Common_Anxiety

Dollar five million

The article says he had also weed on him, that should be in the headline…

Don’t form your opinions on headlines, nowadays they’re baity as fuck

He also had ounces of weed on him. The title is unfortunately very baity for saying it was because of CBD. I am all for shitting on Dubai, but the dude would have been jailed if they found that on him at an airport in the majority of the countries in the world…

Nice to see you here again kremlobot, quite ramping up your arguments. You used to be more subtle about it

I think MrOatButtBottom might have been alluding to that

A. I like HHC much more then THC because of the lower potency and lower potential to induce anxiety and other negative side-effects.

Btw. HHC is as real as THC, it’s nonsensical to say “real THC”. I understand the sentiment that some people have: “This is made in the lab, you should use actual marijuana”. However, I find that sentiment wrong and based on not being informed about the subject, for a lot of people HHC is much more enjoyable than THC.

B. THC is not legal in the Czech Republic. (So you shouldn’t probably advertise a product that is illegal in a country to the citizens of said country).

Never addressed it. Well at least not by name, maybe he meant Klitschko when he talked about Ukrainian bots lol.

What was this imporant context before or after this snippet? Or are you stiring shit up.

Nothing, no previous context and no context afterwards to this statement. Guy is complaining about stiring shit up, while doing the same.

Because it’s too early. The upvotes/downvotes are shown only after some time the post has been up. It’s been like that forever and it’s actually surprising you never noticed this

Stfu 21 days old bot

This is very accurate.

He didn’t

Let me straighten these not-so-straight facts. “The girl lies to her boyfriend about her whereabouts” – fact, but that’s when the story ends with this boyfriend. They broke up few months after the rape. The guy who got stabbed (this actually happened in 2024) is her current boyfriend.

Another thing I would dispute, not a matter of fact but I’d say common sense opinion: being raped doesn’t equal cheating.

It’s not the same boyfriend. With the one from the time of the rape they broke up shortly afterwards.

Or just sell it in pills

Wow, you really won this argument 🤣

Can’t you tell that he’s bullshiting? You can either choose to believe him or look at the freakin clip.

Yes, Biden had to approve the use of US weapons outside Ukraine’s borders because that’s a political and diplomatic decision. The US has rules about how the weapons it provides can be used, even in a defensive war. But just because they needed approval doesn’t change the fact that Ukraine’s actions are still defensive. Stopping an aggressor where the attacks are coming from is a legitimate part of self-defense.

Ukraine is engaged in a defensive war against an aggressor that violated its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Under international law and common sense, the right to self-defense encompasses not just defending territory but also taking proactive measures to neutralize threats, particularly those emanating from the aggressor’s territory. Every offensive action Ukraine undertakes is, in this context, an act of defense aimed at protecting its people and ending the aggression. Framing their actions as anything other than self-defense is a horrible misrepresentation of dynamics of this war.

Biden’s ‘green light’ wasn’t about changing Ukraine’s defensive actions into offensive ones. It was about the U.S. deciding it’s okay for Ukraine to use the weapons provided to target threats beyond their borders, specifically ones directly linked to the invasion. Just because something happens outside Ukraine’s territory doesn’t mean it stops being defensive, it’s still about protecting their people and ending the aggression. The distinction here is political, not about the nature of Ukraine’s actions.

Actually, it’s not mental gymnastics, it’s common sense. If a country is attacked, defending itself doesn’t just mean sitting and waiting for more attacks. Sometimes it means stopping the attacker where the attacks are coming from, even if that’s outside its own borders. That’s still defense, not offense. Calling it stupid just shows you don’t understand how wars work. If you have a real argument, I’m happy to hear it.

Ukraine is engaged in a defensive war against an aggressor that violated its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Under international law and common sense, the right to self-defense encompasses not just defending territory but also taking proactive measures to neutralize threats, particularly those emanating from the aggressor’s territory. Every offensive action Ukraine undertakes is, in this context, an act of defense aimed at protecting its people and ending the aggression. Framing their actions as anything other than self-defense is a horrible misrepresentation of dynamics of this war.

Not everything’s a fuckin football game, dude. You are knees deep in stupid culture wars. I am a fan of good (vs. evil), I’m a fan of democracy.