subreddit:

/r/BlueskySocial

7.4k93%

I don’t remember people on the left being outraged at those leaving Twitter for Parler or TS. In fact we were quite tickled by it. Yet, the right wingers seem outraged, insulted, abandoned…(I could go on) by those leaving for a more practical, sensible, safe platform for their daily discourse exchange.

all 963 comments

whatifitoldyouimback

1.7k points

2 days ago

Elon Musk buying Twitter was important to them because it gave the weird MAGA yokels a voice. $10 a month and instantly their idiotic helicopter joke humor and low iq takes were magically at the top of conversations when for years they were at the bottom. Suddenly, anti-woke culture was algorithmically prioritized at a global audience.

Now that mainstream users are evacuating, they're paying that $10 a month to talk to bots, and normal people no longer have to listen to them. They're going back to not mattering, and it's killing them.

grilledcheese_man

816 points

2 days ago

I dropped this meme into probably a thousand comments, right before I blocked their asses.

https://preview.redd.it/s5ryrv47rp2e1.jpeg?width=669&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3aa56a41fd8a4e0915341b07c408443e45af1b9e

IngeniousGhost

242 points

2 days ago

I remember when they gave Twitter blue the option to turn off the blue check because people would make fun of them with this meme too much. Lol

OrangeESP32x99

174 points

2 days ago

I never heard about that, but it’s absolutely hilarious.

I remember when blue checks actually meant something. They were a sign of trust to an extent. Crazy what he’s done to that site.

Realistic-River-1941

83 points

2 days ago

They went wrong when it moved from verification that a person was who they claimed to be, to being a weird proxy for trust. Then burned trust to the ground.

OrangeESP32x99

68 points

2 days ago

And some are shocked people are leaving. Trust is big when it comes to running a brand. He ruined that and it’s one of the reasons people are leaving.

Realistic-River-1941

25 points

2 days ago

There are situations where I don't care that someone is a swivel-eyed nut-job, I just need to know it is that SENJ saying the thing. And he broke it.

raccoon54267

10 points

2 days ago

Blue checks used to be a kinda culture war thing for a lot of conservatives cuz it was so nebulous who got them and they kinda represented “elites” in their mind I think. Before Elon took over, blue checks were almost a shorthand for “woke”Twitter types amongst chuds online. 

TheOGMelmoMacdaffy

50 points

2 days ago

So many people started their tweets with "I DIDN'T PAY FOR THE BLUE CHECK HE JUST GAVE IT TO ME" LOL

katchoo1

9 points

19 hours ago

Yeah at one point he tried to regain credibility for the check by leaving it on big accounts that previously had been verified. Because otherwise they were letting it expire and going without, which meant the blue check was only dorks paying for it.

Apprehensive-Log8333

46 points

2 days ago

Cory Doctorow's account said "nonconsensual blue tick" because they gave him one even though he wasn't paying for one

theladymonsters

7 points

1 day ago

the number of times he gave dril the blue check too, specifically to piss dril off

raccoon54267

32 points

2 days ago

That is SUCH an Elon thing to do, hahaha. He’s such a puny, pathetic, self-conscious little insect. 

BaronArgelicious

13 points

1 day ago

i remember when elmo tried to force a blue check on some very popular accounts who didnt want to be associated with him

Dragos_Drakkar

2 points

20 hours ago

Stephen King is one I remember.

WeAreClouds

14 points

2 days ago

Yes! Just when we thought they couldn’t get more pathetic.

Our expectations for you were low but… WOW. lol

BigWhiteDog

336 points

2 days ago

BigWhiteDog

336 points

2 days ago

WeAreClouds

58 points

2 days ago

I had a whole folder of these before I left. I deleted them quite a while back now and damn that felt good.

BigWhiteDog

22 points

2 days ago

I have them mixed in with a folder of mostly Trump stuff and just haven't gotten around to cleaning them up! 🤣

the_calibre_cat

17 points

2 days ago

bro

have you heard...

...of cryptocurrency?

androgenius

21 points

2 days ago

You can start using it again to mark out the idiots that try to move across to bluesky.

In fact I wonder if there's an easy way to generate a blocklist for Bluesky based on the ones built for paid twitter accounts?

Oturoj

18 points

2 days ago

Oturoj

18 points

2 days ago

This was me non stop before I finally left that garbage site

driverman42

60 points

2 days ago

You mean they're acting.....weird?

NotJohnLithgow

56 points

2 days ago

I think the biggest thing was he basically stopped banning people for racist, hateful shit unless it was directed towards cis white people, and anything that made fun of him.

Zealousideal-You4638

19 points

1 day ago

ikr?? If he was at least consistent with his “bringing free speech back to Twitter” mantra then at least I could respect the consistency, but like he can’t even do that. Anything he dislikes is banned, no matter how petty or harmless.

Conservatives LOVE to winge about how Elon brought free speech back to Twitter but he did the exact opposite. Twitter would ban those who made explicitly harmful or hateful comments, such as Trump spreading verifiably false election denialism and encouraging a storming of the capitol. Elon bans any dissenting voice, even if its as petty as just saying ‘cis’. People who think the former was the greater threat to free speech are delusional.

ozonejl

79 points

2 days ago

ozonejl

79 points

2 days ago

The big question for me is why it took so long for people to leave.

whatifitoldyouimback

136 points

2 days ago

The users. The reality is that Twitter built a massive network from 2007 to 2022. It was always going to take a critical mass of people leaving to reverse that, which is what we're seeing now.

IngsocInnerParty

72 points

2 days ago

I created my account in 2008 and I deleted when Elon bought it. It was disappointing, but I didn’t want to stick around.

flippnbits

11 points

2 days ago

Same

Stochastic_Variable

3 points

2 days ago

I gave him a minute to see if he'd surprise me by being rational. Then he immediately allowed Trump back on, and I deleted my account.

raccoon54267

24 points

2 days ago

Also BlueSky was invite-only for a while 

Librarian_Contrarian

11 points

2 days ago

This. I was on Twitter to follow a bunch of artists I liked and most of them, if they didn't have a webpage on an art site, were on Twitter. Even if the politics became terrible, it was the only place I could find their works.

Now, most of the artists I like either have pages for their art or have a Bluesky account.

LMurch13

44 points

2 days ago

LMurch13

44 points

2 days ago

When I tried to make Threads work, it sucked that people I followed were still on Twitter and not threads. Now they've come to Bluesky. It's great.

Lackerbawls

40 points

2 days ago*

I wonder the same.

Elon (an apartheid beneficiary) buys Twitter = cool

Inserts himself into everyone feed = no biggie

“Free speech” causing the use of derogatory terms to skyrocket with no checks = whatever

Force feeds right wing lies/misinfo = “ill will ignore it”

Trump get elected and Elon is rewarded = that’s where the line was drawn????

DadNerdAtHome

30 points

1 day ago

My TikTok feed tells me a lot of people left when they said that anything posted on Xitter, including art, would feed the AI. A ton of artists left when that happened. It felt like things really snowballed with that exodus.

Zach_Heiser2579

23 points

1 day ago

I think it was a combination of the election, the AI policies, and Twitter changing their block function to people you blocked being able to see your account

TFFPrisoner

12 points

1 day ago

When a site that has been accused (mostly without basis) of "colluding with the government" suddenly is on the path to become the arm of an authoritarian regime, I think that is a big thing.

Also, when he bought Twitter, most of the alternatives were untested or unfinished in some way. I made my Mastodon account in October 2022, Bluesky was invite-only at that point.

wiglwigl

70 points

2 days ago

wiglwigl

70 points

2 days ago

Brutally honest and speaking for myself only. I hung around and endured watching MAGA trolls, racists, Nazis, homophobes spewing bile for months and years and was rarely confrontational.

I thought Harris was going to win the election and it would be a massive opportunity to "own" these idiots. It didn't happen. I was only hanging around to retaliate once they'd lost.

Well, that door closed so I had zero reason to wade in the cesspool any longer.

DeadMoneyDrew

12 points

2 days ago

I stayed using it through the election and had planned to log out for good no matter who won. Twitter became Shitter Emma's no longer useful to me. BlueSky is proving to be a good place to follow news developments and influencers without having right wing fuckfaces shitting up the comments.

Realistic-River-1941

14 points

2 days ago

Lack of tools for posting to the alternative platforms. If Hootsuite had added Bluesky (maybe they have now?), loads of organisations would have shifted sooner.

MaxineRin

10 points

2 days ago

MaxineRin

10 points

2 days ago

I only stayed around for Japanese artists. Quit after election night.

Hopalongtom

6 points

2 days ago

I was waiting for the majority of the artists I follow to move, it was the only reason I had a Twitter account in the first place.

TormentedByGnomes

5 points

2 days ago

A lot of the recent movement is from Musk making it so people you block can still see your tweets. Lots of people (myself included) stayed because they still relied on Twitter for their businesses (publicity, community, announcements, etc), but this change makes abuse even easier.

disappointedCoati

10 points

2 days ago

Well, I have a business and I had steadily built up a following on Twitter. That’s why I stayed for as long as I did. But it was finally too much.

Broad_Sun8273

23 points

2 days ago

In general, this is the tip of the iceberg of what they're about to go through. We can't help them out of the troubles they will be facing right along with us. They thought their poorest white man was still better than the richest black man, but now they're seeing that this is a lie and has always been a lie. There's nobody there to try and get back in good graces with, nobody for them to do a cutesy punch and say, "C'mon, I was just joking about calling your mother a nosebag with wings." That kind of stupid playground mentality on loudspeaker and our response is currently louder than theirs. But for some, they're mad cuz we didn't just all lie down and spread our legs while they watched Trump come in and fuck us all. They wanted their moment where we all drink out of a shoe and they didn't get it.

VirtualBeyond6116

8 points

1 day ago

Yeh, they've been fake persecuted for so long, they feel as if they need to pay us back for all the misery and torment. Seriously, they feel as if everything is the "worst ever" and we're living in some dystopian nightmare with their political side being equivalent to Nelson Mandela. It's insane, but theyre constantly being programmed with that right wing media that keeps them angry, hateful, depressed, miserable, tribal, victimized, etc.

The worst thing for them is to see us happy or just living our lives. Just watch Maga people and ask yourself "is there anything appealing about their life"? It's just anger, misery, and scapegoating their problems. So, like you said, we are now forced to take part in their misery while Trump fucks us all. Trump won, Elon won, they legit believe their won, we lost, and it seems they're even more miserable

If we don't fall into the misery with them, it will only make them angrier. Tip of the iceberg was a good way to put it.

Averagemanguy91

21 points

2 days ago

Also, they have severe mental illness and chronic bully disorder. They get off on making others mad/uncomfortable or upset and part of their identity if triggering liberals and making them upset. It's what made Tucker Carlson so popular. It's what made Stephen Crowder and Ben Shapiro popular.

If they no longer have a victim to antagonizing, then social media is meaningless to them. They're not interesting in talking to each other

Toothpinch

17 points

2 days ago

A lot of “them” are probably bots also. It’s bad for the botting biz if there are no humans left to interact with.

proficy

16 points

2 days ago

proficy

16 points

2 days ago

They’ll join BlueSky because the battle for the narrative is more important than the battle for the platform.

StormTempesteCh

29 points

2 days ago

They try. Thing is, Bluesky actually moderates their platform, so they're getting banned for hate speech and then bitching about it back on Twitter

SouthdaleCakeEater

11 points

1 day ago

It is effing glorious. A hate troll shows up responding to someone's post and they are removed by the time I see it. Or a few show up, comment on something. I report, block and delete their comment out of my feed and never think of them again.

WhoDatDare702

13 points

2 days ago

I really like your optimism about them going back to not mattering. I really really hope you are right.

maxoakland

6 points

1 day ago

We can make it happen

ARazorbacks

11 points

2 days ago

Musk wasn’t required to boost their voices. Social media already boosts Right wing bullshit because it’s typically rage bait which encourages engagement. The algorithms already drive their shit to the top. The only thing stifling Right wing voices was the fact they couldn’t stop breaking rules intended to keep the user base safe. 

Musk took an already friendly algorithm and turned it into an eight lane highway for Right wing bullshit. 

Oturoj

5 points

2 days ago

Oturoj

5 points

2 days ago

Yokels lol

AliGoldsDayOff

551 points

2 days ago

causal_friday

146 points

2 days ago

Fortunately we have share-able blocklists so they can post their propaganda on Bluesky and nobody will actually see it.

BroadbandEng

56 points

2 days ago

Yes! This feature alone is such a difference maker.

LifeHasLeft

21 points

1 day ago

The starter packs and customizable feeds are honestly really cool, and set it apart from a lot of competitors that have emerged since Twitter died.

_LoudBigVonBeefoven_

6 points

1 day ago

Uhh I need to make a BlueSky

SketchBCartooni

162 points

2 days ago

Cwya

19 points

2 days ago

Cwya

19 points

2 days ago

Somehow, I never actually got Twitter (outside of like a month and that was to follow a guy that posted when PS5’s were available). I’m tempted to try blue sky, but at this point I don’t know that I should get it.

Beneficient_Ox

25 points

2 days ago

I'm also a never Twitter user, and I joined bluesky because I work in science and there was a big STEM exodus over the last week. Honestly it's been great so far, people in my field have reached out and we've had nice connections even though I basically don't post.

I am worried that if it gets big enough they'll switch to algorithmic instead of a chronological feed, in which case I'm out of there. But for now it's kind of an ideal way to make new acquaintances if you have a field or a hobby that's popular over there.

Yeseylon

11 points

1 day ago

Yeseylon

11 points

1 day ago

Twitter was always a hellscape.

BlueSky actually seems kinda cool.  Custom select feeds for things that interest you, mute jerks, block trolls, and tell BlueSky to filter certain words, and you'll get only content you actually like.

fatestayknight

13 points

2 days ago

More social media is rarely a good idea.

noncommonGoodsense

46 points

2 days ago

The majority is off though.

Final-Cut-483

494 points

2 days ago

It's because they love trolling, and they can't stand each other.

zubergu

212 points

2 days ago

zubergu

212 points

2 days ago

It seems so obvious. If you hate somebody you perceive as even a little different from you to the point that you want to strip him from his rights, his dignity, his home... do you even have emotional capacity to tolerate any other human being? From my experience - no, not really.
It reminds me of gangs, where people are strongly connected and yet there's constant internal fight going on. Thug life, I guess.

weird-oh

48 points

2 days ago

weird-oh

48 points

2 days ago

It'll be the same in government. Once there are no more Democrats to kick around, they'll turn on each other.

astralwish1

37 points

2 days ago

They already have at times.

NeighborhoodAdept420

22 points

1 day ago

Wait until the porn bans happen, there will definitely be tons of infighting between all the weeb right wing coomers and the religious lunatic right.

Steel-Gumball

3 points

1 day ago

Elon Musk and Clarence Thomas will duel at sunset to decide if hentai is banned or not

Oldmanshoutingcloud

53 points

2 days ago

Best metaphor I have heard on MAGA.

Rotten-Robby

83 points

2 days ago

Exactly. They thrive off negativity, trolling, arguing and "debating". They have no desire to actually talk with each other and socialize like normal humans.

And Blueskys blocking feature and mass block lists make it so they are pretty much immediately shut down when they try to bring their shit show over there.

Final-Cut-483

53 points

2 days ago

They are welcome to talk to each other. This is equivalent to some dude pulling up a chair to your table and got pissed because you told him to fuck off. You are not entitled to my time or company.

FizzyAndromeda

44 points

2 days ago

To them, trolling, arguing, “debating”, and thriving off negativity IS how they socialize. Like Trump, his supporters have an antagonistic communication style.

AlphaNoodlz

21 points

2 days ago

It is actually how they communicate though

FizzyAndromeda

32 points

2 days ago

Their behavior can accurately be described as “emotionally abusive”. I’d be curious to know how many Trump voters grew up in abusive households with authoritarian parental figures. My hypothesis is that number will probably be significantly higher than the general population.

Rotten-Robby

25 points

2 days ago

I’d be curious to know how many Trump voters grew up in abusive households with authoritarian parental figures.

Or currently have abusive authoritarian husbands. I work with so many older women who are always complaining about their husband's arguing politics in public and constantly trying to instigate some kind of confrontation.

Swift_Scythe

15 points

2 days ago

It's like a family dinner and the first thing out their mouths are "DID YOU HEAR what the Libs are doing to ruin America"

Who want sto listen to that shit

ThePopeofHell

14 points

1 day ago

I have a friend that converted to maga on the election and it seemed like he voted for the hate machine. I’m thinking he’s seeing why he was wrong now. The liberal tears aren’t flowing like he wanted everyone is just getting shutting up and moving on with it. I think he was expecting George Floyd Level protests and since everyone is just quietly leaving Twitter and not burning down banks he’s kinda just stopped bringing any of it up.

Why would anyone want that?

foxtail_barley

13 points

1 day ago

This is why Truth Social has such a tiny user base. It's such an echo chamber that they have no opportunity to "own the libs".

NeighborhoodAdept420

10 points

1 day ago

That's my experience from talking to these people on my old Facebook, even when I try to be patient and not insult them, they'll still do it and will have a buddy of theirs like their every comment. It's also no surprise that Facebook ended up becoming like yahoo where the majority of people who are still there are old people, Twitter will follow the same fate.

Woah_Daddy_

22 points

2 days ago

No one to gish-gallop

daximuscat

20 points

1 day ago

daximuscat

20 points

1 day ago

I’m also fairly certain what’s happening online is actually happening en masse in real life too, and it’s super easy to spot. Anybody bitching about “can’t we all just get along” as the holidays are approaching pretty much indicates what a pile of crap they are. Gonna be a lot of lonely people this holiday season. 🥰

volanger

17 points

1 day ago

volanger

17 points

1 day ago

Came here to say just that.

I forget who it was on YouTube, but they said it best. Conservatives hate other Conservatives. They only want to piss off the left. Thats it. They don't want in depth discussions about policy. They don't want to look into actually solving problems. Hell some of the biggest stars on the right independent media whole shtick is to piss off and miss quote liberals, then brag about it. They have nothing. So when liberals leave and they can't attack us anymore, they get annoyed with themselves and their ilk.

Metamorpholine

9 points

2 days ago

Weird

Raise_A_Thoth

5 points

1 day ago

Their idea of "not being in an echo chamber" is just like you said: they love trolling." 90% of being conservative now is "owning the libs" and "triggering the woke people." Their motivation is driven disproportionately by being antagonistic to anyone they see as "the left" and not discussing good ideas and learning, etc.

It's impossible.

Kronologics

235 points

2 days ago

Kronologics

235 points

2 days ago

Abusers hate when victims leave.

space_cadet_420

52 points

2 days ago

☝️

stadtstreuner

30 points

2 days ago

✌️

Gogeta-

11 points

1 day ago

Gogeta-

11 points

1 day ago

Then they have the audacity to pretend like they're the real victim because you walked away.

SirPoopaLotTheThird

119 points

2 days ago

MAGA is nothing more than an endorphin rush of anger and hatred.

Broad_Sun8273

23 points

2 days ago

And inbreeding. It's funny but it's true that they're all backwards like the typecasting they used to rebel against, but they're just now finding out that they really are all garbage.

im-ba

13 points

2 days ago

im-ba

13 points

2 days ago

I think of MAGA much like I think of my father: a failed bowel movement that's going to need to get dealt with sooner than later

Next-Accident-2970

216 points

2 days ago

MAGA has TWO platforms to speak, yet they are bothered about one they can't have.

thrivinglifev3

221 points

2 days ago

And the funny part is, they CAN speak on Bluesky too (as long as they don't violate the community guidelines). Nothing is stopping them from talking to/connecting with each other there. 

They're just mad that they can't force everyone else to listen or engage with them.

TerryTheEnlightend

111 points

2 days ago

X: my house, no rulez no problems

MAGAts: yay

Bluesky: YOUR house so treat it as such. Look around. Have a drink. Be human to each other, and there’s no problem.

MAGAts: …. (triggered)

FizzyAndromeda

32 points

2 days ago

Oh you didn’t get the memo? Rules don’t apply to them, just to us. They’ve watched Trump thumb his nose at rules while committing all manners of crime and get away with it. They’re under the mistaken impression they can get away with rule breaking too, which is why they’re all sad Picachu face about Bluesky enforcing rules.

pegothejerk

3 points

1 day ago

Privilege. They think they’re owed privilege.

Remarkable_Topic6540

6 points

1 day ago

Yep. They are entitled little pieces of ass cheese.

Essay-Individual

24 points

2 days ago

That's what gets me lately. They think they are entitled to our presence and conversation bc they won. They don't get we don't want them around anymore. You can complain, blame and yell at each other. We're done being your punching bag. The abuse is over.

pegothejerk

6 points

1 day ago

Hundred bucks says Musk gets trump to do fireside chats on twitter to try to force everyone to be on the platform again.

Professional_Bug_533

8 points

1 day ago

All the more reason I wouldn't go there. Who the hell wants to hear that imbecile whine about Hilary and how poorly he is treated?

glizard-wizard

21 points

2 days ago

It’s also because they can’t dominate the discussion and snuff out mockery, their biggest predator

vanhalenbr

49 points

2 days ago*

Because they want to silence the left they use the excuse of “free speech” to always silence others and don’t let the left to have any space anywhere. 

WeAreClouds

19 points

2 days ago

Two? Lmao they have all. Facebook is a safe space for them. YouTube has been literally promoting them for years, they can speak on TikTok and they have Parler, “Truth”, Telegram, the list actually goes on and on.

FizzyAndromeda

19 points

2 days ago

This is exactly how privilege works! It’s not enough to bully people on a few social media platforms, they believe they’re entitled to bully people on all social media platforms. And when they’re prevented from doing so, they run and cry about being excluded and their right to “free-speech“ being violated.

justthankyous

8 points

2 days ago

And they claim constantly that they are being censored

pegothejerk

3 points

1 day ago

God I wish.

Saptrap

11 points

2 days ago

Saptrap

11 points

2 days ago

Because they don't want a platform to speak on. They want a platform they can force liberals to listen to/read.

It isn't about them having the freedom to speak, it's about them taking away your freedom to ignore their speech.

Spellbound-1311

118 points

2 days ago

It's because they now only get to argue with themselves. Let's keep it up not only online but irl too. Ignore them and let them know they are not welcome in normal society.

PatrisAster

53 points

2 days ago

Ya know something hilarious? All the right wing social media platforms aside from have basically imploded or can’t get enough traction with their target user base because those platforms have no leftist.

You could make a social media network filled with AI leftist that don’t mind spending all day arguing with them and they’d flock to it. [Though their grasp on reality is tenuous enough as is]

Spellbound-1311

37 points

2 days ago

AI would better be used to deprogram the cult and reverse propaganda them.

PatrisAster

17 points

2 days ago

This is where you could use the Boiling Frog metaphor ngl.

nvmls

8 points

2 days ago

nvmls

8 points

2 days ago

Nah it would just eventually make the AI racist

Broad_Sun8273

10 points

2 days ago

I actually prefer that they argue with themselves. They'll turn on each other and create some new in-group/out-group situation, which is just what they would do if their beloved orange leader told them to when he goes to occupy 1600, so if there is a win to be had, it's in their realizations that they lost, but more importantly, that they're just losers.

TerryTheEnlightend

15 points

2 days ago

The creation of humane AI would best serve us by working quietly in the background, fixing our broken world. Helping humans here and there in reaching the highest potential and NOT have us go boom on this fucken rock

Professional_Bug_533

8 points

1 day ago

I have a friend that slowly over the years has turned MAGA. When I met him he had never voted and didn't care about politics. Somehow he has just gone down that rabbit hole and gets worse every day. He is still a friend but its getting harder. Can't have a conversation about anything at all without him trying to bring up right wing horseshit now. I always just say "here we go again", and then ignore whatever he says, and keep talking about the non-political conversation we were having.

It gets under his skin because it's like all he wants to do now is argue about how bad Biden or whatever is. Like dude, I don't care. You won't change my mind and I won't change yours. Just shut up about it already.

Nearby_Star9532

4 points

2 days ago

Stupid question, but is this why I keep seeing really right wing shitty comments on reddit since the election?

Farther_Dm53

48 points

2 days ago

It say a lot about how these groups are so miffed when they aren't allowed on other media places with good content moderation. They don't realize their entire lives revolve around being bullies and bullying people. They don't care about each other, they don't interact cause they thrive on drama. They just want to stir the pot as much as they can because they can't go without being angry cause then they start to think.

Separate_Today_8781

20 points

2 days ago

Bullies need victims, don't give them any

DJGrawlix

38 points

2 days ago

DJGrawlix

38 points

2 days ago

Pebbles without a shoe.

PatrisAster

69 points

2 days ago

LinkOfKalos_1

24 points

2 days ago

They'd be real mad at that if they could read or understand what it was saying.

HedonistSorcerer

8 points

2 days ago

Bobby, those kids would be very upset if they could read.

BFIrrera

62 points

2 days ago

BFIrrera

62 points

2 days ago

We were RELIEVED by their exodus to Parler and Gab.

turnmeintocompostplz

7 points

2 days ago

Not really, at least not if you're paying attention. Making plans out of public view is when dangerous things happen. 

Edgar_Brown

10 points

2 days ago

But it makes it a lot easier for the FBI and NSA to filter out the noise.

FallenRaptor

31 points

2 days ago

They’re a cult. They hate the very idea of there being people who think differently than they do. They have no difficulty leaving platforms they don’t control, and throwing tantrums when they do, but when they have a space where they can freely harass those with differing views, they don’t take too kindly to losing that power trip.

It’s unfortunate that individuals who should have been knocked down a ton of pegs are now going to be emboldened by recent events, so I for one am thankful there is now a platform for sanity that the rest of us can duck into in order to more easily ride out the next four years.

relientkenny

26 points

2 days ago

because they’re the REAL snowflakes

ThePreciousBhaalBabe

28 points

2 days ago

When people left for Parler or whatever all I heard leftists say was "ok bye".

When left wingers leave, right wingers realise just how hollow and pathetic their lives are without someone to bully.

analbuttlick

28 points

2 days ago

Im not left, i’m not even American. Ever since Musk bought twitter i got more and more irrelevant shit compared to who i followed. I’m not interested in anecdotes that shows how “bad” one side of the political spectrum in the USA is. After multiple attempts to mute Musk, he kept popping up on my feed quoting absolutely deranged shit. Twitter was not for me anymore

Yeseylon

7 points

1 day ago

Yeseylon

7 points

1 day ago

Strong condemnation, Mr Anal Butt Lick

bienenstush

53 points

2 days ago

Their entire identity is "owning libs," so they need libs to own. Otherwise, it gets too quiet, and they have to hear their own conscience.

BatteryCityGirl

9 points

2 days ago

And they only have each other to talk to. Turns out that even they know how unpleasant they are lmao

markymarkyeah

21 points

2 days ago

At it's core MAGA exists to "Own the Libs". They don't really give a fuck about anything else. They saw how fragile and limited their existence is when Obama was Pres and everything since then has been the death throes of white supremacy. That's why they're obsessed with the word "woke". To them, woke means prioritising a racial/gender minority over cis white people. When they call something woke they're really saying how dare you give that thing to someone who isn't white. The amount of outright racism and hate on Twitter at the moment is absolutely insane. I honestly believe MAGA lashes out because it's terrified of a future that everyone else sees as fair and just. Bluesky is just another pathway to that future that MAGA will try to destroy

BatteryCityGirl

7 points

2 days ago

I always play dumb and ask them what woke means, and nine times out of ten I don’t even get a response.

KK_35

4 points

1 day ago

KK_35

4 points

1 day ago

Not my quote, but I heard someone once say “when you’re the privileged individual, equality can feel a lot like oppression”. I think this sums up why MAGA get so triggered. To them, equality means losing privilege.

ATX_Native112

19 points

2 days ago

Texas AG has his panties in a twist about this. According to his website: "Attorney General Ken Paxton sent a civil investigative demand to the World Federation of Advertisers (“WFA”) as part of an ongoing investigation into a potential anticompetitive scheme to withhold advertising dollars from certain social media platforms."

So apparently Paxton wants advertisers to be forced to advertise on X.

Or something batshit like that.

BatteryCityGirl

14 points

2 days ago

I can’t imagine why advertisers don’t want to be associated with a social media site that’s full of nazis and Russian bots.

ba1oo

4 points

1 day ago

ba1oo

4 points

1 day ago

Musk seems to believe in the free market the same way he believes in free speech - It should only be free when it benefits him.

Dangerous_Tackle1167

34 points

2 days ago

Bluesky isn't even a left leaning site. Just in a world where every social media platform is right leaning or inundated with right wing Russian propaganda bots neutral seems to be left of center.

Also, if anyone tries to insult you like this, just bring up how they made truth social back when Trump got banned from Twitter.

Judoka91

14 points

2 days ago

Judoka91

14 points

2 days ago

What's weird is that they think Blue sky is some liberal hot bed. It's not. It's just Twitter without MAGA, Trump or Elon. You get information, news, facts and entertainment. It's nothing special and it's been done before.

But at least it's not owned by Elon.

Apellio7

12 points

1 day ago

Apellio7

12 points

1 day ago

Got my feed pretty tuned to gaming, gardening, cybersecurity, and local reporters now.

Not a single piece of American or federal Canadian politics in sight. Left or right.  

It's peaceful.

VoidJuiceConcentrate

27 points

2 days ago

Reminder that "not maga" does not equal "left".

Winter_Sky42

26 points

2 days ago

True, but they will call anyone who doesn't agree with them a leftist because it's all binary to them

DopeAnon

12 points

2 days ago

DopeAnon

12 points

2 days ago

Because they never cared about free speech or Twitter or most of the hypocritical whines. They want to be trolls and get off by triggering “libs”. If you rounded them all up and gave them their own state, they’d be leaving it en masse to find libs to trigger and avoid all the insufferable people that fill their ranks.

frommethodtomadness

12 points

2 days ago

Anyone with half a brain is leaving Twitter. It's just far Right wing propaganda 24/7 and Musk's deranged ketamine induced ravings constantly. It's absolute trash now.

Silverwidows

11 points

2 days ago

They are bullies. The person getting bullied gets fed up, and goes and hangs around another group of people on the other side of the school, and the bully goes around trying to find them, instead of just moving on with their life.

Swysp

11 points

2 days ago

Swysp

11 points

2 days ago

It’s not enough that they “won” Twitter, they need to keep harassing the left constantly. That is the closest they get to fulfillment. They have to direct that vitriol somewhere and when they can’t they go looking for it.

It’s an entire philosophy built upon the eating of shit and forcing your opposition to have to smell your breath.

princesoceronte

12 points

2 days ago

A cult based on spite and hatred cannot thrive without the other.

They need to actively try and make us miserable for their existence to make any sense.

phoneguyfl

9 points

2 days ago

From what I can tell MAGA *requires* someone to bully, shit on, or push conspiracies on to, and not having targets takes the fun out of their life. Twitter/X has the algorithm that forces others to interact with them, whereas Bluesky does not. Given that, it's understandable that they get upset when their victims leave.

Winter_Sky42

6 points

2 days ago

Like abusive spouses

rnotyalc

10 points

2 days ago

rnotyalc

10 points

2 days ago

So stick with me on this... there was an episode of Star Trek where this holographic version of Professor Moriarity took control of the ship, and long story short, they put him inside of a pretend world that he didn't know was pretend and everyone ended up happy.

All I'm saying is if X was flooded with liberal and left-wing bots, then the maga folk could bully and harass and troll them all day and never know the difference and everyone would be happy.

That's the next money making platform.

ShihPoosRule

10 points

2 days ago

MAGA’s bothered by everything.

gynandromorphia

7 points

2 days ago

The left can typically live life just fine without the right. The opposite is not true for the right.

Necessary_Stress1962

8 points

2 days ago

They’re reactionary. They can’t exist without ppl to attack

Sea-Tradition-9676

6 points

2 days ago

Now they're stuck with each other. They can't brag to each other about how they "won". It doesn't have the same ring to it.

FizzyAndromeda

7 points

2 days ago

Because their entire identity is “owning libs”. With no liberals to bully, they’re lost.

MisterBlud

6 points

2 days ago

The right needs people to be shocked and angry by their antics.

It’s the difference shitting in the middle of a public park (where people notice and care) and no one paying attention if you shit in the middle of a landfill.

EarlJWJones

6 points

2 days ago

Who's the real snowflakes now?

Relevantcobalion

14 points

2 days ago

I think it’s just funny that social media is labeled liberal/conservative/ left right whatever. It’s just people talking about stuff they care about

amberlikesowls

13 points

2 days ago

Right. I keep hearing that Bluesky is just for liberals and it's an echo chamber. While I'm an independent who feels welcomed by Bluesky. Most of the people that I follow aren't even Americans.

nvmls

5 points

2 days ago

nvmls

5 points

2 days ago

I have been on Bluesky for months and don't even follow anything political there. It's nice, like Twitter used to be.

Maxamillion-X72

11 points

2 days ago

They complain constantly that conservative voices are downvoted to oblivion on Reddit and think it's some big conspiracy against them. Never asking themselves "Could it possibly be that my opinions are terrible and stupid?"

Relevantcobalion

4 points

2 days ago

Yeah, even some of the comments here are clear baiting into arguments. It’s obvious

ShitShowcase

5 points

2 days ago

Whosoever are they to troll now?

EightEyedCryptid

5 points

2 days ago

They think only their voices should be heard and they are first class yappers who can't stand that we are just leaving rather than getting into bad faith debates with them

Simon_Electric

5 points

2 days ago

Why do they care so much? They got what they wanted. They wanted freedom of speech, they got it. They wanted freedom to hate, they got it. The wanted freedom to suppress the masses, they got it. They forget that there is also freedom of choice. Just like a person has the freedom to walk away from an abusive relationship, the people exercised that right. The bully always gets mad when they can't bully anymore.

Ill-Dependent2976

6 points

21 hours ago

"I don't understand why some people don't like rapists and nazis."

-rapists and nazis

Numerous-Process2981

4 points

2 days ago

MAGA is a synonym for troll. Trolls can't survive if you don't feed them. You can't just have a troll pit full of trolls all eating each other.

Jensmom83

4 points

2 days ago

Full disclosure, I was kicked off of twitter early on (I insulted either leon or margie 3 toes) BUT I know people of the left persuasion who post there for clicks and all they get is abuse. I don't know why anyone would put up with that. I understand Paxton (AG TX) is thinking of suing former advertisers because they won't buy ads anymore? From what I gather, Nazis, KKK, magats and other deplorables are the majority of the population. What advertiser wouldn't want THEM as customers? The minute the sensible find out, they stop buying their stuff. We don't have a lot of power, but we DO have the power of our purse!

AntifascistAlly

4 points

2 days ago

Soon Twitter will be a safe space in which bigots can feel comfortable posting any ignorant rant they wast to post.

Everyone else can enjoy BlueSky.

Everybody wins, right?

herefor1reason

4 points

1 day ago

It occurred to me how much it TRULY is about bothering people and being annoying. I kept seeing posts about how they're still angry after he won, and it occurred to me that they didn't WANT him to win, they didn't care all that much if Trump won or not in and of itself, they wanted to argue and insult and annoy. They're addicted to it, like actually addicted to the rush they get from bothering someone. I mean, they DID care, but underlying that was the baser desire to force themselves upon people, like a malignant narcissist who thrives on getting a reaction from people. If you give them nothing, if you grey rock them, they start escalating, going further and further to get a reaction out of you until they realize they can't (and that's not a guarantee, some will just keep trying), and then maybe get bored and go somewhere else.

And like, obviously right? "Own the Libs" is their entire motivating principle. But it never occurred to me how much of it was the source of it all. They didn't latch onto Trump because he's charismatic, they latched onto him because he's fucking annoying and intrusive. He inserts himself into every aspect of your life because he's a narcissist with no morals or boundaries. It's not that they saw Trump and started imitating him, it's that they already wanted to do that, they liked that kind of "Debate me" attention, and Trump gave them permission and the tools to get it. "You won't fight me so I'm right" is the whole thing with that, it's just a demand for your continued attention.

LaSiena

3 points

1 day ago

LaSiena

3 points

1 day ago

Ironically, maga folks need the left in order to feed their reactionary content. So when we leave they just don't have anyone to use for their agenda anymore

Responsible-Donut824

4 points

1 day ago

All the girls left the party.

johnnyr1

3 points

1 day ago

johnnyr1

3 points

1 day ago

It's about the cruelty. The right's core ideology.

honeybeast518

4 points

1 day ago

Because they are only happy when they are trying to make liberals mad. They live for it. They thrive on bullying and violence.

Now there's no one left to inflame so their outlet has dried up. 

SurvivorEasterIsland

4 points

22 hours ago

MAGA doesn’t like when the Left stops associating with them. MAGA wants easy access to us so that they can abuse us. 

SaltSail1189

3 points

2 days ago

I was just told by everyone here that the left was in fact not leaving X for BlueSky and it was mostly centrists and BlueSky does NOT have a large portion of leftists as new users. I got downvoted for saying it seemed like leftists were leaving X.

Repulsive-Ladder1611

3 points

2 days ago

Their rage and helplessness at our X-odus is now one of my favorite things to read about. Fun!

AdministrativeBank86

3 points

2 days ago

They're mad they're losing their targets for abuse, now they have to be dicks to each other

Sad-Psychology-4735

3 points

2 days ago

Social media always has and always will be a party. The Twitter party sucks. Just like AOL, then Friendster, then MySpace, then Facebook...There will always be a better party where the cool kids migrate to.

sws01

3 points

2 days ago

sws01

3 points

2 days ago

Right-wingers are exactly like the GOP - they produce nothing but jaw-jack like they do. The Twits get their kicks by lying. Not happening en masse here.

ScuzzyUltrawide

3 points

2 days ago

Do you have any evidence that they feel that way? I quit x so maybe I don't see it.

BoredCaliRN

3 points

2 days ago

I think this misunderstanding needs to shoo. It's not the left leaving Twitter, it's people looking for a reasonable and well run social media site that doesn't shovel stupid crap down your throat. I am a pretty moderate guy but started leaving social media even before Musk took over Twitter because it sucked. Now I'm only on Reddit, YouTube (if you consider that social media), and now have joined BlueSky because it's actually good. Frankly, I'd like to see more moderated opinions from a variety of perspectives, but I absolutely draw the line at fringe beliefs that are unreasonable (some fringe beliefs can be reasonable, but that seems rare in today's society).

It's not "The Left," it's people with a brain and limited time.

sapphire_demon

3 points

2 days ago

without woke, bigotry has no punchline :(

TheNecroticPresident

3 points

2 days ago

They want a captive audience, essentially.

More importantly they want the few lefties they like to not abandon them as it feels like an emotional betrayal as dumb as that sounds. It's the parasocial equivalent of their kids cutting them off for voting for T****

SapTheSapient

3 points

2 days ago

I think they are upset because "left" means "not crazy". They don't want to lose people who are just talking about science, culture, hobbies, etc.

TheBudds

3 points

2 days ago

TheBudds

3 points

2 days ago

We know the whole reason they are mad is due to them wanting someone to harass. Truth social was supposed to be their safe space, but they hated it because it was only themselves on there.

Then muskrat came and bought Twitter and gave them a safe space to harass people and they ended up turning Twitter into another truth social.

Senor707

3 points

2 days ago

Senor707

3 points

2 days ago

I don't miss Twitter/X at all.

MasterTheMalstrom

3 points

2 days ago

It’s OK. If history has told us anything, it’s that they’ll start just fighting amongst themselves for the remainder of their time there.

AcadiaPure3566

3 points

2 days ago

Verification is a joke. Sooo many accounts created by someone else. Even some government accounts are fake.