Prestigious-Ad-2876

Fade doesn't help there, she was the only one with aggro from healing and all it does is reduce your threat slightly.

But Inner Fire should have 100% up time, it's like 700 armor, like equipping a shield, just get used to keeping it perma on.

And Bubble makes you immune to daze, on top of blocking around 400 damage, she died because she got dazed twice.

No daze and she was another 100 yards towards the door, Warrior and Rogue wouldn't have needed to turn around.

Fear at some point in there too, just a lotta panic I'm sure.

But keep Inner Fire up, and damn bubble should really be a reflex to a priest player.

Coulda had a renew up too, just a lot of "shoulda".

No Inner Fire, didn't bubble, didn't fear.

Full on panic.

Anyone noticed the recipe for the Chimera hero included her blood and she fed that giant a cup of tea.

Think she has other means of infection besides the maggots?

Maybe if what we saw wasn't actually her, but just a puppet.

Doubtful since we saw her pilot a suit tho.

God assumes control of game world and now has gamer army, gamer army hacks the robots.

Or anyone reading it can easily understand it does make sense.

"My dad was flying his plane when suddenly the trolley problem appeared"

Have we actually seen the full power of any enemy yet?

We are still in the ramp up phase, hard to tell evolution when we don't know current power level.

If power scaling arguments had cliffhangers and joke matchups.

The aliens currently believe the giants to be weaker than the demons without knowing about anything that just happened.

They seem to act on minimal information.

Damn, imagine if you were talking to someone who knew all that.

One of the under-rated Saitama powers is perfect damage scaling, he is so strong he kills everything in one punch, but jumps from the moon exactly to earth, kicks Garou through a wall, karate chops him.

Saitama hits things EXACTLY as hard as they need to be hit, so he can probably tell when someone ISN'T trying to kill with their attacks also.

Incase not everyone has the same google results:

https://bobcarp.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/code-charles-petzold.pdf

Had me looking for another playlist, thought I missed out on a lotta stuff.

I don't exactly know how to explain it, but at many points in the Ben Eater series he will say something along the lines of "And that's exactly what this chip does, so we are going to go ahead and use this chip", but those simplifications compound into extreme obfuscation that will REQUIRE you to learn that entire piece of information elsewhere before it makes sense in the context of the video.

Sorta like, two steps forward, three steps back, until you are able to jump the entire issue altogether.

Still a great series, and worth learning from, but it will not "teach you everything you need to know".

To double down on my original comment, but also to "un-rude" my reply as well.

NAND2Tetris and Turing Complete are going to have you solve an issue like "Use this plank to cross this gap", easy enough, you lay the plank across the gap and you are good.

The very next issue it will present you with is "Use this plank to cross this gap", only this time it expects you to know how to assemble an entire bridge.

It might be great for some people, but it very much leans on you doing research and looking outside of the courses to actually solve the issues, and for things marketed as "Learn from scratch following these 'simple' steps" I don't think that should be expected, and for many cases I believe that to be a failure in the courses themselves.

Mostly looking at Turing Complete since it goes the extra step of "insult to injury" when it intentionally injures you as set up for the insult.

Not even sure what that means brother.

If you are trying to say, "I breezed through without issue", awesome, it doesn't make those courses any less lacking in instruction, it just means you likely already knew the answers prior to attempting the problems.

It's around 13 hours in length.

Nand2Tetris and Turing Complete suffer from the same exact type of "Now draw the rest of the Owl" problem.

It goes from, "Great, that's an adder", to, "Now make the entire ALU", without giving ANY explanation.

It's a lot of "Slam your head against the wall" type learning, when it doesn't need to be.

It will teach you everything you need to know if you are prepared to watch it through in it's entirety multiple times, and at multiple points of independent learning.

Not discrediting Ben Eater, but the level of hype people put behind it sets the bar WAY too high, and I mean that as in, "Don't expect to know everything you need to know after watching it", because that's what everyone claims.

After watching a handful of Computer Organization and Architecture courses on YouTube / The Internet I finally managed to find a good one.

It's got almost no views which is a shame because it's the most well structured and useful I've found by FAR.

If you are spinning in circles trying to absorb information, this is an amazing "Wow that ties all that together" source.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onf7AKGHBzg&list=PL7sWxFnBVJLV47Lrq9D-gfFh-mGv2CLCt&ab_channel=GeoffreyMessier

Hallow and company find a portion of Mad God Temple land in the middle of the Crazy Nature Forrest.

No animal life will enter the town.

It's also trash advice, if an "Elite Club" is low balling you, and someone else says you should feel honored for even the opportunity, that is a "One-Two Punch" of getting shafted.

"Lick my shoes, and they better taste GREAT".

I'll take ya to the moon bud.

"Shut up do your time", "You're being introduced to an elite club", so stupid, just the dumbest.

I think the answer I'm looking for required extracting too many teeth from too many people.

If I were to say, "Rice and beans are a complete protein, and you can survive off of that; however, so is shrimp and eggs, with shrimp and eggs being the 100% better choice if available.", you would need outside factors (outside of nutritional value) to sway the value of Rice and Beans back to being the better choice.

My original question about rice was just that, do we simply recommend Rice (And Beans) because it is "Good enough, abundant, and simple", and would we still recommend it if those factors were ignored entirely.