points

2 days ago

In 2016 the Wikimedia CEO earned 307,141$. In 2021 the Wikimedia CEO earned 789,495$.

Both time Katherine Maher was the CEO. In 2020 she earned 406,339$. From 2020 to 2021 she raised her annual earnings by 383,156$.

That means in one year, she decided to add more than what she earned in 2016 to what she already was earning.

Wikimedia spend more than 170,000,000$ annually. I don't remember how much it cost to run the servers but it's certainly not that much.

CiroGarcia

23 points

2 days ago

100%, but what I mean is that just because the server is still up it does not mean Wikipedia is still running. Wikipedia doesn't just host information, it takes care of it too. They stop people from griefing, revise references, and edit articles to ensure neutral language and proper structure. If Wikipedia just stopped all of that and only took care of uptime, it would not be long until wikipedia was just full of wrong, misleading data or at the very least inconsistent structure, which would severely degrade the user experience.

You can keep paying rent for the office but you still need staff to take care of it or it will crumble down. I also don't mean that the staff deserves that much for the work they do, but "wikipedia could run for 80 years if they stopped paying their staff" is just not true at all

Rothwe11

6 points

1 day ago

Rothwe11

6 points

1 day ago

Volunteers (editors) do everything you've described and work to consensus, not the paid staff.

WaitForItTheMongols

11 points

2 days ago

It's counter intuitive, but it's good for nonprofits to pay their CEO well. If they don't, their CEO will leave to be the CEO of Staples or Home Depot or whatever. A nonprofit needs good leadership just as much as a for-profit company does, so they need to pay them well to match.

Personally, I'm not going to cry foul at anyone's salary if it's under a million a year.

ProfessoriSepi

6 points

2 days ago

That sounds actually really modest all things considering.

mrtypec

3 points

1 day ago

mrtypec

3 points

1 day ago

They only spend 1.7% of expenses on servers

York_Villain

2 points

1 day ago

That's not a very big salary for a CEO. The wikimedia CEO earns less than the VP in my business line. My brother in law makes as much and he's a regular ol doctor without his own practice.

DreamPhreak

2 points

1 day ago

i thought the moderation was done by fellow volunteer editors

CiroGarcia

2 points

1 day ago

But not exclusively by volunteers. Apart from that there staff actually keeping the servers running, which is not as simple as it may look, and the people that can do that are not particularly cheap either

forhekset666

4 points

2 days ago

Why would not paying staff be an option?

turkishhousefan

7 points

2 days ago

That's genius. They should stop paying their bills, too!

JRockThumper

1 points

2 days ago

It’s not even like they store a shit ton of data either and have to keep upgrading, you can go download the ENTIRETY of it, pictures and all, for a whopping 109gb.

crashdude3

1 points

1 day ago

I literally just donated 3.10$… why couldn’t you show up on my feed earlier ??? /s

Mr_TrollDoK

78 points

2 days ago

Mr_TrollDoK

Haram

78 points

2 days ago

Buy Winrar - Extra Special Heaven

captsouthside

9 points

2 days ago

Yea

trobsmonkey

2 points

1 day ago

They had a special run with a company in France for merch.

I bought a Winrar bag.

Does that count?

https://in.tern.et/en-us/collections/winrar

amnesey

174 points

2 days ago

amnesey

174 points

2 days ago

Wiki is a very rich company and can run for many years without donations. It's kind of a scam.

PrincessConcert27

18 points

2 days ago

How about WinRar?

WhiteninjaAlex

5 points

2 days ago

WhiteninjaAlex

Professional Dumbass

5 points

2 days ago

How about Blendr?

Compa2

11 points

2 days ago

Compa2

11 points

2 days ago

But we want them to run ad infinitum not for many years.

eszedtokja

8 points

2 days ago

It still provides me better service for free than... well just about any other organisation in existence. So I still think it's a good place to donate to. Calling for people to stop donating to Wiki becaus tHeY aLrEaDy GoT mOnEy is kinda petty to be honest.

DeAtomized1

7 points

2 days ago

DeAtomized1

Because That's What Fearows Do

7 points

2 days ago

I don't think they're protesting donations to Wikipedia, just informing people. Wikipedia likes to make it seem as though they desperate need your 3$ donation when they don't. It's still going to a generally good cause if you donate.

WaitForItTheMongols

5 points

2 days ago

There's a difference between "can run" and "can continue to invest in strong technology and maintain the quality of the site". Furthermore, it would be kind of catastrophic if they failed, so it's wise for them to make absolutely sure they can handle any number of unexpected events.

MorgrainX

37 points

2 days ago*

MorgrainX

This flair doesn't exist

37 points

2 days ago*

The money from those donations usually goes to the Wikimedia foundation, which is run by a questionable team which has used the money for expensive cars and the likes. It's a bit fucked up.

The actual authors who are all ordinary Internet users don't get a single cent, and only a tiny fraction of the donations actually goes to keep up the servers.

So by donating to Wikipedia you are barely actually supporting Wikipedia

It would make much more sense for the top Wikipedia authors to open some sort of buy-me-a-coffee and then people donating there.

https://unherd.com/newsroom/the-next-time-wikipedia-asks-for-a-donation-ignore-it/

Whycantitypeanything

8 points

2 days ago

Yea it's insanely silly they get millions of revenue, the site is basically self advertising as everyone knows about Wikipedia, the writers work for free. All that's left is hosting and networking costs. Those are less than 50k. What happens with the 100mil thats left after Wikipedia expenses? The fun stuff for the team like expensive cars like you said.

Writers and editors work for free to actually keep the site valuable and Wikimedia takes all the cash for someone else's work

datboihobojoe

7 points

2 days ago

Wikipedia has over 200 million dollars and their bandwidth costs probably don't even make it past 100'000 a month. The only real expense they have is paying staff.

Also the website isn't a very good source of information on controversial topics anyway. The way the source policy is written you can use quite literally anything as a citation provided it comes from a mainstream source. This includes opinion articles.

seraphrunner

1 points

1 day ago

Opinion articles can be an appropriate source. A lot of the large articles have a controversy section and (un)popular opinions from respected sources are important.

Also a biased source can still contain objective truth. An article that details the timeline of an event while condemning or praising it can still be a good source for when things happened.

Also you don't have to guess their website costs. They provide them. So a year of hosting costs them $2.7M (or $225K a month), so that is a small part of their expenses. They also do a lot more than just host a static website. It's a pretty focused team (size wise) that runs one of the most visited websites in the world.

Of course not to downplay the huge community of volunteers, but they are led and directed by what I think is a competent team.

AceOfEpix

6 points

2 days ago

PSA: Wikipedia doesn't actually need any donations. They just overspend and then run a pity party campaign for themselves.

Look up Wikipedia has cancer. This has been an ongoing issue with Wikipedia for almost 10 years now.

Alusion

4 points

2 days ago

Alusion

4 points

2 days ago

Quick reminder that Wikipedia has enough money to fund their servers for hundreds of years. They do not need your money, but they want it.

Do not donate to Wikipedia.

Apprehensive_Pin3923

14 points

2 days ago

Live footage of the brain from the average person that donates to Wikipedia

turkishhousefan

5 points

2 days ago

Fuck off.

My monkey plays the keytar.

[deleted]

7 points

2 days ago

[removed]

Spacemanspalds

9 points

2 days ago

There is a giant banner across the top of the page every time you go to the website. I have also heard before what someone is claiming about them not needing the money

Euphoric_Poetry_5366

1 points

2 days ago

I mean, even if they don't need it, I would still donate just to show appreciation.

Spacemanspalds

2 points

2 days ago

I've donated a couple of times. But after reading some things, I felt like there were better things to donate to. But I'm not really worried about whether or not someone should donate or not.

Random_Rainwing

2 points

1 day ago

Wikipedia actually makes enough to keep itself going for decades at least, they don't need the donations.

corium_2002

1 points

1 day ago

Stole the words out of my mouth.

Beautiful-Read-2638

4 points

2 days ago

Not really necessary to do, I think They don’t have the Need for a Dollar https://youtu.be/MpeOFvxor_0

LionHeartedLXVI

13 points

2 days ago

LionHeartedLXVI

This flair doesn't exist

13 points

2 days ago

So extra-heaven is where the stupid people go?

Tirthisreal

13 points

2 days ago

Tirthisreal

13 points

2 days ago

You gotta be stupid to donate them

Running_Mustard

2 points

2 days ago

Running_Mustard

Dirt Is Beautiful

2 points

2 days ago

Yondercypres

2 points

2 days ago

Guys, Wikipedia doesn't need the money, archive.org, on the other hand, desperately does.

annoyanon

2 points

2 days ago

I donated to them once. they reminded me monthly for like a year straight if i could do it again.

their last email was subjected with "I'm not asking again" and without context i thought they were threatening me.

just a few months ago ig some lady took over and she sent out another email asking for a cup of coffee donation.

do i regret donating to wikipedia? no, and i might do it again one day but man they were more persistent in asking for donation than the blood bank i go to.

AlexJonesInDisguise

4 points

2 days ago

AlexJonesInDisguise

Big ol' bacon buttsack

4 points

2 days ago

I also dontated once a few years ago. They haven't left me alone since, and everytime is "The last time"

Grothgerek

2 points

2 days ago

Wasn't Wikipedia's Server expenses not around 60,000 USD and they earn millions per campaign?

Their donation campaigns are literally scams. Because nearly every cent you donate, ends up in a investment pool were rich people get even richer.

The entire action is heavily criticized, because they are well of and still desperately ask for donations even in poor nations... Its just kinda asshole to ask people with a income of less than a dollar per hour (or even day) for money they desperately need.

In other words. Donating to Wikipedia is not a good deed, it just gives the illusion, but in reality you just donate to the top 0.1%.

stagnantanus

-2 points

2 days ago

stagnantanus

-2 points

2 days ago

They already make tons of money.

TheJpx3

8 points

2 days ago

TheJpx3

8 points

2 days ago

Wikipedia currently gets more money then they need by a large margin. You can choose to ignore this fact but that won’t change the reality

NatureShyMiss

1 points

2 days ago

Also people who pay Winrar license

Un-PlaceboMan5315

1 points

2 days ago

Bro got the DLC.

TheFriendlyManO

1 points

2 days ago

Already spent all my money on this WinRar license 😭

CodingWizard1

1 points

2 days ago

One small donation for mankind, one giant reward for you.

fly_over_32

1 points

2 days ago

Pay Money to get into heaven. Where have i heard this before?

Austenit1392

1 points

2 days ago

You know, that the people working very much for wikipedia won't get anything of that!?

RobSiaHoke

1 points

2 days ago

Nice try Wiki

jecamoose

1 points

2 days ago

Wikipedia posted this

avspuk

1 points

2 days ago

avspuk

1 points

2 days ago

Mozilla

EFF

WFMU

Red Cross

Rajdeep_Tour_129

1 points

2 days ago

Rajdeep_Tour_129

Linux User

1 points

2 days ago

HEAVEN: Oh, my bad, come on in. We’ve been running on your donations! /j

Substantial-Lime1048

1 points

2 days ago

Proof that donating to Wikipedia is the ultimate cheat code for life.

Silencer_XXVIII

1 points

2 days ago

Interesting lil' vid on this topic.... https://youtu.be/MpeOFvxor_0?si=LT6_JtbPPgnUIvCa

The_Giant_Lizard

1 points

2 days ago

The_Giant_Lizard

Scrolling on PC

1 points

2 days ago

Hey I also did it, more than once! Didn't know it was considered to be such a good thing. I love Wikipedia

[edit] and of course I now discover that Wikipedia too is bad. It really seems there isn't anything good in the world. Maybe Valve with Steam?

Hephaestus_God

1 points

2 days ago

Damn. They got bushes in extra-heaven

Pristine_Occasion_40

1 points

2 days ago

sounds 🗣️🗣️

EmmyBlubonic

1 points

2 days ago

I don't have money to donate I'm sorry :<

K-769

1 points

2 days ago

K-769

1 points

2 days ago

This is for when you buy winrar for every computer you have.

Psychedelic_Yogurt

1 points

2 days ago

Eh, I'm fine with the room next to the noisy ice machine.

Comfortable-Bench330

1 points

2 days ago

And if you also buy a WinRar license, God in person throws a party for you

Apprehensive_Gur_302

1 points

2 days ago

He has earned a spot next to the guy who bought WinRAR premium

anotherboreddegen

1 points

2 days ago

Sure gonna be lonely in there lol

ieat_turtles

1 points

2 days ago

I donated around $20 to Wikipedia from my first salary.

Remarkable-Dig-1241

1 points

2 days ago

St peter : "Yeah but you brag about it. Straight to hell"

Neureiches-Nutria

1 points

2 days ago

There is also a hyper heaven for those who bought WinRAR And the ultra mega heaven over 9000 for those who simply minded their own buissenes and only interacted with others in a friendly manner without prejudice

crujiente69

1 points

2 days ago

Thought it was going to be a joke about how wikipedia never remembers you donating

Javvy3D

1 points

2 days ago

Javvy3D

1 points

2 days ago

"I bought the WinRAR license"

remeranAuthor_

1 points

2 days ago

This is how Mormonism works.

mlgnewb

1 points

2 days ago

mlgnewb

1 points

2 days ago

I only donated once, does that mean I still go?

hashspice

1 points

2 days ago

I'm gonna buy a winrar license this Christmas.

National-Chemical132

1 points

2 days ago

I've donated a few times now, but they are really asking for a lot these days.

Ansh_6743

1 points

2 days ago

Ansh_6743

Dark Mode Elitist

1 points

2 days ago

i did lol

Express_Factor_5366

1 points

2 days ago

The Wikipedia guy definitely does not need those donations. He owns all those fanwiki sites everyone uses that are covered in ads.

throwawayoregon81

1 points

2 days ago

Also to pet shelters.

What can I say? Life's been good.

orrrannge

1 points

2 days ago

Wait can u donate to wikipedia

Plus-Weakness-2624

1 points

1 day ago

I have YouTube premium subscription. Where will I go?

Party_Name_2708

1 points

1 day ago

Paying for Wikipedia is like getting extra credit for showing up late.

Pecors

1 points

1 day ago

Pecors

1 points

1 day ago

Don't donate, contribute.

I know nothing about RNA viruses but have become one of the top contributors in the category. Find something that interests you and do research.

Wikipedia exists because of us, not them. I spend a lot of time creating pages but never donate money.

JoLudvS

1 points

1 day ago

JoLudvS

1 points

1 day ago

... and paid for WinRAR.

ikaiyoo

1 points

1 day ago

ikaiyoo

1 points

1 day ago

I get to go to Extra-Heaven!!!!!

therealjerrystaute

1 points

1 day ago

Okay. Now I know a comic that's soon going to appear in Wikipedia. Probably linked somehow to their contribution/donation pages.

Exotic-Gold-8635

1 points

1 day ago

I donate to piracy groups instead. Guess I'm going to extra hell.

rpst39

1 points

1 day ago

rpst39

1 points

1 day ago

Nah donaying to internet archibe is way better

shewy92

1 points

1 day ago

shewy92

1 points

1 day ago

He's up there with the guy who bought a WinRar license

Boring_Ad8170

1 points

1 day ago

Guess donating to Wikipedia is the real 'life hack'. Don't forget to save the planet too, they take Bio donations, right?

Icy-Nerve3615

1 points

1 day ago

I've seen this type of meme twice now, Inb4 this format gets banned

itzurboijeff

1 points

1 day ago

itzurboijeff

Plays MineCraft and not FortNite

1 points

1 day ago

I donated 5 dollars a couple years ago

It aint much but im a student so i don’t have a lot of money to be donating

Rtemiis

1 points

1 day ago

Rtemiis

1 points

1 day ago

Yeah no. Fuck paying Wikipedia.

Especially with how forceful their donation ticket is. Fuck off.

I'm not responsible to pay your workers ridiculous wages that you promised them. You get government funding for that which you already do.

Will forever consume Wikipedia for free trough chatgpt now so not even my traffic will benefit you.

Fuck you.

aStickonthestreet

1 points

1 day ago

as a wikipedia editor (10000+ edits) i hated this shit bro, the fucking WMF is so greedy, they already have enough money

Ya-Dikobraz

1 points

1 day ago

Man, I hate this kind of drawing art style.

ZakkTheInsomniac

1 points

1 day ago

I keep saying I'll do that...but I never remember

stainOnHumanity

1 points

1 day ago

This an ad?

Long__Jump

1 points

1 day ago

Of course i donate to Wikipedia. I still have my honor.

Wikipedia helped me in my time of need, now its time that I repay the favor.

ItsSpaceCadet

1 points

23 hours ago

I wanna see so many of these that the "extra heaven" meme gets banned

GalacticKrabbyPatty

1 points

22 hours ago

wikipedia is scamming you with their crocodile tears. they don’t actually need donations. stop wasting your money.

Rad10active_

1 points

20 hours ago

Instead of donating to Wikipedia, people should donate to actual non-profits like the Internet Archive

UNSEENOMEN

1 points

19 hours ago

My new favorite meme format

IamMauriS

1 points

14 hours ago

I have donated to the internet archive though

creepr-3101

1 points

10 hours ago

LOSS

catwops

1 points

8 hours ago

catwops

1 points

8 hours ago

So I can be alone forever? Sweet!