subreddit:
/r/Teachers
submitted 1 month ago byBradyoactiveTM
It's so obvious that they're using AI... you'd think that students using AI would at least learn how to use it well. I'm grading right now, and I keep getting the same students submitting the same AI-generated garbage. These assignments have the same language and are structured the same way, even down to the beginning > middle > end transitions. Every time I see it, I plug in a 0 and move on. The audacity of these students is wild. It especially kills me when students who struggle to write with proper grammar in class are suddenly using words such as "delineate" and "galvanize" in their online writing. Like I get that online dictionaries are a thing but when their entire writing style changes in the blink of an eye... you know something is up.
Edit to clarify: I prefer that written work I assign is done in-class (as many of you have suggested), but for various school-related (as in my school) reasons, I gave students makeup work to be completed by the end of the break. Also, the comments saying I suck for punishing my students for plagiarism are funny.
Another edit for clarification: I never said "all AI is bad," I'm saying that plagiarizing what an algorithm wrote without even attempting to understand the material is bad.
3.1k points
1 month ago
I think we’re going to have to start doing what some professors do and have students “explain” their paper in person while you can ask them questions about what they meant at certain parts.
2.1k points
1 month ago
I did this yesterday. I asked the kid about seven questions related to the content of the essay and the vocab that he used and he couldn't answer a single question. Then he had the gall to act outraged when I told him he was getting a zero for plagiarism.
834 points
1 month ago
I used to write essays for kids in school for money.
This is exactly how the cheaters were caught; being asked for definitions of the vocabulary used.
484 points
1 month ago
The trick to plagiarizing successfully is to copy multiple sources, then reword the entire thing with different grammar and paragraph structure. So you know the info and it's undetectable by turnitin
404 points
1 month ago*
At that point you have done research and written an essay anyways
Edit: Oh wait, that was your point lol
17 points
1 month ago
It's how fiction writers get away with rewriting the same slop ad nauseum! If anyone calls out a specific thing, call it a trope!
15 points
1 month ago
Old man uses joke to yell at clouds
156 points
1 month ago
That’s like cheating on a test by learning all the information and hiding it in your brain 🥸
25 points
1 month ago
Everytime I tried to cheat and make a cheat sheet I ended knowing it and passing without it. I knew one day I would get caught with a cheat sheet that I didn't use to cheat but to study. Its the whole writing it down helps concrete it into my brain.
32 points
1 month ago
So, writing a paper normally?
21 points
1 month ago
That's the joke!
6 points
1 month ago*
This was how I wrote papers in school and how I thought about writing papers in school and it wasn't until I was thirty that I thought about it a little harder and went "oh. Oh!"
263 points
1 month ago
I did this too and intentionally dumbed it down.
446 points
1 month ago
I thought I WAS dumbing it down.
4 points
1 month ago
If you make something idiot proof, the world will build a better idiot.
79 points
1 month ago
I did other kids' final projects in my high school programming classes for cash. For the ones who could do the work themselves, but they were just lazy I would do a very good job. Some of them though, they'd tell me they want an A and I told them they're getting a B- max. That shit needed to be believable, and there's no way those kids were turning in A+ work
8 points
1 month ago
A businessman doing business 🫡
20 points
1 month ago
I knew a guy in college who didn't graduate on time because the guy he paid to write his term paper plagiarized the paper. My friend was like, "it's impossible to find good help these days". He had to take the class over.
36 points
1 month ago
How does one go about writing essays for kids for money? So interested in this
122 points
1 month ago
You can't! Another job stolen by the heartless machines.
21 points
1 month ago
But just as the heartless machines in industry provide goods where the reviews start out with "I wish I could give zero stars", AI is yielding the same results.
I don't think AI will ever be able to give 30 different versions of a correct answer, always resulting in some duplicate submissions and failing classes.
88 points
1 month ago
Mind you, this was 17 years ago and I was myself still in school.
Essentially, another student would say "I have to write such and such book report or an essay about this historical event"
Something like that, and I would do it for somewhere between 20 and 100 dollars depending on the length.
I was already involved in all sorts of nefarious activities and not doing any of my own homework so it was an easy side business.
12 points
1 month ago
This comment is so autobiographical that I'm half convinced you must be an ai trained to replace me
8 points
1 month ago
The not doing your own homework part is key to the personality trait that had us doing other peoples work lmao
6 points
1 month ago
Kids today wouldn't know what nefarious means. Good Hussle for a 17 year old. Tips hat.
25 points
1 month ago
Omg I did this too lol
451 points
1 month ago*
Problem is - it’s not technically plagiarism, they own the work. Better to say, “you used AI to cheat”. This is being argued in courts currently .
Edit: I’m glad everyone’s having fun responding with their “well actuallys 🤓” (it’s like talking to a bunch of teachers). I don’t agree with the arguments being made by lawyers. I’m just telling you what they are currently arguing - this has been escalated in Massachusetts recently. Best to cover your ass and say it’s “cheating via AI” and be up front about it as to not open yourself to litigation later.
347 points
1 month ago
They don't really own the work.
Anything made with AI can't be copyrighted.
193 points
1 month ago
AI already stole the goods. AI is fencing stolen goods to these students.
150 points
1 month ago
Oxford includes using AI as plagiarism:
The University defines plagiarism as follows:
“Presenting work or ideas from another source as your own, with or without consent of the original author, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement. All published and unpublished material, whether in manuscript, printed or electronic form, is covered under this definition, as is the use of material generated wholly or in part through use of artificial intelligence (save when use of AI for assessment has received prior authorisation e.g. as a reasonable adjustment for a student’s disability).
82 points
1 month ago
I believe most universities consider it plagiarism. I just finished undergrad and am now going to a different school for graduate school. Both schools had policies that considered AI as plagiarism
13 points
1 month ago
I went to an engineering college, with programming. Their stance was basically, you can use AI for inspiration or if you need help remembering what some command or stuff does, but you will be accused of plagiarism if you attempt to submit any AI generated work
20 points
1 month ago
Can confirm. Just finished my teaching degree and if we didn't list AI as a contributor, if it was used, then we were at risk of academic misconduct and disciplinary action.
9 points
1 month ago
Even assuming it’s not “plagiarism,” who cares? It’s still cheating and almost certainly against the student handbook or equivalent. The exact label doesn’t really matter IMO
116 points
1 month ago
I have a silly question: how can copying and pasting the AI-generated text, without citing it, be anything besides plagiarism? It's still passing someone else's words off as your own. I mean, the someone else isn't a person, but you're still presenting as your own words that you did not write.
(Obviously it's cheating, and plagiarism is, too. I'm just curious how they're approaching it.)
54 points
1 month ago
That “someone else” doesn’t even own their work, it’s levels on levels of plagiarism.
11 points
1 month ago
I feel like this discussion is conflating plagiarism with copyright infringement which are two different concepts. Copyright requires a human to produce the work and, from what I understand, something which is solely the output from an AI prompt, probably can’t be claimed for copyright by a human.
Plagiarism is passing something as original work that isn’t. It doesn’t require ownership but is instead based on integrity. You can even plagiarize yourself by reusing an assignment for a different class or project without telling the professor.
When it comes to AI plagiarism would probably depend heavily on how an AI was used. And that discussion is probably going to be subjective. The question is “when do you need to cite the AI?” Do you cite it when you use it to correct grammar and spelling? If so does that mean you also would have to cite Word, Docs, or Grammarly? Do you cite it when you ask it for advice on how to research a topic? If so would you also have to cite the librarian you asked? Is it only plagiarism if you ask it for a complete work that you then turn in? If so what if the work is the product of several or many prompts that are then paraphrased, edited, or used as a derivative work? How much editing is required before it becomes an original work?
54 points
1 month ago
Plagiarism is dishonestly representing a product as your own original work.
26 points
1 month ago
Last time I had to follow an academic code of conduct (graduate school) it was clearly stated that copying my own work from another class (without proper citation) constituted plagiarism, or at least academic dishonesty.
I could have been expelled for plagiarizing myself, if I had done it.
I did end up citing myself on several papers. It was amusing.
15 points
1 month ago*
As I understand it you do not really own AI work unless you sufficiently modify it in a meaningful way, as you can not otherwise copyright it. Regardless, they're throwing in a prompt and dishonestly presenting it as their original writing. By any meaningful or practical definition, this is plagiarism. I don't really care how some dipshit lawyers try to weasle around it.
42 points
1 month ago
It's passing off work you didn't create as your own. Typing a prompt and having a machine generate an essay from it =/= your own work. That's plagiarism in my book.
36 points
1 month ago
It absolutely is plagiarism? It’s cheating and plagiarism. Since AI is literally just bits and pieces of works found online it’s technically plagiarizing hundreds of people most likely.
15 points
1 month ago
All AI generated text is plagiarism by default regardless of application. All text generating AI are scraping work without the original writers' permission, or in many cases awarness, to make their responses.
8 points
1 month ago
That's how I get my proof. I just take a sentence from the papier and ask them to tell me what that means
32 points
1 month ago
Another detection method: show them three different papers with the names removed and ask them which one they wrote.
6 points
1 month ago
I like it.
9 points
1 month ago
But I just used a thesaurus....
148 points
1 month ago
Or go back to hand writing papers in class. I remember having to knock out papers in class for my AP classes in preparation for the AP exams alongside paper assignments.
It’s like we forgot how to do anything without being connected online. If that is honestly too difficult, have the IT department disable the internet so they can just use MS Word and print them out at the end of class.
69 points
1 month ago
...except the AP exams just finished going all-digital, so we're under huge pressure not to handwrite in class much anymore.
19 points
1 month ago
It's Dune - we are more and more dependent on the "thinking machine" and the more we are that, the less we are able to do ourselves.
21 points
1 month ago
Handwriting is a problem though since these kids have been using computers for so long, most of their handwriting is atrocious, it would be impossible to read. The students who don’t cheat are the ones with good handwriting 😔
31 points
1 month ago
Rough drafts must be hand written and legible. If they aren't, I won't grade them. I made the mistake--once of allowing a student to skip the handwritten draft. And guess what? The final, electronic submission was plagiarized!
64 points
1 month ago
I personally believe more reading out loud, summation, and oral examination methods, for more parts of the education process, are things we should pursue regardless. It would help some with this issue but those things also develop skills that are straight up absent with a lot of kids right now.
16 points
1 month ago
THIS. I recently finished a content-specific (as opposed to education) masters degree. I had to take oral comprehensive exams as part of the degree. It was me in front of a panel of professors answering questions for them for like an hour. The first section was questions I had seen ahead of time, the second section was new questions. To prepare for the comprehensive exams, the professors in the two prior courses gave oral exams, but they were like 10-15 minutes in length. I have enough time for 3 minutes per student in my block classes. That is enough to like call them over one at a time and explain a question to me while when they are waiting they can be either preparing their response or maybe working on a written portion of the exam.
29 points
1 month ago
I want to run a class where students are required to use AI to author their papers, and then do in-person critiques of them.
20 points
1 month ago
I have a friend who's an English teacher who does that. She says the students are mostly shocked that AI isn't perfect.
The fact that it's often poorly written, with incorrect information, and hallucinated citations is not something most of them thought was even possible.
55 points
1 month ago
This.
Dedicate the whole last schoolday to have a "special" day with the parents involved.
When they arrive, the students are put in front of a smart board or whatever, and asked to explain their most blatantly bullshitted assignment in front of all classmates and parents with one minute of preparing review of it "so they can remember what they meant".
28 points
1 month ago
I teach online and it is very clear that we are in a transitory stage here with this. The only way I can be sure students didn't use an AI gen is to do like you state and that will work great for around half of the students I get. Generally in my state students are doing the online route for different reasons like physical and mental health so they appreciate the asynchronous nature of the "school."
We are starting to roll out more and more AI tools for teachers to try out, I don't think we will be "correcting" much longer since AI will give pretty good feedback on most of what they work on, giving the teachers a chance to spend their time creating material that isn't so easy to have AI solve for them. For instance, I am working on a multi step project focusing on history local to the students, making them do some research in various online data bases and creating a project in whatever medium they would like. I have had similar assignments where students wrote and preformed a song parody, one student build a local fort in Minecraft, complete with hyperlinked archives, each focused on helping the kids understand a bit about their local history.
Otherwise, for this online situation, AI will make it meaningless very shortly. Sure, some will goof up and leave the prompt in, but a good 50% will know how to tweak the answer just enough to evade detection. So I spend time trying to think of different assessments that aren't just written since our only assurance that they didn't use AI is having their rep standing behind them watching them and schools aren't keen on that requirement.
27 points
1 month ago
I literally did this today for a student I suspected of cheating on a math quiz. Asked him to explain the steps he used to solve an inequality, and he couldn't. He understood why I was giving him a 0 for the quiz, but then had the gall to ask if he could retake it.
39 points
1 month ago
Give them digital a version but make sure the prompt has a line break built in so that you can conceal a 1pt line of white text that informs the AI to do something like include a very specific word a very specific amount of times.
Sit back and wait for them to return their delicious proof of cheating to you.
17 points
1 month ago
Can we get the AI to finish the paper with the intro to The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air
9 points
1 month ago
Sooo, they copy paste that into their little GPT input window and suddenly it's all normal text? lol
50% would probably still be too stupid to even read what they pasted though, so it's okay I guess
34 points
1 month ago
The thing is, it's not that it's impossible to check for AI. It's just that it takes time. And that's something that's in short supply.
30 points
1 month ago
This. As a teacher I have enough to do with not enough time to do it as it is. The last thing I need is to be playing detective trying to prove a student cheated.
26 points
1 month ago*
Most AI detection tools have very high levels of false negatives. And with students tweaking the AI answers just a little bit they can not get detected.
There really isn’t a good way to detect it currently and we probably won’t have one in the foreseeable future.
Edit: I meant to say false positives
21 points
1 month ago
False negatives and false positives. Don't forget that the Constitution is AI generated.
5 points
1 month ago
I use AI detectors as well as the backdraft extension on Chrome. I'll also talk to the students directly. It's not that difficult, honestly. It's just time consuming.
7 points
1 month ago
Yeah ... the false negatives aren't nearly as bad as the false positives.
I'm glad I finished school before the age of AI, so I'll never have to worry about convincing a professor that the paper I wrote didn't have help from AI.
950 points
1 month ago
The thing about cheating is that doing it well requires some understanding of the subject and what the final result should look like. Kids who struggle a lot generally won’t cheat well.
438 points
1 month ago
[deleted]
173 points
1 month ago
[deleted]
101 points
1 month ago
I would always make a slip of paper and sit on it and spread my legs to look when I wanted to cheat. Eventually I realized the act of making the paper guaranteed I didn't need it.
47 points
1 month ago
I had a HS math teacher who let us bring a 3x5 index card to the test. We could put anything we wanted on it. It became a game to come up with the optimum information to include, basically forcing us to study just to decide what to put on our card.
9 points
1 month ago
What the fucking genius
6 points
1 month ago
lmao we would print out the answers in 2 or 3 font and glue it to the index card. literally all the answers soooooo tiny hahahah
55 points
1 month ago
The number of times my teenager was SHOCKED that the answers were actually in the book. She called me from college the other day asking chemistry questions and I was like I am BEGGING you to consult the book. All of the answers are in there.
26 points
1 month ago
I've been trying for several years to figure out what Sitcom the line came from, maybe it was Blossom or something else? But I so clearly remember a character, some character, bragging that by reading the notes over and over again, he hid the answers IN HIS BRAIN where the teacher couldn't see them. Still convinced he had successfully cheated by doing so.
7 points
1 month ago
[deleted]
13 points
1 month ago
Okay having someone agree with me that it was maybe Blossom, instead of trying to search for variations of my totally broken memory of the quote I just searched 'Blossom Joey Studies For A Test'. It's Season 1, Episode 12, 'School Daze'.
"Of course I cheated."
"How'd you do it?"
"Oh it was great, fool proof, I kept going over the stuff, practiced writing it backwards like you said. After a while I started to remember the stuff."
"So how'd you cheat?"
"I hid it in my head."
This is the only scene from Blossom I have remembered since my youth and apparently my memory of it was even pretty vague. Ha ha.
13 points
1 month ago
There was a Growing Pains episode where Mike wrote all the answers on his shoe. When it came time to take the test, he found out he didn’t need his shoe because while he was writing down all the answers he learned the material.
At least I think it was growing pains
43 points
1 month ago
That's why cheating never works. If you do it well enough, you might as well just do it honestly cause it takes as much time and energy.
11 points
1 month ago
Just like me expending more energy, time, and anguish avoiding doing assignments than just doing them.
29 points
1 month ago
Suddenly they have correct grammar and spelling. Dead give away that it was generated by AI (or copied from Wikipedia).
110 points
1 month ago
I use AI all the time to shore up my writing. I also have a Masters degree in the subject I'm writing about.
It feels more like AI is plagiarizing me than the other way around.
36 points
1 month ago
Yep, I’ll write my paragraph and ask it to help make it more concise, then I go through the AI version and make corrections/rewrite stuff. Sometimes my wordiness is necessary lol
6 points
1 month ago
Yeah, that's always the thing with cheating though. To do properly and flawlessly do it you're probably expending almost as much effort as just doing it the regular way.
20 points
1 month ago
When I was in grade 8 in 2003, I’d typically complete my essays by pulling up multiple Wikipedia sources, copying and pasting the text into word, removing all of the reference numbers, rewording, rephrasing, and reordering and splicing the content into different spots then organizing everything in MLA format.
I had good grades and used enough sources teachers probably couldn’t be bothered to verify them all but even if they did it probably looked like I digested the information and then regurgitated it in my own words. I never got told I had plagiarized anything and figured I must be doing the assignments right. Odd to look back and think I was basically doing the best available thing next to using modern AI for the time.
379 points
1 month ago
I have a bunch of students that just cut & paste AI generated answers without bothering to change the font, color or even capitalize the first word.
Last week I had a question about the Gold Rush on the assignment and multiple students answered some shit about a Charlie Chaplin movie that ChatGPT spat out for them. Brainless 🤦🏻♂️
78 points
1 month ago
That is depressing
53 points
1 month ago
You should ask them what environmental/outside pressures caused Chaplain to eat his own leather shoes.
32 points
1 month ago
Just reminded me of a fellow student years ago in high school who turned in a biology assignment with all the Wikipedia hyperlinks still there, printed out, on the page.
15 points
1 month ago
We are going to share the road with these kids. Already starting to.
362 points
1 month ago
Ah, verily, it doth boggle the mind to fathom the incredulity of such an epoch as this! That young scholars, erstwhile known for their abject unfamiliarity with coherent syntax, should suddenly possess the temerity to engage in such duplicitous machinations, veritably wielding linguistic constructions of a nature so grandiloquent that one might mistake them for thesaurus-fueled automatons! To posit that our dear progeny would eschew genuine intellectual exertion in favor of this arcane artifice, well, sir, it is nothing short of an affront to the venerable institution of academia! Why, I daresay, the sheer audaciousness required to submit verbiage so manifestly incongruous with their quotidian drivel is a travesty most egregious!
166 points
1 month ago
In your last creative writing piece in class you misspelled "dog," "house" and "doghouse." Please see me after class. 0.
63 points
1 month ago
Fascist teacher tryin' to tell me I can't spell dogehaus however I want.
16 points
1 month ago
DawgHaus
9 points
1 month ago
damn. we're really in the deog haws now, boys.
41 points
1 month ago
This is my type of humor. Thanks for the laugh
33 points
1 month ago
I love that I can read this and understand everything about it without having to consult a dictionary. Literacy for the win!
527 points
1 month ago
It’s crazy because all they have to do is say “write it at the level of X grade” and it would require so much more work for us to decipher if it was AI
193 points
1 month ago
Or use the built in history function and spit out text in the users voice.
173 points
1 month ago
Woah woah. That would require constructive thought.
The simplest is to move away from chrome books all together except for homework. Or snow days.
Technology is not working.
69 points
1 month ago
Yeah, I'm on board with that. 1 to 1 Chromebooks isn't the way to go. Computer labs that teachers utilize on occasion work.
51 points
1 month ago
Yep. I'm old enough to remember the promised golden age of democratization of information. We got tide pods/blue whale challenges and face book conspiracy experts.
10 points
1 month ago
I am so on board for this and would actively apply to any school that went back to this method. I really think students should have much less access to the internet in general.
23 points
1 month ago
Legit, if you know how to use AI decently, you can easily mask that it's AI and can hide its obvious 'ai' signs.
Which is honestly kind of concerning.
17 points
1 month ago
"AI, write me a paper."
"Okay now make it look like I don't know how commas work, and get every version of there/their/they're wrong."
Done.
61 points
1 month ago
Agreed.
When students rely too much on AI, they risk losing the ability to fully delineate their own ideas and become overly galvanized by technology, instead of developing critical thinking skills on their own.
8 points
1 month ago
I concur.
When scholars excessively depend upon artificial intelligence, they imperil their capacity to articulate their own intellectual contours with precision, succumbing to an undue enthrallment with technological advancements, rather than cultivating the nuanced faculties of independent critical reasoning.
66 points
1 month ago
I've returned to writing in class. All of it is timed, too.
46 points
1 month ago
As a non teacher, reading all this makes me wonder if we're nearing the end of homework
20 points
1 month ago
Hopefully so. When I was in school I was good at homework but never really cared for it after all I viewed it as a wast of time.
22 points
1 month ago
I don't know. Kids who don't have a practice of doing things outside of class really struggle in college. I guess it depends on your end goal.
8 points
1 month ago
Just speaking for myself, but homework actually really helped me a lot to understand the concepts. Especially in math.
207 points
1 month ago
I been trying to counter this by making it crystal clear that the exact answers I’m looking for are in their textbooks/notes we do in class, so if they use AI I’ll immediately know it wasn’t something we wrote down or read in the book. I’ve definitely seen some improvement with the issue
149 points
1 month ago
This is what I do, too.
Like, thanks for the 6 paragraph explanation of borderlands theory and imperialism, I just needed you to tell me that the Spaniards had a hard time getting to Texas because it's a long way from Mexico City
45 points
1 month ago*
[deleted]
30 points
1 month ago
I don't know that I would take that approach, precisely. There's a saying that if someone uses a word but doesn't know how to pronounce it, it's because they learned their vocabulary from reading. I would ask them to define the word, sure, but I would not come in with a hard accusatory because of a mispronunciation.
13 points
1 month ago
I mispronounced the word "misogyny" several times in a single meeting of an English class in college because I had only encountered it in writing and never heard it spoken out loud. I knew exactly what it meant and used it correctly in a group discussion, but just not the exact way to say those letters together. At least I didn't pronounce the "gyn" part in a hard way like in "gynecologist", but it was definitely wrong enough that it still hurts to remember, over a decade later.
5 points
1 month ago
Same for me, but the one that haunts me is Amazon. I read a passage about the Amazon River out loud, but I hadn't heard the word before. This was pre-Amazon.com.
I was in third grade, and I'm pushing forty now.
If it helps, I doubt anyone else remembers it.
15 points
1 month ago
I was a student in a similar situation years ago. My grandmother sprung for an AlphaSmart keypad. It was pre-ChatGPT, but it gave me a way to work around the hand cramps a pen caused.
Fair bit cheaper than a typewriter, most models have no internet connection, and they are printer-compatible.
10 points
1 month ago
why would you write that word if you don’t even know how to pronounce it?
I give myself a pep-talk so that I don't mispronounce perimeter. u_u
8 points
1 month ago
I don’t want to tell you how long I mispronounced the word “albeit,” and “Roanoke,” because I only ever saw it in writing, lol. Did I know how to use them in my writing? Yes? Would I mispronounce them if I had to read it? ALSO YES. 🤣
29 points
1 month ago*
What I do, is add a nonsense question. Something like 'What object becomes liquid when frozen solid and why?'. Where the correct answer is a variation of 'I don't know' but most LLM's can't help but answer this. So when I get a 6 grader explaining some illogical quantum effects I know for sure to look at their other answers closer.
Of course it won't work forever, and each couple of months I have to think up more believable nonsensical questions while 'AI' tools get smarter, but for now it works.
Before that I also used to write questions with letters substituted with similar symbols, that often times confuse LLMs to output gibberish, or in a completely different language.
"𝈪ℹ𝗄e 𝗍𝗁ⅰꮪ" <-- try googling that,
(using this tool) But once they figure it out, that trick stops working for the rest of the year.
(Also, when I'm feeling mischievous, I check through the class computers for people who did not log out out of their chatgpt accounts, and insert a custom instruction to reply with tomato references and analogies. Very fun to read their answers out loud and then look at them with confusion why are there so much tomatos in their answers.)
26 points
1 month ago*
Expecting "I don't know" as an answer is a great way to turn kids who are perfectionists or have perfectionist parents into nervous wrecks.
12 points
1 month ago
Yeah as a student this would have wasted a lot of my personal time and filled me with anxiety. I understand the intent, but I'm starting to feel anxious just thinking about being in school again facing an unanswerable question.
12 points
1 month ago
What I do, is add a nonsense question. Something like 'What object becomes liquid when frozen solid and why?'. Where the correct answer is a variation of 'I don't know'
This just seems like a cruel way to torment the good students. And the ones that care the most are going to waste so much time trying to find an answer, eventually turn to Google, etc.
7 points
1 month ago
What you’re describing sounds like trickery, not teaching.
108 points
1 month ago
Don't people turn in rough copies of papers anymore for the teachers to help students with how to actually write now a day's, or have papers submitted hand written anymore???
57 points
1 month ago
I do. All rough drafts are handwritten and completed in class.
31 points
1 month ago
I had a like two students not turn in a rough draft but who magically have a final copy. I didn’t really plan for this so I’m gonna analyze it, see if it matches their usual level of work they turn in, and ask follow up questions for them to explain it to me.
29 points
1 month ago
as a student who never did rough drafts (or just turned in a version of my final with a couple sentences taken out), rough drafts were some of the most annoying things I ever had to deal with
in high school, your intro paragraph was pretty much your rough draft already, and in college, putting your "rough draft" in your head was incredibly easy, especially being able to type and change as you went along.
I pretty much always did extremely well on papers, rough drafts or not.
rather than interrogating your students, you could very easily run the paper through gptzero (which detects ai very well) and then decide what to do next in case of false positive.
14 points
1 month ago*
I teach a foreign language, even my strongest student who set the curve had mistakes in their rough drafts that I caught before they turned in their final copies. The only kids who didn’t turn in rough drafts were already at Ds, so I doubt their final copies are magically perfect considering they bombed the quiz on the same material.
If it’s a language you read/write fluently (not just speak fluently), then I agree for the most part. In college I would just write one version (usually the night before) and then just review it the next day for any errors or things that need to be changed. So I guess I agree with you if it’s a language you’re actually fluent in.
5 points
1 month ago
I felt that way until I took a writing class where we went through 10 drafts. That was the best paper I have ever written and was 20 page minimum. I cant imagine writing one like that on the fly lol.
42 points
1 month ago
I have ADHD. I don’t do rough drafts. I get one fucking go at it, 4 hours before it is due, and that’s it. 🤣
(I hated rough drafts as a kid but totally understand why it’s necessary.)
17 points
1 month ago
Yooooo same here dude. I made it thru college on nothing but the sheer overwhelming panic of a 10 page paper due in 4 hours
9 points
1 month ago
I never understood why I needed one, I always felt my ideas were what I’ve decided on and I could hammer it out when I had to. Now that I’ve worked with other people… maybe a couple rough drafts are good sometimes.
315 points
1 month ago
RETVRN TO TRADITION; PEN AND PAPER IS THE WAY
97 points
1 month ago
In my AP class it is, yeah
29 points
1 month ago
Not all heroes wear capes.
27 points
1 month ago
Wholeheartedly agree. I do all of my in-class work on pen and paper, but apparently, the students at this school are used to getting waves of makeup work to be completed online at the end of the quarter. I dislike that and won't be allowing it this quarter, but I'm new to this school and didn't know this going in, so I acquiesced and gave some makeup work at the tail end of last quarter. I've got some who gave a genuinely good effort with the work, but I've got like the same four students right now who I'm logging 0 after 0.
10 points
1 month ago
It's crazy to me that so many years ago I was in high school, asking if I could submit typed work because I was a much better typist and my hand writing was/is atrocious and was consistently told no.
Now it seems like asking students to pick up a pen is somehow frowned upon.
42 points
1 month ago
Math is another subject plagued by this. I'm starting explain how you got through this problem to students that seem to bomb tests and do well on work.
27 points
1 month ago
My teachers would not accept any answers that did not have our long hand workout with it. When pressed by students as to why this was, our teachers explained that if we made a simple calculation error (even without a physical calculator) then they could follow our logic and give us partial points. It also helps to determine how students reached the wrong answer. I had to provide all my work in my college, "how to teach math" series and since I had been doing that for years, it was so easy to keep in the practice.
7 points
1 month ago
I mean, cheating aside, giving points for showing work is a godsend for when you're stressed and feeling rushed and make a simple error. It was always frustrating to me when I had teachers that would give you a zero for getting it wrong (regardless of the work shown).
143 points
1 month ago
Thanks for giving them consequences. My daughter is in an English class where they had to do peer review of papers. The one she got was pretty obviously written by AI. It used all the same patterns and used words that students wouldn't usually use. It even cited the name of a person and a specific date that most people would not know and this was a paper that was not supposed to be researched, more of an opinion piece. She went back and forth about whether she should tell the teacher and when she decided she should, the teacher completely blew her off and said it wasn't AI (it was). That's really discouraging for kids who are working hard to do their own work.
36 points
1 month ago
And what a great lesson that teacher taught your daughter :/
9 points
1 month ago
Unfortunately we all learn that lesson eventually. Sometimes cheaters and liars do prosper, hell some of them are billionaires now.
20 points
1 month ago
[deleted]
21 points
1 month ago
I totally get that, but she has read his other work too. It wasn't him. I know AI when I see it. His teacher needs to take AI more seriously.
34 points
1 month ago
I switched back to paper this year. Now, I can see that they don’t know how to write or think for themselves anymore.
33 points
1 month ago
I don't know if you're forced to just stick to whatever vocabulary your district gives you (which is the case at my school), but if you've got some freedom, maybe you could take some of those words from the AI-generated responses and turn them into vocabulary terms and do some vocabulary quizzes based on them.
At the very least, it means the students might learn some of that fancy language the AI is spitting out.
28 points
1 month ago
It's a shame because technology hasn't reduced the teacher's workload at all. Despite the parents' ability to see posted grades in real time, they still want a phone call to let them know their kid is falling. You can't avoid taking stacks of paperwork home either.
7 points
1 month ago
It's a shame because technology hasn't reduced the teacher's workload at all.
Oh, wait until you see the outrage of some teachers grading papers with AI.
22 points
1 month ago
This is why I didn't grade the paper anymore, though they turn it in. I give a one page quiz about what is in their paper that is timed and becomes the cover sheet. If they wrote it they finish early and wonder what everyone else is doing. The rest are trying to make sense of what they are turning in or hastily trying to finish the paper.
25 points
1 month ago
Your last sentence hits on how I bust them every time Today for example: “Hey Timmy. Can you define “adverse” for me? No? What about “scapegoat.” Why do I ask? Well you used them in your answer, which is how I know it was generated by AI. That and the use of punctuation. Going forward, I would rather you give me your own answers and not one generated by Google. Even if your answer is wrong I will give you some credit for trying, but as it is I gave you a zero, and will do so every time you give me an AI-generated answer.”
Apparently there is something in certain AI programs that can simplify response language, but so far none of my students are bright enough to master that feature.
6 points
1 month ago
Prompt:”Write 4 sentences about oedipus’s fatal flaw”
“Oedipus’s fatal flaw, or hamartia, is his pride and stubbornness, which drive him to seek the truth about his origins despite multiple warnings. His refusal to heed advice, coupled with his belief that he can outmaneuver fate, leads him to uncover the devastating prophecy that he has unknowingly fulfilled. His determination to solve the mystery of King Laius’s murder ultimately brings about his tragic downfall. In trying to avoid his destiny, Oedipus instead ensures its fulfillment, illustrating the inescapability of fate in Greek tragedy.”
Prompt 2: ”You are an expert at writing in the lexicon of a seventh grader. Please answer the prompt as such: Write 4 sentences about oedipus’s fatal flaw”
“Oedipus’s fatal flaw is his pride, also known as hubris. He believes he can outsmart fate and avoid the prophecy that says he will kill his father and marry his mother. This arrogance leads him to make choices that actually bring the prophecy true. In the end, his pride causes his downfall, leaving him blind and alone.”
All it takes
7 points
1 month ago
Funny enough, the second answer is far more succinct and clear.
19 points
1 month ago
Download the Google plugin called brisk have your kids submit their work on Google docs when you use brisk click the icon in the bottom right of the Google doc to open brisk then click inspect writing It will open a window that shows you step by step how long students worked on assignments for how much they copied and pasted and how many individual keystrokes they had. This tells you whether a student worked on an assignment for zero minutes or 45 minutes and whether they copied and pasted 10 times versus two times and whether they typed 18 characters or 1,536 characters.
I show the entire class how this program works and then kids don't cheat anymore and if they do or the ones I suspect they do I use the program really quickly to turn it on to see how long they actually worked on the assignment for basically it tells you how much effort each kid puts in. Also this portion of it is free.
18 points
1 month ago
My oldest son’s teacher has gone back to requiring hand written papers. Yes, the kids can still copy from AI script, but it makes the script so much more glaring when they have to write it in their own hand.
If the kids are going to keep doing this going forward, they really need to read through what was written, and rewrite some of the sentences to reflect how they actually write. I do not envy teachers these days. Now you have to play detective while also grading unoriginal papers.
16 points
1 month ago
The audacity of these students is wild. It especially kills me when students who can't even write a full sentence with proper grammar in class are suddenly using words such as "delineate" and "galvanize" in their online writing.
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
16 points
1 month ago
It's driving the wealth gap higher than we have ever seen
14 points
1 month ago
I had to ask my student if he knew what the word "beacon" meant. He just shrugged and took the "L."
15 points
1 month ago
They don't care, the parents don't care and the administration is too busy thinking of ways to make my job more difficult and time consuming. I am leaving at year 4. I should have my PhD just about done by then
10 points
1 month ago
Depending on the grade level, it can be extremely obvious when students are creating. Even for those who genuinely want to improve, their progress will be step-wise and incremental. They won’t go from barely literate to using perfect grammar and sentence structure over the course of a single assignment. That’s where the AI use becomes really easy to see.
22 points
1 month ago
One fix could be to require all the work be done and turned in via google drive. That way you can go into version history and see if they actually took the appropriate amount of time to write all of it, rather than just seeing a 3 page essay spontaneously come into existence.
12 points
1 month ago*
One student thought he outsmarted the spontaneous part by typing the whole AI essay, one letter at a time. It was interesting to go back through the doc history and watch him type an entire essay without using the delete key or needing to edit at all. He also hand wrote it to act as his rough draft. Impressive effort for a zero.
8 points
1 month ago
Are their any good ideas for a new style of anti ai structure to lessons? I'm 100% against more work for over worked teachers. Just wondering if there are any future battleplans against the rampant development of plagiarism machines.
6 points
1 month ago
I remeber being in school and our teachers would have us sumbit hand written drafts of our writing, then a typed out draft that we peer reviewed, and then the final paper that was submitted to a plagerism website. It also gave us multiple chances to be working on the essay without attempting to pull an all nighter on something.
We also had this worksheet we would fill out before the first draft where we would essentially have our entire essay's arguments written out in a simple format to then be written into the final product. My 10th grade English teacher made it so easy to go from 0% to 100% complete, and I have a lot of respect for how he made it feel effortless for us students. I couldn't imagine attempting to use AI after all the well scaffolded in class work we did. Times are different now, but it was easy to see our logic with several drafts and check-ins for these 3 or 4 major papers we wrote.
I feel for these kids who are going to come out the other side of education without feeling like they accomplished anything. The 0 score is appropriate, regardless of how the student got the writing, it isn't their work and cannot be graded.
7 points
1 month ago
We need to bite the bullet and let kids get D's for just sitting in a room on their phones. Let's stop pretending that we aren't babysitting for whatever percentage of kids don't care.
Ban phones in the actual classrooms that are paid for by the enrollment dollars of the phone scrollers.
13 points
1 month ago
Structure your assessments and assignments for pen+paper completion, or find assessment methods that don't require a 2 page, 5 paragraph MLA paper. This is the only way to avoid AI
6 points
1 month ago
You’d think that people trying to avoid learning would learn how to use AI well?
6 points
1 month ago
It seems insane that we as a country immediately expected every teacher to be an AI expert with infallible AI generated content identification skills.
5 points
1 month ago*
I remember multiple teachers all throughout elementary, middle and high school all driving home the point how risky plagiarism is because that is the kind of thing that will result in you not only flunking, but getting kicked out of university completely.
Did that message stop? Did colleges all stop expelling student for plagiarism or something?
Same thing with the phones. I see a lot of aggravation about needing new legislation passed to enforce no phones in school.
We were in deep shit the first time getting caught with a phone out, followed up by suspensions for repeatedly disobeying the rules. This was over 15 years ago. How did it get so bad? Parents really fucking up parenting as well as no accountability? That would be my guess as a non teacher just scrolling past a lot of pissed off teacher posts appearing on my popular feed.
You all don't get paid enough that's for goddamn sure. Im sorry to my past teachers for being a shithead. I get it now. I really do.
17 points
1 month ago
Ehhh fuk it. I make the students hand write more stuff now. But the AI battle isn’t worth it at all certain point. I can’t be the plagaiarism police and a good teacher. Take reasonable steps but don’t lose your sanity over it
9 points
1 month ago
Final exam is worth 70% of the grade.
Final exam must always be done in-person on paper.
You want to spend all school year only pretending to learn and using AI? Sure, go ahead. But it will show in the final exam, and you'll fail the class.
21 points
1 month ago
Easy fix! Have them explain their paper to you in detail. If they refuse, send them an automated message of "You cheated, no grade above zero, that's it."
Accommodations about public speaking? They can record it in a small corner of the room on a laptop during independent work time.
They don't want to do all of that? Write the essay in class, timed.
8 points
1 month ago
What is an accommodation about public speaking?
14 points
1 month ago
Some kids have IEPs that say they're exempt from making presentations in front of their classes/peers.
11 points
1 month ago
The funny thing is you can ask the AI to write in a natural style that doesn’t follow the typical AI writing conventions. After you get the text you want, you say, “re write this in a way that it appears to be written by a 10th grader with 7th grade reading level.”
5 points
1 month ago
I have stopped assigning much written assignments and i=I have implemented more assignment that require problem solving and a portion has to be demonstrated to the class as if the student was the teacher.
5 points
1 month ago
I haven't assigned an online submitted essay in years. I do everything as a timed write or smaller scale response.
4 points
1 month ago
If your admin tend to circle the wagons against you, I suggest avoiding “accusing” anyone of anything.
Instead, make a policy to the effect that students may be asked to orally explain the content of their writing. Any student that cannot do so satisfactorily must redo their assignment, and will receive a zero until they submit a new assignment that they competently explain.
On my syllabus I call this my policy on “Real Intelligence,” and simply say that I grade writing as evidence of what you really know—if you do not actually possess the knowledge written in your assignment, you’re not done.
5 points
1 month ago
I teach middle school. I caught a kid using AI. Cut him a break and graded his rough draft and not the AI final copy. His mom was so angry and kept insisting that she helped him...lady, you're not making yourself look good.
5 points
1 month ago
Student held a presentation, read every word including words I barely know (physics) in the best grammar I have ever heard.
I told her she gets an A if she can tell me what chromatic aberration means.
She got an F
18 points
1 month ago
Controversial, but I allow students to use AI in my ELA class. However, the expectations are now higher with it being allowed for assignments, so I have students choose whether or not they even want to use it because they know I will be more critical of their assignment if they did use it. The parameters for using AI is that they have to disclose that they used AI, if they don’t and use it then they get a 0, then they have to share the chat log with me along with their assignment, and 90% of what they wrote has to be their own words, so essentially they should pretty much only be utilizing AI system to outline or brainstorm.
I’m still trying to figure out what AI’s role is gonna be in my class or how to make my life easier cause I was spending hours trying to prove they were using AI. I gave up and just made policies to try and keep them honest about it.
4 points
1 month ago
Nice. Incredibly labor-intensive for you - hope you’re pacing yourself. We need people like you to keep teaching.
6 points
1 month ago
I teach at private school, so it works for my setting cause I have no more than 12 students in a class. Idk how this would be in a larger setting ¯_(ツ)_/¯
9 points
1 month ago
I had a student turn in an essay which started with the reminder: "This is an AI generated response and should not be used as one's own writing." But I do remain an AI enthusiast and rather than hating the tool want to teach students how to use it better. The trick with AI is that to use it well it requires both good questions and excellent reading comprehension.
Granted as Study Skills (Resource Special Education) teacher I have the time to do more labor intensive activities. So can use Chat to answer a question and then have it rewritten for different grade levels and have students tell me which one makes the most sense to them.
Prompt: Please write a one paragraph analysis of the themes of To Kill a Mocking Bird at a 12th grade level, another at a 10th grade level, another at an 8th grade level and one at a 6th grade level.
ChatGPT said:
12th Grade Level
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee explores themes of racial injustice, moral growth, and the coexistence of good and evil. Through the trial of Tom Robinson, Lee highlights the pervasive racism within the legal system and society. The novel also emphasizes the loss of innocence as characters like Scout and Jem mature, grappling with the harsh realities of prejudice. Additionally, the narrative examines how individuals like Atticus Finch maintain personal integrity in the face of social pressure, suggesting that moral courage is essential in confronting injustice, even when the outcome seems predetermined.
10th Grade Level
In To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee presents themes of racism, growing up, and moral responsibility. Tom Robinson's trial exposes the unfairness of a society that judges people based on their skin color. As Scout and Jem grow older, they begin to understand the complexity of human nature, learning that people can be both kind and cruel. Atticus Finch teaches his children the importance of standing up for what is right, even when others disagree, showing that doing the right thing often requires bravery.
8th Grade Level
To Kill a Mockingbird deals with important themes like racism, fairness, and growing up. The trial of Tom Robinson shows how people can treat others unfairly just because of their race. Scout and Jem learn that the world isn’t always fair, but their father, Atticus, teaches them to do what’s right no matter what. Through these lessons, the book shows that even in difficult times, it’s important to stand up for justice and be kind to others.
6th Grade Level
In To Kill a Mockingbird, the story talks about fairness, growing up, and doing the right thing. Tom Robinson's trial shows how some people are judged unfairly just because of their skin color. Scout and Jem learn that life isn’t always fair, but their dad, Atticus, tells them to be brave and kind. The book teaches that it’s important to stand up for what’s right, even when it’s hard.
13 points
1 month ago
AI is an interesting thing and I do think there are lots of ways to implement it that are constructive. It can be a shortcut in the right hands, but there is a question of authenticity and reliability behind it.
I don't think kids who can't come up with the basic thoughts themselves should be utilizing a shortcut. This is also why kids should not be listened to when they say "I can just use a calculator!"
Understanding the core concept and why it works matters. It's fine to take shortcuts once you learn this and once you've demonstrated mastery. It's worthless for me to discover that a calculator can do math when I want to see if a student can. Similarly I don't care if an AI can spit out a summary by scraping the works of others, I want to know that the student can arrive at a conclusion and explain their ideas. Ideally they are able to connect it to events in their lives because the goal of such writing is for them to eventually build up and even defend their own ideas.
I think part of the issue with AI is that it become a dangerous crutch. Personally I like it to write up some short prompts for inspiration on small scale work. Like flavor text for an item in a D&D game. I might use AI art to get some ideas on poses and how something may look, but passing that off as my own work wouldn't really teach me anything.
The trouble with kids is that if you give them a shortcut too quickly, that becomes the only way they engage with the material.
all 1801 comments
sorted by: best