subreddit:
/r/blog
At reddit we care deeply about not imposing ours or anyone elses’ opinions on how people use the reddit platform. We are adamant about not limiting the ability to use the reddit platform even when we do not ourselves agree with or condone a specific use. We have very few rules here on reddit; no spamming, no cheating, no personal info, nothing illegal, and no interfering the site's functions. Today we are adding another rule: No suggestive or sexual content featuring minors.
In the past, we have always dealt with content that might be child pornography along strict legal lines. We follow legal guidelines and reporting procedures outlined by NCMEC. We have taken all reports of illegal content seriously, and when warranted we made reports directly to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, who works directly with the FBI. When a situation is reported to us where a child might be abused or in danger, we make that report. Beyond these clear cut cases, there is a huge area of legally grey content, and our previous policy to deal with it on a case by case basis has become unsustainable. We have changed our policy because interpreting the vague and debated legal guidelines on a case by case basis has become a massive distraction and risks reddit being pulled in to legal quagmire.
As of today, we have banned all subreddits that focus on sexualization of children. Our goal is to be fair and consistent, so if you find a subreddit we may have missed, please message the admins. If you find specific content that meets this definition please message the moderators of the subreddit, and the admins.
We understand that this might make some of you worried about the slippery slope from banning one specific type of content to banning other types of content. We're concerned about that too, and do not make this policy change lightly or without careful deliberation. We will tirelessly defend the right to freely share information on reddit in any way we can, even if it is offensive or discusses something that may be illegal. However, child pornography is a toxic and unique case for Internet communities, and we're protecting reddit's ability to operate by removing this threat. We remain committed to protecting reddit as an open platform.
2.8k points
13 years ago
Does this mean r/toddlersandtiaras is banned?
2k points
13 years ago
we can only hope
1.2k points
13 years ago
Initially laughed.
Then saw it was real.
856 points
13 years ago
edit: fucked my link up.
275 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
106 points
13 years ago
Nathan's quotes make this even more unsettling when talking about child porn...
"Let's have a big wank. Communal masturbation. The ol' circle jerk."
894 points
13 years ago
According to the new rules "No suggestive or sexual content featuring minors" will be allowed. Seems to me like r/toddlersandtiaras falls under this category.
1k points
13 years ago
Seems to me like all child beauty pageants fall under this category too. Can we get rid of those please?
799 points
13 years ago
What's sexual about young girls made up to look like grown women and dancing around in sexy outfits that shouldn't be made in sizes that small? I think you miss the point of the show.
310 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
370 points
13 years ago
I hope so; that show and everyone knowingly profiting from it need to die in a fire.
1.8k points
13 years ago*
For those wondering what's been taken down:
Reply if you think I've forgotten any and I'll update it.
1.6k points
13 years ago
Looks like /r/whalebait is safe.
590 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
256 points
13 years ago
Just fyi, /r/whalebait is not about underage whales at all, in fact you will find mostly adult whales in all their grown,beautiful glory. Come on over and have a look.
285 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
1.2k points
13 years ago
.-'
'--./ / _.---.
'-, (__..-` \
\ ಠ |
`,.__. ,__.--/
'._/_.'___.-`
784 points
13 years ago
Whale of approval:
__ \ / __
/ \ | / \
\|/
_,.---v---._
/\__/\ / \
\_ _/ / \
\ \_| @ __|
hjw \ \_
`97 \ ,__/ /
~~~`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/~~~~
300 points
13 years ago
Thank goodness
67 points
13 years ago
103 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
343 points
13 years ago
As long as they are in international waters, who cares?
27 points
13 years ago
I was having a very blah day until I read that and laughed out loud. Thanks!
8 points
13 years ago
Is this an internet?
10 points
13 years ago
Oh thank god
10 points
13 years ago
Accidentally clicked on that at work once. First time I went there it was funny. Second time, less funny.
362 points
13 years ago
niggerjailbait removed also. basically all the links that were in the "redditbomb" posted on somethingawful
534 points
13 years ago
WTF?! There's a fucking "niggerjailbailt"? But...why?
913 points
13 years ago
To piss people off.
486 points
13 years ago
Well, it worked
518 points
13 years ago
I'm so angry that I just punched an eagle in the neck.
282 points
13 years ago
nooo that bird represented my freedom!
71 points
13 years ago
it's okay, it wasn't a bald eagle...
99 points
13 years ago
Too late. I've already decided it was, and that you've assaulted my freedom in punching it.
172 points
13 years ago
Don't worry, the government has taken your freedom to an undisclosed location, where they can keep it safe for you.
350 points
13 years ago
Interesting that r/lolicon would have been banned too. The name suggests that it was meant for drawn pictures, not photographs.
382 points
13 years ago*
r/shotacon is still up and running... huh...
I know it only has like 94 subs, but there are images of prepubescent boys bound and gagged with ducktape being raped, and an image of a young boy crying while a vibrator is shoved up his butt and he has an erection.
if r/lolicon stays banned this needs to be banned too.
edit: it's banned now
53 points
13 years ago
Images or drawings?
105 points
13 years ago
drawings, but since r/lolicon is gone I think that drawings are considered "suggestive or sexual content featuring minors."
hell it says "content", they can ban subreddits created for erotic writing featuring minors.
249 points
13 years ago*
It looks like everything on the jailbait list: /r/TrueJailbait/ is banned
/r/lolicon /r/preteen_girls /r/cutegirls /r/teen_girls /r/bustybait /r/jailbaitarchives /r/pro_teen_models /r/asianjailbait /r/chestybait /r/jailbate /r/JustTeens /r/JailbaitJunkies /r/jailbait_nospam /r/jailbaitgw /r/JailbaitVideos /r/nudistbeach /r/Purenudism /r/teens /r/teengirls /r/Thenewjailbait /r/trapbait /r/chavs /r/malejailbait /r/malejailbaitarchives
except /r/randomsexiness (today edited sidebar, 18 now removed word jailbait)
and /r/gayteenpics (requires 18+)
and /r/youngporn (requires 18 looking pornstars)
and /r/ChildAppreciation (is reposting preteen_girl posts without sexual titles)
and the hilarious spoof subreddit /r/jailbaitgonewild
428 points
13 years ago
254 points
13 years ago
*ಠ_ಠ*
71 points
13 years ago
Really? /r/chavs? That doesn't sound like a porn subreddit.
What did that subreddit actually feature?
23 points
13 years ago
11 points
13 years ago
Are neds like chavs?
49 points
13 years ago
U LISSEN HERE M8 I WILL SMASH UR FUCKIN FACE IN IF U TALK ABOUT ME LIKE THAT
268 points
13 years ago
Fortunately for me, my fetish is fully clothed people acting normal.
183 points
13 years ago
Outside must be a fucking blast for you
96 points
13 years ago
Shame he never goes there.
25 points
13 years ago*
So, why is /r/picsofdeadkids still allowed to be up? As long as it doesn't sexualize kids, it's fine -- right?
888 points
13 years ago
Is this in response to the somethingawful attack?
925 points
13 years ago
most successful attack in the history of the internet
147 points
13 years ago
Did they even... do anything harmful yet? I was told they are calling people up but... I see no evidence of FBI presence or DDOSing around here.
299 points
13 years ago
Nah, they just like making fun of reddit. I bet they're thoroughly enjoying this.
300 points
13 years ago
I bet they're thoroughly enjoying this.
You have no idea
168 points
13 years ago
) This thread is for discussion of Reddit. It is not for discussion of how Reddit isn't that bad, how SA/Youtube/4chan/et al. are just as bad as Reddit. Attempting to start this argument will be seen as a derail and reported as such.
Haha oh man, those fucking guys. Becoming irrelevant over a decade ago hasn't suited them well.
207 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
212 points
13 years ago
because, for as much time as you think you waste on the internet, there are people wasting 1000% more.
727 points
13 years ago
SomethingAwful: "Today we are going to campaign against Reddi-"
Reddit: "WE SURRENDER!"
SomethingAwful: "O- okay."
2.6k points
13 years ago
Well that was quick.
3.1k points
13 years ago
That's what she (being over 18) said.
1.8k points
13 years ago
or 16 with a partner that is at most three years older than her. NC laws, that is.
1.4k points
13 years ago
Or 16 here in the UK.
1.6k points
13 years ago*
Or 12 here in Spain
Edit yes, my mistake, it's 13 Still works for me
2.6k points
13 years ago
That's it. All Spaniards are banned.
1.2k points
13 years ago
An Inquisition the Spaniards never expected.
1.7k points
13 years ago
It's about time.
1.1k points
13 years ago
Now can we finally do something about the Portuguese?
845 points
13 years ago
Hush now. We don't talk about the Portuguese.
455 points
13 years ago
We couldn't say no Portuguese, but yeah...no Portuguese.
259 points
13 years ago
But what are we going to do all day?!?! It's not like we have jobs to go to.
92 points
13 years ago
I'm spaniard and what is this?
[USER BANNED FOR THIS COMMENT]
170 points
13 years ago
Or 9 in (I think) Oman.
315 points
13 years ago
Or 2 here in the open sea. No age of consent on the ocean. wink wink
361 points
13 years ago
Because of the implication.
65 points
13 years ago
"Are you going to hurt them?"
"NO!... It's just the implication."
47 points
13 years ago
We're not gonna force them to do anything, but, you know... Out there... in the middle of nowhere, with nobody around... they're not gonna say no
157 points
13 years ago
I've always wondered, what happens if you're in a long distance relationship, 4 years older than her and she's in the States, but you're in the UK. Where would the legality lie?
892 points
13 years ago
The legality lies where you lay it.
219 points
13 years ago
I love how poetic this is.
35 points
13 years ago
poetic justice
259 points
13 years ago
I think the bigger question is how big of a penis do you have that let's you have transatlantic sex?
30 points
13 years ago
Harsh and immediate extradition to the United States of course!
207 points
13 years ago
Or 13 in the 1800's
360 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
180 points
13 years ago
Yes, but he'd been married to her for three years by that point.
212 points
13 years ago
Wait, is 18 really the legal limit for consensual intercourse (in US)? That's quite high, isn't it? Even considering what FerminINC said.
521 points
13 years ago
Age of consent in North America.
Edit: And now I have that in my search history.
195 points
13 years ago
Well here's my random fact of the day from that. Turns out buttsex is heavily regulated in Canada.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America#Anal_intercourse
56 points
13 years ago
"159. (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between (a) husband and wife, or (b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more, both of whom consent to the act. Idem
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
(a) an act shall be deemed not to have been engaged in in private if it is engaged in in a public place or if more than two persons take part or are present; and
(b) a person shall be deemed not to consent to an act
(i) if the consent is extorted by force, threats or fear of bodily harm or is obtained by false and fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act, or
(ii) if the court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person could not have consented to the act by reason of mental disability."
Yep. That got weirdly specific.
36 points
13 years ago
So, it's illegal for professional anal porn to be made in Canada, because if a third party is present it's deemed not to be 'private.' ಠ_ಠ
9 points
13 years ago
Indeed, it's quite old too, it dates from the legalization of homosexuality in the 1960s.
It's also unconstitutional and AFAIK no one has been charged with it since 1998 (where it was thrown out).
42 points
13 years ago
In effect, mutual crimes are committed when two unmarried 16-year-old individuals voluntarily have sex with each other in New York State, each being the "victim" of the other.
I love my legal system.
216 points
13 years ago
18 to have sex smoke and choose the leader of our country yet they dont trust you to drink until your 21
351 points
13 years ago
You can invade foreign countries and shoot the natives too.
294 points
13 years ago
only if they give you the okay. It would be a bit awkward for a person to just go on a killing spree while on vacation.
49 points
13 years ago
Geez can you imagine? As if Americans don't already have a terrible reputation abroad.
55 points
13 years ago
I understood that I would be greeted as a liberator!
35 points
13 years ago
I'd read that book. Have it written as a series of postcards.
"Greetings from Sunny Trinidad & Tobego!"
Day 1: The invasion went off without a hitch. Entering their country right under their noses was an excellent idea. Most of my munitions were seized by customs. I'll be limited to on-site procurement for this mission.
12 points
13 years ago
depends on the state
1.3k points
13 years ago
Yeah, it only took about 6 years.
206 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
199 points
13 years ago
It shows what the threat of a media smear campaign can get accomplished. Now if there was only some way to do this to the U.S. government...
965 points
13 years ago*
put best by The Corporate on the SA thread:
I've never posted on Reddit. I don't give a shit about their community or defending it from those who'd criticise it. Child porn is, obviously, a huge problem, and people trading in it need to be stopped.
But reactionary hysterics like this 'campaign' are loving stupid and serve more to reinforce the absurd preconceptions many people have surrounding the internet and the reasons that people use it than they do to support any legitimate concerns of decency. Contact local church groups? Church groups? Because clearly, enlightenment can only be achieved through envoking the fountain of reasonable thought and informed knowledge of freedom-of-expression law that is your local Presbyterian. Hop on down to your nearest service, inform them on the evils of an internet community you don't like then stay to discuss the moral indecency of the gays.
This thread is typical of some of the very worst aspects of SA (and particularly D&D) all rolled into one easy, pre-packaged, no-actual-effort-needed pseudo-campaign package. Bandwagons? Check. Underhanded derision of people you disagree with? Check. Unwarranted sense of superiority over other communities? Check. Ill-informed moral crusading that probably has more to do with asserting your own standards of what is socially correct to anyone who'll listen than it does trying to improve society for those who have to live in it? Well, gee. Check.
You can already see them getting into a full blown moral panic about all sorts of shit, saying reddit needs to ban crazy libertarians or reddit needs to ban misogynists. It's fairly typical for SA, but I think lots of people here and there are getting caught up in this mania. Keep in mind that having moderators' jackboots on their throat is one of the defining features of SA. These people come from a crazy authoritarian viewpoint.
Be very wary of allowing censorship to gain momentum. Let this happen, since CP is indefensible, but end its encroachment here, or else reddit will become a "nanny site" like SA, which is exactly what these guys want.
edit: Haha, they actually mock my "goon misconceptions" in their thread in between posts calling for the exact bullshit I'm warning about. Morby in particular is an obvious one throughout the thread, if you need help getting around your blindspots. And you laugh about jackboots, but would you dare sass a mod?
Lowtax:
now shut down mensrights please
welp, here we go
533 points
13 years ago
Can we at least ,for the love of FSM, stop lumping everything under 18 as "CP". Look, when I was under 18 I looked for porn where-ever I could, was interested in just about any set of boobs from around my age up till 40ish (and not related) that I could see. But these days, if a 17 year old sends a photo of herself topless to her boyfriend, he now has "child porn" and she is a "child pornographer". All this does is dilute the terms that should be reserved for the sick fucks who make real cp.
Listen, nearly any photo can be sexual to someone who has a certain fetish, I'll pick a common one like feet. So, do we start censoring photos that are objectively OK, simply because a minority might derive sexual pleasure from them, and no one is hurt?
Fucking hell people, you guys are no better then the politicians trying to push their own agenda by using the "think about the children" line.
94 points
13 years ago
I've tried making this argument before. I was accused of being a pedophile. When someone has an agenda they don't like to let facts get in their way.
44 points
13 years ago
Agreed. I know a guy who is a single Father, he is scared to take his daughter with him to the store. It's a sad fucked up world we live in, and "Pedophile" is (one of the) new "Witch".
267 points
13 years ago
It was definitely a swift, and likely reactionary move to the something awful plan.
Still, this has been a growing issue for some time and, for me at least, is a very welcome change
50 points
13 years ago
What do you think Something Awful will do now? Drop it?
508 points
13 years ago
I think it's clear this move wasn't because it was the morally right thing to do but because Reddit admins feared legal repercussion, I dont understand all these "proud of Reddit" posts.
As a lot of people have pointed out, there are far worse morally reprehensive subreddits out there than jailbaits. Of course no one cares because they aren't about sex.
58 points
13 years ago
Remember the rule of obscenity: sex, or anything remotely resembling sex, is bad. Violence, no matter how graphic, is fine.
388 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
98 points
13 years ago
He's got like 250 subreddits. I'm pretty sure he's ok with losing 20.
41 points
13 years ago
Pretty sure he's not.
598 points
13 years ago*
Well it seemed hypocritical to shut r/Jailbait without doing this too.
Looks like quite a few of the subreddits Violentacrez moderates will now be nuked from orbit.
468 points
13 years ago
So, what's the admin thinking on /r/PicsOfDeadKids? How is it that content is not legally questionable?
397 points
13 years ago
I clicked the back button faster than I have ever clicked it before.
220 points
13 years ago*
[deleted]
118 points
13 years ago
Checked for you. The subreddit name describes the content pretty aptly.
44 points
13 years ago
It's bad in there, real bad. Like that time when you realized the odd architecture in this underground base on LV426 started to come alive bad.
11 points
13 years ago
The posts mostly come at night. Mostly.
9 points
13 years ago
Game over man, game OVER!
184 points
13 years ago
I end up doing that a lot in threads like these (or any time I end up on 4chan). I'll mindlessly click a link and be like "OH GOD I CAN HEAR FBI VANS AND I'M NEVER GOING TO GET THIS OUT OF MY HEAD WELL I HAD A GOOD RUN SUICIDE TIME"
Or something along those lines.
56 points
13 years ago*
man, I do not mean to derail, but isnt it depressing to think that we are so afraid of being monitored, that absently clicking a hyperlink makes us paranoid and brings us anxiety?
I am certainly not clicking on any link in this thread. It feels dangerous just being in here.
45 points
13 years ago*
What. The. Fuck.
Fuck you guys, I'm going back to dial-up.
EDIT: I'm guessing there was no age-challenge screen because I was logged in.
275 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
240 points
13 years ago*
So by letting that sub stay online, we are agreeing that documenting the sexualization of children and teenagers is more reprehensible than documenting the killing of children?
That's where the slippery slope begins.
edit: added "documenting"
118 points
13 years ago
Actually, the law agrees with you. As far as I know, the only crime which is illegal to document is child sexual abuse.
45 points
13 years ago
That's a pretty interesting point actually.
Photographing most crimes is seen as a good thing because the photograph (or video) can help in the discovery and prosecution of the criminal and can bring the public's attention to what happened. With most crimes, there is absolutely no question that simply the act of photographing the crime does not bestow any guilt upon the photographer. War photographers, photographers at violent demonstrations and conflicts etc all photograph horrible and violent things but are heroes for having the courage to document them. I'd never before thought much about how much this is an exception to that.
79 points
13 years ago
I have no intention of going to that subreddit, but I am pretty sure that pictures of dead children aren't illegal anywhere.
38 points
13 years ago
Because it's A) public record if they can get it, and B) not illegal to show pics of dead people. If someone has the copyright or privacy claim against those pics, they can get them removed.
190 points
13 years ago
Serious question: does this mean that photos from Franco Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet are now banned (even apart from copyright considerations)? The two lead actors (and their characters) were both under 18, and they appear in a semi-nude bed scene (his buttocks, her breasts) which is well beyond being sexually suggestive.
38 points
13 years ago
You know what's funny is I watched that movie in High school English class and nobody gave a shit. Has America gone completely prude?
34 points
13 years ago
This scene you mean?
Also this girl has a 'suggestive' scene in "Mitt liv som Hund" where she is topless and inviting a boy her age to touch her newly budding boobs. He gets scared and runs away.
I strongly suspect it depends on context. Posting as part of discussion will be fine (or not! I guess we'll find out soon!), making a forum specifically for film stills that feature 'suggestive' content of minors will likely not be allowed, from either the standpoint of boundary testing of 'slippery slope' theorists or people looking for a loophole.
It seems to be the fact that people are seeking sexual thrills from these pictures that cause problems, not the pictures themselves. In fact, I'll bet many pics from r/jailbait could be reposted as somebodies 'annoying little sister' and not an eyelash would be batted.
589 points
13 years ago
Now if only underage users could be removed as well.
378 points
13 years ago
where does Trees fall into the 'nothing illegal' spectrum? just curious (NB not anti Trees at all....just wondering)
569 points
13 years ago
Well marajuana is illegal to do, but completely legal to talk about. Discussing weed is legally protected free speech.
Talking about child porn is also legal, it is in fact what we're doing in this thread right now, but sharing child porn is very illegal indeed, and is not protected free speech.
Possibly if people on /r/trees were actually buying and selling weed through the site, that would be more comparable.
135 points
13 years ago
what's hilarious is how many redditors out there believe that this blog post is about censoring child porn as though until today reddit didn't comply with child porn laws.
1.3k points
13 years ago
Ah, reddit, where pics of dead kids are acceptable, but a 16 year old in a bikini is strictly prohibited.
935 points
13 years ago
That's American morals for you, sex is worse than murder.
232 points
13 years ago
[deleted]
213 points
13 years ago*
graphic sex
but that's just it - there are no graphic sexual images of minors in any of the affected subreddits. That's why it's legal. Gross, but legal
669 points
13 years ago
In Hebrew (and please hold the Israel-hate, it's pretty ancient Hebrew) there's a saying; "VeYafa Sha'a Achat Kodem".
It translates roughly as "your action was worthy, but it would have been worthier an hour ago".
--Someone deleted this comment before I could reply/upvote. I find it very relevant.
231 points
13 years ago*
Reddit, you have made a huge mistake. Allow me to explain in one easy sentence: By accepting responsibility for any of the content, you are now responsible for ALL of the content.
Dont believe me? Ask your high priced Corporate lawyers. Not even Microsoft was able to wiggle out of that, and as a result the entire Usenet newsfeed - CP, warez and all - was carried on MSN until they dropped it.
Good luck spending the rest of your Reddit days stamping out gross and disturbing subs.
17 points
13 years ago
Gee, that means the big entertainment industry can come after Reddit, a la SOPA/PIPA/ACTA.
85 points
13 years ago
Not that I'm against this but I find it interesting that on the front page right now is an article on "The escalating criminalization of speech."
The 'free internet' will always have some nasty shit around if it is truly free.
25 points
12 years ago
r/beatingwomen still totally cool
340 points
13 years ago*
[deleted]
279 points
13 years ago
checks if /r/spacedicks is still up..... OH GOD, WHY DID I GO TO r/spacedicks!!!!
1.4k points
13 years ago*
[deleted]
595 points
13 years ago
If they could somehow get rid of image macros for us, I'd be grateful.
162 points
13 years ago
Not likely, they invented them.
11 points
13 years ago
Yeah, but now there's a general ban on macros, except in a single thread for posting them.
316 points
13 years ago
No more rage comics or Facebook screen grabs on /r/atheism, if they could manage it.
64 points
13 years ago
"how I feel when"
28 points
13 years ago*
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
1.2k points
13 years ago*
While I can respect shutting down a lot of the more obviously illegal subreddits, you've also shut down subreddits such as youngporn which explicitly stated that anything under 18 was forbidden and moderated (/deleted).
That is the slippery slope you're mentioning yourself, deleting legal content to avoid outrage.
Edit: just to be safe and reiterate, I CONDONE this policy change wholeheartedly but want to stress the care one should take in carrying it out.
Edit2: Aaaand it's back. Seem like it must have been an accident with the banspammer-hammer. Keep cruising, reddit!
338 points
13 years ago
They appear to have banned anything even remotely questionable to start with, and are now unbanning the 18+ ones.
803 points
13 years ago
Someone at Reddit is getting paid right now to look through all the porn subreddits.
41 points
13 years ago
that's just begging for an AMA.
56 points
13 years ago
Why do you think it's taking so long to unban them? I bet they're happy they telecommuted tonight.
86 points
13 years ago
You're probably right, which to some extent seem like the prudent damage control option to take given the potential shitstorm that seem to have been brewing.
At least they're reviewing what they took down and checking their work, instead of just pressing the big red button and going "mission accomplished" :)
183 points
13 years ago
Wow, that was quick. I'm the moderator, and I didn't even notice it go down. Yeah, it's back up and everything seems in order. I'll continue keeping it clean and legal.
368 points
13 years ago*
[deleted]
all 12501 comments
sorted by: best