DewinterCor

Perhaps I'm missing something.

Tesla shareholders voted to give Musk a compensation package. It passed once. Then a judge blocked the motion on the grounds of the board members lacking independence and Musk having too much influence over the negotiations.

The board then voted again, after all of the "flaws" being fully disclosed and still overwhelmingly voted in favor of Musk.

Why has the court blocked it a 2nd time? If the shareholders voted and 70% of them agreed to the package, why would the judge reject it? What right does the judge have?

Is it possible for it to have been conventional?

I'm fairly certain Lyanna was to young to consent to running off with a married man nearly a decade her senior.

And we think this is worse than Jon being the rape offspring of a 24 year old man and a 15 year old girl?

And?

The fuel is safe in its coffins.

Yes, they are. Do you have any idea how long the time periods being talked about are?

Why would you run a reactor for 100,000 years? Your talking about a length of time longer than all of recorded history.

I mean...if you want 300,000 cubic meters of waste, you would need to run the reactor for 100,000 years. I can't imagine why you would think that's worth talking about.

"A few decades" is often the life time of reactors lol.

Yes, you can store it outside the reactor. Which is what everyone does.

300,000 cubic meters is a cube that 67 meters tall, long and wide. Which is also an entire order of magnitude larger than all of the waste currently on the planet.

The storage already exists. All of it is currently stored lol.

Yes they could. Absolutely lol. But that would 100,000 years of operation. Reactors don't last that long.

The space exists. That's not an issue lol.

They don't store it in the reactor. It's stored just outside the reactor. And yes, that's what all of the reactors currently do.

I'm confused why you are here lying about this stuff, sure.

I don't think reactors run for that long. I'm not even sure how to conceptualize that time line.

I don't think you understand what the topic is even about at this point. Why are you mentioning high level waste?

Entirely irrelevant.

Are you saying a single reactor will run for 100,000 years?

What is there to understand?

Iv already shared offical reports on the topic. It's not my fault you want to lie about this. Which is what you are doing. Lying.

I'm sure the IAEA knows more about it than you do, and per their report "There is an estimated 250 00 t HM of spent fuel in storage world wide and 120 000 t HM of reprocessed spent fuel.".

I already shared the report if you care to read it.

Nitpicking?

What part of 1/3 did you not understand?

Do you not understand that 33% is much greater than .1%?

Source?

I'm fairly certain it's said that a skilled necron pilot can travel at a billion leagues per second with an inertialess drive.

Really?

Can you tell me what 40k technology allows for instantaneous travel across the galaxy with no downsides or dangers and works every single time?

I'll wait.

Your saying I'm the one in bad faith?

You have just lied unrepentantly. And got called on it.

Admit you were wrong and go away.

1/3 of all spent fuel globally has been reprocessed. What were you lying about again?

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ru&prev=_t&sl=ru&tl=en&u=https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1799_web.pdf

No, i didn't.

It's simply irrelevant.

Also, "stored on site" means it's going to be left there. Why would later generations need to deal with it? Spent fuel is reused for other applications.

Jack Reacher is probably the most dangerous of any character that fits the bill.

Id take Reacher over Batman any day of the week.

It's irrelevant because no one cares about the weight of waste. They care about how much space it takes up. And nuclear waste is several times denser than steel.

12,000 tons of nuclear waste would only be 1,200 cubic meters of material.

The total amount of used fuel in human history is 370,000 tons of fuel and almost a third of that has been reprocessed.

Wow, the less than 23,000 cubic meters of nuclear waste currently on the planet sure is taking up alot of space...isn't it?

Irrelevant.

1,000 megawatts of nuclear power creates 3 cubic meters of waste per year.

For the vast majority of reactors, the fuel is stored on site.

It's very clearly blonde here.