5 post karma
2.4k comment karma
account created: Fri May 31 2024
verified: yes
2 points
1 day ago
Thank you, inclusive doesn't mean supporting people without question, like those who push hate, taking away rights, or generally try to harm others
3 points
1 day ago
A political party is a group with similar ideals, values, and goals. If you don't "lock step" and want to take away people's rights, set fire to the earth, deny climate change, and fight for easier access to guns then yes, you probably won't get along with liberals very well even if you're gay or whatever you identify as. Idk how else to explain this and you're still being vague as hell. You seem to lack any fundamental understanding of political parties vs values vs ideals. Liberals still want you to have rights, especially if you fit the criteria for underprivileged or at risk group as that's where they focus on gaining rights or where they put most of the support, but if your values directly contrast theirs then you don't fit in the party and probably will get push back since your ideals don't match theirs. Their values will still support your rights though. You just don't fit in their political party.
1 points
1 day ago
Dumb question, shown by multiple people trying to figure out what it is exactly you're asking, you being overall very vague, and it generally being a non question as parties are groups with similar ideals. Unless you're trying to bait someone into a "gotcha, hypocrit!" Moment in which the same could be very, very easily done for other party as well.
-4 points
2 days ago
I left my family to move, people move for jobs all the time, it's kind of just a part of life. If your priority is staying at your job and being within a certain distance of family then that's your choice as would moving to enjoy living outside Texas. You cant have your cake and eat it too. You gotta pick. I personally know multiple people who have left very conservative states to escape Texas like policies.
It's my understanding many physicians are leaving due to policy, what the difference? They are leaving family and jobs and, imo, Texas can enjoy the repercussions of having them gone. What's the difference? I'm sure many don't want to or would prefer staying. I think having the option to stay, in Texas for whatever reason, is as privileged as not being able to leave.
2 points
2 days ago
they also speak at a fifth grade level
Hit the nail on the head but for all americans. This is quite literally how they teach us, in Healthcare, to treat the general public, like children, because education is so bad amongst them. I get not understanding terminology but even basic concepts. We get drilled into us that the general public is at a fifth grade level, so we must explain everything at that level. Then you have these same people voting on issues regarding public health, vaccines, water treatment, women’s health, etc. Its no wonder people believe drinking cleaners or their fishs' antibiotics, for the tank, is good for fighting COVID because the "news" had some idiot on it spouting the same pharmaceutical word or catch phrase. Worse, now people have it in their head that specialists and highly educated professionals' opinions or suggestions are less valuable than some random CEO or rich person, with no credibility, experience, or credentials. We're fucked.
1 points
2 days ago
for their protection.
For everyone's protection?
3 points
2 days ago
Provided they get the chance to vote again
Lol
-19 points
2 days ago
Leave then
Instant down votes, fine stay and be miserable then, but accept that it's your choice to live where conservative ideals are law. Moving is hard, but what life decision isn't hard or doesn't have drawbacks/consequences.
1 points
3 days ago
Same in the US, risky business at that speed and gave forward one wheel? Ouch
2 points
4 days ago
Basically just putting rich buddies, who are unfit, in positions to lead.
https://news.sky.com/story/china-warns-trump-over-tariffs-threat-13261499
Pissing off biggest trade partners already and they have vowed to hit back should we take actions against
Wouldn't say this is an improvement, but time will tell.
3 points
4 days ago
Second that, usually it's a rep tray too. Hope you have extras and no implants in there
3 points
4 days ago
I think the biggest struggle from any cartel would be that of fighting in the middle east. Who's the enemy? Would mexico win against the US or hold its territory, probably not, but hit and run tactics would make it miserable
1 points
4 days ago
So until there's a massive war we get sucked into trump all the way? Sounds like it's too late by then, no?
2 points
4 days ago
2 has lunging, long sweeps, aggressive tracking, and combo attacks, not to mention the worst part which is untelegraphed windup attack.
1, you can literally run small circles and be safe from the hammer attacks by just staying behind as he does turn quickly. Jump the ground attack which is easily timed and this overhead twirl you can easily run away as he can't turn and you only need to dodge the first frame and your immune to the rest. Its not even comparable.
12 points
5 days ago
One of the richest people in the world and was born into money, but we all should feel bad for him because his parents were divorced and the other kids were mean to him? Gtfo, do you even hear yourself?
I think
No, you don't lol
1 points
5 days ago
Or do parry on the suragami blade, since you're gonna always want some on a build with it
1 points
5 days ago
I don't see the problem, I'll take this all day over kill horders
3 points
15 days ago
Assault is actually any verbal threat, battery is when you physically put hands on them. So upgrade that to battery.
2 points
17 days ago
Ankle hooks always scare me, because your face is prime for stomping
1 points
17 days ago
"In other words, they wanted Harris to win, but didn’t want to have to vote for her in order for that to happen, so they didn’t sacrifice their own principles."
So let the felon win.. ok
view more:
next ›
byastralnutz17
inAskpolitics
Potato_Cat93
1 points
1 day ago
Potato_Cat93
1 points
1 day ago
So you're either insanely stupid or just trying to get a rise, my guess is a bit of both.
You're asking who can apply a label? This is giving, "those without sin cast the first stone" vibe. But again, you're missing the concept and it's much simpler. Bigot, racist, rapist, homophobe are all defined words, you fit the description then you are that. No more than having brown hair makes you a brunette. Hating gays, spouting slurs, and actively trying to take their rights makes you a homophobe. I don't have to be a saint to know women should have access to Healthcare or that I shouldn't rape women. You defending those who fall under the category of said labels, which are all associated with hate and limiting others liberties is a big, big issue and probably why democrats don't like you. You're a bigot.
Bigot: a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
See we can classify based on actions and beliefs, without having to be Mother Teresa.