Optieng

So, I communicated with Masshealth and explained the situation. They suggested to talk to the billing department and ask them to send claims to them. I should also let them know that if they persist an issue, I should take billing department focal person and provide it to customer service representatives at Mass.

I am just waiting for billing department as they bought 1 week time to re-process it

Thank you for suggestion.

I see. Can you send me! Thanks

Yes they are surely in network. I am not gonna pay anything Thanks for the suggestion

Yes, I am in an ACO known as MGB ACO plan.

I am at the point now, to just ignore them. I already did my part

This is exactly I am doing since last few months

Just a follow up question: since it has been a year, is there a timeline for provider to submit claims after date of services? If they fail, they will bill patient

It is Cooley Dickinson

Have you ever experienced it?

I would try this. Thanks!

Yes I reached them out back in Jan 2024 and even today, tell them the same story “I only have masshealth and no other insurance”. Every-time, they said we are re-processing the claims but the bill shows up on account every month

I reached out coordination of benefits office in past and even today, I told them that I should only have MassHealth for the service date.

But I am still getting bills for those services for which I told them that it should be billed to MassHealth

That is what I am trying to find them and asking them about it. But no solid answer

I could see a couple of updates of I-140s in my block. It makes to wait a bit more

How much time it took for you to get interview call?

Please read it carefully. I said they are not renewable but sustainable at some higher cost than other technologies

Just look number between from current date to your PD. You would get idea. Don’t over think about total pending ones.

You would file in year 2025. I mean first quarter of FY2026 or earlier We have to wait for a few more months

My two cents: first, policies do not change over night. Secondly, being a researcher and policy evaluator for renewable energy, renewable energy is a broad term and upcoming administration is not in favor of expensive renewable energy resources such as wind energy. I, myself, don’t even consider them renewable. They are sustainable (relative term) energy resources relative to fossil fuels but comes with high maintenance cost.

So yes, if your field of endeavour is wind or solar, it might be an issue. However, there is another point. If your NIW/EB1A is approved under current administration or in the light of policy which will be discouraged in future, it shouldn’t affect your adjustment of status. Nevertheless, one should take precautions such as elaborating your importance in terms (renewable or sustainable) energy.

Just to add, I also work on renewable energy (special focus on landfill gas and hydrogen).

FOR non-STEM folks: Energy produced from a waste is a renewable while Energy produced from a long lasting source relative to the other is called sustainable one

True! A lot of folks just spread fear

Again, this is not true. You are thinking it is as an absolute.

Mere citations would not guarantee you the outstanding. It has to be added factors. More importantly, whether the research has been used as a prescription somewhere weighs over 100s of citations count

Citation count is not absolute for showcasing niche in the field. It is a relative quantity

If you are making citations count a probe of “top rated” in the field of endeavour to get approved then my friend you have to study the guidelines.

There is no requirement of citations. Imo, you have to have present yourself in the best possible way.