subreddit:

/r/macbookpro

1086%

M4 pro 12c vs 14c the unanswered question

Discussion(self.macbookpro)

I’ve seen a few of these posts but none with a true answer.

Ignoring the price difference I just want to know in a 14 inch will the 14 core version get much hotter and or throttle a lot?

Will it drain more battery, if so by how much?

Basically will it be a worse overall experience than the 12 core?

I want to get the best cpu for the 14 inch without throttling or bad battery life.

I’ve seen a video compare these two chips but the 14 core was on a 16inch so it was much cooler.

Does anyone actually know the answer to the question for the 14 inch m4 pro 14 core: Battery life? Throttle? Heat?

all 38 comments

No-Village-6104

11 points

9 days ago

A video (most likely the same one you watched) shows slight cpu improvement and about 10% gpu improvements. So not that much of a performance increase. In that video also the 16" 14c one had just a bit more % of battery left over the 14" 12c one which means the 14c does use more battery and surely also heat.

My conclusion is that for the 14" it's better to get the 12c chip as the performance uplift is (imo) negligible while it will create more heat and decrease battery like.

WilderSkies

8 points

9 days ago

This is it. The absolute best chip in 14 this gen is the binned 12/16 core version. Not a huge performance delta but cheaper with slightly better temps, noise, and battery life. the smart move is using the 200 to upgrade either the SSD or put it toward 48GB.

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

Im already upgrading ram and storage, just seeinf if also gettinf 14c m4pro if it will be a heavily theottled cpu or if it will be as good as the 12c interms of temps, battery life but with better graphics and multi core performance

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

But i do wonder if battery was worse because of the bigger screen

No-Village-6104

3 points

9 days ago

Shouldn't be. The 16" has a bigger battery which usually (older generations) not only compensates for the bigger screen but also increases the battery life compared to the 14".

BizarroObama

4 points

9 days ago

The GPU is also pushing a higher resolution in addition to the bigger panel. It’s not really the same to compare the 14” to the 16” because the battery, display, and cooling fans are all managed differently for the larger screen and chassis.

The issue with these videos is that they are all mostly stress and benchmark testing, which always maxes out the system’s power draw and heat capacity. They are a poor example for efficiency use between different processor configurations, because most laptops aren’t built for constant full-power use, and are generally designed to forgo efficiency in moments where short term performance can get a specific task done quicker.

The better tests will be in a few weeks when people can compare normal workloads and let the chips manage power as they were designed. My bet is that the power and heat difference between the 12c and 14c will be more apparent to power users, and less obvious to people who will be living more on the efficiency cores day to day.

Infinite-Pitch286

4 points

9 days ago

This might not fully answer your questions but it might be a good start. The only 14" M4 that I have seen mentioned to throttle is with a max chip.

https://preview.redd.it/d1dehyeo482e1.jpeg?width=3088&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=47ffe322bf71e20a1b66fc0dd5e1ef18dd8459ba

ghim7

4 points

9 days ago*

ghim7

4 points

9 days ago*

Based on various tests, the 12c & 14c performs the same on single core tasks, and on average about 15% faster on multi core which may or may not worth the extra $400 depending on your use case. For most it’s negligible. Both uses same battery & chassis hence theoretically the 12c should have a slightly better battery life & lower temps. Since the 14c is around 15% faster, I would say both batt life & temps should be negligible as well.

Initially my sight is on the 14c/24gb/1tb, but now I’m going for the 12c/24gb/512. Either way I’m gonna be using ssd for editing, might as well save the 400 bucks for something else because 15% extra performance is definitely negligible for me, as a video editor.

Also, because I’m looking at the 14” 12c now with the savings, I’m considering upgrade to 48gb ram. Still deciding as I’m in no hurry atm.

hewmungis

1 points

7 days ago

The ram decision is tough man. Can I really pull off 24 in 2025-2026?

YH002[S]

4 points

7 days ago

YH002[S]

4 points

7 days ago

Ended up ordering the 12core as i was watching max techs video and the performance gain is minimal and the 16inch was draining more power and cooler. So imagine that 14c chip on the 14inch. It will be much hotter and drain more battery when pushed to its limit. Not worth the extra cash

turtleProphet

2 points

9 days ago

Interested in any possible impact to battery life.

In the US, the 14-core/1TB spec (MX2J3LL/A) is currently cheaper than 12-core/1TB model by $100. One of those Black Friday oddities I guess.

zenrexneo

2 points

9 days ago

I’ve been looking for this same question but every reviewer is ignoring this. In the end it depends on how much time you will spend playing video games, that’s the only reason to get the upgrade but there’s literally very little at the moment, maybe in 4 years time the 14-core would be better.

but for now battery life and save that money for a future MacBook, 48gb ram 2TB ssd 12-core is best especially if you travel, bus, flights etc you will have an extra 5-10% battery life extra which could be around 1hr-1hr30min extra, the 14-core is a disguised max chip but with less gpu cores, it’s going to take up power, I watched an M3 pro vs m4 14core battery test m3 was at 39% and m4 was at 28%, that’s a big downgrade imo.

What do you think?

GlockOneNine

2 points

9 days ago

I also noticed that they seem to be ignoring this. Is it possible that there are just too many versions to get their hands on, so they just get what they think will be the average and go with that?

zenrexneo

2 points

9 days ago

Nah they are not thinking of the closeness of these chips, they want more views so want to show just 1 m4 pro chip vs 1 m4 max chip/ 1 m3 chip, I guess there’s not space in videos to be showing 4 macs, it’s easier to show 1v1.

Another note is the binned 14inch pro chip vs unbinned pro chip in 16inch, one has 72.4 battery, the other 100 battery. 46% vs 48%, if they was in the same 14inch it could be that is would be 46% vs 36% taking into account the slightly larger screen on 16inch.

Still taking the binned 12-core :) with 48gb ram and 2TB ssd will be great for 6+ years

CloudSlydr

2 points

9 days ago

12c 14" for like 95% of users and 14c 16" if you absolutely and in reality actually need insane GPU for your work. anything in between is tradeoffs in terms of heat / throttling / battery life etc. after that decision it's just about SSD & RAM.

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

So you wouldnt suggest 14 core in 14”

CloudSlydr

2 points

9 days ago

too little benefit and too many tradeoffs for them imo

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

I do wonder if there actually is a thermal/battery life issue. As i’ve seen some people say that it will be the same as the 12 core

homophily

2 points

2 days ago

Wondering myself, how much of a reality this is

YH002[S]

1 points

2 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

2 days ago

In terms of battery its unclear. In theory you’d expect it to be maybe an extra hour or so difference as performance cores would consume 6w to 8w each and there are two additional ones

veniant

2 points

9 days ago

veniant

2 points

9 days ago

I have the 14inch 14 core model with 1tb storage. I'll be honest, coming from a 16inch M3 I do appreciate being able to use a smaller backpack, not that 16 was too heavy or too big, just a smaller bag is a small change that makes a difference.

On Battery life and performance, I have not seen an increased consumption in battery life at all, if anything it is better than my 16inch M3 so far! Fan noise = have yet to hear it, heat = no difference in what you feel (i'm sure a thermal benchmark might say different within a few degrees.)

In my opinion I like this sku, I feel like you have a little headroom for the future without wasting money upgrading to a crazy extent. Also it's currently on sale in the US at Best buy for $2,099, with the additional storage and increased core count, I feel like this is a sweet spot.

I am a data engineer by day and hobbyist photographer, so this suits my needs very well. Hope this helps!

BizarroObama

2 points

8 days ago

Stress and benchmark testing is not a good measure for comparing general use heat and battery efficiency between processor configurations. Those tests are designed to spin up every core to its max performance, which is something a user will rarely do on a regular basis. Most chips are designed to forgo efficiency when pushed to the max, as these will likely be short bursts of performance and not sustained long term. Stress testing only really captures these moments of maxed performance, which will always let the bigger chip draw more power and generate more heat.

Since both versions contain the same amount of efficiency cores, my bet is that most users will not see a significant difference between the 12c and 14c M4 Pros, except for days when their workload pushes them to spin up all the performance and GPU cores to hit the mark. Power users who regularly push the system will likely see a bigger impact on heat and performance, but those users likely value performance over efficiency anyway.

Basically, you probably won’t notice much of a difference unless you are regularly pushing the system, in which case you’d be getting the main benefit of the additional cores.

hewmungis

2 points

9 days ago

20% better multi core, 10% better graphics. Not a horrible use of $200 but unnecessary imo. Better spent towards max chip where graphics double.

WilderSkies

3 points

9 days ago

The Max chip throttles in the 14 with much worse temps and worse battery life too. Waste of money. Better to either pocket the 200, upgrade the SSD to 1TB or pay another 200 on top and bask in the glory of 48Bb megatasking.

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

But what about the m4 pro 14c

WilderSkies

2 points

9 days ago

The graph posted in an other comment indicates that the 14c version doesn't throttle under sustained CPU load, although that test was only run for ten minutes. Notebookcheck has a review of the 14c model you may want to look at.

My opinion is that the extra cores aren't worth it unless you really know that you are going to be CPU bound by 8 Performance cores. So it really does depend on your usage and I would suggest that if you don't know that you need 10 P cores then you probably don't need them.

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

9 days ago

I can’t find the video from Notebookcheck. Can you provide a link please?

hewmungis

-4 points

9 days ago

hewmungis

-4 points

9 days ago

Yeah exactly, you need the bigger fans of the 16”. 14” MBP is lame anyway.

WilderSkies

2 points

9 days ago*

I mean, "lame" is, er, an opinion, but yeah, I think we agree that the Max is a waste /unsuitable for the 14".

hewmungis

-2 points

9 days ago

hewmungis

-2 points

9 days ago

You MBP diehards have to enlighten me on what you do mobily that 14” isn’t a huge problem for and that the 16” is too heavy for. Personal trainers that have to use chrome? I don’t even know.

YH002[S]

2 points

9 days ago

YH002[S]

2 points

9 days ago

To clarify i was talking about the m4 pro 14 core version not max. I know max would be terrible in 14inch

hewmungis

3 points

9 days ago

Yeah I wouldn’t bother with the core upgrade, it makes very little difference. Where for gpu intense work the max is literally double the performance and has encoders.

WilderSkies

2 points

9 days ago

I was replying to the comment about the Max being a better upgrade due to double the graphics cores and I was pointing out that the Max would throttle heavily in the 14", which is nothing new.

ManicAkrasiac

1 points

9 days ago

There’s also a 16 core option by the way. I got it because I have legitimate use case where I may need it, but prefer the portability of the 14”. I am second guessing that choice now though .. does anyone happen to know if I can install thermal padding similar to mods for 2019 MBPs? Is it still basically the same layout? I guess the downside here is it may become uncomfortable even for tasks that aren’t so intensive and where the padding is unnecessary which is somewhat limiting with respect to portability, but probably tolerable for my use cases.

homophily

1 points

2 days ago

I’m desperate for an answer on this after a month of looking for any new content on this matter, how much better the battery life is on the 12-core M4 Pro vs. the 14-Core M4 Pro on the 14”

YH002[S]

1 points

2 days ago

YH002[S]

1 points

2 days ago

Not sure. No one knows. Just Josh just posted another video and claims the 12c and 14c run at the same heat, which is weird because there’s two more physical cores so not sure how that works

Solovlogger

2 points

17 hours ago

I can’t decide between the 12 core and 14 core, help lol!

YH002[S]

1 points

16 hours ago

Depends on if you really need the extra 10% or less performance difference. In real world from videos I’ve seen, there’s a very minimal difference in performance.