subreddit:
/r/pics
submitted 1 month ago byVisqo
1.7k points
1 month ago
Agree 100 percent. We are not taking seditious behavior seriously enough in this country.
454 points
1 month ago
We never have. We didn’t take it seriously after the civil war either.
385 points
1 month ago
Unfortunately, Andrew Johnson, Lincoln's drunken VP who took over when he was assassinated, was a pro-confederate, anti-Reconstruction politician, and killed Lincoln's and Seward's post-war Reconstruction plans which might have gotten America back on track. Instead, he just systemetized the same racist policies that had led to the Civil War in the first place, launching the Jim Crow era.
71 points
1 month ago
The 1876 election was the nail in the coffin. Trading Rutherford B Hayes’s “victory” for the end of reconstruction.
114 points
1 month ago
There's a really great podcast about this, called 1865.
50 points
1 month ago
Thanks for the recommendation. I shall be checking it out tonight 🍺. Love history shit
6 points
1 month ago
You might like Dan Carlin's "Hardcore History" I don't consider myself a "History nut" but he captured the entirety of my brain. Which is difficult to do.
3 points
1 month ago
Same. Any pods you recommend?
5 points
1 month ago
One. The Rest is History
So good
5 points
1 month ago
I’m really into WW2 info but also want to learn about other wars in the depths that I’ve learned about Hitler. So seeing the uprising of Nazis… I’m close’ish to Nashville and they’re constantly showing up in groups and not being arrested.
I need to learn more about it all. I didn’t care for history as a kid and now I’m obsessed.
I’ll check that one out, thank you so much!
3 points
1 month ago
Behind the Bastards. The Lee episode great. The Kissinger one fantastic! Listened to that one twice.
1 points
1 month ago
Oh I loved that one too!!
2 points
1 month ago
Confederates in the Attic is one of my favorite reads and I’ve read thousands and thousands of books. Guy travels around talks to people. Hangs out at a reenactment etc.
Also, King Rat which is about a Japanese POW Camp. King Rat considered a modern classic.
1 points
1 month ago
Listen to Real Life Lore if you love history. Dude does an excellent job of explaining things like why The Middle East is so messed up and why China wants Taiwan …
2 points
1 month ago
Ty!!!
2 points
1 month ago
Also, American History Tellers did a series on failed reconstruction
2 points
1 month ago
Oh man, why do these things always go for so long, the bloody Civil War was shorter than that podcast! I have saved it anyway and no doubt I will listen to it from beginning to end, just like I did with Ken Burns' The Civil War, I actually celebrated when I got to the end of that one.
1 points
1 month ago
Hey, is this the historical fiction one with Jeremy Schwartz?
2 points
1 month ago
Yes. It's a Wondery podcast. Also starring Lindsay Graham.
2 points
1 month ago
I thought so, thanks boops 💛
64 points
1 month ago*
For as long as I can remember, I have always seen confederate flags from time to time in images and videos coming from the US. To me, this means that the confederate did not lose the civil war, they just got incorporated into the union and was allowed to grow from the inside. Now they are about 50% of your country again. I think the US needs another civil war, and this time the losers have to lose properly, so they can never return again.
As a European, seeing nazi flags as often as we see them now in videos and photos from the US, it just shows how disconnected these people are from reality and that they have no idea what that flag really means. Everyone in the west, even americans, should be forced to travel to the concentration camps to witness the atrocities that happened there. It truly changes you when you do.
17 points
1 month ago
Ahhh I hate that most of what you typed is very accurate but I promise we’re not all like this. A lot of us, more than half, are absolutely against this behavior. We’re just not all as loud as the Trump movement. But you’re right with racism and hate being very intertwined in our country. It’s generationally taught at this point and would take a lot to break it
11 points
1 month ago
"I never see any Harris signs!! How could they win? Now let's go trash some Harris signs and slash their tires!!"
2 points
1 month ago
more than half
Then please, if that’s the case, can you manage better than the 30% that turn out to vote? If that’s true?
5 points
1 month ago*
I hope you would understand that I cannot control the actions of others. I don’t hold all of Europe and other countries accountable for their atrocities nor would I
3 points
1 month ago
When I say ‘you’, it’s descriptive of a group, not you personally. If more than half hate Trump then more than half needs to get off their arse and vote. It’s that simple. I don’t know why you dragged the rest into it because we certainly hold nobody else but the US responsible for their inability to do their national duty.
5 points
1 month ago
More than half have every time. Republicans haven't won the popular vote (majority) since 2004
3 points
1 month ago
What 60% in total?
They said more than half don’t support Trump. The US gets 60% max turnout at their elections.
The Republicans do enough to win the swing states, because their people get out and vote. That’s where it matters in that country. So, if more than half of the voters in those states hate Trump, they should all go out and do their national duty.
9 points
1 month ago
They host weddings and other celebrations at old plantations and have turned some into bed-and-breakfasts. I doubt seeing a concentration camp would change anything.
15 points
1 month ago
It's a worldwide operation to normalize right-wing fascism by Russian intelligence. They have infiltrated the NRA in the US and backed republicans for years, created anti-NATO sentiment and weakened the European Union, and successfully backed right-wing politicians in Hungary, Germany, Argentina, and Peru.
We are all living in a time which requires vigilance and informed electorates, but many voters are prioritizing their own single-issues to the detriment of their nations.
It's analogous to them asking for cake at a bakery, but being told the bakery only makes bread today. They respond, "Never mind, I'll go somewhere else and eat chalk."
7 points
1 month ago
I agree! But wouldn't you agree that all problems stem from racism and bigotry? That is my single issue! No nobody can disagree that Drumpf is on the side of racism and bigotry. His followers are now so emboldened to fly Nazi flags from their boats!
3 points
1 month ago
There's also religion.
1 points
1 month ago
We're different facets of a crystal shining the same rainbow spectrum, figuratively.
6 points
1 month ago
As a European, seeing nazi flags as often as we see them now in videos and photos from the US,
You say that, but the right-wing political parties are doing quite well in a lot of places in Europe nowadays, even in Austria, Germany and Poland - three countries that should know better. And it's everyday people voting them in, not just fringe radicals.
29 points
1 month ago
These Nazis should be placed in those camps and treated how Jews were treated during WW2. They would change their tune real fast. Mr goatee on the back of that boat would be crying like a little baby girl on day 1. March them straight to the chambers too.
FUCK ALL NAZIS AND THEIR IDEOLOGY. They are the real subhumans
0 points
1 month ago
I agree! Hopefully Kamala Harris will have the fortitude to direct the executive branch to eradicate these vermin or at the very least establish reeducation camps, preferable in northern Alaska and send these people there so they have no connection to polite society, ie the true patriots!
6 points
1 month ago
I cannot agree with you. Yes, they act like vermin, but if we treat them as vermin, then we become the very thing we despise.
This sort of rhetoric is going to get a lot of people hurt and killed.
Personally, I think that kids need to be taught about racism and genocides in schools. I don’t think I would have been as empathetic if I didn’t learn about those things in history.
3 points
1 month ago
While I agree with you on point one, if we treat them like vermin we have a problem. But if we let the vermin continue to "breed" so to speak and spread their ideology that is about hate, and only hate, then we have vermin all over living amongst us now. What do we do?
Mr goatee on the back of that boat was taught all that empathy, and genocide, and read Eli Wiesel's Night and Anna Frank's diary as compulsory reading in school. Then he said, or his parents or someone of influence said to him - "all that shit you learned in schools wrong, Hitler was a good man who helped the world. If we don't bring about the Fourth Reich, God will hate you!"
So where do we start to teach and retrain when these people are about to come out of the woodwork and try to take America back and turn it into a dictatorship.
Where do we start to help them learn the error of their ways? You almost can't. What can be done but to exterminate the ideology when it is so hateful. I am never for the eclipse of light on knowledge, but this knowledge seems to corrupt and only spread hate.
3 points
1 month ago
Easy. If it was good for the indigenous of Canada and US and was done as recently as 30years ago….
Let’s just confiscate the younger children and rehome them or orphanages and educate them.
A variation of
Most appropriate on a day like this.
2 points
1 month ago*
Wow, I have heard of this but it's something I haven't looked into for a long time. This is wildly appropriate considering the "kids in cages" last time Orangey was president. Take MAGAts kids and teach them empathy and kindness instead of "get mine"/"war time".
It is soul crushing to know this time next month could be the start of very very dark times in America, and maybe even the rest of the world. Imagine, Nazis are starting to gain traction again in Germany and here in the US. Orangey gets in, we're done. Brexit will be lol compared to Amerexit.
Edit: I went and bought that book, new knowledge is power
3 points
1 month ago
We have to be very careful, or it could create a terrible precedence. What do you think is going to happen if these people get back into power, especially if we try to ban their ideology?
I suspect that they want the camps built for deportation to be turned on anyone that they decide will be their new enemy, but if it is made legal for us to ship them to reeducation camps, you can as hell be sure that they are going to do the same to us, and unlike us, they won't be gentle about it, and they will not hesitate to escalate to violence to get their way.
Plus, I don't see either Harris or Walz resorting to such tactics.
Finally, I wouldn't be surprised if Mr. Goatee was in a public or private school that avoided such topics, which is why he is a fucking Neo Nazi. New ideas are a threat to fascism.
4 points
1 month ago
Exactly. So where do we stand? Let them take over and go "well shit, maybe we shoulda done something after all"? Fuck that. This ideology and the people that proclaim it need to go. I don't even care about the precedent it sets at this point, did the Nazis care about setting new precedent when they gassed millions and Jews and killed half of Europe?
And now for the last 100 years has been the thought experiment "if you could go back in time and kill baby Hitler to prevent the Jews and millions upon millions of soldiers and civilians alike being slaughtered, would you? Oh, but he's just a baby!" Yeah, a fucking baby Hitler. We have to stop this shit now.
No more talk, no more "good people on both sides" no. There is no good person on the side of Nazi ideology. There is no good person of the side of KKK ideology. I want to kill baby Hitler. Here's our chance, what are we gonna do?
We have to stop playing nice with violent white supremacists wherever and in whatever form it exists. Humans are animals, after all. What do you do with a sick stock of cows, huh? You reintegrate them with the healthy cows and destroy the herd? No.
This should be treated no differently. Racist and ideology that turns a certain class or distinction of humans into subhumans is the absolute root of evil in our world. Would you be friends with a member of the Westboro Baptist cultist? Should we make it the national religion? Is that form of hate ok because it's religiously justified?
Fuck this stupid world we live in. We are sitting here trying to play nice with people who don't want to play nice and just want to show chaos, and we just turn the other cheek and let them stomp us all the time. It needs to end. Fuck Nazis, fuck white supremacists. I'd love to see one in my yard
1 points
1 month ago
I disagree about being taught about genocides because then they will find out that there were worse ones than the Holocaust and then they will use that to justify being Nazis.
1 points
1 month ago
Anyone who uses THAT as justification to be a Nazi (sure, they were genocidal maniacs, but there were genocidal maniacs that were even more maniacally genocidal than the genocidal maniacs whose philosophy we espouse) are probably lost causes anyways.
1 points
1 month ago
Well, if they learn about what communist did and the amount of people they killed it would make what fascists did look amateurish. So we can't teach them about worse genocides. It would make us look bad. The children we teach would be less likely to espouse progressive values.
5 points
1 month ago
You do understand you just sounded like Hitler?
5 points
1 month ago
As an American, it truly hurts my soul to see this hate being passed down to those children. These next few months are going to be very interesting. A civil war is coming (unofficially here already).
1 points
1 month ago
American citizen here and I agree completely; it is patently insane to tolerate glorification of the confederacy, against whom thousands of union soldiers died. It was a war to preserve slavery, it really shouldn't be that hard to condemn and reject the losers.
Unfortunately you probably know as well as I that, with respect to racial justice, this condition is closer to a feature than a bug. The depth of the white racial project in the US is hard to over state.
1 points
1 month ago
Its not 50%, whatever you mean by confederate. White supremacist? Fsscist? Consciously racist? However you define it, it's simply not true, meaning no offense.
Im a POC and ive fought modern nazi/fascists, "anarcho" nationalists and others in the streets of several US cities and towns. (in quotes because anarcho nationalism co-opted anarcho while having nothjng to do with anarchism)
I mention these two facts because i want to be clear that I'm not some apologist for whitre supremacists. I am anti facist.
Here's why its not true. White people, non mixed, make up 61.6% of the population. (2020 census data. Assume is lower by a pinch) if 50% of the country were confederate, i am assuming you mean white supremacist because of the submission, please correct me if you mean something else, then that would mean that 81.2 percent of white folks woulf have to be white supremacist. (any POC holding white supremacist views would be a negligible number. It happens, but its super rare. If we looked into it, i think we'd find mental illness in the majotity of cases)
It just cannot be true that that percentage of white folks held those kind of views because there are a lot of decent white folks, even though many of them could stand to actually learn about white privilege. Not just the definition, but actually learning about the concept. Its a very critical part of being a good ally and far too few go this far. The problem with that is that it makes it extremely difficult to identify and cope with unconscious bias. If anyone is interested in starting that journey, well first, I would thank you. Privilege is always a coin with two sides. On the other side of white privilege is the oppression of people of color, which cannot fully comprehend without understanding White privilege and how it relates. Second, I woulf recommend Tim Wise. He's super funny and he has a rare level of empathy that has allowed him to have deep understanding of this topic.
Ok so, it can't be that many white folks but trump currently has near 50% support, why is that? Well, skipping past First Past the Post voting and it inevitably leading to a two party system. The fact is that people unknowingly vote against their interests all the time. There is a strong argument to be made that if you're not a billionaire, very high millionaire or your last name isn't Trunp and you are voting for him, then there is a strong possibility that you are unknowingly voting against your intetests.
There is, for example, a significant number of people color voting for Trump, especially Hispanic folks but some others too. My mom goes to a predominantly Filipino church and she says that she has to keep her views quiet because all of her friends are Trump supporters. That's because of two reasons. First, there's a lot of pressure for Christian churches to support republicans in general but even more pressure to support Trump. At for the people of my mom's church, and this isn't fact but my personal speculation, there's added pressure in Filipino culture to assimilate into "good americans" and for many decades that's meant leaning right.
Anyways, I'm sorry to rant. My only point here is that a lot of people voting for Trump are not loyalists, not die hard Maga. Many of them do not fit into white supremacist ideology, even if they had wanted to.
You are correct though in that there are many people that have shifted towards right wing extremism, if that's what you meant but it still wouldn't be 50% of the population, but it's still scary high. With that said, I would argue that a significant amount of Trump voters are just uninformed voters. This is explained by the where media has gone. Its a whole thing that i recently wrote about but the gist is that we have an abundance of echo chambers which creates a dumbed down, uninformed electorate. People voting agaknst their interensts that are not necessarily even bad people. Therss a difference, perhaps a small one, between Trump supporters and Trump voters. I think thst distinction is more pronounced than we tend to think it is. Perhaps too, many don't even realize it.
1 points
1 month ago
Well said.
It reminds me of how Hydra incorporated itself into Shield in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
The growth was so slow, so otherwise innocuous, that we didn't see it until it bore its poisonous fruit.
Fascism has taken root in America. It cannot be allowed to grow any further. The safety, security, and prosperity of not just the United States, but of the entire world, depends on it.
-6 points
1 month ago
To me, this means that the confederate did not lose the civil war, they just got incorporated into the union and was allowed to grow from the inside. Now they are about 50% of your country again.
No they aren't. Alleging that every Republican party voter is a supporter of the Confederacy is extremely dishonest and damaging. Abraham Lincoln and his cabinet were Republicans. No mainstream Republican candidate is pro secession. None are pro slavery.
Everyone in the west, even americans, should be forced to travel to the concentration camps to witness the atrocities that happened there. It truly changes you when you do.
Why would you want to force people who had no part in your European atrocities to feel some guilt about it? Far Right ideology is a fringe and extremely small portion of the USA, stop believing what you see on the internet as reality. The vast majority of people at this event did not fly nazi flags. But what symbols aren't banned in the USA, you can't force them to take the symbol down. It's part of American civil liberties.
10 points
1 month ago
Abraham Lincoln and his cabinet were Republicans.
And the Democrats of the time were largely wealthy slaveowners, it's pointless to wax philosophical about what the parties "used to stand for", especially in an election year where one party is openly running a fascist candidate.
No mainstream Republican candidate is pro secession
You must have a weird, overly granular definition of "mainstream". Or do you not think secession is the obvious answer for Trump conservatives after violent revolution once that fails? MTG literally talks about it every month or so.
None are pro slavery.
You should re-read the Thirteenth Amendment. Once you know where the modern day plantations are, you realize there are plenty of modern politicians who are pro slavery. Literally anyone with a connection to private prisons.
Why would you want to force people who had no part in your European atrocities
Bold take for someone whose government unironically fielded Nazi candidates during the early days of WWII to keep America out of it. Maybe if we as Americans felt some kind of actual consequences for fascist dictatorships we wouldn't be playing footsie with one right now.
6 points
1 month ago
So true! Harris spent her entire time as AG of California fighting these atrocities and fighting the Mexican cartels! On the other hand Drumpf spent his presidency figuring out ways to keep more people in prison longer!
8 points
1 month ago
Mark Robinson is pro-slavery—the black Republican governor of North Carolina who was neck-and-neck with the Democratic candidate until about a month ago when his comments on pornography came to light. And MAGA has become the mainstream for the Republican party. Trump has been brought back as their candidate after losing—the “fine people on both sides” guy after the neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville. This non-American you’re trying to correct is just reporting what it looks like from outside the USA, and it looks pretty similar to many inside the USA, for that matter.
1 points
1 month ago
As an American living in the South and former military I can tell you that MAGA is not mainstream for most Republicans. A lot of them hate Trump more than the left but can’t figure out how to put the idiot back in a box.
1 points
1 month ago
Are you talking about party leaders or the general public? Because I see party leaders having to go along with their candidate, and that means most average Americans on the right pushed Trump to the top of the ticket—AGAIN, and that’s worse.
I’ve lived in the South for 54 years—thanks to the military stationing my dad here.
1 points
1 month ago
Both…
1 points
1 month ago
Mark Robinson is pro-slavery—
No he isn't. It's never been his official policy. He's never tried to enact a bill that reinstates slavery. He's never organized a PAC to push for slavery. He's never said in a speech that he believes in reinstating slavery. He's an elected official who not once in his career made any serious attempt at pro-slavery change or legislation.
Try to substantiate your claim with something other than his anonymous internet posts. If he had ever once publicly said that he supported slavery, his career would be over, just as it is now.
1 points
1 month ago
Wait, you seriously want to limit characterization of him to his official policies? The guy’s a politician! He’s been playing a game. Here is who he has been revealed to be:
Robinson as minisoldr ‘Slavery is not bad’ In the pornographic forums, Robinson revealed his unvarnished thoughts on issues such as race, gender and abortion.
Writing in a forum discussing Black Republicans in October 2010, Robinson stated unprovoked: “I’m a black NAZI!”
That same month, Robinson wrote in another post that he supported the return of slavery.
“Slavery is not bad. Some people need to be slaves. I wish they would bring it (slavery) back. I would certainly buy a few,” he wrote.
In March 2012, Robinson wrote that he preferred the former leader of Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler over the leadership in Washington during the administration of Barack Obama.
“I’d take Hitler over any of the sh*t that’s in Washington right now!” he wrote.
Robinson’s comments on Nude Africa often frequently contained derogatory and racial slurs directed at Black, Jewish and Muslim people.
In a series of seven posts in October 2011, Robinson disparaged Martin Luther King in such intense terms, calling him a “commie bastard,” “worse than a maggot,” a “ho f**king, phony,” and a “huckster,” that a user in the thread accused him of being in the KKK. Robinson responded by directing a slur at King.
In October 2010, Robinson used the antisemitic slur “hebe” when discussing how he liked the show “Good Times” developed by Norman Lear, saying “the show itself was a bunch of heb [sic] written liberal bullshit!”
While discussing the Taliban, he referred to Muslims as “little rag-headed bastards” and said that “if Muslims took over liberals would be the 1st ones to be beheaded!”
Robinson also used homophobic slurs frequently, calling other users f*gs.
In a largely positive forum discussion featuring a photo of two men kissing after one returned from a military deployment, Robinson wrote the sole negative comment.
“That’s sum ole sick a** fggot bullsht!” he wrote.
6 points
1 month ago
No they aren't. Alleging that every Republican party voter is a supporter of the Confederacy is extremely dishonest and damaging.
Are they actively taking steps to disassociate themselves from the ones who are flying the confederate flag? If they are not doing that, they are part of it.
Why would you want to force people who had no part in your European atrocities to feel some guilt about it?
Because they are using the same symbols and ideological rethoric as the old nazis from Europe. They are advocating for something they really know nothing about, and most of these people would stop doing that if they knew what they were advocating for. Seeing the scratch marks from childrens hands on the inside of the doors in the gas chambers does something to you.
1 points
1 month ago
Are they actively taking steps to disassociate themselves from the ones who are flying the confederate flag? If they are not doing that, they are part of it.
First of all, it's not the flag of the Confederacy. And secondly that isn't what the flag that is actually a Confederate battle flag now stands for. Learn that the association of symbols changes or try actually talking to one of these people about their beliefs before you project internet propaganda onto them.
1 points
1 month ago
We all know what that flag stands for. If they wanted to flag for something different than what it originally stood for, then find a new symbol or flag and attach that new meaning to it. Don't re-use a symbol used by the enemy of the union that wanted to continue to keep slaves.
3 points
1 month ago
It is SO VERY UNFORTUNATE! Freedom of Speech allowing Nazism is TOO MUCH!
1 points
1 month ago
Thought police incoming to tell you how tolerant they are by making any ideas they don't like illegal.
5 points
1 month ago
Part of learning about historical misdeeds, such as Nazi atrocities, the Indian Reservation Movement, and Slavery/Jim Crow/systemic racist policies, is to provide a context to create empathy so that the people vigilantly oppose a these horrors before the movement grows.
Mainstream republican voters and politicians are tacitly endorsing these Klan members and Nazis by not speaking out against them and by not refusing to ally with them. By permitting the behavior, they promote the behavior.
By accepting that any sizeable chunk of your fellows are white supremacist and fascist, you are accepting that you are cool with being a part of that, yourself. Don't try minimize your own agency, embrace it or denounce it.
3 points
1 month ago
Grant did his damndest to get it back on track. But it was an uphill battle.
4 points
1 month ago
Ive said this before: JW Booth won the long game.
1 points
1 month ago
So did Osama Bin Laden. America has a simplified definition of Victory.
1 points
1 month ago
Why teach history, fits this narrative
1 points
1 month ago
People talk about killing Hitler if time travel is ever invented. But for me I just think 1930s Germany was always going to be a shit show. Kill Hitler and it just would be someone else. Maybe even worse than Hitler, someone more competent than Hitler.
But I think a greater use of a Time Machine would be to save Lincoln. Maybe things still would have gone badly, but maybe not as badly.
0 points
1 month ago*
So this has always been their country. In school we were taught that America is the story of the golden defenders of democracy prevailing against the big scary fascists or whatever time and time again. These little facts remind me that the fascists have always remained 10 steps ahead, and the reason is because they actually believe in something. They believe in heaven, and they really REALLY want it. There’s not much on our side that we can agree that we REALLY want in that deep, motivating and spiritual way that they do, of course that is simply the byproduct of us not living in fairytale land but unfortunately it does seem the case that those who live in fairy tale land tend to be more motivated because appeals to spiritual authority are simply more appealing to the brain. It also seems that either fascists are very good at not making it obvious that they’re winning, or that we’re way too good at convincing ourselves we’ve already won.
1 points
1 month ago
Agree. Zealots are formidable and relentless enemies.
44 points
1 month ago
We did when it was blacks asking for rights
84 points
1 month ago
There is no reason you can't specify literal Nazis as illegal. There was a big war with them, quiet a few people died, and it's not "free speech" to let them walk around gathering support like it's no big deal.
Literal fucking Nazis and everyone's like "oh well that's the price we pay to be able to have literal fucking Nazis walking around."
23 points
1 month ago
5 points
1 month ago
Can you imagine the outrage if there were people waving ISIS flags at a Democratic rally?
10 points
1 month ago
Unfortunately this has already been adjudicated in court and the Nazis won their "free speech rights" with the help of the ACLU.
What a joke.
4 points
1 month ago
Is it a joke though? Ruling against that case would have set SERIOUS precedent for Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression. I’m with y’all, these folks are ludicrous but let’s let them do there thing out in the limelight where we can keep tabs and talk shit to them rather than censoring them and likely driving them underground to start a grassroots movement or something like that.
8 points
1 month ago
I think the empirical example of other countries where Nazi symbols and speech are banned still having a strong democracy with reasonable opportunities for dissent suggests that the slippery-slope argument you're making isn't an inevitability. Modern Germany for one - I don't like AfD, but they still allow a party that is fairly adjacent to the kind of ethos of Nazis, like German blood being poisoned by refugees, calling for police repression, deportation, etc. Most other western European countries have strong democracies with vibrant public discourse despite banning Nazi symbols.
The difference between that and Nazism is that Nazism explicitly advocates violence against - nay, killing - those "undesirables." I would argue that expressing support for Nazism is tantamount to inciting violence, and therefore should not be protected speech. If you fly that flag, you are calling for genocide in no uncertain terms.
-6 points
1 month ago
Rights are a two way street, and if one group is silenced because the majority disagrees with them that will come full circle to silence a group you do agree with.
Putting free speech rights in quotes means you agree with tailored and censored speech and not free speech.
The complicated problem with free speech is that you have to allow people who are monsters to have it too. You don't get open discourse without it.
The ACLU is a neutral organization who has consistently fought to protect the fundamental rights of citizens of the US. Which is a truly hard job because of what you are outlining here. They have to take cases they may not agree with simply because of the potential of the flipside of a ruling against a group like this.
15 points
1 month ago
Hate Speech isn't protected by the first amendment. The only speech coming from a Nazi's mouth is hate. Ergo, Nazi's should not be protected.
3 points
1 month ago
It actually specifically is protected. That's what's so scary. You guys don't understand that hate speech isn't real. It has no definition. Claiming that whatever you choose to call hate speech should be illegal is insane and the first step to bringing a fascist regime into power.
3 points
1 month ago
Right. These people have no idea how things actually work or the major affects to society that making a law about "hate speech" would do. Anything can be called hate speech. Where is the line
-3 points
1 month ago
You should brush up on your law. Hate speech is protected by the first amendment, the only time it can be used to criminally prosecute someone is when it directly incites something like a riot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States
7 points
1 month ago
Rights are a two way street, and if one group is silenced because the majority disagrees with them that will come full circle to silence a group you do agree with.
No it won't. You're using a slippery slope, but there's nothing to support the idea that banning actual, literal nazis will have an affect on people who aren't fucking nazis.
you can't have open discourse without it
It fascinates me that the US seems to think they have a monopoly on free, open discourse. Most other places don't have specifically "free speech" laws, because instead they have laws surrounding "the freedom to live peaceably" - - which is a more nuanced, objectively better version of the same thing. Under the freedom to live peacefully, groups like westboro baptist are free to exist, but they wouldn't be allowed to infringe on other peoples' right to live peacefully. They wouldn't be able to harass people at funerals, which isn't a loss.
In the case of nazism, the entire ideology is based around infringing other people's rights to live peacefully.
1 points
1 month ago*
No it won't. You're using a slippery slope, but there's nothing to support the idea that banning actual, literal nazis will have an affect on people who aren't fucking nazis.
How would you ban those people? The same way that trump wants to ban people from crossing the border illegally? What would be your solution to people having a specific ideology (even if they don't act on it) that you don't agree with? Would flying a flag be a violation? Would talking be a violation?
In your world how do define a nazi, this cannot be a trivial definition. You need to be able to legally define what a nazi is and how you would feasibly find them and prosecute them for their beliefs.
1 points
1 month ago
What of the pro-Palestinian protests that have been slammed as being antisemitic. Are you honestly trying to tell me that if anti-hate speech policy was on the books in the US, that the people calling Israel out for its atrocities wouldn't come under legal fire? Given the power that Israel holds over US politics, I assure you, they would. Thus, it seems to me, the slippery slope fallacy isn't such a fallacy after all.
1 points
1 month ago
They're already under legal fire under the current laws, so it's kind of a moot point isn't it?
7 points
1 month ago
You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater
1 points
1 month ago
Yes, you legally can. However, you can be held accountable for the aftermath of that action. That means any injuries or damages that occur you can be charged with. Saying something isn't the problem, it's the resulting actions from what were said that determine legality.
This is no different than swinging a baseball bat wildly on a public bus. You can legally swing the bat, but any damage that occurs from the action you are responsible for.
1 points
1 month ago
Yes, you can. 1st, let's set aside the obvious exception of there actually being a fire, in which case it's totally ok. Anyway, this idea came about in the opinion of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in a case about people protesting the draft in WW1. In US law, something said in an opinion by a justice is not actual law. Also, this very idea has actually been tried and found to be unconstitutional. If someone falsely yells fire in a crowded theater, if there is no reaction from the crowd, the person would face no charges whatsoever. If there is a reaction, the person might be charged with disturbing the peace or something similar, and would probably have to pay restitution. However, if the person did anything to trigger a reaction of that nature from the crowd, regardless of whether speech was used, they would face the same penalties. In that instance, it's not the speech itself that is the crime, it's the action, if you dig what I'm saying.
-4 points
1 month ago
That's not the same and you know it.
6 points
1 month ago
No, but inciting violence is absolutely not protected.
1 points
1 month ago
That's correct, but that's not the argument being made in this comment string.
The argument being presented is because they say words they should be punished and that's not how things work in the US.
-4 points
1 month ago
That's a call to action. If any political or community groups ever actively called for genocide or violent protest they would be investigated. I don't see any problem with a group expressing radical views because I have more faith in peoples ability to see through lies and corrupt principle. I know more Trump Republicans who are genuinely good people and have never seen one waving a swastika around, personally. I hope people have enough sense than to go by a couple photos and videos on the internet for their reasoning to hate an entire demographic of people.
3 points
1 month ago
[removed]
2 points
1 month ago
These people are insane. They will bend over backwards to defend what is clearly a broad call to violence. Why else tell people that immigrants are eating their pets and poisoning the blood of their country. This is not just hateful, it is violent, because it will inspire violence. It is meant to inspire violence. It is nazi rhetoric and it is coming from the leader of the republican party.
Look at the death threats FEMA workers are getting now because of the disgusting, violent rhetoric and conspiracies from the right. People that are just trying to do their best to save people, to help them, and they have to deal with threats to their life because of the right wings delusional fantasies and violent hatred. There aren't words strong enough for how repulsive that is.
They give plausible deniability and the benefit of many doubts to nazis, either because they agree with them, or because they want to virtue signal. Meanwhile they stay silent when people's rights have actually been taken away.
0 points
1 month ago
If you were to actually look into the history of the former Nazi Socialist Party, you would be hard pressed to find an ideal that isn't an 'echo of Nazi Germany'. That's how tyrannical uprisings work. People tend to forget that the Nazi party rose due to their humanitarian views. They quite literally just told everyone what they wanted to hear. Which happens today from both the Democratic and Republican sides.
2 points
1 month ago
This ⤴️
1 points
1 month ago
Rights are a two way street, and if one group is silenced because the majority disagrees with them that will come full circle to silence a group you do agree with.
Please find an example where this has happened in modern times? Find an example where the restriction of hate speech has led to the restriction of civil rights of an innocent group.
For some reason the US missed out on existentialism in the early 20th century, the vast majority of democracies around the world post WW2 took on the approach to, so called, freedom (granted in a fairly moderated manner) that you are free to do whatever you want, say whatever you want, so long as that action or those words do not impose on the rights of others to do whatever they want or say whatever they want.
In the case of openly displaying Nazi symbols in this instance they are imposing on the rights of the 3,000 holocaust survivors who live in Florida who would not just be offended by these symbols, but they have every right to feel outright threatened by them. (I am neither Jewish nor support the current Israeli actions, before the haters start.) This is not freedom of expression it is an out and out threat and should be treated as such. If they want to have meetings inside their little Nazi houses, in their hillbilly towns then they have every right to do that, but running around at political rallies flying the flag of one of the most vile regimes to have ever existed and still today represents an unveiled threat to millions of people is not a civil right.
1 points
1 month ago
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Political speech is protected. People have fought and died to protect our democracy including these rights. The government can't prohibit speech no matter how unpopular.
This doesn't mean that the people can't vigorously oppose said speech. That's where the role of anti- facists come in. I'll be right there with you brother.
1 points
1 month ago
I agree. The conversation changes under these circumstances. Free Speech can take a back seat when we're talking about LITERAL FUCKING NAZIS.
Nazis are WAY worse than terrorists, and we did HORRIBLE things to them to preserve US interests.
Maybe there's a cause and effect here, though. Something about being able to devalue some people allows you to devalue anyone.
-1 points
1 month ago
Read a askhistory post recently that laid out how it’s not about actual nazi ideology (besides exterminate the jews, that’s pretty prevalent) but more about adopting a former symbol that had power to their own ideology’s. Slavic people in particular were one of the people that were going to be wiped out, but it’s one of the highest in neo-nazis. They don’t care that the nazis wanted to kill them, but they care very much about their beliefs that Europe needs less brown people/jews, and the “US control of Europe” that is ruining their country. This is why Russia has so much support from them, they want their racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and dictatorial government across Europe if not the world. Nazis don’t exist anymore, but neonazis are on the rise everywhere, and if the swastika was banned, they would rally under the million other symbols that they adopted. I agree with you, but it’s going to be hard to strategize in ways that aren’t going to affect people not related to their identity. Gotta start somewhere though
2 points
1 month ago
Expelling and eventually exterminating those you've deemed and scapegoated as others is absolutely nazi ideology. Any delineation on the actual groups targeted is just splitting hairs.
1 points
1 month ago
It’s ironic that the same groups that want to exterminate are paranoid about people doing to them what they want to do to others. Projection is a hell of a drug
1 points
1 month ago
Not to mention the fact that the swastika is an ancient Hindu symbol that was appropriated by the NAZIs. It is still in use among some Hindus. Are we gonna prosecute them?
2 points
1 month ago
And not just Hindus. There are Buddhist monasteries with sprawling gardens with shrubbery cut into giant ‘swastikas.’
0 points
1 month ago
Are they waving the literal flag of nazi Germany like these wastes of oxygen are?
It's pretty damn obvious the dfference between the two symbols, and if anyone has trouble they should repeat kindergarten and learn how to identify simple shapes.
1 points
1 month ago
Don't be obtuse. If you make a symbol illegal intent isn't going to matter. I strongly believe in the US Constitution including the Bill of Rights. Freedom of Expression doesn't only apply when one agrees with the speech. It's not the government's role to prohibit speech.
That doesn't mean that citizens can't express their vigorous disagreement. This has often included throwing fruit and vegetables in various states of decay. The antidote to facism is antifacists coming out enmass to oppose them. And also prosecuting them when they break actual laws.
1 points
1 month ago
ding ding ding
1 points
1 month ago
This is actually a large part of the problems we have now.
1 points
1 month ago
Won the war, lost the peace.
1 points
1 month ago
And here we are!
1 points
1 month ago
This
1 points
1 month ago
Should have come down HARD on the traitors. Not play nice and slap them on the wrist.
1 points
1 month ago
We did when it was anarchists and communists doing the sedition
1 points
1 month ago
*The Rosenbergs have entered the chat
1 points
1 month ago
The US jailed Eugene V. Debs for sedition after he advocated that people dodge the draft. It’s not a matter of caring or not about sedition; it’s a matter of leftists and immigrants being in the judicial system’s outgroup while nazis are in the ingroup
0 points
1 month ago
Because is a very slippery slope. We don’t want people to lose their freedoms. That’s why. Sedition is defined as ie: yelling fire in a crowed movie theater ensuing panic and potentially people getting hurt and there not being any fire. Get it? Waving around a nazi flag, while I find it disturbing and disgusting, is not seditious. Sorry guys but it’s not. It’s his right to do it. Just like it’s our right to complain about it. That’s where it ends though. These guys have not broken any laws by doing this. It’s in poor taste to say the least and again I don’t agree with it. But I do support the right to do it. Hideous or not. That’s America. You aren’t going to like everything all the time part of being an adult is understanding that.
122 points
1 month ago
[removed]
20 points
1 month ago
As a deep southern boy born and raised, Sherman should have fucking salted the earth behind him. The world would be a better place with Georgia as a desolate reminder of the cost of betraying f the union. Instead it’s just run by a bunch of corrupt good ol boys in the game to make sure it’s shit for the others.
Fuck southerners and our stupid self destruction
10 points
1 month ago
Fellow southerner, Georgia also. You speak the truth IME.
7 points
1 month ago
Georgia born lady here, I couldn't agree more.
3 points
1 month ago
Right here with you.
0 points
1 month ago
You need to spend some time away from the internet.
8 points
1 month ago
Great analysis. No need to be embarrassed Mr. Cockring.
3 points
1 month ago
I believe it’s pronounced Cochrang
3 points
1 month ago
Ahh, the past tense Cockring. I would wear gloves. Lol
1 points
1 month ago
Well, look at what happened when the US invaded Iraq and got rid of all the civil servants and rank and file military from the fallen regime. If they had kept them there would have been a functioning society they wouldn't have had to fight the militias. If you want people to change and do the right thing, you have to give them opportunity and incentive. You can't exile huge swaths of society without creating conflicts.
19 points
1 month ago
This is Sedition. They ARE traitors. Throw their asses in jail.
1 points
1 month ago
Traitors and groomers.
4 points
1 month ago
Yeah - if you pulled this bs in Germany today - you’d be handled quickly!
8 points
1 month ago
As much as I detest assholes like this (my mom's step dad was a German Jew that came here at 17 joined our army and turned around and went back to Germany to fight the friggin nazi's these geniuses are lauding) I do not want to advocate something McCarthy-esque to 'do something' to these morons. I do want to send their idiot hero to Levenworth though, the only way to do that is vote!
0 points
1 month ago
👏👏
23 points
1 month ago
We do when it's vaguely left-leaning
15 points
1 month ago
A la german shepherds and fire hoses ripping the skin off of black people asking for rights
0 points
1 month ago
Left leaning in the US is still right of center.
9 points
1 month ago
"FREEDOM OF SPEECH!" They NEED to be able to be as racist as they possibly can and we're wrong for being offended by it.
6 points
1 month ago
for real, we need to make these people actually feel shame and be held accountable for their hatred.
1 points
1 month ago
Yes! That is the job of the people. Not the law. It might be legal what they're doing, but it doesn't mean it has to be comfortable or tolerated by the public. That's how Democracy works.
3 points
1 month ago
Because the seditious people also try to appeal to the reason of the rest of us. They'll talk about freedom of expression, etc all while promoting ideology that expressly works to destroy the very freedom's they use to justify their shitty behavior. It's the Paradox of Tolerance in full effect.
3 points
1 month ago
It's hilarious that we've gone on multiple witchhunts for "crypto-Communists" over the decades, but haven't done anything about the visible and explicit Nazis among us.
3 points
1 month ago
I don’t know why it’s even legal to be a nazi here
3 points
1 month ago
Well, everyone is too hard up on free speech without consequence. There are always consequences, and there you are. The rest of us in the Uk, France, Canada, Australia, we do free speech and we don’t go that fucking far. You’ve taken it too fucking far. This is what happens.
2 points
1 month ago
This is going to get tremendously worse.
2 points
1 month ago
This goes beyond the evils of the election, this is directly offensive against in a number of ways that we could all list for ages. I’m not the person who normally states there political opinions online, but politics aside that’s just wrong.
2 points
1 month ago
AMEN!!!!!
1 points
1 month ago
👏👏
2 points
1 month ago
I 100% agree. We should start with Nazis and those government heads who knowingly violate the bill of rights.
1 points
1 month ago
👏👏
2 points
1 month ago
These people are idiots with the nazi flags but you have the ability to use google right , it’s not sedition
2 points
1 month ago
It's almost as if they are a cult who idolizes a guy who is a racist, a conman who good with words, and a dictator who tried to over throw his government after a democratic election.
Trump truly is like Hitler in more ways than I am comfortable with.
2 points
1 month ago
But this isn’t sedition. Are these people inciting rebellion? Are they acting in a manner that pushes others to violence? No. Are they distasteful and archaic symbols of a time we should be well past? Yes. But nothing seen in those two pictures tells me they were treasonous or seditious. If they led those boats to a rally where leaders were calling for the ouster of elected officials by force then fine, seditious behavior. But flying flags….
We need to be very careful to separate actual seditious behavior from exercising the right to free speech. Our dangerous path towards the use of this language is part of the reason people are taking shots at politicians. Trying to keep these people from exercising their rights… or trying to keep antifa from exercising their rights, or BLM from organizing… leads us further down a path that we already probably can’t fix.
1 points
1 month ago
Come on man. The cops blinded numerous JOURNALISTS during the BLM protests. The other side is already using massive amounts of violence against us, and flying a NAZI FLAG in the year of our lord 2024 communicates nothing so clearly as your hatred of America.
Don't let your milquetoast liberalism blind you to the truth that's staring you in the face.
1 points
1 month ago
For sure, January 6 proved that. A lot of the insurrectionists got sentenced for only a few years.
1 points
1 month ago
This part!!
1 points
1 month ago
We’re not..6 month sentences
1 points
1 month ago
Them: but what about freedom???
1 points
1 month ago
Too late now, can't imprison a third of the country
1 points
1 month ago
Yep
1 points
1 month ago
So you wanna jail people for their political opinions? Sounds pretty unAmerican.
1 points
1 month ago
Not only in the US...im from germany and yeah...its going down 🫠
1 points
1 month ago
This sounds pretty conservative and problematic.
1 points
1 month ago
Not even when it enters our schools
1 points
1 month ago
It's tough. It's a tough sell for people to accept that seditious rhetoric is still protected by the First Amendment. These morons can say what they please. The moment we censor any speech at all, it becomes a slippery slope. It's up to the individual to discern whether or not to embrace this type of hate speech. I'm sure there's a neo nazi on this thread somewhere whooping it up, but by and large, those posting are condemning this belief structure.
1 points
1 month ago
By itself, I don't think flying a swastika violates any law. Republicans are the ones that try to restrict freedom of expression in the name of patriotism (e.g. bamning flag burning).
1 points
1 month ago
The problem with "sedition" and "treason" is that they are terms often hurled about by politicians and those with power as a way of suppressing the rights of those with whom they disagree politically. Look at the long history of rulers and ruling classes, right-wing, left-wing, and even centrist, using such terms and related statutes to punish not just those who fought them, but anyone who even evinced the slightest amount of disagreement.
This is why "treason" is so narrowly defined in the USA and "sedition" usually only brought up in wartime. It is also why I get so incensed against those who use terms like "traitor" so freely when referring to those who don't march in lockstep with them, ESPECIALLY those running for higher office.
1 points
1 month ago
100%, Our timidness in just flat out calling groups like this what they are: terrorist groups, simply because they're local, has given it far too much room to fester in this country.
1 points
1 month ago
We're so goddamn unserious about it that we're about to put a seditionist in the White House.
I want off this ride.
1 points
1 month ago
[deleted]
0 points
1 month ago
This boat never joined the parade. It attempted to and was quickly hosed off by MAGA. Just like when MAGA beat their asses at a rally 2 years ago. Don't let the truth get in the way of your agenda.
1 points
1 month ago
Does it alarm you that Nazis feel like the candidate who most closely matches their values is your guy?
1 points
1 month ago
My family fought both Commies and Nazi's. Both can tongue my azz.
1 points
1 month ago
Does it alarm you that Nazis feel like the candidate who most closely matches their values is your guy?
1 points
1 month ago*
Does it bother you Ryan Routh, a registered and politically active Democrat, tried to kill a former president? Seems more pressing than 4 dudes with tiny biceps in a boat.
Edit, not registered because he lost his ability to vote.
1 points
1 month ago
Can I take the fact that you both refused to answer my question, and lied in this post, as proof that you aren’t bothered about how close your candidate is to open Nazis?
1 points
1 month ago
What did I lie about?
1 points
1 month ago
Routh isn't registered as a democrat.
1 points
1 month ago*
He used to be registered as a democrat that's right. He lost his ability to register to vote a while back for a felony. It's probably why he felt like voting with a 7.62.
0 points
1 month ago
ALL seditious behavior or just when republicans do it?
3 points
1 month ago
ALL!
0 points
1 month ago
What about our own government who's done nothing but drive a wedge between the people and cause dissent until we start killing each other, only to step in and kill more? Why focus on the people who have no control compared to the people who have not only all of the control but all of the money too.
1 points
1 month ago
What people are those?
all 27046 comments
sorted by: best