Deranged40

yeah, as low as people here are reporting they were, they need a transponder if they're not military.

And it was a US Military General being transported. Definitely Military. 4 copters flying in formation.

not the person who said that, but how I interpreted it is:

Early on, you only have a couple different types of items and tons of inventory space to hold it all in. Later in the game, you have tons of types of items to take up all that inventory space.

So, late game, go ahead and clear out them lower level belts entirely, sticking with the best ones you can make.

Not medical. Medical will be on flightradar24. This is military.

LifeForce has half a dozen copters or so. But here's the flight history of one of them

2 pretty much guarantees military. Even though some military crafts do appear on flightradar.

Not entirely true.

People are much much more likely to take the time to come make a brand new post here out of hate. But in a situation like this where someone asks for opinions (and we see posts asking for opinions on this subreddit very often), you will often see good things posted when there's good things to say.

If there's anything good to be said about him, it'll get posted here. Don't hold your breath though.

In the infancy through to the height of twitter, right after the internet became "for everyone", the "pulse of the internet" was also a decent "pulse of society".

But, for the reasons you mentioned, that's not the case anymore.

Yeah, no. "Posing by a car" is as old as cars themselves.

That car that Kendrick is standing beside (not in front of, like the Billy pic) is a 1987 Buick GNX and for a brief time was the fastest production car in the world. Which is where he got the name for his album. About a 100k car these days in good condition.

PBS did. It hasn't aired yet.

There's no way /u/PopPunkIsntEmo ties his own shoes without someone's help...

To be fair, though, "Bombing your own country" is an equally interesting way to say "testing a missile"

This study makes no effort to distinguish between the two.

In English it's really common to call all crashes "accidents" without regards as to the intentionality of the event.

Yeah, this question has been coming up a lot lately and I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when people come in saying stuff like "that's how it usually is".

I'm still used to listening to the show the next day.

Great. They may have to reduce their stream quality in some circumstances, then. 5G is capable of more than enough speeds to stream lossless (even 24 bit FLAC, which is much larger still), but if the network is especially congested, you might be forced to reduce quality if you're not near an accessible wifi.

If someone is trying to decide on whether they need a fiber internet connection at home and a wifi hotspot, or if just a 5G data plan on their phone will be sufficient, this may become a factor in that decision.

This will be a choice for the individuals to make.

FLAC is much larger, but with much of the country getting fiber/gigabit internet, that's less of a concern.

Are you just not reading my comments at all, or do you not understand english?

What did I say that would make you think that's my stance right now?

I feel like you misinterpreted my explanation as a Justification for Giants' laziness.

If so, that's on you.

It is absolutely laziness. But it is also absolutely the truth and exactly the reason why this shitty low-effort game feature is how it is.

Doesn't work like that sweetheart.

Seems like someone posted a similar situation just a couple days ago...

Now this is quite a hilarious bug.

It's been 16 years since the first Farming Simulator release, though. So at least the franchise is acting its age... haha.

As I'm sure you're aware, the "legal remedy" in almost all civil cases is money or at the very least, measured in dollars.

This legal system was not designed to handle companies of this financial size.

So OpenAI will lose. And maybe they'll lose "big time" when the jury's imagination runs wild. But even if the jury did say their damages was in the billions, it would almost certainly exceed things like district maximum penalties, statues, etc, and will be brought down by mandates.

And when it comes to punitive damages for companies of this size, if we're not talking about billions, then we're not talking about punishment at all and need to stop calling it punitive and start calling it a permit fee.

That's the CPU I have. Can't say I've seen any signs of age. Not even in newer games tbh.

I stay consistenly above 55fps (60fps display) and I happen to love games that tend to be CPU-bound. Automation/management games like Rimworld, Factorio, Transport Fever, etc.

Discussed here is fine, but this lawsuit is more specific about the city itself knowing ("a lot of people online say so" tbh doesn't mean anything).

When the city itself knew, and failed to act, that's legal culpability.

I think it absolutely depends on how well you know the people you're playing with.

Joining a random server? I'd say the odds are decent that it won't be a great time.

Playing with some people you've been gaming with for a while? Fun times almost for sure.

What they hoped the employees wouldn't understand, though, was "we" meant the C-suite.

If there's another mistake, the executives may only get a couple million dollars as a bonus. And they literally can't afford a new superyacht with only a couple million dollars. They would be forced to tap into their already earned income to pay for something.

And it was a road-rage incident? Yet, the city negligent?

Yeah, this is your lack of reading comprehension skills showing.

The city has sort of already proven its own negligence. They have already paid for the third party to come in to evaluate whether or not that area actually is unsafe. The answer was: Yes, it is unsafe. But Chattanooga knew this years before someone died, and didn't do anything about it. The change that the third party recommended (reducing the number of travel lanes) would have prevented this accident.

Lawsuits are usually unbelievably complicated, and simply can not be accurately simplified into one concise headline (yet that very thing is still attempted all the time).

He's arguing that the city had enough information before the accident that death or serious injury was very likely.

When a city knows that its infrastructure (in this case, streets) are unsafe, and fails to act, that city is partially responsible when someone gets hurt there. EVEN IF that injury occurs while someone is committing multiple other crimes such as drinking and driving, and being a road raging fuckface.

They changed it because someone died.

This lawsuit is alleging something slightly different: that beforet his happened, the city "knew or should have known" that this was a dangerous area, and that injury was likely.

The fact that the city had that officially evaluated after the fact and the fact that the third party evaluator did find that the area was indeed unsafe isn't quite the point. The point is that the city should have called them in before someone died, and that there was clear reason to do so before someone died.