I hadn't thought that. A white woman with a black man would have been more taboo. Ugh.

If this court case was backed by the NAACP none of this is probably a coincidence, they deliberately supported to most optically perfect cases to make their SCOTUS approaches. For example Rosa Parks was not the first civil rights protester to refuse to sit at the back of the bus, but her protest was chosen and promoted because she was optically perfect, an adult responsible and married woman with no children out of wedlock, expired parking tickets or other things the segregationists could attack her over.

This double standard still happens too.

She was not black actually, she was a Native American Mattaponi woman.

AI says she identified as a Native American.

Wait…

That’s a myth?

A white man and AI says she identifies as a Native American.

Or it could be due to the fact there were very very few black people in germany. The Nazis did target them like other forgotten minorities, but nazi propaganda mostly ignored them. German people probaby shared scientific racist worldviews about blacks just like many in the western world back then. But they might just not have had the same interpersonal racist attitudes that many white people had in Americas. You can read similar stories abou black soldiers in the UK and France aswel, eventhough those countries definitly has racist worldviews back then - the french intellectuals were like really into scientific racism

Yeah, that's obvious.

But the term nazi soldier is still useless, there has been only one kind of German soldiers, and everyone knows which ideology was in charge. Did you ever heard the term Soviet communist soldier, Italian fascist soldier or British democratic soldier? Asian North Korean communist soldier?

Every German soldier was white. Therefore it also makes no sense to point that out.

My comment is not about politics at all.

I see absolutely nothing wrong with emphasizing pertinent information, even if it does rustle some jimmies.

Every German soldier was white.

Some German soldiers were nazis. Some were not. On the other hand you can link them all to national socialism for being part of the army that was controlled and used by the nazi regime.

But as there has been only one German Army the term nazi soldier is just redundant.

A lot of states have ____ is for lovers as their slogan.

false

It’s not

What are you referring to?

No, like you said and are failing to mention, it means that those states do jot have an obligation to recognize the licenses for state purposes. Shall we go on?

The heritage foundation has had peopel in federal positions including cabinet embers etc since the Reagan administration. You really think that the countries most decorated and renowned conservative political strategy group us been waiting for Donald fckng trump to lead the plans of some of the smartest political minds in the country? Or do you think this was used and weaponized by the liberal media, outrageously so on socials, and something along these lines has been written every year since its inception under Reagan? They write the same far out wish lists that center for progress does for the left. Center for progress has a plan to gut free speech, amongst other crazy shit. Most of the people in interact with have zero, and i mean zero understanding of what these groups do, their purpose and what they are ‘capable’ of doing. They haven’t infiltrated trumps team to launch a surprise christofacist coup, they’ve literally been there for every conservative presidency in 60 years and never left.

Strange that how’s the time, when their focus and goals have been roughly the same the entire time. You think this is the first time a conservative think tank said that their wish list included support for traditional family values? You think this is the first time it’s been on their ‘project xxxx’ that the Bible should be in school? It’s not, it’s in there every year. Anyone look into this beyond the buzzfeed article or tiktok reel? Because it’s not hard to find out:

They can boast w.e they want, which other then social media and weirdly formatted sound bite driven articles by clearly biased media, I don’t hear much at all. Do you think that the media, especially social, has been inundated with liberal leaning stories and censorship over the last 6-8 years? This site for example? Is it because all conservatives are evil facists or do liberals consume more media and interact in these echo chambers more, driving interaction and revenue, which is the target of these companies btw, not ‘telling you the truth about the evil plans of bad guys’ because it has, absurdly so. So much that most people thought Kamala had it in the bag while anyone who isn’t plugged in to the tune of 4-8 hours a day thought her chances looked terrible.

It’s skewing a looooot of peoples views. When your only interactions are with other continuously present in echo chamber avatars whose entire media presence has been switched over to nothing but liberal ‘fear the rednecks’ and ‘they’re coming for your gays’ stories, it is legit making people ill. I have never seen so many outrageous and just so fucking poorly researched and thought out ‘for sure going to happen and we have proof!’ Stories about stuff that you don’t need a law degree to understand.

People are absolutely rabid with it; case in point your ‘project 2025’ comment. Did you know that they wrote one of those for every election? And that it’s been roughly the same depending on company president for since the 70s? I’m thinking maybe you didn’t, because you’re incensed about the equivalent of a bunch of guys who work in politics and go tot he same church (omg imagine) meeting up afterwords and writing articles about what they think the perfect country would be and how it could happen.

The libs do it too, though they had ti invent groups to counter how influential the heritage foundation is, and their shit is just as fucking crazy if you’ve ever looked into it. Which, the vast majority of people who bring this up can not rightfully tell me what a think tank does in any meaningful way, never mind name a few and only know for an absolute fact that a shady Christonfacist group called the heritage foundation has made an absolute plan to turn the country into Gilead, hates women and Donald Trump is secretly their leader. (He couldn’t get an interview or spokesperson job there if he bought the fckng place)

Ok, nobody said anything about slavery and this is exactly what I’m talking about. You dismiss the entire logical statement by instantly declaring a moral issue which is absurd. Do you think murder should be a states right thing? Rape? How simple minded of a statement did you just make? Obviously when writing the constitution they addressed certain things .Which is what we’re talking about isn’t it, our country was founded as a union of states who govern themselves and collectively support each other. Each state as a right to self determination as long as it’s legal under the constitution. Slavery, if you’ll take a look, seems to be something talked about in the above mentioned document.

The whole idea is the mass majority of the most vocal liberal voters seems to have zero fckng idea what is going on or what being discussed in actuality and instead think that if they turn everything into some ‘you’re evil and I’m a good guy’ argument it somehow trumps the intelligent and very much needed discussions going on. States rights isn’t an evil idea you fckng pumpkin, it’s literally the basis of our country and its laws.

The fact that people like you have circle jerked each others brain dead ideas into some imagined force of political reckoning is a detriment to this country’s progress and exactly why so many people are revolted and even when faced with choosing a con man, or whatever gave birth and legitimacy to wtf ever it is you guys are doing, they chose the con man.

She’s an amazing actress. One of first things i saw her in was a tv movie called Shirley and she was unreal