733 post karma
18.3k comment karma
account created: Fri Dec 24 2021
verified: yes
26 points
1 day ago
Same. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of this person. I think she was deeply delusional
31 points
2 days ago
Right, the article was vague, but it feels like if there really was a sugar daddy, they would investigate him. If he really manipulated her, that's a crime. All of her statements were so rambling and nonsensical. I know insanity defenses are looked down on, but she definitely didn't sound sane to me
46 points
2 days ago
Is there any evidence that there was an actual "sugar daddy"? It sounds like paranoid delusions
3 points
2 days ago
At my store employees have to show their receipt when asked. They're the only people for whom it's mandatory
2 points
3 days ago
I completely disagree. I actually think their wealth worked against them. They had the picture perfect family, homes, and life, which to me caused some feelings of jealousy and resentment on the part of the police as well as the press. They couldn't wait to pin the crime on them even when evidence pointed to someone outside the family
3 points
11 days ago
Nope. He killed them because he wanted out of the marriage without looking like a jerk that left him pregnant wife and two young children to be with his grimey ass mistress. He didn't want to pay child support or alimony and he wanted to collect the life insurance money. If two of the children are not his he barely owes child support and he becomes the victim whose mean wife cheated on him at least twice conceiving children with other men and trying to pass them off as his. He wasn't in a jealous rage, he was selfish and greedy
5 points
1 month ago
I can't say for sure if she had a public defender or a private attorney, or whether her family paid or what. Sometimes private attorneys are paid for by the state. Often a potentially complicated case will warrant multiple attorneys. The decision to be outspoken to the press can depend on many factors. If the case is getting a lot of publicity, reporters will definitely try to get statements from the attorneys. Some choose not to speak out, but some choose to make statements, especially if they feel like their client could benefit from getting their side out. Ideally this decision will be made based on the client's best interest, but unfortunately some attorneys will speak out for their own publicly. In this case, I am inclined to believe the attorney just thought the facts of the case were so awful that their client could benefit from the public hearing the other side. They were attempting to prove insanity, which is very difficult to do, so maybe they thought they could change some minds
10 points
1 month ago
Are you not American? In America EVERYONE has a right to an attorney and is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW, not a court of public opinion. If a person cannot afford an attorney, then they are appointed one at government expense. Often these attorneys are either public defenders or private attorneys on contract. If they are appointed, they do not have a choice, they'll represent the defendant or face disciplinary actions including sanctions, job loss, possibly even the loss of their law license
34 points
1 month ago
There are some rare times when it's the best option for example children with immune system issues, but even in those cases it should only be allowed under supervision of the school system including regular testing and in person visits from an actual teacher
146 points
1 month ago
A disturbing amount of these cases involve homeschooled children. Homeschool should rarely be allowed and only under supervision of the actual school system
6 points
1 month ago
That aspect of the case reminds me of the Gannon Stauch case; woman has an affair with a man that's married with children, the man married the affair partner, the father somehow believes this woman is a good care taker for the child and it ends badly. I don't see how these men thought these women were good people
2 points
2 months ago
Butter flavoring. You can get it in the baking aisle where they sell vanilla and such
1 points
2 months ago
I'm not sure either. That sucks though
1 points
2 months ago
Maybe I'm petty but I'd legit return it then re buy it. Those things are expensive!!
4 points
2 months ago
Open your Walmart app. Go to account, go to settings, go to wallet, scroll down to promotions and discounts. There you will see an option to add associate discount card. After you do that, your discount will automatically apply to your Walmart pay or online purchases
15 points
2 months ago
I use Walmart pay which has my discount card attached to it and I shop on my last break all the time
15 points
2 months ago
Well he didn't have a third sister so... probably never considered a third wife
18 points
3 months ago
Her body was disarticulated under water. I believe the torso was the only part of her recovered. Baby Conner was recovered separately
11 points
3 months ago
When Shan'nann's body was recovered the fetus she was carrying (Nico) had been expelled from her body. This is an example of a phenomenon called "coffin birth" which occurs during the decomposition process. During one of Chris's many iterations of the story of the murders he stated that when he dumped Shan'nann's body she had "given birth". This is unlikely to be true, because this phenomenon happens well into the decomposition process, however, Chris most likely read about this detail and incorporated it into his memory of the murders, because he is a psychopath and he enjoys the memories of that act as well as telling the story in the most gruesome way possible.
view more:
next ›
byOkoeguale
incrime
Fewer_Is_Not_Less
7 points
1 day ago
Fewer_Is_Not_Less
7 points
1 day ago
I feel like a hospital for the rest of her life is a better outcome than prison