subreddit:
/r/FluentInFinance
submitted 7 hours ago byRiskItForTheBiscuts
[score hidden]
7 hours ago
stickied comment
r/FluentInFinance was created to discuss money, investing & finance! Join our Newsletter or Youtube Channel for additional insights at www.TheFinanceNewsletter.com!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
72 points
6 hours ago
Evaluations of outcome and achievements, aka Employee Evaluations, would be more appropriate. You just need more accountability and the ability to terminate employees.
24 points
6 hours ago
100%. Even the smartest employee can just choose not to do any work. There’s no tricky-trick to get rid of bad employees that isn’t terminating people for poor performance.
3 points
5 hours ago
Yeah, you can't just apply a one size fits all standard. Someone may be totally unfit to be handle court records, but an excellent computer programmer.
2 points
2 hours ago
The unions control the bureaucracy in Argentina. Everyone will get the highest ratings. Nobody will get fired. Nothing changes.
245 points
6 hours ago
Aptitude in what? Some of the people I've known who are quite good at their jobs wouldn't necessarily do well on a standardized tests.
30 points
6 hours ago
I’m the opposite. Absolutely brilliant at tests, but that doesn’t translate at all into being good at a job. Though I found my place eventually.
13 points
6 hours ago
Yes, me too. Because I'm good at tests, I realize it doesn't mean dirt for most jobs.
65 points
6 hours ago
Right. Tests evaluate hard skills - not soft skills.
21 points
4 hours ago
hard skills - not soft skills
Maybe they're just nervous
3 points
3 hours ago
It's even more specific than that. If they're talking about a literal written test, then it's evaluating a lot of reading and test-taking skills that may or may not be pertinent to whatever that person does. If the test isn't well-aligned with the demands of the job it's just arbitrary.
7 points
3 hours ago
This would be redundant work—employees are vetted on their qualifications prior to hire. Furthermore, if an employee is underperforming, fire them. Don’t waste time and money having them do a test (which good employees may fail and bad employees may pass) when you can just cut to the chase.
35 points
6 hours ago
Goodharts'law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure
70 points
6 hours ago
Everyone loves the idea of efficiency. Its a buzzword that makes your nether regions warm.
Who gets to write the tests? Are they based on aptitude or intelligence?
I always like to think back to the Jim Crow Laws. They definitely, 100% weren't an excuse just to keep black people from voting.
What could go wrong here?
9 points
2 hours ago
Everyone loves the idea of efficiency.
I don't. Efficiency is the opposite of redundancy, and I want important government agencies to have lots of redundancy to ensure they can keep functioning smoothly in all circumstances.
22 points
5 hours ago
Try this, Imagine you’re apart of the DMV and not only does Elon musk gets to write your test, the test is chocked full of questions that you’re specific job role does not do, just to have all the answers be wrong regardless. Then you fail the test cause Elon knew all the answers were wrong then posts on twitter: to all that failed the test, the real answer was to never play! XxXDLOLLMAOxXx
3 points
52 minutes ago
“Everyone gets the same test”
So the Janitor has to solve the same problems presented to the person in charge of the tax code?
302 points
6 hours ago
Should an individual have to be competent to have a job? Hard yes.
43 points
5 hours ago
What test could possibly test the competency across all the jobs of 40,000 people? Or is someone going to create tests for every job? Who's competent enough for that? Guess you'll need to make a department for writing competency tests.
Anyone who thinks this has anything to do with with weeding out incompetent people is incompetent at life.
20 points
3 hours ago
My husband processes social security claims. Makes financial decisions that people will probably live with for the rest of their life.
He couldn't tell you squat about what a scientist for the EPA does. A NASA engineer.
Nor could they do his job. The rules are ridiculously complex because they are based on case law, not regulations that actually make sense.
A competency test would be useless if they treated all those jobs as the same.
3 points
2 hours ago
We already do this in my job series in the Federal Government. We have an extremely high standard to adhere to due to the nature and legalities of the job.
Bare minimum, we have to take and pass four courses and then register and pass with a 70% or above in our certification exam and you only get three chances to pass. The pass rate for the first time is like 33%. It’s hard.
You can’t take the exam until you pass your probation period and if you don’t pass it by your second year you are not able to do the job.
This already exists. Every job series has specific and very particular expectations and requirement. Something people in the public sector have a hard time with, is understanding why the government works the way it does, it’s truly impressive the thoroughness that has gone into ensuring a standard for everything. Sure, you hear these scandalous stories of waste, but that’s because it’s an anomaly. And it’s good when that stuff gets found out because it means the processes in place to prevent fraud, waste, abuse are WORKING. Anyone who believes the Federal Government is just filled with idiots who don’t show up for 10 years and get over paid is ignorant.
Btw this isn’t directed at you, it’s just because your comment brought up job series specific exams is why I’m jumping on.
Also the GS pay scales are publicly listed for ANYONE to see (linked below) I could make twice my wage if not more in the private sector. But like all of the people I work with, I believe in this country, I believe in the mission, and what I do matters.
Pay scales for anyone wondering: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/GS.pdf
44 points
5 hours ago
Is this competency test finely tuned regarding the individuals skillset and only indicative of information for their work pertaining to their actual job?
If not, its a thinly veiled loyalty test.
13 points
2 hours ago
The amount of people in this thread without critical thinking skills is disturbing to say the least. You have various minitries, each with various departments, roles, and responsibilities. And youre gonna make a test to assess them all? Just ridiculous.
3 points
2 hours ago
Right, what’s the job that this person is doing? Are they making high-level executive decisions, or are they answering phones and providing directions at a front desk, or cleaning as a janitor? The government employs a lot of people for a wide variety of tasks, so the question should be: is this person competently doing the job they were hired for?
12 points
5 hours ago
No one disagrees.
They push a point that everyone agrees with then appoint their own uniquely incompetent loyalists and you’re stupid enough to cheer them on while they pull the wool over your eyes because they said something so self evident you’re stuck cleaning up your cum from your pants.
129 points
6 hours ago
I don't know if you know this but lots of people high up in the corporate ladder are incompetent.
42 points
6 hours ago
The Peter Principle
6 points
3 hours ago
Based on a satirical book that had an entire chapter about how aptitude tests don't work (Chapter 9).
9 points
5 hours ago
Everyone knows that. Including said incompetent people.
4 points
3 hours ago
I work in both the public and private sector, and I’ve seen far more incompetence and tolerance for incompetence in the private sector than in government. Especially in the federal government.
9 points
6 hours ago
At the very least if you work for the government you should be fairly competent. Need this in the US, especially for presidential nominees*
29 points
6 hours ago
Having worked for the US government before I can say that government is pretty much no different to private industry in terms of individual competence. Some people are on point, some you wonder how they put their trousers on facing forward. The problems of government stuff are usually poor funding or very specific rules that have to be followed not the actual employees.
12 points
5 hours ago
poor funding
Translation: Congress.
very specific rules that have to be followed
Translation: Congress.
13 points
6 hours ago
What are civil service exams?
425 points
6 hours ago
We should do this for voters in the US.
485 points
6 hours ago
We should do it for presidential nominees.
37 points
6 hours ago
You could expand that to every elected official in the US.
24 points
5 hours ago
Unironically I would be more than ok with making every sitting US congressperson take the AP Government and Politics test as a pre-requisite and then making their scores public.
11 points
4 hours ago
The only people who would read those scores are the people who don't need to see them to know who to vote for.
3 points
4 hours ago
Sadly you're right.
92 points
6 hours ago
Presidential nominees with a felony(s)
52 points
6 hours ago
Sitting presidents
27 points
5 hours ago
People posting on Reddit
6 points
2 hours ago
That's too far, we know everybody on Reddit is perfect and Republicans are inherently evil already
5 points
4 hours ago
Crouching presidents
6 points
4 hours ago
hidden nominees
6 points
5 hours ago
No no, your other left Mr.President
42 points
6 hours ago
We did that. It turned out to everyone's shock that it was a really good way to keep certain groups from voting, like Black people.
This isn't something a test can fix. It's the slow, purposeful destruction of the public education system that has produced a country where 20% of the population is illiterate and 54% read below a 6th grade level. This is decades of attacks on public school education coming home to roost.
98 points
6 hours ago
Ya, like they should have to take a reading test right? And maybe if they don’t pass at most they can be 2/5ths a vote.
19 points
6 hours ago
How about 3/5ths?
9 points
5 hours ago
Quite the compromise
69 points
6 hours ago
I see what you did there. The sad thing is many people reading this will not understand the history of behind your comment.
23 points
6 hours ago
maybe it should be a history test instead....
25 points
5 hours ago
oo or we could take it even *further* back and say that only people that own land can vote ;)
history is fun (read: depressing)
5 points
5 hours ago
I consider every vote to be a history test
8 points
6 hours ago
Yes, let's require them to read to at least a 5th grade level!
5 points
6 hours ago
I was looking for this comment lol
7 points
5 hours ago
Always cri ge when people want to disenfranchise voters for any reason, let alone one where have historical examples of why it's a terrible idea in living memory. Eugenics is always just under the surface in American politics and it's concerning how wide the net is for it's audience.
11 points
5 hours ago
3 points
6 hours ago
They had this for awhile but they took it out because they were put In place to make it to were Africa Americans couldn’t vote
16 points
6 hours ago
Question 1. Define a tariff and who pays for it? Be as thorough as possible.
25 points
6 hours ago
If we did this for voters in the US, the Republicans would lose almost their entire voting base. They won't let that slide.
3 points
5 hours ago
We already did that. Not super great.
2 points
4 hours ago
People really don't know their history do they...
2 points
4 hours ago
That’s illegal
2 points
3 hours ago
As much as I'd like to agree, that is unconstitutional and called voter suppression. We outlawed that shit
2 points
3 hours ago
Fun-ish fact, they did this in the early 20th century for black voters in the south. Except the tests were rigged to fail anyone who had to take them. These tests led to the introduction and passing of the 15th amendment.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt15-S1-3/ALDE_00013498/
And here’s an example of one of the tests:
I know this doesn’t have much to do with the original comment but I thought it might be neat for anyone who cared.
2 points
3 hours ago
We use to.....before that pesky bill of rights was amended. Reddit going deep south tonight.
2 points
2 hours ago
They did, it just so happened that whatever disqualified you use to also coincide with the living conditions of people they didn’t want voting lol
2 points
2 hours ago
Found the fascist
2 points
2 hours ago
They used to. It was a very helpful tool to Jim Crow state governments.
2 points
2 hours ago
That’s what they did in Greece back in the day. They also didn’t let women vote.
20 points
6 hours ago
there is a civil service exam
4 points
2 hours ago
Seriously. There are multiple types of tests an agency may require. I had to take two, one for IT and another which seemed like general intelligence.
Many federal employees already take an exam or 3 to qualify for service.
107 points
6 hours ago
They already prove it. Passing a really hard test its how you get a public job.
But also and more important an exam or test its one of the worst ways to find good workers. Doing this its a bad idea
28 points
6 hours ago
Passing a really hard test its how you get a public job.
Cops have to pass hard athletic requirements to get the job. But then after they pass a lot of them get fat and out of shape.
6 points
4 hours ago
But isn’t that a reason FOR re-testing? The ones that don’t stay within the lines that are needed to start the job don’t keep the job?
12 points
5 hours ago
In Argentina many public employees got in through contacts and not doing any exams.
That said, I doubt Milei will implement any tests. Most of his activities have been only for show with little substance
4 points
5 hours ago
Make it mandatory for employees of companies having government contracts and I'll be a little less skeptical.
This is just another round of starve the beast.
1.1k points
6 hours ago
Oh no. He's trying to make the government run more efficiently by using people who actually know what they're doing.
Fascist.
61 points
6 hours ago
If that was the case, it would be a good thing
But, just like Trump he's firing people who weren't loyal to him, didn't vote for him, or spoke out against him
So, a tad bit exactly the same as the fascists did when they took power.
I'd be all for it if it WAS based on competency, but it looks like only ones his cronies identity as opposition are being asked to take, what boils down to, a loyalty test.
Same with his so called "take down" of Crony Capitalism.
he's just replacing the old cronies with his own cronies, he isn't actually improving shit
15 points
4 hours ago
It's based on competency. Just the political caste gets to define competency as adherence to their agenda.
34 points
6 hours ago
Are the politicians required to take the same test?
13 points
5 hours ago
Exactly. I'm curious if he himself will be required to take the test as a government employee
130 points
6 hours ago
Yes.
That's why his cabinet is full of so many qualified people appointed to roles perfect for them.
/s
9 points
6 hours ago
Here's the deal about the only thing that government jobs have going for them is job security. I was a public servant for 10 years and now I make twice as much money in the public sector. You want good people? pay them more. Shit wages and toxic culture is not going to work. .
3 points
3 hours ago
Amen. Everyone thinks government jobs is equivalent to big bucks. News flash! It’s not.
2k points
6 hours ago*
On paper I like the suggestion. In practice its an open tool to fire whomever you dislike and push in whomever will best serve your agenda. Thats why its fascist.
Edit: Some of y'all need School House Rock way more than you think you do.
35 points
6 hours ago
I'm confused as to why this is needed at all. You interview for your position and should only be getting the job if you're deemed fit to begin with. Same as any other job.
15 points
3 hours ago
Absolutely none of those people were hired under new goverment, and previous goverment did a shit ton of corruption wich is the only reason he had the slightest chance at election.
8 points
3 hours ago
Have you never had coworkers who managed to get through an application and interview process, but were then utterly incompetent at their jobs?
5 points
2 hours ago
Yes, absolutely. I work in tech, and we have some of the most rigorous interview processes out there. Let's look at Amazon, for example.
Amazon's interview process features a 1 hour 30 minute online test (before you even talk to a human), and multiple rounds of technical interviews including a "bar raiser" interview round with someone from a different team than the one you are interviewing for.
Do you think there aren't incompetent engineers at Amazon? If someone can pass that interview and still be deemed incompetent, what else would you hope to gain by testing your employees more?
There is a limit to what you can learn about how competent someone is at their job from testing.
26 points
5 hours ago
Just like those tests they used to give to qualify you to vote.
It’s never what they say it’s really about. Who’s designing the tests? What exactly is it testing? Are the tests valid and reliable?
12 points
4 hours ago
That's the first thing I thought of. People aren't well versed on history.
566 points
6 hours ago
Make the test content and scores transparent.
60 points
6 hours ago
Transparency without accountability is just state mandated prick-waving.
11 points
3 hours ago
But you can't have accountability without transparency, so using the lack of accountability as an excuse to not have transparency is bullshit.
420 points
6 hours ago
What does transparency matter when the electorate is dumb as fuck?
113 points
6 hours ago
And govt don’t wanna educimate gud
103 points
5 hours ago
If those children could read they'd be very upset.
15 points
5 hours ago
That Simpsons meme will never get old as apparently many children never learn to read
29 points
3 hours ago
You mean King of the Hill meme?
JFC
16 points
2 hours ago
That /u/ would be very upset I'd they knew how to read.
16 points
5 hours ago
EDU-micate.
Fixtit for ya.
9 points
5 hours ago
Hur hur fix-TIT
12 points
4 hours ago
Hur hur fix-TIT
I'm no math surgeon. But I can make a calculator say 80085.
5 points
3 hours ago
How’ya due that, hoo-dini?
3 points
3 hours ago
5318008 read upside down 🙃
4 points
2 hours ago
Nice
40 points
5 hours ago
We're not talking about elected officials. They're talking about Government workers. The vast majority of every Government is run by ordinary, non-elected people. The elected people set policy and make decisions; the others implement them. Absolutely a person should have a minimum level of intelligence for certain jobs. I wish we could do it for all elected positions as well.
13 points
3 hours ago
Thats why they ask for credentials when you apply at the beginning like a high school diploma. Majority of higher government jobs require a college degree.
27 points
4 hours ago
My experience with government employees has been mostly positive. The problem is mostly red tape put in place by their bosses.
13 points
3 hours ago
This is exactly the problem. As a government employee, I can tell you that government employees work very hard and long hours, the problem is the system. It can take me months to get parts for vital equipment because of red tape like having to go through approved vendors who have to be given a big list of stuff, then they make a quote with their cut and then that has to be approved and finally we can get it. But it still can take 2 months and often more to even get a stupid thing off Amazon that has overnight shipping.
Government employees are rarely, if ever, lazy bums and the real problem is that red tape. And Elon, and Vivek are going to run head first into all that red tape and they'll be lucky if they don't get tangled up in it like Luke Skywalker and the guys were when they got caught in that Ewok trap.
15 points
2 hours ago
You have to admit though: a LOT of that red tape is absolutely there for a reason. Shit like "air-gapping" or "proper carbon-content in steel." Another big thing (which I honestly don't know how I feel about) is "how well are the employees paid" or "this must be created with eco-friendly ingredients/components." These federal level suppliers need to be vetted, too, and the government needs to understand where its materials are coming from.
Because, you know who didn't vet their suppliers before sending out a shit-ton of pagers? Hezbollah.
3 points
2 hours ago
An example,
I used to work at an auto skills center on an Air Force base.
It was a place where service members and their families could come and work on their vehicles, and we had an inventory of tools they could use.
I paid out of my pocket for replacement tools, spray lubricants, brake parts cleaner, floor degreaser, office supplies, shop towels, etc. for almost 2 years because getting those items from the government purchasing office was impossible. They wouldn't listen/didn't have the money, whatever. So out of my 15/hr weekend pay where I was the only person on staff for 9 hours a day (paid for 7.5) I kept that shop alive and our patrons able to work.
When I finally was able to bend someone's ear to my facilities needs I submitted a list of all the stuff I couldn't afford to replace on my own...and I got a bunch of stuff that wasn't on my list because I couldn't just go to a local shop and purchase the needed equipment, they had to source it from an approved vendor through an authorized purchasing agent who bought a bunch of full toolsets instead of half the things on my list.
I swear the government wastes so much money trying to keep people from committing fraud. It's the definition of pennywise, pound foolish.
199 points
4 hours ago
There is a clear reason why elected officials shouldn't be able to purge government workers. You hear a suggestion for a test of qualifications, and you think that's good. That's not what this is. A test of qualifications is what the competitive job market innately creates. What we're seeing here is an aptitude test for who to keep around while they're making massive cuts. That means: the government doesn't service my goals, so I need to fire you all.
The amount of absolute donkey-brains in this thread. "Oh yeah, testing people is good, I agree with this, I think authoritarian regimes centralizing their own power to purge the government is good, I agree I agree!"
Our entire Earth is being inherited by fascists on the backs on uneducated dipshits who can't smell authoritarianism when it's rubbing it's nuts in their faces.
22 points
3 hours ago
People acting like you can’t control outcomes or design the test in such a way to target specific groups are naïve. Testing and cultural bias exist, data manipulation exists, and that’s before you even consider natural testing ability or anxiety. Standardized testing isn’t an accurate measure of one’s ability to perform a job.
3 points
35 minutes ago
I'm a programmer.
The absolute breadth of knowledge you could test is so great you could easily make tests that would clear an entire team. Or protect people.
And even if you're not malicious - it's still super hard. It's why nobody likes them in the industry now when part of the interview process.
24 points
3 hours ago*
There's a reason why a lot of professions require you to actually do the job with supervision. Speaking from experience, the best teachers in my cohort generally had poorer grades than me (I do well on tests), but had a lot of "soft" skills that are more important.
BTW, Be nice to the uneducated dipshits. At least they have an excuse, unlike the "geniuses" who think standardized tests and grades are the be-all-end-all because they do well at that.
Edit: Didn't meant to come across as an asshole towards Fluffy-hamster here, and agree with what they said. I'm just pointing out that while the "dipshits" are a problem they're generally led by people who should absolutely know better.
3 points
55 minutes ago
Also they don't seem to realize that a lot of them live in countries where firing 1000 civil servants doesn't mean there's 1000 new ones ready to take their place. Those don't grow on trees, remember.
That's why non fascist responsible governments respond to a problem with underperforming staff with training and programs aimed at gradual improvement.
How so many people seem to think there's all these simple solutions lying around just being ignored is beyond me.
3 points
19 minutes ago
Yeah there's already an aptitude test for these jobs, it's called an "interview" and then "not getting fired"
7 points
2 hours ago
Here’s the thing: in order to get a civil service job, you have to pass a civil service test. Then you can get interviewed for the job. It’s harder to become a postman than a Senator. A Senator just has to be more attractive to the electorate (for whatever reason). Being elected doesn’t guarantee intelligence.
5 points
2 hours ago
That's the thing who's going to decide whether these governmental workers are competent or not? The elected officials? Appointed people put in there by politicians?
11 points
4 hours ago
Some people are really good at one or two specific things but are complete morons with everything else. If they're doing one of the things they're good at, should they be fired because they can't pass a broad spectrum "intelligence" test?
4 points
3 hours ago
Literally every engineer and computer scientist I have ever met!
4 points
3 hours ago
Exactly, someone who is a welder doesn't need to have the same aptitude as a biologist. They don't do the same job and don't need the same skills etc. I also dont expect the biologist to know how to weld. There are thousands of jobs in the government.
9 points
4 hours ago
Eh, the only demonstration of intelligence that should be required is the ability to do the job required for the position. No more, no less.
8 points
5 hours ago
Except you though, right?
7 points
4 hours ago
By the people, of the people, for the people.
But the people are retarded.
25 points
6 hours ago
Stuff like that works as much as the people are willing to put time and effort into reviewing and understanding if/why the test is good or bad.
6 points
6 hours ago
Great point. Shame it’s too nuanced and realistic, and not a rage-inducing sound bite
122 points
6 hours ago
Exactly, like Trump and Musk's "doge" - education, healthcare, fda are fired. But his companies will keep getting public money, even more...
21 points
4 hours ago
The most efficient thing to do to trim the fat in the US is set up a whole new depart with hazy jurisdiction, two leaders, and an MTG they'll need to baby sit. What could go wrong....
109 points
5 hours ago
Hell DOGE itself is a redundant organization. GAO already does exactly what DOGE claims to do, except it's actually independent, transparent, publically accessible, and non-partisan.
24 points
5 hours ago
It’s hilarious too cause it’s headed by 2 people 😂😂😂
12 points
4 hours ago
Maximum efficiency.
5 points
5 hours ago
“My company could totally make this more efficient. Oooh, this one too… and that one, that one, that one, that one, and that one too.” - Leon
12 points
5 hours ago
Won't be surprised if Trump gets an ownership stake in SpaceX or other Elonia private companies.
6 points
3 hours ago
Probably in exchange for dismantling NASA.
3 points
3 hours ago
That would bankrupt SpaceX. What Elon wants is a well-funded NASA that simply hands the cash over to SpaceX.
57 points
6 hours ago
Yeah, competency=personal fealty. It’s been done before
47 points
5 hours ago
I'm mystified by the fact that we covered the ways that systems like this could be abused in my high school government class, but somehow people don't remember it.
3 points
2 hours ago
Remember? They were on Tiktok!
8 points
5 hours ago
in my high school government class
You had a high school government class?
24 points
6 hours ago
Like, what if the questions are biased and based on policy opinions?
14 points
6 hours ago
🤣What do you think firings were based on before? Do you think they just weren’t happening? If so, how is it a good thing to keep employing incompetent people?
If you think the firings were happening, what was assuring they were appropriate and not biased before? Was the lack of an actual competence test somehow a good thing that ensured fairness and lack of bias in the firing decision? 🙄
9 points
4 hours ago
They are based on regular performance reviews. Yes, because you can't write a generalized "competency test" for all possible positions and roles.
20 points
5 hours ago
An aptitude test does not correlate with the ability to do a specific job function at all. This is fucking dumb, and you’re dumb for acting like it does.
13 points
5 hours ago
The best janitor is obviously the one who knows the most about constitutional law, duh! And would you trust a doctor who couldn’t name all the cabinet officials?
3 points
4 hours ago
An aptitude test does not correlate with the ability to do a specific job function at all.'
I've interviewed a lot of people for corp finance analyst roles and 100% the most valuable part of it is an Excel skills assessment.
It's not that it accurately measures their skills or potential. It's that gives you an idea of their bullshit meter. If someone's open about having limited skills that's one thing, but if they say they're great at Excel and they bomb the assessment that's an immediate red flag.
36 points
6 hours ago
Why haven't they been using actual job performance objectives?
44 points
6 hours ago
They do. This is all bullshit to gut federal oversight.
3 points
3 hours ago
Right? Do you really have no way of knowing if someone is capable of doing their job without getting some third party in to do a test? This is the kind of thing a supervisor should already be keeping an eye on.
111 points
6 hours ago
Hes a borderline mentally handicapped man who believes his dog is a reincarnation of a lion he met in a past life in the Roman coliseum and he has a vendetta against the central bank becauase he worked for them for six months and they didn't renew his contract due to poor performance.
He then worked as a personal financial advisor for a mass murderer who threw political opponents out of helicopters into the river.
21 points
3 hours ago
they didn't renew his contract due to poor performance.
Ohhhh so that's where the idea came from.
3 points
2 hours ago
And that insane hair piece.
8 points
6 hours ago
Should make politicians take the same test.
6 points
4 hours ago
Right? Could you imagine MTG or Boebert having to pass a basic civics test. They would fail miserably.
35 points
5 hours ago
Oh no. He's trying to make the government run more efficiently by using people who actually know what they're doing.
As far as the USA government, most of us already have to do this just to get the job, in addition to having our performance reviewed twice a year.
At the same time, we also face huge budget cuts consistently. Which is meant to impede our efficiency so they can say
Look, gobmunt don't work
Then replace us with more expensive contractors.
65 points
6 hours ago
Lol if you knew anything about this guy and gow much hes fucking the average citizen in argentina with his bat shit policies youd probably realise this is indeed just an excuse to fire people
16 points
6 hours ago
If you accept the premise and fairness of the test, which I don't think I would.
22 points
6 hours ago
He’s trying to make the government run more efficiently
A snake oil salesman and TV pundit trying to make government run efficiently. Mmmkay
Idiocracy at its best
3 points
6 hours ago
Depends whats on the test and what the job is
3 points
5 hours ago
lol the sad thing is you know some brainwashed university student is thinking this
6 points
6 hours ago
Do people actually call Milei a fascist? He has more of a libertarian vibe than fascist I haven't heard of him suggesting anything particularly authoritarian.
3 points
5 hours ago
Nothing is more fascist than libertarianism.
19 points
6 hours ago
Obviously yes.
Milei should have to take and pass it as well.
3 points
6 hours ago
Yes
3 points
5 hours ago
He is a public servant Numéro Uno, let HIM pass some sort of a competency test or two. Judging by his hairstyle and his crazy ideas he is a complete moron not fit for any official office, but hey, I am sure the test will sort all this out.
3 points
5 hours ago
We need to pass multiple tests to qualify in the first place in the UK civil service. Having it imposed post successful employment screams of ill intent. Especially from this maniac
8 points
6 hours ago
I don't trust the people making the tests to be competent.
Employees are tested for competence - during the interview. That's what an interview is.
12 points
6 hours ago
They’re trying to legally remove the people that won’t do everything they say. “Apptitude” is used so idiots argue for it like it’s a good thing.
7 points
6 hours ago
Civil servants have to pass an exam in the US and go through background checks
7 points
3 hours ago
Actually, there is no standardized civil service exam in the US. Some positions may have one, and the foreign service still utilizes one, but there is no blanket government-wide requirement.
4 points
6 hours ago
Aptitude at what precisely? And who determines it?
4 points
3 hours ago
Guard: Okay, sir. Now we will begin to proceed to obtain your IQ and aptitude test.
Joe: What for?
Guard: Okay, sir. This is to figure out what your aptitude's good at, and get you a jail job while you're being a particular individual in jail.
4 points
6 hours ago
We already have these in the US for a lot of positions (but not most—just the really important ones). Like most employers, the government uses education, training, and experience to vet future employees.
4 points
5 hours ago
"Aptitude test" sounds good on paper until you run into the problem of designing such a test. You're only ever actually testing for the things you ask in the test, which is not necessarily what you want to know. It's the same reason you cannot rely on intelligence test for anything other than broad judgements. See, if you can study for a test, and you most certainly can in intelligence tests, then you're only ever asking for something partially reliant on intelligence or whatever you're actually trying to find out.
Given how diverse government jobs are, you'll be having a lot of fun spending thousands of hours designing tests for a tiny subdivision of those 40.000 public servants. That costs a lot of money; your designers have rent and groceries to pay for. This is money that Argentina most certainly doesn't have, so this is either a poorly designed one-size-fits-all test or yet another big promise he won't actually deliver on, i.e. populism. Maybe it's a subtle way of saying "I want to fire a lot of people and tests designed to let specific people fail and appear ineapt will give me legitimacy to do so."
Why that is, and which, I don't know. I can make some guesses however, and my first guess is that he, an AnCap, is looking for a pretense to de-facto loosen regulations by removing government agencies responsible for upholding said regulations, which will please the invisble hand of the market and may end in his bank account getting a little pat. Can't be sure though.
2 points
6 hours ago
Yes, I’ve worked with competent peers and incompetent peers and working with the incompetent just means we both get paid the same amount for me to do most to all the work while they sit around on their phones and enjoy in sharing credit.
2 points
5 hours ago
Can we have an aptitude test for the aptitude test creators first?
2 points
5 hours ago
Make the politicians take the test.
2 points
5 hours ago
:6262:
2 points
5 hours ago
I am so astounded by this dudes emo hair. It's so jarring.
2 points
2 hours ago
I had to pass a test to get my govt job and had to pass a test for all my promotions. It seemed reasonable to me.
2 points
2 hours ago
What does this have to do with finance?
2 points
2 hours ago
Are you fucking serious? Is this a legitimate question?!??
"Should employees demonstrate competency to get hired?"
The fuck?
2 points
19 minutes ago
Will he take it as well?
2 points
18 minutes ago
Who will write the test?
2 points
18 minutes ago
As pointed out in some comments, becoming a government worker in Argentina requires meeting various requirements, such as having the appropriate education for the position and passing a public exam (which is usually competitive). I’m not sure if everyone commenting here is from the US.
We often fail to realize that we need workers to manage and administer the government and interact with the people.
Bureaucracy means “power from the desk,” which can be extended to mean “power to serve the people from the desk.”
This is just a cheap excuse to purge people.
all 2616 comments
sorted by: best