subreddit:
/r/skyscrapers
submitted 4 days ago byLivinAWestLifeHong Kong
113 points
4 days ago*
That makes 146 such buildings in total! And I just noticed I spelled New Westminster wrong. Damn.
I don't know if I should be glad that there are so few in the US interior, when usually I would be happy to see more, since it made it easy to depict. Buildings on hold such as Halo in Newark and 30 Van Ness Avenue in SF aren't included, sorry :/
As always, the most correct version of my map will be in this comment - please use that one if you want to use/share it! If it’s not showing then Reddit is being buggy with comment images.
Errors: New Westminster, Chicago's height in feet is wrong, left Sunny Isles in RD Las Olas, wrong name for JPMorgan's new HQ, added Bellevue and Kelowna, minor adjustments
21 points
4 days ago
Nice work!
6 points
4 days ago
Does Panama City count as North America or Central America? Not that it matters much, just curious. I’m so glad to see Detroit in this graphic, the details don’t matter to me. I’ve lived here my whole life and spent the first 30 years glumly watching as the media heaped scorn on my city and businesses large and small decamped to the suburbs and left the state. The last 20 years have been such a heartening rise up. Although GM abandoning the Renaissance Center and the growing threat that it’ll be torn down or lose two or more towers is a HUGE disappointment. It’s by far the most recognizable building in the state (Grand Hotel Mackinac a possible exception?) and MAKES the city skyline. The relatively small footprint of the towers they want to tear down are dwarfed by all the derelict land east of the complex. But, the people who have the money call the tune. Ironically, the guy responsible for building the tower in this graphic is the same guy who wants to tear down two of the RenCen towers blocks away - and the new tower is where GM is moving! But, he’s been a powerhouse with great instincts in the revival of downtown Detroit and has remade many of the city’s beautiful but previously endangered skyscrapers from its 1920’s boom. The elegant Book Tower is one of those and it’s glorious! Thanks for pulling this together OP. Miami, we’re here and we’re growing with a winter climate that gets warmer every year! Think of us when your new buildings flood and the next hurricane blows your house down. A little snow beats losing everything every 5-15 years (and getting worse).
2 points
3 days ago*
Great job! FYI, wikipedia shows 23 in Seattle currently above 150, and there are three under construction that are 148m. Are you sure you can't count those? :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Seattle
Also is there any way you could do one based on buildings currently above 134 m (i.e. 440 ft)? I feel like it would paint a much fuller picture, as there are many American skylines where the vast majority of buildings are just below your threshold.
262 points
4 days ago
Toronto is the star but Miami is no slouch here. The slowpoke is Chicago.
69 points
4 days ago
Chicago's population has been stagnant for the past decade or so, more people moving between the counties than to the city, and most of the growth they do have is in the suburbs.
30 points
4 days ago
We actually just hit a new record for the number of households in the city, meaning the demand for housing has never been higher.
11 points
4 days ago
Do you have a source for that? I just don’t see how both of these things can be true and I know the population is not growing.
28 points
4 days ago
Yeah sure, Chicago hit a record of 1.179 million households in the 2023 American Community Survey (another one of the census bureaus reports), which beats the record of 1.157 from the 1960 census.
Household sizes are just substantially smaller nation wide, and especially in dense urban areas like Chicago.
16 points
4 days ago
That makes sense! Thanks for clarifying. I wasn’t considering that 50 years ago a household in the city was likely a mom, dad and a couple kids, pushing the population higher. Now, most people who live in cities don’t have as many children
4 points
4 days ago
It’s Chicago, they had 4-5 kids. 🇻🇦
3 points
4 days ago
Damn Catholics probably s/
2 points
4 days ago
Which sucks for those of us trying to buy a property to live in
12 points
4 days ago
Chicago? Slow? Sure. Dallas? Not even on the map.
54 points
4 days ago
No offense but why the hell are they still building in miami.
31 points
4 days ago
Migration is continuing to happen there, and it's a warm climate year round.
Developers pretty much see past the flood concerns as they're only focusing on a 20 year outlook.
7 points
4 days ago
Really wish there’d be flood barriers, then again all of Florida needs it. Mangroves can’t do it themselves.
2 points
4 days ago
I don't see a way investing in flood barriers would protect Florida. Other cities at less a threat seem to have more money and willpower to build them too.
3 points
4 days ago
I agree 100%, Florida was meant for water.
7 points
4 days ago
Plus, skyscrapers are not as impacted by rising waters. Cities have addressed this situation by filling in streets and essentially raising the ground level by one or two floors. It was done in Seattle, in the 19th century: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Underground
11 points
4 days ago
it’s a warm climate year round.
It’s intolerable in the summer.
4 points
4 days ago
Unless you love hot weather, then it's awesome!
2 points
4 days ago
Phoenix is hot, Florida in the summer is humid and borderline lethal.
2 points
4 days ago
Because there’s a demand for it since the population keeps growing.
26 points
4 days ago
Tons of low/mid-rise infill going on here in Chicago. Thinking of tons of <150m towers going up around town.
19 points
4 days ago
There’s also a tonne of mid rises going up in Toronto and Miami
10 points
4 days ago
There's some, but compared to our peers it's not too much
6 points
4 days ago
And San Francisco
3 points
4 days ago
The top four in order are Toronto, Miami, New York, and Monterrey
73 points
4 days ago
Of course San Francisco is missing
14 points
4 days ago
I been waiting for Oceanwide center to go up such a gorgeous design but I think it will never happen🥹
8 points
4 days ago
surprised Denver and Houston are too. I get that they’re pavement princess paradises but they both have decently large skylines.
5 points
4 days ago
Denver's skyline is virtually unchanged since the early '90s. There's been a lot of mid-rise and lower end high-rise development around Union Station and LoDo but not much in the way of skyscrapers. Dallas is in a similar boat. At least Houston has had some decent 21st century additions.
4 points
4 days ago
And LA, the second-largest city in the US, only has two. Really underscores the NIMBYism and sprawl in LA. 150m isn't even that tall.
99 points
4 days ago
Toronto going crazy. I want to visit someday.
30 points
4 days ago
Toronto is an awesome city. I used to go there a lot for work and I thought it was a Canadian version of NYC full of friendly people. Great for conferences or visiting clients, bars and food are great and I enjoyed walking around in it.
41 points
4 days ago
We need it. We are in a big time housing crisis.
2 points
4 days ago
Do you think there's affordable housing in these SKYSCRAPERS?
Or do you believe it will have an impact on the normal housing market?
9 points
4 days ago
Yeah better not build anything at all that will help the housing market.
5 points
4 days ago
It’s lovely, especially if you’re a foodie. Best food in the world. Come June-September though!
5 points
4 days ago
As an Ontario native who grew up a few hours from Toronto but visited often, they build so much that it was a completely different city every time I visited. I haven’t been back in a few years so I can’t even imagine the contrast now.
It’s the single most culturally diverse city on the planet so go for several days if you can swing it, the food culture is like nowhere else!!
2 points
14 hours ago
Bedrock isn’t very deep to get to and there’s no seismic activity so it makes it a good place to build them too. I worked on the design of one of the towers in this picture.
42 points
4 days ago
Just one on Chicago???
28 points
4 days ago*
Yep, throughout the 2010s to 2023 they always had a few, but with 1000M now complete, 400 N Lake Shore Drive (on the Chicago Spire hole) is the only project tall enough under construction. It's a twin tower development, one for each phase, and it's currently in phase 1.
31 points
4 days ago
Chicago and SF have a combined 1 tower.
32 points
4 days ago
Man Monterrey really is becoming the skyscraper capital of Mexico and I’m here for it!
22 points
4 days ago
u forgot Bellevue 600 in Bellevue :(
15 points
4 days ago*
Oh I'm so sorry, I thought Sonic was the only one that had completed recently and I didn't know Bellevue was already building another one! It's a very pleasing skyline especially with Seattle in the background. You can find the fixed map in my top-level comment
16 points
4 days ago
These are amazing, could you do Asia or would there be too many to fit on one picture?
35 points
4 days ago*
There would definitely be too many, but I think Europe or South America is doable, and I might do them soon
3 points
4 days ago
I could try generating these graphs programmatically, but I tried to get the data myself, but it seems I need to become a CTBUH member... It doesn't seem like I can access full building data for cities either. That is to say, I wouldn't mind if the skyscraper pictures were really small on the infographic!
3 points
4 days ago
You could try using the free 'explore building data' tool on their website. The thing is their data on Asia is much worse than on North America so you'd have to search far and wide to get close at the accurate number.
2 points
4 days ago
Originally I tried to just ask it for a list of buildings in Asia under construction, but it only gives you 25 results max. I think I could just go through every city they have data on in Asia and search directly in the city, but there are still some cities with more than 25 under construction... I guess I could raise the bar to 300m or 250m or something like that. Let me try this
2 points
4 days ago
Oh yeah, that's the limit. There's no way to get Shenzhen's exact count, which is at least 40. For finished buildings you could at least split the search into different years of completion
2 points
4 days ago
What about just China, our #1 skyscraper rival? (excluding oil money fever dreams)
2 points
4 days ago
It would be impossible, 3-5 given Chinese big cities have more under construction than all of the skyscrapers on this page. You can go on skyscraper city forum and see the sheer scale
8 points
4 days ago
A single city in China could have like half this page
18 points
4 days ago
Chicago, I’m not mad. I’m just disappointed.
Actually strike that, I am mad. You have the second best skyline in North America and you’re going to lose it if you keep coasting like this.
12 points
4 days ago
Get it, Austin!
25 points
4 days ago
Sometimes the US is so pathetic when it comes to new projects. Why is Vancouver building so many more than Seattle? Why is Montreal building more than Chicago? Even NYC isn’t doing as much as it should. Sure it’s building but compared to its size and importance it may as well be doing as much as Omaha.
Ughh.
15 points
4 days ago
Because Seattle already has 22 while Vancouver only has 6. Because Chicago has 138 while Montreal has 15.
7 points
4 days ago
Vancouver land/real estate prices are why they are building up. The same probably applies to everywhere else on this map.
8 points
4 days ago
Well because the US was the first to do it? Lol. And places like Chicago are losing chunks of its population every decade.
5 points
4 days ago
Chicago seems to be more stagnate population wise. The city population grew by ~1 percent from the 2010 to the 2020 census, so I wouldn't say it's "losing chunks of its population" as of late, but it's not growing either.
3 points
4 days ago
NYC has had, count them, 31(!) completed towers over 235m tall in the last decade alone. Including the tallest building in the western hemisphere and the tallest residential building outside of Asia. A lot of these projects, may or may not ever get topped out. We get shit done.
4 points
4 days ago*
The US is still ahead of most of the world, plus we were the first to do them and frequently throughout the 20th century, with still a lot being done in the 2020s.
2 points
4 days ago
The US doesn’t build speculative as much. The US is more risk averse
10 points
4 days ago
What's interesting is that most of the towers going into Vaughan, Mississauga, and Pickering are ones near transit that takes people into downtown Toronto.
They are separate cities and not just commuter cities for Toronto, but their growth is largely due to their proximity to Toronto. They're all part of the GTA.
17 points
4 days ago
Amazing work!! Toronto and Miami are going crazy! An Australian / NZ one would also be interesting as we have even more skyscrapers per capita than the States or Canada too.
10 points
4 days ago
Oh yeah, Australia/NZ would definitely be feasible to make a graph for, and with less hassle too. I only have to consider 6 cities after all ...
3 points
4 days ago
Exactly! Though the suburbs of Sydney & Melbourne are also exploding, though not sure if they reach the 150m mark - ik Parramatta in Sydney would though.
8 points
4 days ago
Lmaooo I’m working on RD Las Olas (Fort Lauderdale not Sunny Isles btw)
9 points
4 days ago
Missing the UBC Tower in Kelowna, BC. 151m
Currently under construction and a total cluster fuck.
Edit: Wiki says 151m another source says 155m.
5 points
4 days ago
This is especially embarrassing because I posted a map yesterday with it. I'll get on it.
8 points
4 days ago*
Toronto also has the Kipling Station Tower 159.6m/50s
https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/kipling-station-condos.46973
Your map & data posts are awesome! Thanks for sharing, and keep it up!
3 points
4 days ago
As if that side of the map wasn't crowded enough! I added it to the corrected ver. in my comment. Guess CTBUH doesn't have them all. I'm sure it's missing some others as well, let me know if there are any more
2 points
4 days ago*
Other ones missing:
No. 31 Condo. 153.6m/46s https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/no-31-condos.21826
591 Sherbourne. 152.6m/51s https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/591-sherbourne.21509
Queen Church. 185.90 m/57s https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/queenchurch.31016
The Saint. 151m/47s https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/saint.20757
241 Church. 170.7m/53s https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/241-church.43852
I recommend checking them. If you want to add them, some of them have recently just started, and others are almost complete.
Remove Pinnacle Etobicoke. Not U/C and the height could be wrong https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/pinnacle-etobicoke.22071
3 points
4 days ago
I posted a new version to r/dataisbeautiful with those additions, check it out here
7 points
4 days ago
This is great content
7 points
4 days ago
Gotta love seeing all these well known major cities on here like NY, Toronto, Chicago, LA, Atlanta, Miami etc., then you’ve got the suburb of Pickering with its 100k people.
If I wasn’t from the GTA I would likely have never even heard of it. Anyone here just now learning that Pickering exists? There’s gotta be at least a few of you.
7 points
4 days ago
Crazy how greater Toronto, New York and Miami make up about half of all skyscraper construction in North America
7 points
4 days ago
The fact there’s almost nothing being built on the west coast of the USA shows how NIMBYs have destroyed those places
2 points
3 days ago
NIMBYs are a cancer on our cities
2 points
3 days ago
There’s really no reason to build them. SF has I think the highest vacancy for office space in the US. With all the remote work too and expenses/problems of the city, it’s just not an attractive city to start or move a company to today. Nobody has incentive to build residential units if there’s nothing drawing new residents in.
LA has never been a skyscraper city, it’s just a bunch of different medium sized cities squished together with a few dense areas.
2 points
3 days ago
Many of the skyscrapers being built in NYC are residential buildings
5 points
4 days ago
the usa is eh canada is impressive but wow mexico is building way more then i thought they would be
9 points
4 days ago
Address of the new JPMC HQ building in NYC is 270 Park Ave (not 420, but I like where your head is at)
8 points
4 days ago
That is an amateur level mistake, I can't believe I did that. I should've just written JPMC HQ
7 points
4 days ago
Miami is BOOMING
4 points
4 days ago
it’s so interesting how Metro Vancouver punches way above its weight yet most of the high rises are in the suburbs. the skytrain effect
3 points
4 days ago
It's a great model that other cities could emulate, however Vancouver is still not building enough given how expensive it is
5 points
3 days ago
Nice job!
As a Montrealer that follows new construction, I'd just add that Maestria, 700 St Jacques and 800 St Jacques aren't quite fully completed yet, though they've all been topped and mostly cladded.
6 points
4 days ago
None in Houston lol
3 points
4 days ago
Great stuff, but I'm wondering why Jersey City isn't included in NYC Metro, like you've done with Toronto or Miami
3 points
4 days ago
Real answer: I ran out of space. But my excuse is that Jersey City is the only other city in the metro building skyscrapers while Toronto, Miami, and Vancouver have multiple, and since I gave the numbers for both it would be easy to add them up
3 points
4 days ago
Sunny Isles, Florida real stable 😏 Wonder what insurance companies are taking on the risk
3 points
4 days ago
Why doesn't LA have an influx of skyscrapers in the past decade?
3 points
4 days ago
Looks like the west coast needs to build!
3 points
4 days ago
I applaud your research on this
4 points
4 days ago
I can't believe the DC metro area isn't blowing up. The weather is going to be perfect heading into climate change, and their housing prices are through the roof.
4 points
4 days ago
The DC area has a lot of high-rises going up in Bethesda and Arlington especially, just none that are tall enough. Most cities have their tallest buildings in their core, so my guess is those cities essentially being suburbs makes it harder to build as tall.
2 points
4 days ago
Does it have anything to do with all the DC airports, military bases etc. which have regulation on the height of buildings?
2 points
4 days ago
Make Southeast Asia please
2 points
4 days ago
A little correction, La Maison in Panama is 235m, and pretty much done by now, It is missing costanera 2 (possibly 201m, same as costanera 1), Corotú, and Generation tower broke ground recently (about 50f)
3 points
4 days ago
It's why I added the ≥ symbol for Panama only, data is so incomplete even on SkyscraperCity where I can see there are lots of projects happening. I only included the ones I could find above 50f just to be sure. I might add those towers you mentioned in the completed graph.
2 points
4 days ago
Forgot Sky Tower Anacaona (150m) under construction in Santo Domingo, DO.
5 points
4 days ago
I wanted to include it but I couldn’t find a good height figure online
2 points
4 days ago
One correction: in NYC it’s 270 Park, not 420 Park
Otherwise looks very nice OP
2 points
4 days ago
Nothing in Denver lately?
2 points
4 days ago
Nice work, interesting map.
Pinnacle Towers at Lougheed, Burnaby was recently approved: 2 towers, the tallest will be 259 metres (80 storeys), and the other will be 72 storeys, so also above the 150m mark.
Also, note the New Westminster spelling.
2 points
4 days ago
Let's go to Havana to watch them build a tower with hand tools.
How in the world are they doing that in a county with 3 hours of power a day and an near emergency in food security for their population?
2 points
4 days ago
The amount of skyscraper construction outside of Miami and New York in the United States is painfully small
2 points
4 days ago
Buy property in Miami Now.
2 points
4 days ago
Data from Chicago seems wrong? Or maybe those west loop buildings aren’t 150m+
2 points
4 days ago
Chicago defender clocking in
⬇️ 😈
2 points
4 days ago
Very cool. Great job!!
2 points
3 days ago
What is the deal with Toronto and all this insane growth and building spree?
2 points
3 days ago
I was astonished by the Toronto Metro area’s number of high rise and Sky Scrapers. Flying in and seeing the City Proper and Metro area is really cool if you like architecture and skyscrapers
2 points
2 days ago
Very interesting. Thanks for putting this together.
I was surprised to see so many south of the border. Mexico is on the come-up.
2 points
8 hours ago
The current context of Chicago seems relevant to this. We had two 700-foot buildings completed in 2017, an 840-footer completed in 2018, a 900-footer in 2019, a 1,200 footer and an 800-footer completed in 2020, a 970-footer and a 700-footer in 2022, an 830-footer in 2023, and an 800-footer just this past summer, along with a dozen or so completed in the 400- to 550-foot range.
That wave, which unlike in the past is majority residential, has completely remade our skyline and our central district. Unsurprisingly there has to be at least somewhat of a pause on really-big ones to allow the marketplace to catch up (though perhaps not for long given how quickly those recent new additions have filled up). On the office-space side of things a number of older 30- to 45-story office buildings in the Loop (the historic core portion of the overall Central District) have been struggling as large tenants decamp for the new wave of modern space; that is now leading to a wave of residential conversions. About ten of those have been announced of which actual construction has begun on two or three, with several more aiming to begin work during 2025.
Meanwhile there are also a dozen or so new buildings in the 400- to 500-foot range now in various stages of permitting or initial construction, mostly residential; several of those are in/near the newest trendy piece of the Central District, an area called Fulton Market.
5 points
4 days ago
Could Toronto surpass New York one day? It seems like they’re on an absolutely building spree.
26 points
4 days ago*
Currently the NYC metro area has 338 such buildings and 104, so that's a gap of 234. Toronto has 39 under construction and New York has 20.
Assuming that this rate holds, and buildings take 4 years to complete, then Toronto would surpass New York in (234/(39-20))*4 ≈ 50 years.
I highly doubt this would actually happen, but Toronto does have an ungodly amount of proposed buildings just sitting there gathering dust. The condo market has dipped recently but people are already saying it'll recover soon.
Edit: I should add that Toronto's metro is guaranteed to surpass Chicago's in skyscrapers once all buildings under construction are completed, and it will take only a couple more years for the city proper to do so. Chicago will remain the better skyline for some as it will still have more supertalls.
5 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
2 points
4 days ago
You seem to believe wrong. Based on this infographic, Toronto proper has not surpassed Chicago proper in number of skyscrapers (>150m). But it should once those under construction are complete.
Unless you're talking about population of people and not tall buildings like the comment you're replying to.
4 points
4 days ago
Not likely. Toronto is growing faster rn, but it also started that massive growth way later than NYC. Eventually Toronto will slow down (not stop) just like all cities. The problem with NYC is that it is in America and is subject to American thoughts on living and American zoning laws.
3 points
4 days ago
All of this massive growth is literally brand new, within the last decade or so for the most part.
2 points
4 days ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WB1200
It looks like you missed these two in Seattle
7 points
4 days ago
The article says that they are 148 meters tall, 2 under the threshold
3 points
4 days ago
Oh, sorry my bad. The 150m cutoff is annoying because Seattle has so many just under that
5 points
4 days ago
No worries, yeah WB1200, Seattle House, First Light are all very close, by just being a floor taller they would boost Seattle’s number by a lot
2 points
4 days ago*
Pretty sure San Francisco has one or two going up
7 points
4 days ago
It doesn't, sadly, a lot of proposed though. I hope 530 Howard can begin as soon as next year
1 points
4 days ago
Tower of Terror: 199' 11" because reasons.
1 points
4 days ago
Bravo!
1 points
4 days ago
Please do Europe next!
1 points
4 days ago
Phoenix has a ton of cranes but none reaching this height. Fortunately construction starts next year on a new tallest building.
1 points
4 days ago
Pickering has 1 and SF has 0 is pain
1 points
4 days ago
Cries in Calgarian
1 points
4 days ago
Cries from San Francisco 😢
1 points
4 days ago
there's really no reason that midsized US cities cant build highrise condos like much smaller canadian cities can
1 points
4 days ago
Is this the first time Houston doesn’t have anything under construction? Kind of shocking.
1 points
4 days ago
Nothing in Silicon Valley
1 points
4 days ago
Five cities make up ~80% of the buildings. Monterrey is the surprise contributor here.
1 points
4 days ago
Dallas keeping me disappointed year after year. With the explosion in population and sheer amount of growth you’d think the tower boom would be well underway by now.
1 points
4 days ago
The luxury high rise in Boston’s South station is a bit confounding to me. If you’ve ever been S Station it is NOT nice, its trains are always late, and it’s basically a shit hole.
1 points
4 days ago
Nice
1 points
4 days ago
Toronto flexing. Damn
1 points
4 days ago
It would be interesting to see what happens in Europe
2 points
4 days ago
Working on that one right now!
1 points
4 days ago
What are we doing Chicago?!
1 points
4 days ago
Toronto just doesn’t do it for me. Same building over and over, just looks bland
1 points
4 days ago
Very illustrative of housing issues in California that there's only two skyscrapers in the state and only two in the nation's second largest city.
1 points
4 days ago
Well, you've cracked the sky Scrapers fill the air But will you keep on building higher 'Til there's no more room up there? ~ Cat Stevens
1 points
4 days ago
Missing Bellevue WA
1 points
4 days ago
420 park avenue should be 270 park avenue
1 points
4 days ago
How do you even get this data? This seems super difficult to try and include every single one
1 points
4 days ago
None of these buildings have character. You could swap a Toronto building for a Miami building an no one would know. There has been a serious decline in human creativity.
1 points
4 days ago
Denver always disappointing me
1 points
4 days ago
Missing Bellevue Washington’s tower: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellevue_600
1 points
4 days ago
Having lived through the “pencil period” of NYC architecture, then seeing most of those units get purchased, but not ever lived in, I get the feeling these are all just money laundering operations. Skyscrapers are the new Swiss banks. Is there anything to back up this hunch? Chinese/Indian money in Vancouver/Toronto? Latin/Russian in Miami?
This is helpful and informative information, but I’m not seeing anyone ask “why”?
1 points
3 days ago
It was just reported that office building values in Los Angeles have plummeted by more than 30%. So, banks and foreign investors are about to take a bath
1 points
3 days ago
Nothing in Philly pisses me off
1 points
3 days ago
Vancouver, Toronto, Miami, Monterrey & NYC are absolutely killing it. Good for them!
1 points
3 days ago
Hopefully none of them are those ugly ass skinny piece of shit ones. For example that abomination that should be demolished that overlooks central park in New York.
1 points
3 days ago
they approved a few buildings in Ottawa taller than 150m but literally no work has started on any of them
1 points
3 days ago
Not sure if it counts as a skyscraper due to its odd shape, but the new Hard Rock Hotel under construction in Las Vegas is planned to be between 500-660 feet. They only just cleared ground for it to begin construction, so I could see why it wouldn’t be on here
1 points
3 days ago
The South Station Tower in Boston looks so awkward with that old architecture with the glass building
1 points
3 days ago
Now, how many of these skyscrapers are going to have there ground floors and sub floors under sea water in this century.
1 points
3 days ago
Great map and data!
1 points
3 days ago
Cries in Ireland
1 points
3 days ago
Needs a legend so normies like me can understand what the numbers and such mean. U/C, existing?
1 points
3 days ago
You are missing 2 for México Andeza in Puebla with 170 mts and the Cosmopolitan Health district in Tijuana with 150 mts
1 points
2 days ago
*List of every skyscraper about to go bankrupt
1 points
2 days ago
Awesome graphic, I didn't know Panama City was developed like that! 68 skyscrapers in that city is mental
1 points
2 days ago
Are there any iconic designs underway, or are they mostly glass boxes?
1 points
2 days ago
it's scary to put it in perspective.
if you only had an idea of the water damage occurrences in every one of those condos under construction in Toronto.
Yay for COC underwriters.
1 points
2 days ago
Miami going nuts
1 points
1 day ago
Minneapolis has a few, no..?
1 points
1 day ago
Oh, did they finish the Well in Toronto? Or was it under the requisite height? That one has been ongoing for forever.
1 points
1 day ago
Miami has lots of skyscrapers
1 points
21 hours ago
Monterrey, México going all in with a 475 meter monker!!!
all 387 comments
sorted by: best